Processed: a bit time for review

2019-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 920459 + pending
Bug #920459 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu: breaks with color and/or xcolor when 
spread or negative X coefficients are used
Bug #921299 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu: breaks with color and/or xcolor when 
spread or negative X coefficients are used
Bug #921779 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu: breaks with color and/or xcolor when 
spread or negative X coefficients are used
Bug #921783 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu: breaks with color and/or xcolor when 
spread or negative X coefficients are used
Bug #921789 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu: breaks with color and/or xcolor when 
spread or negative X coefficients are used
Bug #921802 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu: breaks with color and/or xcolor when 
spread or negative X coefficients are used
Bug #921838 [texlive-latex-extra] tabu: breaks with color and/or xcolor when 
spread or negative X coefficients are used
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
> outlook 920459 will upload a fix before Wednesday this week
Outlook replaced with message bug 920459 message 
Outlook replaced with message bug 920459 message 
Outlook replaced with message bug 920459 message 
Outlook replaced with message bug 920459 message 
Outlook replaced with message bug 920459 message 
Outlook replaced with message bug 920459 message 
Outlook replaced with message bug 920459 message 
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
920459: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920459
921299: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921299
921779: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921779
921783: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921783
921789: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921789
921802: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921802
921838: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921838
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: A patch is available

2018-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 894874 + patch
Bug #894874 [src:mod-gnutls] mod-gnutls: FTBFS with Apache 2.4.33-1, reverse 
proxying seems fully broken
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
894874: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894874
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: A fix is almost ready ...

2017-09-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 fixed-upstream
Bug #874205 [src:open-adventure] open-adventure FTBFS on !amd64/arm64: test 
failure
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.

-- 
874205: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874205
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: A patch is in the bug

2017-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 862742 patch
Bug #862742 [filetea] filetea: Wrong version of jQuery gets installed
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
862742: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862742
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: a patch fixing #861987

2017-05-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 861987 patch
Bug #861987 [flightcrew] flightcrew: insecure use of /tmp
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
861987: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861987
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: A fix for the warning

2017-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + stretch
Bug #861152 [nagstamon] nagstamon: InsecureRequestWarning: Unverified HTTPS 
request is being made.
Added tag(s) stretch.

-- 
861152: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861152
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: A better title

2016-10-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> unarchive 834963
Bug #834963 {Done: Antonio Terceiro } 
[src:ruby-protected-attributes] ruby-protected-attributes: FTBFS too much often 
(failing tests)
Unarchived Bug 834963
> retitle 834963 ruby-protected-attributes: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)
Bug #834963 {Done: Antonio Terceiro } 
[src:ruby-protected-attributes] ruby-protected-attributes: FTBFS too much often 
(failing tests)
Changed Bug title to 'ruby-protected-attributes: FTBFS randomly (failing 
tests)' from 'ruby-protected-attributes: FTBFS too much often (failing tests)'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
834963: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834963
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: A better title for Bug#834683

2016-10-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> unarchive 834683
Bug #834683 {Done: Stephan Sürken } [src:mini-buildd] 
mini-buildd: FTBFS too much often (failing tests)
Unarchived Bug 834683
> retitle 834683 mini-buildd: FTBFS, not enough entropy to generate keys
Bug #834683 {Done: Stephan Sürken } [src:mini-buildd] 
mini-buildd: FTBFS too much often (failing tests)
Changed Bug title to 'mini-buildd: FTBFS, not enough entropy to generate keys' 
from 'mini-buildd: FTBFS too much often (failing tests)'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
834683: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834683
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: A new version tuxonice-userui was uploaded with a workaround for bug #759856

2014-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> affects 759856
Bug #759856 [libmng-dev]  not included anymore before  
(causes tuxonice-userui to FTBFS)
Removed indication that 759856 affects src:tuxonice-userui
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
759856: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=759856
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: a package should build from scratch

2014-02-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> severity -1 serious
Bug #714596 [jenkins] jenkins build-depends on itself: impossible to bootstrap
Severity set to 'serious' from 'wishlist'

-- 
714596: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714596
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: a fix is prepared

2012-11-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> package crawl
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'crawl'
Limit currently set to 'package':'crawl'

> tags 692947 + pending
Bug #692947 [crawl] crawl: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)
Added tag(s) pending.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
692947: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692947
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: A few linux-2.6 bugs, September edition

