Bug#421301: should conflict against old java-gcj-compat-dev
Package: gcj-4.1 Version: 4.1.2-4 Severity: serious (as already mentioned on IRC). the new gcj-4.1 apparently changed location of jawt (and other sos): libgcj7-1-awt: /usr/lib/gcj-4.1-71/libjawt.so java-gcj-compat-dev does excpects it on another path: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 2007-04-26 13:50 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libjawt.so - ../../../gcj-4.1/libjawt.so Which then causes: java-gcj-compat-dev ist schon die neueste Version. 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 57 nicht aktualisiert. 1 nicht vollstäig installiert oder entfernt. Es mü0B Archive geholt werden. Nach dem Auspacken werden 0B Plattenplatz zusälich benutzt. Richte java-gcj-compat-dev ein (1.0.65-10) ... file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgij.so file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj.so file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj-tools.so file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libjawt.so [...] Regards, Rene -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-powerpc Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages gcj-4.1 depends on: ii ecj 3.2.2-1 standalone version of the Eclipse ii gcc-4.1 4.1.2-4 The GNU C compiler ii gcj-4.1-base4.1.2-4 The GNU Compiler Collection (gcj b ii gij-4.1 4.1.2-4 The GNU Java bytecode interpreter ii java-common 0.25 Base of all Java packages ii libc6 2.5-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libc6-dev 2.5-4GNU C Library: Development Librari ii libgcc1 1:4.2-20070405-1 GCC support library ii libgcj-bc 4.1.2-2 Link time only library for use wit ii libgcj7-dev 4.1.2-4 Java development headers and stati ii libgcj7-jar 4.1.2-4 Java runtime library for use with ii libmagic1 4.20-4 File type determination library us ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime Versions of packages gcj-4.1 recommends: ii ecj-gcj 3.2.2-1standalone version of the Eclipse ii fastjar 2:0.95-1 Jar creation utility -- no debconf information signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#421301: should conflict against old java-gcj-compat-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 clone 421301 -1 severity -1 important retitle -1 needs update for new gcj-4.1 reassign -1 java-gcj-compat-dev thanks Rene Engelhard wrote: java-gcj-compat-dev does excpects it on another path: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 2007-04-26 13:50 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libjawt.so - ../../../gcj-4.1/libjawt.so Which then causes: java-gcj-compat-dev ist schon die neueste Version. 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 57 nicht aktualisiert. 1 nicht vollstäig installiert oder entfernt. Es mü0B Archive geholt werden. Nach dem Auspacken werden 0B Plattenplatz zusälich benutzt. Richte java-gcj-compat-dev ein (1.0.65-10) ... file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgij.so file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj.so file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj-tools.so file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libjawt.so [...] And java-gcj-compat-dev of course needs an update. Regards, Rene -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGMkB4+FmQsCSK63MRAqfoAJ9Li7BHDyB5D1za5cW+yGOAvXzr+QCfd74X zlrtMosI/7ESpWOBn9Lhork= =lzLv -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#421305: should not enter testing before OOo 2.2.0
Package: myspell-de-de,hunspell-de-de Version: 20051113-8 Severity: serious This is a dummy bug to prevent this entering testing without OOo 2.2 as it would break german spellchecking for OOo in testing (as iit won't be installable in testing together with OOo and bitney doesn't catch that) -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-powerpc Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages myspell-de-de depends on: ii dictionaries-common [openoffi 0.80.1 Common utilities for spelling dict myspell-de-de recommends no packages. -- no debconf information signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#421301: should conflict against old java-gcj-compat-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rene Engelhard wrote: file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgij.so file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj.so file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj-tools.so $ dpkg -L libgcj7-dev | grep \.so$ /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.1/libgcj_bc.so /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.1/libgij.so /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.1/libgcj.so /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.1/libgcj-tools.so Regards, Rene -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGMlEQ+FmQsCSK63MRAp6pAJ47zUJsJieOXz6DZzhsrCdNUYnQBgCdFuAM A68gSke1RSo4cNAbq3nJoOE= =KDkW -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#421300: fails to configure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rene Engelhard wrote: Richte java-gcj-compat-dev ein (1.0.65-10) ... file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgij.so file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj.so file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj-tools.so file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libjawt.so pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (4) pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (4) Hmm. Interestingly this went away when 421301 gets fixed (i.e. the symlinks are right). Regards, Rene -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGMlLr+FmQsCSK63MRAojvAJ9gsViW8f99316+WcXq36sdPYKgYgCfevc8 vbueroQkXFOQ+kuiMAhKnSg= =yefv -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#421301: should conflict against old java-gcj-compat-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rene Engelhard wrote: Rene Engelhard wrote: file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgij.so file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj.so file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj-tools.so $ dpkg -L libgcj7-dev | grep \.so$ /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.1/libgcj_bc.so /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.1/libgij.so /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.1/libgcj.so /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.1/libgcj-tools.so also the headers /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/include$ ls gcj jawt.h jawt_md.h jni.h jni_md.h linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/include$ ls -la linux/* * lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 2007-04-27 20:06 gcj - ../../../gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/gcj lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 51 2007-04-27 20:06 jawt.h - ../../../gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/jawt.h lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 54 2007-04-27 20:06 jawt_md.h - ../../../gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/jawt_md.h lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 50 2007-04-27 20:06 jni.h - ../../../gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/jni.h lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 53 2007-04-27 20:06 jni_md.h - ../../../gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/jni_md.h lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 