Bug#978280: marked as done (sunpy: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b . subprocess returned exit status 2)

2021-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jan 2021 16:20:28 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#978280: fixed in sunpy 2.0.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #978280,
regarding sunpy: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b . subprocess 
returned exit status 2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
978280: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=978280
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sunpy
Version: 2.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201226 ftbfs-bullseye

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
> -
> 
> Command: dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -sa -rfakeroot
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package sunpy
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 2.0.5-1
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution unstable
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Ole Streicher 
>  dpkg-source --before-build .
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd64
>  debian/rules clean
> dh clean --with python3 --buildsystem=pybuild
>dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=pybuild
> I: pybuild base:232: python3.9 setup.py clean 
> running clean
> removing '/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9_sunpy/build' (and everything 
> under it)
> 'build/bdist.linux-x86_64' does not exist -- can't clean it
> 'build/scripts-3.9' does not exist -- can't clean it
>dh_autoreconf_clean -O--buildsystem=pybuild
>dh_clean -O--buildsystem=pybuild
>  dpkg-source -b .
> dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)'
> dpkg-source: info: building sunpy using existing ./sunpy_2.0.5.orig.tar.gz
> dpkg-source: info: using patch list from debian/patches/series
> dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are:
>  sunpy-2.0.5/sunpy/_version.py
> dpkg-source: error: aborting due to unexpected upstream changes, see 
> /tmp/sunpy_2.0.5-1.diff.gRUUPR
> dpkg-source: info: you can integrate the local changes with dpkg-source 
> --commit
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b . subprocess returned exit status 2
> 
> Build finished at 2020-12-26T18:27:38Z

The full build log is available from:
   http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/12/26/sunpy_2.0.5-1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with me
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sunpy
Source-Version: 2.0.7-1
Done: Ole Streicher 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sunpy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 978...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ole Streicher  (supplier of updated sunpy package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 16:53:19 +0100
Source: sunpy
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Astronomy Team 

Changed-By: Ole Streicher 
Closes: 978280
Changes:
 sunpy (2.0.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version 2.0.7
   * Push Standards-Version to 4.5.1. No changes needed
   * Rediff patches
   * Remove version.py: generated during build. Closes: #978280
Checksums-Sha1:
 0beef78515bf6ce0b0e453482cb10fd466344af6 2692 sunpy_2.0.7-1.dsc
 f545e841c9ae7049265d9813c27ac9712760cc71 8060871 sunpy_2.0.7.orig.tar.gz
 bf6fd67053f3363e7345263d745d8d81a236b315 7212 sunpy_2.0.7-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 

Bug#978280: marked as done (sunpy: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b . subprocess returned exit status 2)

2020-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Dec 2020 12:17:13 +0100
with message-id 
and subject line Re: Bug#978280: sunpy: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: 
dpkg-source -b . subprocess returned exit status 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #978280,
regarding sunpy: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b . subprocess 
returned exit status 2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
978280: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=978280
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sunpy
Version: 2.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201226 ftbfs-bullseye

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
> -
> 
> Command: dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -sa -rfakeroot
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package sunpy
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 2.0.5-1
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution unstable
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Ole Streicher 
>  dpkg-source --before-build .
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd64
>  debian/rules clean
> dh clean --with python3 --buildsystem=pybuild
>dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=pybuild
> I: pybuild base:232: python3.9 setup.py clean 
> running clean
> removing '/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9_sunpy/build' (and everything 
> under it)
> 'build/bdist.linux-x86_64' does not exist -- can't clean it
> 'build/scripts-3.9' does not exist -- can't clean it
>dh_autoreconf_clean -O--buildsystem=pybuild
>dh_clean -O--buildsystem=pybuild
>  dpkg-source -b .
> dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)'
> dpkg-source: info: building sunpy using existing ./sunpy_2.0.5.orig.tar.gz
> dpkg-source: info: using patch list from debian/patches/series
> dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are:
>  sunpy-2.0.5/sunpy/_version.py
> dpkg-source: error: aborting due to unexpected upstream changes, see 
> /tmp/sunpy_2.0.5-1.diff.gRUUPR
> dpkg-source: info: you can integrate the local changes with dpkg-source 
> --commit
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b . subprocess returned exit status 2
> 
> Build finished at 2020-12-26T18:27:38Z

The full build log is available from:
   http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/12/26/sunpy_2.0.5-1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with me
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Source: sunpy
Source-Version: 2.1.0~rc1-1
Done: Ole Streicher 

This is already fixed in the version that is currently in experimental.
I expect the stable upstream version soon.

Best

Ole--- End Message ---