2011-09-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Hi,
> #
> # As you all know, the linux-2.6 has bugs.  More stalled important or
> # normal bugs at the end of September than at the start, so we're
> # still losing the battle to recover all useful data from each report
> # before the submitters get bored.
> #
> # Acting as bug receptionist is not very fun, so let's see if there
> # are other ways to make progress.  Here's a summary of the first few
> # important and serious bugs not tagged "moreinfo" or "forwarded" in
> # the bug list.  Please feel free to follow up to them with
> # information or hints to move them forward.
> #
> # Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/642988
> # Submitter: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe 
> # Summary: [experimental] linux-headers depends on linux-kbuild-3.1.0
> #  which is not in the archive
> # Workaround: build src:linux-tools from svn.debian.org.  Or don't use
> #  out-of-tree modules.
> #
> # Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/643817
> # Submitter: Ben Hutchings 
> # Summary: [squeeze, sid] NULL pointer dereference in the new IPv6
> #  fragment ID generator
> # Reference: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1196272/focus=1196503
> # Regression: yes
> # Comment: will presumably revert CVE-2011-2699 fix for now
> #
> tags 643817 + upstream
Bug #643817 [linux-2.6] Fix for CVE-2011-2699 can result in crash in VM hosts
Added tag(s) upstream.
> #
> # Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/593304
> # Submitter: Ben Hutchings 
> # Summary: [lenny] Removal and reinsertion of floppy or mtdblock device can
> #  cause oops
> # Fixed-upstream: 2.6.28, 2.6.27.51
> # Comment: requires physical access to exploit, but the fix seems low risk.
> #  I think we should take the fix.
> #
> # Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/598104
> # Submitter: Mirosław Zalewski 
> # Summary: [squeeze] BIOS on Toshiba Satellite machines corrupts DSDT
> #  during bootup
> # Fixed-upstream: 2.6.36
> # Comment: can't reproduce the bug on my Satellite C650D, BIOS 1.60 09/02/2010
> #  Once we have confirmation the fix works, we can apply and pass it to gregkh
> #
> tags 598104 = upstream patch moreinfo
Bug #598104 [src:linux-2.6] Toshiba Satellite C650: DSDT is borked (acpi 
errors, slow boot, wifi fails, etc)
Added tag(s) upstream and moreinfo.
> #
> # Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/516785
> # Submitter: Hermann Lauer 
> # Summary: [lenny, squeeze, sid] System Hardware FATAL RESET with cassini 
> driver
> #  on sparc
> # Reference: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sparc/10405/focus=11193
> # Comments: DaveM does enough great work as it is.  We shouldn't have to
> #  rely on him to carry the brunt of this work.
> #
> #  The fundamental questions are: where is it panicking?  And why?
> #  Maybe someone can make progress by the printk method.
> #
> #  Some people are using the cassini driver with more or less success on
> #  similar (but presumably not identical) machines:
> #  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sparc/14032/focus=14044
> #  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.ports.sparc/14019/focus=14025
> #
> tags 516785 = upstream moreinfo
Bug #516785 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64-smp: [sparc] SunFire480R 
cassini network driver kernel panic
Added tag(s) upstream and moreinfo; removed tag(s) help.
> forwarded 516785 
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sparc/10405/focus=11193
Bug #516785 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64-smp: [sparc] SunFire480R 
cassini network driver kernel panic
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sparc/10405/focus=11193'.
> #
> # Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/517627
> # Submitter: Thibaut VARENE 
> # Summary: [lenny, squeeze, sid] AceNIC driver requires unpackaged
> #  firmware
> # Reference: 
> http://wiki.debian.org/KernelFirmwareLicensing#acenic_.28drivers.2BAC8-net.29
> # Comments: From 
> :
> #
> #  "Alteon grants you a limited, non-transferable, non-exclusive,
> #   perpetual license to use, execute and compile the Software solely
> #   for the purpose of creating, testing and providing software
> #   programs (herein, the "Authorized Drivers") for use with ALTEON
> #   ACEnic adapters and ALTEON network cards. You may copy the Software
> #   and may publicly display the source code of any Authorized Driver
> #   in educational journals and periodicals; provided that you
> #   reproduce all applicable copyright and other proprietary notices
> #   that are contained within the original copy of the Software. You
> #   may license the object code of an Authorized Driver, including the
> #   Software contained therein; provided that such Authorized Driver is
> #   restricted to use solely with ALTEON ACEnic adapters and ALTEON
> #   network cards."
> #
> #  Debian is not an educational journal or periodical (well, we do
> #  periodically make releases :)), as far as I know, but it looks like
> #  the compiled firmware should be distributable.  Next step i

Processed: A bug in webkit

2010-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 568948 webkit 1.1.19-1
Bug #568948 [epiphany-browser] epiphany-browser: vertical scrollbar is screwed 
up
Bug reassigned from package 'epiphany-browser' to 'webkit'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions epiphany-browser/2.29.6-1.
Bug #568948 [webkit] epiphany-browser: vertical scrollbar is screwed up
There is no source info for the package 'webkit' at version '1.1.19-1' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '1.1.19-1'
Bug Marked as found in versions 1.1.19-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.126626723727104.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: A patch for bug 514406

2009-02-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 514406 + patch
Bug#514406: xautolock: Uses freed memory for starting the locker
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#434855: Processed: A (partial) fix for mips/mipsel

2007-11-11 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
> [snip]
> > Just one question:  Is it possible for you to try to build the packages
> > on mipsel? 
> 
> I can try, but right now the best mipsel machine I have set up is a
> puny 250 MHz machine. :-)

This fails due to a missing -lcurl, your package lacks the build
dependency.

I installed libcurl4-openssl-dev, this seems to work (but may cause
license trouble with GPL software, in that case it should be
libcurl4-gnutls-dev).