57 2007-04-27 20:06 linux/jawt_md.h - ../../../../gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/jawt_md.h linux: insgesamt 8 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2007-04-27 20:06 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2007-04-27 20:06 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 57 2007-04-27 20:06 jawt_md.h - ../../../../gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/jawt_md.h $ dpkg -L libgcj7-dev | grep jni*\.h /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/include$ dpkg -L libgcj7-dev | grep jni*\.h /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.1/include/jni.h Regards, Rene -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGM2LF+FmQsCSK63MRAqQJAJ9c2+CmPh5xFxkq5znT9miR8f+KxwCbB71x LdnY7lR6VFYHX8lp5AjHd7A= =hclc -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#438870: fixed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 close 438870 2.2.1-8 close 438870 2.3.0~oog680m2-1 thanks Hi, fixed in above versions (typoed the bugnr in the changelog) Regards, Rene -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGzVdt+FmQsCSK63MRAsxmAJ98lnT2yRbiOIFyLLnc8bYQG1BzQQCfcoYj OHA2yKrCvn1W7+MVxPYblxY= =5pF4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#439348: ftp.debian.org: Too low priority for libwpg-0.1-1
Hi, Sven Joachim wrote: The latest upload of openoffice.org-draw to unstable added a dependency on libwpg-0.1-1 which is of priority extra. This priority needs to be bumped to optional. Yep, I noticed to late that (damn, dh_make which defaults to extra now) that I uploaded with the wrong prio. Rene, is the dependency correct? [...] Yes. [...] I would assume that a Recommends or even Suggests would be more in order, many people will never need to open WordPerfect presentations. That's the same argument as http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=415284. See my arguments there against it. Gr??e/Regards, Ren? -- .''`. Ren? Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#439496: unmerge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 unmerge 439496 reassign 439496 swing-layout thanks Hi, how is unzip not found (so a missing build-dep on unzip) related to the Java errors in gjdoc? Regards, Rene -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG0Dun+FmQsCSK63MRAgiEAJwPSxs7mvlwdzufLqntNqYbfcBx4gCeOaQs flhtGJlMCtcYLJ2aS/lduM4= =kghN -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#439670: depends on non-existing version of ecj-gcj
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev Version: 1.0.76-2 Severity: serious # apt-get install java-gcj-compat-dev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: java-gcj-compat-dev: Depends: ecj-gcj (= 3.3.0+0728) but 3.3.0-2 is to be installed E: Broken packages And in fact: $ rmadison ecj ecj-gcj ecj |3.3.0-2 | unstable | source, all ecj-gcj |3.2.2-2 | unstable | hppa ecj-gcj |3.3.0-2 | unstable | alpha, amd64, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc It's not in in incoming either - but it's in Ubuntu. So you either need to upload Ubuntus version to sid or lower the depends... Regards, Rene -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages java-gcj-compat-dev depends on: ii ecj-gcj 3.3.0-2standalone version of the Eclipse ii gappletviewer-4.1 4.1.2-14 Standalone application to execute ii gcj-4.1 4.1.2-14 The GNU compiler for Java(TM) ii gjdoc 0.7.8-4documentation generation framework ii java-gcj-compat 1.0.76-5 Java runtime environment using GIJ ii python2.4.4-6An interactive high-level object-o ii python-central0.5.15 register and build utility for Pyt Versions of packages java-gcj-compat-dev recommends: ii libgcj7-src 4.1.2-14 libgcj java sources for use in ecl signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#439670: depends on non-existing version of ecj-gcj
Matthias Klose wrote: Rene Engelhard writes: Package: java-gcj-compat-dev Version: 1.0.76-2 Severity: serious looks like a newbie gone wild and filing bug reports without looking into NEW first. Irrelevant. a) I am not a newbie. I just know it's not installable *now* and therefore it's a bug *now*. Yes, it'll get fixed when ecj is through NEW, but that doesn't change that the package in sid is broken currently. *You* were uploading a pacjage knowingly not being able to install in sid because *you* *knew* that ecj was in NEW. b) you could have prevented that yourself by not uploading a package which knwingly is not installable in sid. But waiting for all the gcj-42/java-gcj-compat uploads until ecj was through NEW. Gr��e/Regards, Ren� -- .''`. Ren� Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#439670: depends on non-existing version of ecj-gcj
Hi, Matthias Klose wrote: no, I don't care anymore about delays in NEW after having to wait about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary packages have to land in NEW, then they should process them in time. What do you gain by blocking transitions of depending packages by weeks? Is this really wanted? And what do you gain from making them (== packages build-deping on java-gcj-compat-dev) unbuildable (on clean sids, and - more importantly - on the buildds)? That doesn't help the transitions either. Gr??e/Regards, Ren? -- .''`. Ren? Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#439670: depends on non-existing version of ecj-gcj
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Rene Engelhard writes:
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
no, I don't care anymore about delays in NEW after having to wait
about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If
ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary packages have to
land in NEW, then they should process them in time. What do you gain
by blocking transitions of depending packages by weeks? Is this really
wanted?
And what do you gain from making them (== packages build-deping on
java-gcj-compat-dev) unbuildable (on clean sids, and - more importantly -
on the buildds)?
no, it doesn't change anything, as the new gcj packages did conflict
with the new java-gcj-compat. you yourself did point out that in an
earlier bug report and did request that conflict. so things are not
Correct.
worse than before.
Yes, not worse that what happened after your uploads anyway.
Worse, thogh, than how you could have handled it.
AFAIS, You could have uploaded gc{c,j}-4.2 end ecj. Wait for NEW.
java-gcj-compat-dev so far didn't do stuff with gcj-4.2 so it would not have
affected it.
And after they got out of NEW do what you did (change the default g{i,c}j,
upload gcc-defaults, java-gcj-compat-dev, etc and upload them...)
No installability problems because something was in NEW, only temporary
uninstallability until everyting is uploaded, built and available with the
right versions. That's normal version-skew in unstable and not I uploaded
something depending on something I know of that it isn't in sid.
What happened though, is uploading something to unstable which is
knowingly not installable and which will only be installable when ecj
clears NEW - whenever that happens.
(In which case I obviously and of course would not have filed a bug
like #439670 but would have waited for the new versions being there - or
fetching them from incoming if needed).
Oh, and yes, i do not like the long NEW processing times at all, too,
but that's not a reason to break all packages in sid build-depending on
java-gcj-compat-dev if you can avoid it.
Gr��e/Regards,
Ren�
--
.''`. Ren� Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#440647: Missing dependancy for openoffice.org-common
severity 440647 important retitle 440647 DicOOo.sxw crashes when -base not installed thanks Hi, Barry Klein wrote: Package: openoffice.org Version: 2.x doesn't fit. Version: expects real versions, not some pseudo ones. Severity: serious Umm, no. If openoffice.org-base is not installed, opening DictOOo.sxw (FileWizardsInstall new dictionaries), OpenOffice.org crashes. Define crashes. hangs? Or what? It does that here also with base installed. (Although with a 2.3 development version) Also applies to any other file that contains macros. This applies to all versions of OpenOffice.org Version 2. OpenOffice.org-base is a non-essential part of OpenOffice. It should be Neither is DicOOo. (imho) possible to not install it to save download time or so as not to confuse users with a program they are not likely to use. That's what we do currently. That's why -common does not depend on -base. The openoffice.org metapackage is exactly there for people who don't know what they do, if people just install -writer etc they should know what they do... I am currently thinking about reworking the packages' contents, though... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#442338: openoffice.org_1:2.3.0~rc3-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: error: 'CURLE_FTP_USER_PASSWORD_INCORRECT' was not declared in this scope
clone 442338 -1 reassign -1 libcurl4-gnutls-dev retitle -1 CURLE_FTP_USER_PASSWORD_INCORRECT gone, CURLE_OBSOLETE10 not working severity -1 grave found -1 7.17.0-1 block 442338 by -1 thanks Hi, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: your package failed to build from source. because curl broke afais. [...] | Making: ../../../unxlngs.pro/slo/ftpcontent.obj | g++ -fmessage-length=0 -c -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -DCURL_NO_OLDIES -I. -I../../../unxlngs.pro/inc/ucpftp -I../inc -I../../../inc/pch -I../../../inc -I../../../unx/inc -I../../../unxlngs.pro/inc -I. -I/build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.0~rc3/ooo-build/build/OOG680_m5/solver/680/unxlngs.pro/inc/stl -I/build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.0~rc3/ooo-build/build/OOG680_m5/solver/680/unxlngs.pro/inc/external -I/build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.0~rc3/ooo-build/build/OOG680_m5/solver/680/unxlngs.pro/inc -I/build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.0~rc3/ooo-build/build/OOG680_m5/solenv/unxlngs/inc -I/build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.0~rc3/ooo-build/build/OOG680_m5/solenv/inc -I/build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.0~rc3/ooo-build/build/OOG680_m5/res -I/build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.0~rc3/stlport/stlport -I/build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.0~rc3/stlport/include/stlport -I/build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.0~rc3/stlport/include/stlport -I/build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.0~rc3/ooo-build/build/OOG680_m5/solenv/inc/Xp31 -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/include -I/usr/include -I/build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.0~rc3/ooo-build/build/OOG680_m5/solver/680/unxlngs.pro/inc/offuh -I. -I../../../res -I. -pipe -g1 -Wreturn-type -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -fPIC -DLINUX -DUNX -DVCL -DGCC -DC300 -DSPARC -DCVER=C300 -DNPTL -DGLIBC=2 -D_PTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DSPARC -DNEW_SOLAR -D_USE_NAMESPACE=1 -DSTLPORT_VERSION=400 -DHAVE_GCC_VISIBILITY_FEATURE -D__DMAKE -DUNIX -DCPPU_ENV=gcc3 -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/c++/4.2 -DSUPD=680 -DPRODUCT -DNDEBUG -DPRODUCT_FULL -DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=0 -DOPTIMIZE -DGSTREAMER -DCUI -DSOLAR_JAVA -DOOG680=OOG680 -DSHAREDLIB -D_DLL_ -fexceptions -fno-enforce-eh-specs -DEXCEPTIONS_ON -o ../../../unxlngs.pro/slo/ftpcontent.o /build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.0~rc3/ooo-build/build/OOG680_m5/ucb/source/ucp/ftp/ftpcontent.cxx | /build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.0~rc3/ooo-build/build/OOG680_m5/ucb/source/ucp/ftp/ftpcontent.cxx: In member function 'virtual com::sun::star::uno::Any ftp::FTPContent::execute(const com::sun::star::ucb::Command, sal_Int32, const com::sun::star::uno::Referencecom::sun::star::ucb::XCommandEnvironment)': | /build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.0~rc3/ooo-build/build/OOG680_m5/ucb/source/ucp/ftp/ftpcontent.cxx:587: error: 'CURLE_FTP_USER_PASSWORD_INCORRECT' was not declared in this scope | /build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.0~rc3/ooo-build/build/OOG680_m5/ucb/source/ucp/ftp/ftpcontent.cxx:588: error: 'CURLE_BAD_PASSWORD_ENTERED' was not declared in this scope | /build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.0~rc3/ooo-build/build/OOG680_m5/ucb/source/ucp/ftp/ftpcontent.cxx:591: error: 'CURLE_FTP_ACCESS_DENIED' was not declared in this scope | /build/buildd/openoffice.org-2.3.0~rc3/ooo-build/build/OOG680_m5/ucb/source/ucp/ftp/ftpcontent.cxx:593: error: 'CURLE_FTP_QUOTE_ERROR' was not declared in this scope | dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../../unxlngs.pro/slo/ftpcontent.obj' | ---* tg_merge.mk *--- Looking at curl 7.16.4, I see this defined in curl.h as 10: $ grep -r CURLE_FTP_USER_PASSWORD_INCORRECT /usr/include/curl/* /usr/include/curl/curl.h: CURLE_FTP_USER_PASSWORD_INCORRECT, /* 10 -NOT USED */ in an enum. Now, with 7.17.0: $ grep -r CURLE_FTP_USER_PASSWORD_INCORRECT /usr/include/curl/* /usr/include/curl/curl.h:#define CURLE_FTP_USER_PASSWORD_INCORRECT CURLE_OBSOLETE10 $ grep -r CURLE_OBSOLETE10 /usr/include/curl/* /usr/include/curl/curl.h: CURLE_OBSOLETE10, /* 10 - NOT USED */ /usr/include/curl/curl.h:#define CURLE_FTP_USER_PASSWORD_INCORRECT CURLE_OBSOLETE10 with CURLE_OBSOLETE10 now being in the enum. It seems that curl wanted to keep compatibility but actually broke it because the subsitution doesn't work? Reassigning a clone to curl. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#442338: Fwd: Bug#442338: FTBFS: error: 'CURLE_FTP_USER_PASSWORD_INCORRECT' was not declared in this scope
Hi,
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
curl 7.17.0 breaks the build of openoffice.org. Rene has already found the
cause, it is described below.