Thiemo



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#434855: Processed: A (partial) fix for mips/mipsel

2007-11-07 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
[snip]
> Just one question:  Is it possible for you to try to build the packages
> on mipsel? 

I can try, but right now the best mipsel machine I have set up is a
puny 250 MHz machine. :-)

I plan to change that soon-ish, but this depends on fixing some kernel
bugs first.


Thiemo



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#434855: Processed: A (partial) fix for mips/mipsel

2007-11-07 Thread Christian Holm Christensen
Hi Thiemo,

First off, thank you for your detailed answers. 

On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 02:44 +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
> > Hi again,
> > 
> > On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 21:10 +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
> > > > Hi Thiemo,
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 18:56 +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > > > Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Thiemo,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 00:48 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > ...
> > > > > I notice that the regex in configure excludes now mipsel. 

>From your mails, I gather that it would be OK to assume that mips and
mipsel are the same (Endianness is handled directly in the code). 

...
> > Currently, there's the following code in ROOT to deal with Linux on
> > mips: 
> > 
> > #if defined(linux) && defined(__mips)
> 
> Better would be to check for __linux__ and __mips__. linux might be a
> variable in the code somewhere... The __mips__ version with two trailing
> underscores is the more common one. So:
> 
>   #if defined(__linux__) && defined(__mips__)

OK, thanks. 

> > #   define R__LINUX
> > #   define R__UNIX
> > #   define NEED_SIGJMP
> > #   if defined(__mips64) || defined(_ABI64)
> 
> This is broken, as __mips64 is also defined for N32, and _ABI64 is always
> defined. Assuming the R__B64 controls both address space and register size,
> it should be:
> 
>   #   if _MIPS_SIM==_ABI64

Ah, I see.  Ok thanks. 

> I don't know what the exact semantics of those defines are, and how well
> suilted they are to support N32.
> 
> > #  define R__B64  /* enable when 64 bit machine */
> > #   endif
> > #   if !defined(__MIPSEB__) /* Little endian */
> 
> For more clarity:
> 
>   #   if defined(__MIPSEL__) /* Little endian */

Right.

> > #  define R__BYTESWAP
> > #   endif 
> > #endif
> > 
> > > > > The only
> > > > > difference between both is the endianness. For complete MIPS support
> > > > > it would need the following:
> > > > > 
> > > > > mipsO32 ABI, ILP32, "long long" in a "aligned" even-odd 
> > > > > register
> > > > > mipsel  pair, 4 argument registers
> > > > > 
> > > > > mipsn32el   N32 ABI, ILP32, but with 64 bit wide registers, and
> > > > > mipsn32 "long long" in a single register, 8 argument registers
> > > > > 
> > > > > mips64elN64 ABI, LP64, 8 argument registers
> > > > > mips64 
> > > > 
... 
> > Just to make sure:  There are only two Debian MIPS architectures: mips
> > and mipsel.   Does that mean, that
> > 
> >   Debian arch  | ABI (from your list above)
> >   -+---
> >   mips | mips, mipsn32, mips64
> >   mipsel   | mipsel, mipsn32el, mips64el
> 
> No, sorry again for leaving ot crucial information. Debian currently
> supports only O32 ABI. Support for the other ABIs is planned in future
> but so far hasn't progressed much beyond 64bit Kernels. The ABI names
> quoted above are actually the propsed Debian architecture names, since
> "Debian architecture" effectiely means "support for one specific ABI".

No worries, and thank you for the clearification.

> > The code in CINT related to MIPS is currently 
> > 
> > #elif (defined(__mips)&&defined(linux))
> > /**
> > * MIPS, Linux
> > **/
> > # define G__VAARG_INC_COPY_N 4
> > # define G__VAARG_PASS_BY_REFERENCE 8
> > 
> > I guess these should really be 
> > 
> >| mips   | mipsn32   | mips64
> >| mipsel | mipsn32el | mips64el
> > ---++-
> > G__VAARG_INC_COPY_N|   4| 8 |8
> > G__VAARG_PASS_BY_REFERENCE |   4| 8 |8
> > 
> > if "G__VAARG_INC_COPY_N" is meant to be the size of the argument
> > registers, and "G__VAARG_PASS_BY_REFERENCE" is the number of arguments
> > passed by reference through registers.  Can someone on the CINT mailing
> > list elaborate please? Thanks.
> 
> Sounds like it, yes.

OK, fixed.

> > How would one find out whether the ABI was O32 or N32?  Is there some
> > pre-processor macro that will tell you?  I guess the code quoted above
> > will be enough to distinguish between mips/mipsn32 and mips64, but it's
> > not clear how I would distinguish between mips and mipsn32.  
> 
> For O32:
> 
> #if _MIPS_SIM==_ABIO32
> ...
> #endif
> 
> 
> For N32:
> 
> #if _MIPS_SIM==_ABIN32
> ...
> #endif
> 
> 
> For N64:
> 
> #if _MIPS_SIM==_ABI64
> ...
> #endif

Very nice, thank you.