Eh, no. curl 7.17.0 does *not* break this as you will see below.
Incorrect. It breaks. As you say yourself.
Is it only a formal error by the curl side or openoffice.org requires to
be upgraded to the new API?
The error code CURLE_FTP_USER_PASSWORD_INCORRECT has been moved to the list
of codes that will be removed in the future, and thus it isn't present if
you define CURL_NO_OLDIES when you build.
So if you want backwards-compatible style you *don't* define CURL_NO_OLDIES
and you can use that define fine still. If you define it, you should be
prepared to edit some of the codes to the up-to-date versions.
| g++ -fmessage-length=0 -c -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -DCURL_NO_OLDIES
-I.
So why do these guys explicitly switch off compatibility?
This was done between 1.12 and 1.13 (so pre 2.0.0 beta even) of
ucb/source/ucp/makefile.mk
with the following in cvs log:
revision 1.13
date: 2004/09/20 14:32:42; author: rt; state: Exp; lines: +3 -1
branches: 1.13.16; 1.13.66;
INTEGRATION: CWS systemcurl1 (1.12.54); FILE MERGED
2004/09/20 14:17:24 cmc 1.12.54.1: #i34405# curl has changed its headers
slightly
The Issue URL is http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=34405 and it
seems to be a
part of a commit to fix builds with system-curl and which says:
Description: Opened: Mon Sep 20 14:15:00 + 2004 Sort by: Oldest first |
Newest first
__
--with-system-curl and configure doesn't work with latest curl seeing as curl
moved from CURLOPT_PASSWDFUNCTION being 66 to being 0 which was covered, and now
its moved to -3 by default. Also the curl/types.h is deprecated in favour of
curl/curl.h. Changes allow both old and new CURL varients to work.
Which indeed only does this:
diff -u -u -r1.2 -r1.2.186.1
--- source/ucp/ftp/ftphandleprovider.hxx15 Oct 2002 09:21:17 -
1.2
+++ source/ucp/ftp/ftphandleprovider.hxx20 Sep 2004 14:17:23 -
1.2.186.1
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
#include rtl/ustring.hxx
-#include curl/types.h
+#include curl/curl.h
namespace ftp {
diff -u -u -r1.5 -r1.5.188.1
--- source/ucp/ftp/ftploaderthread.hxx 28 Aug 2002 07:23:14 - 1.5
+++ source/ucp/ftp/ftploaderthread.hxx 20 Sep 2004 14:17:23 -
1.5.188.1
@@ -71,9 +71,7 @@
#ifndef _OSL_THREAD_H_
#include osl/thread.h
#endif
-#ifndef __CURL_TYPES_H
-#include curl/types.h
-#endif
+#include curl/curl.h
namespace ftp {
diff -u -u -r1.12 -r1.12.54.1
--- source/ucp/ftp/makefile.mk 2 Feb 2004 18:36:22 - 1.12
+++ source/ucp/ftp/makefile.mk 20 Sep 2004 14:17:24 - 1.12.54.1
@@ -75,7 +75,9 @@
.INCLUDE: settings.mk
-#CFLAGS +=-fno-inline
+.IF $(SYSTEM_CURL) == YES
+CFLAGS+=-DCURL_NO_OLDIES
+.ENDIF
# --- General -
This is only added for builds with system-curl. Stock OOo as provided
by Sun uses an internal curl copy. 7.12.2. No, no typo.. Amd anything which is
done for
the ftp ucp needs to build/work with both.
Maybe it was simply a security measure? RH did that, so I don't know what he
intended with it.
(Cced).
It seems that curl wanted to keep compatibility but actually broke it
because the subsitution doesn't work?
Nope. We still support the option as described above.
Not when you define CURL_NO_OLDIES.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#442338: Fwd: Bug#442338: FTBFS: error: 'CURLE_FTP_USER_PASSWORD_INCORRECT' was not declared in this scope
Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Rene Engelhard wrote: Nope. We still support the option as described above. Not when you define CURL_NO_OLDIES. You've received (at least) two mails describing the purpose of this define, and it is even explained in the public libcurl header. Feel free to tell us exactly what exactly libcurl did wrong here. I didn't. I just said that you was wrong saying globally that curl 7.17.0 doesn't break builds. In some circumstances it does. You also claimed without making an exception that you still supported the options above. Which evidently is not true with -DCURL_NO_OLDIES I understand your explanations wrt -DCURL_NO_OLDIES and am actually just trying a build which removes it. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#442338: Fwd: Bug#442338: FTBFS: error: 'CURLE_FTP_USER_PASSWORD_INCORRECT' was not declared in this scope
Hi, Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Rene Engelhard wrote: I didn't. I just said that you was wrong saying globally that curl 7.17.0 doesn't break builds. In some circumstances it does. You also claimed without making an exception that you still supported the options above. Which evidently is not true with -DCURL_NO_OLDIES You fiddled with the build so it breaks. You can mess it up in several other ways to make it break too. I don't see how that makes it libcurl's fault. You obviously haven't read my post. I didn't add that define. libcurl supports and works fine with the error code you say it doesn't work with. Not generally, no. As you said youself. You broke the build. Not libcurl. Accept that and stop throwing dirt our way. Read my last message again. I didn't. I even said I am just trying a build with that define removed (It just takes...). I just objected to you generalizing that the new curl does not break. It does when you use that define. That was not throwing dirt on your way but just a fact. I didn't say I objected to the analysis that that define was at ffault and I neither said I won't fix it by removing the define. Maybe you should actually read mails more careful. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#442418: sigcontext.h broken
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.6.1-3 Severity: grave Hi, as discussed on IRC: 13:10 _rene_ MadCoder: ping? 13:14 MadCoder _rene_: small pont 13:14 -!- ema (Emanuele Rocca) [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #debian-devel 13:14 MadCoder pong 13:14 -!- tdykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds] 13:16 -!- Col_Kernel (Joachim Reichel) [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #debian-devel 13:18 -!- pabs (Paul Wise) [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #debian-devel 13:23 _rene_ MadCoder: is there a b0rkage of sigcontext.h known? I have it since 2.6.1-3 13:24 -!- kaeso [EMAIL PROTECTED] has quit [Quit: E quindi uscimmo a riveder le stelle] 13:24 -!- Irssi: Pasting 9 lines to #debian-devel. Press Ctrl-K if you wish to do this or Ctrl-C to cancel. 13:24 _rene_ In file included from /usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h:8, from system.h:86, from conditn.c:38: 13:24 _rene_ /usr/include/asm-i386/sigcontext.h:19: error: redefinition of 'struct _fpreg' 13:24 _rene_ /usr/include/asm-i386/sigcontext.h:24: error: redefinition of 'struct _fpxreg' 13:24 _rene_ /usr/include/asm-i386/sigcontext.h:30: error: redefinition of 'struct _xmmreg' 13:24 _rene_ /usr/include/asm-i386/sigcontext.h:34: error: redefinition of 'struct _fpstate' 13:24 _rene_ /usr/include/asm-i386/sigcontext.h:58: error: redefinition of 'struct sigcontext' 13:24 _rene_ dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../unxlngi6.pro/slo/conditn.obj' [...] 14:10 MadCoder _rene_: I suppose there is a problem with linux-libc-dev again 14:11 MadCoder _rene_: you have to file a bug against it, it's not a libc problem [...] 16:30 MadCoder waldi: it's bits/sigcontext.h 16:30 MadCoder not sys/ 16:30 MadCoder sorry 16:31 noshadow mrvn: install has the disadvantage that one has to think about all permissions and ownerships, just making the changes one likes after dh_fixperms makes sure only those are changed. 16:31 mrvn noshadow: true. 16:31 dendrite noshadow: In this case we have to think about all if it anyhow, so that's not a real downer. 16:31 dendrite noshadow: (for us.) 16:31 waldi MadCoder: which was mostly empty before the last update 16:31 waldi MadCoder: no bug in the kernel 16:31 MadCoder h 16:31 mrvn dendrite: I find chown -R actually quite efficient. 16:31 dendrite I was also mightily confused between DEBIAN and debian directories. 16:32 MadCoder and aurel32 is off for some days 16:32 dendrite mrvn: Yeah, it certainly works. :-) 16:32 MadCoder and he did the last upload 16:32 MadCoder hmmm 16:32 MadCoder waldi, _rene_: okay, I'll try to see what's the problem is then 16:32 noshadow dendrite: just make sure all those things are set in the binary (or rules invoked at that time like install) of debian/rules. So that at package creation time fakeroot still knows what permissions you set them to. 16:32 dendrite mrvn: Thanks. 16:33 dendrite debian/rules... 16:33 mrvn dendrite: indeed it does :) 16:33 dendrite mrvn: =) 16:34 waldi MadCoder: the kernel exports its interface for more than glibc 16:34 -!- bandini (Michele Baldessari) [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #debian-devel 16:34 MadCoder and ? 16:35 _rene_ MadCoder: as said, it broke in -3. afair, -2 did work fine. 16:35 _rene_ MadCoder: (fwiw) 16:35 -!- foka (Anthony Fok) [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #debian-devel 16:35 MadCoder yeah it seems to be related to the: 16:35 MadCoder * sysdeps/amd64.mk: uses x86_64 headers also for the i486 flavour now 16:35 MadCoder that they are compatible. 16:35 MadCoder * sysdeps/i386.mk: uses x86_64 headers also for the main flavour. 16:36 MadCoder the problematic header comes from the x86_64/bits/ directory of the glibc sources 16:36 dendrite So the debian/rules file is basically a makefile, and doesn't actually create explicit settings for the packaged files? That really needs to be done before the package is created, using the usual commands? 16:38 waldi MadCoder: yes. sigcontext.h for xx86_64 is split into two [...] 16:49 MadCoder _rene_: okay it's definitely a libc problem 16:49 dendrite Yoe: No, I can IRC @ work, I'm just too busy coding then. :-) 16:49 MadCoder I won't have tiem to deal with it right now, so please open a bug (RC :/) so that I think about Doing :) Regards, Rene
Bug#442824: missing #include?