...
> > The ROOT configure script uses the triplet 
> > 
> > arch=`uname -s | tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]'`
> > chip=`uname -m | tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]'`
> > rele=`uname -r`
> > 
> > 

Bug#434855: Processed: A (partial) fix for mips/mipsel

2007-11-06 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 21:10 +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
> > > Hi Thiemo,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 18:56 +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > > Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
> > > > > Hi Thiemo,
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 00:48 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> ...
> > > > I notice that the regex in configure excludes now mipsel. 
> > > 
> > > I did that because I wasn't sure if it would work on mipsel straight out
> > > of the box, since the endianess is important for I/O among other
> > > things. 
> > 
> > The places where endianness is visible would need some care, true.
> > The compiler provides built-in macros for that purpose:
> > 
> > __MIPSEL__ for little endian
> > __MIPSEB__ for big endian
> 
> > I presume you already use a macro to select endianness, selecting it
> > via the compiler builtins should be straightforward.
> 
> Currently, there's the following code in ROOT to deal with Linux on
> mips: 
> 
> #if defined(linux) && defined(__mips)

Better would be to check for __linux__ and __mips__. linux might be a
variable in the code somewhere... The __mips__ version with two trailing
underscores is the more common one. So:

  #if defined(__linux__) && defined(__mips__)

> #   define R__LINUX
> #   define R__UNIX
> #   define NEED_SIGJMP
> #   if defined(__mips64) || defined(_ABI64)

This is broken, as __mips64 is also defined for N32, and _ABI64 is always
defined. Assuming the R__B64 controls both address space and register size,
it should be:

  #   if _MIPS_SIM==_ABI64

I don't know what the exact semantics of those defines are, and how well
suilted they are to support N32.

> #  define R__B64  /* enable when 64 bit machine */
> #   endif
> #   if !defined(__MIPSEB__) /* Little endian */

For more clarity:

  #   if defined(__MIPSEL__) /* Little endian */

> #  define R__BYTESWAP
> #   endif 
> #endif
> 
> > > > The only
> > > > difference between both is the endianness. For complete MIPS support
> > > > it would need the following:
> > > > 
> > > > mipsO32 ABI, ILP32, "long long" in a "aligned" even-odd register
> > > > mipsel  pair, 4 argument registers
> > > > 
> > > > mipsn32el   N32 ABI, ILP32, but with 64 bit wide registers, and
> > > > mipsn32 "long long" in a single register, 8 argument registers
> > > > 
> > > > mips64elN64 ABI, LP64, 8 argument registers
> > > > mips64 
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure how to understand your table.   Could you, along the lines
> > > outlined at 
> > >  
> > > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScienceROOT -> Porting Notes
> > > 
> > > tell me what changes would be needed?  Perhaps which already support
> > > registers the 6 cases above would be similar to? 
> 
> Just to make sure:  There are only two Debian MIPS architectures: mips
> and mipsel.   Does that mean, that
> 
>   Debian arch  | ABI (from your list above)
>   -+---
>   mips | mips, mipsn32, mips64
>   mipsel   | mipsel, mipsn32el, mips64el

No, sorry again for leaving ot crucial information. Debian currently
supports only O32 ABI. Support for the other ABIs is planned in future
but so far hasn't progressed much beyond 64bit Kernels. The ABI names
quoted above are actually the propsed Debian architecture names, since
"Debian architecture" effectiely means "support for one specific ABI".

> > > I guess the O32/N32/N64 is the "word-size", but what is the "O" and
> > > "N"? 
> > > 
> > > I don't know what you mean by ILP32/LP63.  I also don't know how to deal
> > > with "long long" in 1 or 2 registers.  
> > 
> > Sorry, I realize that was too terse. O32/N32/N64 are the names of the
> > ABIs (Application Binary Interfaces) supported on Linux/MIPS.
> 
> Ah, I see. 
> 
> > I attempted to add a short outline of its properties to each mention.
> > 
> > ILP32 is a common abbreviation for an ABI with "32bit integer,
> > 32bit long, 32bit pointer size", describing the most important
> > C types. This is like classic Linux i386. The comparable MIPS
> > ABI is O32.
> > 
> > LP64 is a shorthand for "64bit long, 64bit pointer size". This
> > is what most 64bit Unices use, one example is Linux AMD64. The
> > comparable MIPS ABI is N64.
> > 
> > The N32 ABI is a bit odd, it combines a 32bit address space with
> > 64bit wide registers, but it still retains the classic (ILP32)
> > data type lengths. I mentioned "long long" since that is the only
> > data type which is subtly different between both ILP32 variants.
> > Maybe this part isn't relevant for ROOT.
> 
> I guess whether the O32/N32 split is important, depends on where "64bit
> wide registers" registers are used and important. 
> 
> > > I guess the "argument registers" refers to variadic arguments, but
> > > exactly what that wo

Bug#434855: Processed: A (partial) fix for mips/mipsel

2007-11-06 Thread Christian Holm Christensen
Hi again,

On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 21:10 +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
> > Hi Thiemo,
> > 
> > On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 18:56 +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
> > > > Hi Thiemo,
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 00:48 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
...
> > > I notice that the regex in configure excludes now mipsel. 
> > 
> > I did that because I wasn't sure if it would work on mipsel straight out
> > of the box, since the endianess is important for I/O among other
> > things. 
> 
> The places where endianness is visible would need some care, true.
> The compiler provides built-in macros for that purpose:
> 
> __MIPSEL__ for little endian
> __MIPSEB__ for big endian

> I presume you already use a macro to select endianness, selecting it
> via the compiler builtins should be straightforward.

Currently, there's the following code in ROOT to deal with Linux on
mips: 

#if defined(linux) && defined(__mips)
#   define R__LINUX
#   define R__UNIX
#   define NEED_SIGJMP
#   if defined(__mips64) || defined(_ABI64)
#  define R__B64  /* enable when 64 bit machine */
#   endif
#   if !defined(__MIPSEB__) /* Little endian */
#  define R__BYTESWAP
#   endif 
#endif

> > > The only
> > > difference between both is the endianness. For complete MIPS support
> > > it would need the following:
> > > 
> > > mipsO32 ABI, ILP32, "long long" in a "aligned" even-odd register
> > > mipsel  pair, 4 argument registers
> > > 
> > > mipsn32el   N32 ABI, ILP32, but with 64 bit wide registers, and
> > > mipsn32 "long long" in a single register, 8 argument registers
> > > 
> > > mips64elN64 ABI, LP64, 8 argument registers
> > > mips64 
> > 
> > I'm not sure how to understand your table.   Could you, along the lines
> > outlined at 
> >  
> > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScienceROOT -> Porting Notes
> > 
> > tell me what changes would be needed?  Perhaps which already support
> > registers the 6 cases above would be similar to? 

Just to make sure:  There are only two Debian MIPS architectures: mips
and mipsel.   Does that mean, that

  Debian arch  | ABI (from your list above)
  -+---
  mips | mips, mipsn32, mips64
  mipsel   | mipsel, mipsn32el, mips64el

> > I guess the O32/N32/N64 is the "word-size", but what is the "O" and
> > "N"? 
> > 
> > I don't know what you mean by ILP32/LP63.  I also don't know how to deal
> > with "long long" in 1 or 2 registers.  
> 
> Sorry, I realize that was too terse. O32/N32/N64 are the names of the
> ABIs (Application Binary Interfaces) supported on Linux/MIPS.

Ah, I see. 

> I attempted to add a short outline of its properties to each mention.
> 
> ILP32 is a common abbreviation for an ABI with "32bit integer,
> 32bit long, 32bit pointer size", describing the most important
> C types. This is like classic Linux i386. The comparable MIPS
> ABI is O32.
> 
> LP64 is a shorthand for "64bit long, 64bit pointer size". This
> is what most 64bit Unices use, one example is Linux AMD64. The
> comparable MIPS ABI is N64.
> 
> The N32 ABI is a bit odd, it combines a 32bit address space with
> 64bit wide registers, but it still retains the classic (ILP32)
> data type lengths. I mentioned "long long" since that is the only
> data type which is subtly different between both ILP32 variants.
> Maybe this part isn't relevant for ROOT.

I guess whether the O32/N32 split is important, depends on where "64bit
wide registers" registers are used and important. 

> > I guess the "argument registers" refers to variadic arguments, but
> > exactly what that would imply in the ROOT source code I don't know.
> 
> On MIPS (and most other RISC-like architectures) the first few
> arguments to a function are passed via registers. From the
> powerpc code in cint I inferred this is an important property
> which the code needs to know about.

The code in CINT related to MIPS is currently 

#elif (defined(__mips)&&defined(linux))
/**
* MIPS, Linux
**/
# define G__VAARG_INC_COPY_N 4
# define G__VAARG_PASS_BY_REFERENCE 8

I guess these should really be 

   | mips   | mipsn32   | mips64
   | mipsel | mipsn32el | mips64el
---++-
G__VAARG_INC_COPY_N|   4| 8 |8
G__VAARG_PASS_BY_REFERENCE |   4| 8 |8

if "G__VAARG_INC_COPY_N" is meant to be the size of the argument
registers, and "G__VAARG_PASS_BY_REFERENCE" is the number of arguments
passed by reference through registers.  Can someone on the CINT mailing
list elaborate please? Thanks.

How would one

Bug#434855: Processed: A (partial) fix for mips/mipsel

2007-11-06 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
> Hi Thiemo,
> 
> On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 18:56 +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
> > > Hi Thiemo,
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 00:48 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > > 
> > > > > tags 434855 +patch
> > > > Bug#434855: root-system_5.15.07-4(experimental/mipsel/modi): Attempts 
> > > > at guessing your architecture failed.
> > > > Tags were: experimental
> > > > Tags added: patch
> > > > 
> > > > > thanks
> > > 
> > > Thank you for looking into this.  However, I have, with the help of
> > > Boris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ported ROOT to mips.  The GSL stuff is also
> > > fixed. The current sources at 
> > 
> > I notice that the regex in configure excludes now mipsel. 
> 
> I did that because I wasn't sure if it would work on mipsel straight out
> of the box, since the endianess is important for I/O among other
> things. 