Package: x11proto-render-dev Version: 2:0.9.2-4 Severity: grave My OOo build (which just worked fine perfectly on an up-to-date i386 before I did the dist-upgrade which upgraded x11proto-render-dev on my amd64 machine) now fails. I don't think OOo is at fault, though. OOos configure fails with [...] checking whether Xrender.h defines PictStandardA8... configure: error: no, X headers too old. make[1]: *** [stamp/build] Fehler 1 config.log says: configure:26103: checking whether Xrender.h defines PictStandardA8 configure:26136: ccache g++ -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.cpp -llpsolve55 -lhyph -lportaudio -lldap -lldap -lpq -ldb -lexpat -lcrypt -lpam 5 In file included from /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:28, from conftest.cpp:38: /usr/include/X11/extensions/render.h:29: error: 'XID' does not name a type /usr/include/X11/extensions/render.h:30: error: 'XID' does not name a type /usr/include/X11/extensions/render.h:31: error: 'XID' does not name a type /usr/include/X11/extensions/render.h:32: error: 'XID' does not name a type In file included from conftest.cpp:38: /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:47: error: 'PictFormat' does not name a type /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:69: error: 'Picture' does not name a type /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:100: error: 'GlyphSet' does not name a type /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:108: error: 'GlyphSet' does not name a type /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:116: error: 'GlyphSet' does not name a type /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:240: error: 'Picture' does not name a type /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:249: error: 'Picture' has not been declared /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:255: error: 'Picture' has not been declared /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:263: error: 'Picture' has not been declared /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:268: error: 'Picture' has not been declared /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:273: error: 'Picture' has not been declared /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:278: error: 'Picture' has not been declared /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:279: error: 'Picture' has not been declared /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:280: error: 'Picture' has not been declared /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:290: error: 'GlyphSet' does not name a type /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:293: error: 'GlyphSet' does not name a type /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:297: error: 'GlyphSet' has not been declared /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:301: error: 'GlyphSet' has not been declared /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:302: error: expected ',' or '...' before '*' token /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:310: error: 'GlyphSet' has not been declared /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h:311: error: expected ',' or '...' before '*' token I looked whete XID is defined (it wasn't in the old version): /usr/include/X11/extensions/lbxstr.h:#define XID CARD32 /usr/include/X11/extensions/lbxstr.h:#undef XID /usr/include/X11/extensions/multibuf.h:typedef XID Multibuffer; /usr/include/X11/extensions/Print.h:typedef XID XPContext; /usr/include/X11/extensions/recordstr.h:#define RECORD_XIDBASE CARD32 /usr/include/X11/extensions/recordstr.h:#undef RECORD_XIDBASE /usr/include/X11/extensions/render.h:typedef XIDGlyph; /usr/include/X11/extensions/render.h:typedef XIDGlyphSet; /usr/include/X11/extensions/render.h:typedef XIDPicture; /usr/include/X11/extensions/render.h:typedef XIDPictFormat; /usr/include/X11/extensions/sync.h:typedef XID XSyncCounter; /usr/include/X11/extensions/sync.h:typedef XID XSyncAlarm; /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xag.h:typedef XID XAppGroup; /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xfixes.h:typedef XID XserverRegion; /usr/include/X11/extensions/XKB.h:#define XkbExplicitXIDevice(c) (((c)(~0xff))==0) /usr/include/X11/extensions/XKBsrv.h:#define_XkbErrCode2(a,b) ((XID)unsigned int)(a))24)|((b)0xff))) /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrandr.h:typedef XID RROutput; /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrandr.h:typedef XID RRCrtc; /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xrandr.h:typedef XID RRMode; Looks like render.h forgets to include the right header for XID? Needless to say, 0.9.2-4 works. Regards, Rene -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages x11proto-render-dev depends on: ii x11-common1:7.2-5X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc x11proto-render-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#553370: [openoffice.org-wiki-publisher] Error during upgrade from 1.0+OOo3.1.1-2 to 1.0+OOo3.1.1-5
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 08:42:11AM +0100, Thomas Hackert wrote:
there is another message:
Richte openoffice.org-wiki-publisher ein (1.0+OOo3.1.1-5) ...
Copying: wiki-publisher.oxt
Enabling: Wiki Publisher
Enabling: help
ERROR: (com.sun.star.deployment.DeploymentException) { { Message =
An error occurred while enabling: help, Context =
(com.sun.star.uno.XInterface) @26fe540 }, Cause = (any) {
(com.sun.star.loader.CannotActivateFactoryException) { { Message =
Can not activate the factory for com.sun.star.help.HelpIndexer
because java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/lucene/analysis/cjk/CJKAnalyzer, Context =
(com.sun.star.uno.XInterface) @0 } } } }
[...]
Obviously you miss lucene; and indeed the dependency is missing... :-(
But why was it not installed, if it is a dependency?
Because it's as I said: the dependency info in the package is missing.
Got lost in 1:3.1.1-1...
Maybe ... I have installed liblucene2-java (and its dependecies) as
well as (tried to) reinstalled -wiki-publisher, but now I get a load
of messages during the reinstall ... :( OOo was not running, when I
This is correct.
Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von openoffice.org-wiki-publisher
1.0+OOo3.1.1-5 (durch
.../openoffice.org-wiki-publisher_1.0+OOo3.1.1-5_all.deb) ...
ERROR: There is no such extension deployed: com.sun.wiki-publisher
unopkg failed.
ERROR: There is no such extension deployed: com.sun.wiki-publisher
Exception details:
(com.sun.star.lang.IllegalArgumentException) { { Message = There is
no such extension deployed: com.sun.wiki-publisher, Context =
(com.sun.star.uno.XInterface) @1c47af0 }, ArgumentPosition = (short)
-1 }
unopkg failed.
Entpacke Ersatz für openoffice.org-wiki-publisher ...
Richte openoffice.org-wiki-publisher ein (1.0+OOo3.1.1-5) ...
Copying: wiki-publisher.oxt
Enabling: Wiki Publisher
Enabling: help
.Lucene: Indexing to directory
[...]
.
Optimizing ...
21 total milliseconds
Enabling: WikiExtension.xcs
Enabling: WikiEditor
Enabling: mediawiki.jar
Enabling: Addons.xcu
Enabling: ProtocolHandler.xcu
Enabling: WikiExtension.xcu
Enabling: OptionsDialog.xcu
This is correct. All unopükg output and the help indexing on registration.
See the issue I wrote in my last mail. If you want to file a minor issue
for that useless Indexing... output feel free, but it would only be fixed
in 3.2 anyway.
And I still get the same error, when I try to export an ODT file to
wiki text ... :( Am I still missing something?