The places where endianness is visible would need some care, true.
The compiler provides built-in macros for that purpose:

__MIPSEL__ for little endian
__MIPSEB__ for big endian

I presume you already use a macro to select endianness, selecting it
via the compiler builtins should be straightforward.

> > The only
> > difference between both is the endianness. For complete MIPS support
> > it would need the following:
> > 
> > mipsO32 ABI, ILP32, "long long" in a "aligned" even-odd register
> > mipsel  pair, 4 argument registers
> > 
> > mipsn32el   N32 ABI, ILP32, but with 64 bit wide registers, and
> > mipsn32 "long long" in a single register, 8 argument registers
> > 
> > mips64elN64 ABI, LP64, 8 argument registers
> > mips64 
> 
> I'm not sure how to understand your table.   Could you, along the lines
> outlined at 
>  
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScienceROOT -> Porting Notes
> 
> tell me what changes would be needed?  Perhaps which already support
> registers the 6 cases above would be similar to? 
> 
> I guess the O32/N32/N64 is the "word-size", but what is the "O" and
> "N"? 
> 
> I don't know what you mean by ILP32/LP63.  I also don't know how to deal
> with "long long" in 1 or 2 registers.  

Sorry, I realize that was too terse. O32/N32/N64 are the names of the
ABIs (Application Binary Interfaces) supported on Linux/MIPS.
I attempted to add a short outline of its properties to each mention.

ILP32 is a common abbreviation for an ABI with "32bit integer,
32bit long, 32bit pointer size", describing the most important
C types. This is like classic Linux i386. The comparable MIPS
ABI is O32.

LP64 is a shorthand for "64bit long, 64bit pointer size". This
is what most 64bit Unices use, one example is Linux AMD64. The
comparable MIPS ABI is N64.

The N32 ABI is a bit odd, it combines a 32bit address space with
64bit wide registers, but it still retains the classic (ILP32)
data type lengths. I mentioned "long long" since that is the only
data type which is subtly different between both ILP32 variants.
Maybe this part isn't relevant for ROOT.

> I guess the "argument registers" refers to variadic arguments, but
> exactly what that would imply in the ROOT source code I don't know.

On MIPS (and most other RISC-like architectures) the first few
arguments to a function are passed via registers. From the
powerpc code in cint I inferred this is an important property
which the code needs to know about.

> I've Cc'ed this mail to rootdev and cintdev for more input. 
> 
> > Note that the "el" is always the suffix.
> 
> OK.  That goes for the return from `uname'? 

Not quite. The uname is on a 32bit kernel "MIPS", and on a 64bit kernel
"MIPS64", regardless of endianness. You may have noticed by now that I
say "ABI" and try to avoid "Machine" or "CPU", since those are not
necessarily identical things. 'uname' would return the wrong result
if we want to build a 32bit program on a 64bit capable machine.

In Debian the selection is handled via dpkg-architecture, which tells
exactly what build type is asked for.

For other Distributions the best practice is to combine uname output
with a test for predefined compiler macros to figure out the default
endianness, and hope the result is what was asked for.

> > >   deb-src http://mirror.phy.bnl.gov/debian-root unstable main contrib
> > > 
> > > supports mips and hppa.  For more details, see 
> > >  
> > >   http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScienceROOT
> > > 
> > > But thank you for looking into this.  If you'd like to help, then if you
> > > could try to build the packages, it would be great. 
> > 
> > Builds fine on mips/experimental.
> 
> Great.  Could you make the packages publicly available?  If so, I'll
> upload them to the above repository. 

Will soon show up at http://people.debian.org/~ths/root-system/mips/


Thiemo



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#434855: Processed: A (partial) fix for mips/mipsel

2007-11-06 Thread Christian Holm Christensen
Hi Thiemo,

On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 18:56 +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
> > Hi Thiemo,
> > 
> > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 00:48 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > 
> > > > tags 434855 +patch
> > > Bug#434855: root-system_5.15.07-4(experimental/mipsel/modi): Attempts at 
> > > guessing your architecture failed.
> > > Tags were: experimental
> > > Tags added: patch
> > > 
> > > > thanks
> > 
> > Thank you for looking into this.  However, I have, with the help of
> > Boris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ported ROOT to mips.  The GSL stuff is also
> > fixed. The current sources at 
> 
> I notice that the regex in configure excludes now mipsel. 

I did that because I wasn't sure if it would work on mipsel straight out
of the box, since the endianess is important for I/O among other
things. 

> The only
> difference between both is the endianness. For complete MIPS support
> it would need the following:
> 
> mipsO32 ABI, ILP32, "long long" in a "aligned" even-odd register
> mipsel  pair, 4 argument registers
> 
> mipsn32el   N32 ABI, ILP32, but with 64 bit wide registers, and
> mipsn32 "long long" in a single register, 8 argument registers
> 
> mips64elN64 ABI, LP64, 8 argument registers
> mips64 

I'm not sure how to understand your table.   Could you, along the lines
outlined at 
 
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScienceROOT -> Porting Notes

tell me what changes would be needed?  Perhaps which already support
registers the 6 cases above would be similar to? 