No idea yet. This bug handles the upgrade/dependency problem,
nothing else :-)
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
`- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#571397: writer2latex: FTBFS: Bus error (reproducible) while building
Hi, On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:28:23AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. WTF? [copy] Copying 7 files to /build/user-writer2latex_1.0-8-amd64-7Pr9C6/writer2latex-1.0/target/classes make: *** [build-indep-stamp] Bus error dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 Build finished at 20100224-2240 So it's either ant or gcj. I don't see how writer2latex should have any business with it (except calling ant) Ccing debian-java. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#571397: writer2latex: FTBFS: Bus error (reproducible) while building
reassign 571397 ant retitle (reproducible) Bus error while building writer2latex found 571397 1.8.0-2 thanks Hi, On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 01:15:53PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: [copy] Copying 7 files to /build/user-writer2latex_1.0-8-amd64-7Pr9C6/writer2latex-1.0/target/classes make: *** [build-indep-stamp] Bus error dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 Build finished at 20100224-2240 So it's either ant or gcj. I don't see how writer2latex should have any business with it (except calling ant) Yeah, builds fine with squeezes ant. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#571728: Deletion od /var/spool/openoffice helped
Hi, On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 04:54:16PM +0100, Wojciech Zabolotny CERN wrote: I have found the http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566189 (maybe my bug is just duplicate of this one?) Yes. I have removed the whole /var/spool/openoffice directory, and it helped. qed. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#572107: openoffice.org: openoffice crashes at startup
Hi, On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 07:32:14PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: Besides that, wtf do you use 3.2.0-2 on testing? I mean, it is not in testing. There very well might be some increased dep on KDE missing (of course sid packages were built with sids KDE) - but that would be KDE bug But that can't be it, the KDE4 libs in both testing and unstable are 4.3.4. I bet you installed using apt-get -t unstable. Did you also upgrade openoffice.org-kde? Hmm, you must, -kde has a = dep which otherwise would not be fullfillable. As said, it works here. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#572107: openoffice.org: openoffice crashes at startup
reassign 572107 openoffice.org-kde found 572107 1:3.2.0-2 tag 572107 + moreinfo tag 572107 + unreproducible thanks On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 12:52:35PM -0300, pedro bulach gapski wrote: Package: openoffice.org Version: 1:3.2.0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Nonsense. If at all, this probably would be a bug in the kde plugin (which is shown below) which would be openoffice.org-kde. OpenOffice just crashes at statup on mu KDE desktop. Backtrace follows. Not here. (plain sid, amd64 - I don't have a i386/sid/kde4 combo aqnd using KDE4 from a i386 chroot is ummm...) Besides that, wtf do you use 3.2.0-2 on testing? I mean, it is not in testing. There very well might be some increased dep on KDE missing (of course sid packages were built with sids KDE) - but that would be KDE bug I bet you installed using apt-get -t unstable. Did you also upgrade openoffice.org-kde? Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#572107: openoffice.org: openoffice crashes at startup
[ please send sane mails. No HTML please ] On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 04:36:16PM -0300, Pedro Bulach Gapski wrote: I can not tell them apart. No? should be fixed. My guess, however, is at a kde integration issue. If you guess that, how is it hard to see openoffice.org-kde? Anyway, 3.1.1-16 was fine here, apart from the sheet drag-n-drop. OTOH, 3.2 does not load. It only crashes and pops the recovery window at every load. The gdb bt shows a SIGABRT, and maybe that was generated by an abort() or assert() in the code. If it does happen to be a testing/sid issue, at least some dependencies should be fixed. [...] Yeah, but I currently don't see what those should be. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#572107: openoffice.org: openoffice crashes at startup
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 06:28:57PM -0300, Pedro Bulach Gapski wrote: On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org wrote: [ please send sane mails. No HTML please ] sure. My mistake. Sorry. On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 04:36:16PM -0300, Pedro Bulach Gapski wrote: I can not tell them apart. No? I purged all openoffice packages and the $HOME/.openoffice/ for a clean room env, and reinstalled 3.2, this time without openoffice.org-kde. The apps run fine. So this is really a problem with package openoffice.org-kde. That is no valid test. Too many things involved. I mean, it can easily be that either a reinstall or deleting .openoffice.org(!) fixed it already and it doesn't have to do with -kde. (or that you left out -kde) Please do one step after one... Does it come back if you install -kde? Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#571397: still happens
reopen 571397 thanks Hi, the changelog of 1.8.0-3 suggests moving -gcj fixes this. Unfortunately it doesn't; it fails with the same error. $ dpkg -l ant* Gewünscht=Unbekannt/Installieren/R=Entfernen/P=Vollständig Löschen/Halten | Status=Nicht/Installiert/Config/U=Entpackt/Fehlgeschl. Konfiguration/ Halb installiert/Trigger erWartet/Trigger anhängig |/ Fehler?=(kein)/R=Neuinstallation notwendig (Status, Fehler: GROSS=schlecht) ||/ Name VersionBeschreibung +++-==-==- ii ant1.8.0-2Java based build tool like make ii ant-contrib1.0~b3+svn177- collection of tasks, types and other tools f un ant-dockeine(keine Beschreibung vorhanden) un ant-gcjkeine(keine Beschreibung vorhanden) ii ant-optional 1.8.0-2Java based build tool like make - optional l un ant-optional-g keine(keine Beschreibung vorhanden) un ant1.7 keine(keine Beschreibung vorhanden) rc ant1.7-gcj 1.7.1-5Java based build tool like make un ant1.7-optiona keine(keine Beschreibung vorhanden) rc ant1.7-optiona 1.7.1-5Java based build tool like make - API docume un antlr keine(keine Beschreibung vorhanden) Grüße/Regards, René -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#571397: still happens
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 06:02:14PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: Rene Engelhard schrieb: the changelog of 1.8.0-3 suggests moving -gcj fixes this. Unfortunately it doesn't; it fails with the same error. ... ii ant1.8.0-2Java based build tool like make ... ii ant-optional 1.8.0-2Java based build tool like make - optional l How did you find a bug in 1.8.0-3 when 1.8.0-2 is actually installed? 1.8.0-3s changelog claims that removing -gcj fixes this bug: From the changelog: * Do no longer build the -gcj packages because of bus error in gij. Such packages are provided by the ant1.7 source package. (Closes: #570889) I removed -gcj in my 1.8.0-2 and the bug was still there. So either removing -gcj does not fix the bug or someting in addition needs to be done. In the second case I apolofize and wait for -3, but... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#571771: Couldn't configure pre-depend ... probably a dependency cycle