I guess the O32/N32/N64 is the "word-size", but what is the "O" and
"N"? 

I don't know what you mean by ILP32/LP63.  I also don't know how to deal
with "long long" in 1 or 2 registers.  

I guess the "argument registers" refers to variadic arguments, but
exactly what that would imply in the ROOT source code I don't know.
I've Cc'ed this mail to rootdev and cintdev for more input. 

> Note that the "el" is always the suffix.

OK.  That goes for the return from `uname'? 

> >   deb-src http://mirror.phy.bnl.gov/debian-root unstable main contrib
> > 
> > supports mips and hppa.  For more details, see 
> >  
> >   http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScienceROOT
> > 
> > But thank you for looking into this.  If you'd like to help, then if you
> > could try to build the packages, it would be great. 
> 
> Builds fine on mips/experimental.

Great.  Could you make the packages publicly available?  If so, I'll
upload them to the above repository. 

Thanks again for your help. 

Yours,

-- 
 ___  |  Christian Holm Christensen 
  |_| |  -
| |  Address: Sankt Hansgade 23, 1. th.  Phone:  (+45) 35 35 96 91
 _|   DK-2200 Copenhagen N   Cell:   (+45) 24 61 85 91
_|DenmarkOffice: (+45) 353  25 404
 |   Email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Web:www.nbi.dk/~cholm
 | |




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#434855: Processed: A (partial) fix for mips/mipsel

2007-11-06 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
> Hi Thiemo,
> 
> On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 00:48 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > 
> > > tags 434855 +patch
> > Bug#434855: root-system_5.15.07-4(experimental/mipsel/modi): Attempts at 
> > guessing your architecture failed.
> > Tags were: experimental
> > Tags added: patch
> > 
> > > thanks
> 
> Thank you for looking into this.  However, I have, with the help of
> Boris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ported ROOT to mips.  The GSL stuff is also
> fixed. The current sources at 

I notice that the regex in configure excludes now mipsel. The only
difference between both is the endianness. For complete MIPS support
it would need the following:

mipsO32 ABI, ILP32, "long long" in a "aligned" even-odd register
mipsel  pair, 4 argument registers

mipsn32el   N32 ABI, ILP32, but with 64 bit wide registers, and
mipsn32 "long long" in a single register, 8 argument registers

mips64elN64 ABI, LP64, 8 argument registers
mips64 

Note that the "el" is always the suffix.

>   deb-src http://mirror.phy.bnl.gov/debian-root unstable main contrib
> 
> supports mips and hppa.  For more details, see 
>  
>   http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScienceROOT
> 
> But thank you for looking into this.  If you'd like to help, then if you
> could try to build the packages, it would be great. 

Builds fine on mips/experimental.


Thiemo



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#434855: Processed: A (partial) fix for mips/mipsel

2007-11-06 Thread Christian Holm Christensen
Hi Thiemo,

On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 00:48 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> 
> > tags 434855 +patch
> Bug#434855: root-system_5.15.07-4(experimental/mipsel/modi): Attempts at 
> guessing your architecture failed.
> Tags were: experimental
> Tags added: patch
> 
> > thanks

Thank you for looking into this.  However, I have, with the help of
Boris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ported ROOT to mips.  The GSL stuff is also
fixed. The current sources at 

  deb-src http://mirror.phy.bnl.gov/debian-root unstable main contrib

supports mips and hppa.  For more details, see 
 
  http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScienceROOT

But thank you for looking into this.  If you'd like to help, then if you
could try to build the packages, it would be great. 

Yours,

-- 
 ___  |  Christian Holm Christensen 
  |_| |  -
| |  Address: Sankt Hansgade 23, 1. th.  Phone:  (+45) 35 35 96 91
 _|   DK-2200 Copenhagen N   Cell:   (+45) 24 61 85 91
_|DenmarkOffice: (+45) 353  25 404
 |   Email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Web:www.nbi.dk/~cholm
 | |




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: A (partial) fix for mips/mipsel

2007-11-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 434855 +patch
Bug#434855: root-system_5.15.07-4(experimental/mipsel/modi): Attempts at 
guessing your architecture failed.
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: A fix for this problem

2007-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 424469 +patch
Bug#424469: libgetenv-java - FTBFS: Found 1 semantic error compiling 
"uk/co/tigress/System.java":
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: A patch to fix this bug.

2007-08-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 439482 +patch
Bug#439482: packit: FTBFS: error: net/bpf.h: No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: A patch to fix this bug.

2007-08-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 436329 +patch
Bug#436329: playmidi: FTBFS: error: linux/awe_voice.h: No such file or directory
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: patch

> thankyou
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: A patch for this bug

2007-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 433740 +patch
Bug#433740: pybaz - FTBFS: ImportError: No module named uid
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: patch

> thankyou
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: a way to reproduce KMail/DIMAP data loss

2007-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 321102
Bug#321102: kmail loses mails
Bug is already open, cannot reopen.

> tags 321102 - fixed-upstream
Bug#321102: kmail loses mails
Tags were: upstream fixed-upstream
Bug#332473: kmail: dangerous handling of dimap-folders
Bug#350851: kmail: v1.9.1: Data loss w/disconnected IMAP (reported upstream)
Bug#406258: kmail loses all of inbox, mixes different account with disconnected 
imap
Tags removed: fixed-upstream

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: A fixed package is uploaded to mentors.debian.net, waiting for sponsor

2006-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 400050 + pending
Bug#400050: brickos_0.9.0.dfsg-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: invalid operands
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 396358 + pending
Bug#396358: FTBFS: /tmp/ccuT6jNb.s:312: Error: cannot create floating-point 
number
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 399749 + pending
Bug#399749: brickos: Doesn't work with the new version of gcc-h8300-hms
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: a simple patch

2006-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 383915 +patch
Bug#383915: libchm-bin: installs binaries into /usr/bin/bin/
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks, I'm attaching you a simple patch
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: A patch to fix this bug

2006-05-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 359996 + patch
Bug#359996: after upgrade, eyeD3 no longer works at all
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: A patch to fix this bug.

2006-05-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 364264 + patch
Bug#364264: directvnc: FTBFS: dfb.c:33: error: syntax error before 'caps'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: a few bugs + pending

2006-04-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 358657 + pending
Bug#358657: ITP: libsl -- memory-efficient generic linked list library
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 358659 + pending
Bug#358659: ITP: libggtl -- generic game-tree search library
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tags 345776 + pending
Bug#345776: preload: error message in postinstall script during a new 
installation
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: A couple of enhancements required by debian users.

2006-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> forwarded 320282 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#320282: imapfilter: a quiet option would be nice
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> forwarded 320284 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#320284: palo: ftbfs [sparc] syntax error before '__cpu_to_le64p'
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> tags 320282 + upstream
Bug#320282: imapfilter: a quiet option would be nice
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> tags 320284 + upstream
Bug#320284: palo: ftbfs [sparc] syntax error before '__cpu_to_le64p'
Tags were: fixed patch
Tags added: upstream

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: A couple of patches.

2006-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 340289 +patch
Bug#340289: amaya: missing build-dependency on libfreetype6-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> tags 346632 +patch
Bug#346632: amaya: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: A possible fix

2006-01-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 331068 patch
Bug#331068: undefined references while building pngcrush in sid
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> tags 338659 patch
Bug#338659: pngcrush: fails to start with relocation error
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> tags 330026 patch
Bug#330026: pngcrush: uses private symbols from libpng
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: a dependency that isn't strict enough is RC

2005-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 322262 serious
Bug#322262: parted: undefined symbol: ped_unit_get_name
Severity set to `serious'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: A third try

2005-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 308502 normal #I screwed up and typed the wrong bug number
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> merge 319094 309958 308052
Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot
Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file
Bug#319094: package conflicts blackbox & fluxbox
Merged 308052 309958 319094.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: a

2005-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> forwarded 316285 http://bugs.mysql.com/11751
Bug#316285: mysql-query-browser: FTBFS on 64 bit arches.
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugs.mysql.com/11751.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: a

2005-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 316285 + pending
Bug#316285: mysql-query-browser: FTBFS on 64 bit arches.
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending

> forward 316285 http://bugs.mysql.com/11751
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: A way _not_ to handle bugs

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 306015 grave
Bug#306015: php4-mysql: Should depend on php4
Severity set to `grave'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: a missing dependency is RC

2005-05-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 306015 grave
Bug#306015: php4-mysql: Should depend on php4
Severity set to `grave'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: a

2005-03-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 301511 patch
Bug#301511: sysklogd: hangs the whole system
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: A different, not kernel related bug

2005-03-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone 299875 -1
Bug#299875: CAN-2005-0384: Remote Linux DoS on ppp servers
Bug 299875 cloned as bug 301018.

> reassign -1 ppp
Bug#301018: CAN-2005-0384: Remote Linux DoS on ppp servers
Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `ppp'.

> retitle -1 ppp_2.4.3 pppd hangs on re-connect
Bug#301018: CAN-2005-0384: Remote Linux DoS on ppp servers
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)

> tags -1 - patch
Bug#301018: ppp_2.4.3 pppd hangs on re-connect
Tags were: security patch
Tags removed: patch

> tags -1 - security
Bug#301018: ppp_2.4.3 pppd hangs on re-connect
Tags were: security
Tags removed: security

> severity -1 important
Bug#301018: ppp_2.4.3 pppd hangs on re-connect
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: A patch to fix this problem

2005-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 298964 patch
Bug#298964: atris: contains non-free fonts
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: A simple solution?

2005-02-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 295221 patch
Bug#295221: twiki: Twiki should depend on libtext-diff-perl and not provide 
these files
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: A simple solution?

2005-02-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 295221 patch
Bug#295221: twiki: Twiki should depend on libtext-diff-perl and not provide 
these files
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: a missing dependency is RC

2005-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 281392 grave
Bug#281392: eieio: should depend upon cedet-common
Severity set to `grave'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]