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 08:09:49PM +0100, Gábor Gombás wrote: Just a mee too in response to if anyone can still find it again: # aptitude safe-upgrade And dist-upgrade (or full-upgrade I think is what aptitude calls it)? Who said that safe-upgrade will work in all dependency cases? Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#571771: Couldn't configure pre-depend ... probably a dependency cycle
reopen 571771 severity 571771 important retitle 571771 Couldn't configure pre-depend ... probably a dependency cycle (when using aptitude) tag 571771 + help tag 571771 - unreproducible tag 571771 - moreinfo thanks Hi, On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 11:00:45PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 08:09:49PM +0100, Gábor Gombás wrote: Just a mee too in response to if anyone can still find it again: # aptitude safe-upgrade And dist-upgrade (or full-upgrade I think is what aptitude calls it)? Who said that safe-upgrade will work in all dependency cases? OK, also tried with full-upgrade. Also fails. (Also when installing sids aptitude first, though) apt-get dist-upgrade *does* work, though. So the question is what aptitude tries to do better so that it fails I reopen the bug but set it to important as a easy workaround (using apt-get) exists. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#573787: openclipart-openoffice.org: Uninstallable with openoffice.org in testing
tag 573787 + squeeze thanks Hi, On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:25:37PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: The following packages have unmet dependencies: openclipart-openoffice.org: Conflicts: openoffice.org-common ( 1:3.2) but 1:3.1.1-16 is to be installed E: Broken packages I'm setting severity to serious under the belief that the purpose of the openclipart-openoffice.org package is to be installed with the openoffice.org package, and this is currently not possible. True. But this testing-only and that only because britney let it into testing despite this condiditon.. Will automatically fix itself when OOo 3.2 enters testing. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#584272: Can't start pidgin: bad flagvector, (Pidgin:4135): Json-CRITICAL, jack server is not running
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote:
1259.08 ari iulian: the problem is in hunspell
1336.54 iulian ari: Alright... how did you find out?
1344.18 ari iulian: [2]google.com/codesearch.. maybe you should ask him
to get a backtrace
OK, ari probably means google.com/codesearch pointing to hunspells
hashmgr.cxx. Which has the following:
int HashMgr::decode_flags(unsigned short ** result, char * flags, FileMgr * af)
{
int len;
switch (flag_mode) {
case FLAG_LONG: { // two-character flags (1x2yZz - 1x 2y Zz)
len = strlen(flags);
if (len%2 == 1) HUNSPELL_WARNING(stderr, error: line %d: bad
flagvector\n, af-getlinenum());
[...]
I doubt that it's a problem of hunspell - but if it is it's a dictionary bug.
Paul, I see you use hu_HU as locale, are you also using the hungarian
myspell/hunspell dictionary with enchant? If yes, which one? Does it
work if you exchange them? Or remove the one you use=
But it's just a warning there, not a crash And given that no backtrace
or info sent by Paul includes hunspell
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
`- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#584272: Can't start pidgin: bad flagvector, (Pidgin:4135): Json-CRITICAL, jack server is not running
[ please ALWAYS CC the bug so that stuff is recorded in the BTS ] Hi, On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:06:21PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote: Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote: 1259.08 ari iulian: the problem is in hunspell I doubt that it's a problem of hunspell - but if it is it's a dictionary bug. Paul, I see you use hu_HU as locale, are you also using the hungarian myspell/hunspell dictionary with enchant? If yes, which one? Does it work if you exchange them? Or remove the one you use= I have installed hunspell version 1.2.11-1 but I haven't installed hunspell-hu. And myspell-hu? Should I install it? Anyway I'm going to install it now. First of all I ask you *what* you have installed. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#584272: Can't start pidgin: bad flagvector, (Pidgin:4135): Json-CRITICAL, jack server is not running
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 10:30:02PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote: On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:06:21PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote: Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote: 1259.08 ari iulian: the problem is in hunspell I doubt that it's a problem of hunspell - but if it is it's a dictionary bug. Paul, I see you use hu_HU as locale, are you also using the hungarian myspell/hunspell dictionary with enchant? If yes, which one? Does it work if you exchange them? Or remove the one you use= I have installed hunspell version 1.2.11-1 but I haven't installed hunspell-hu. And myspell-hu? I have installed myspell-hu version 0.99.4-1.3 Aha. So myspell-hu is buggy. Should I install it? Anyway I'm going to install it now. First of all I ask you *what* you have installed. OK I will wait your advices! OK, and now please install hunspell-hu (and remove myspell-hu; should happen automatically) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#584272: Can't start pidgin: bad flagvector, (Pidgin:4135): Json-CRITICAL, jack server is not running
Hi, On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 01:52:35PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote: I have now installed hunspell-hu (and removed automatically myspell-hu). I run 'gdb pidgin' command and wait until my HDD stop and Pidgins window never come visible. At that moment I hit Ctrl-C and get BackTrace: So you have exactly the same error message as in the initial report with it? Also with the bad flagvector? I heared that Window Maker window manager that I'm using has a bug when try to run an application with an icon (or so). Maybe the bug is in Wmaker? No. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#584272: Can't start pidgin: bad flagvector, (Pidgin:4135): Json-CRITICAL, jack server is not running
Hi, On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 02:46:36PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote: Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org writes: On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 01:52:35PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote: I have now installed hunspell-hu (and removed automatically myspell-hu). I run 'gdb pidgin' command and wait until my HDD stop and Pidgins window never come visible. At that moment I hit Ctrl-C and get BackTrace: So you have exactly the same error message as in the initial report with it? Also with the bad flagvector? No, now I have not any error messages, either that one for jack server(?) (I can't remember anymore) nor bad flagvector. Aha, so it's not the same bug as we see here. Pidgin just run, but it's window remain invisible. The full backtrace and output from xterm is: Tell that the pidgin boys, not me. Does this backtrace helpful? Ask the pidgin guys? (Which you didn't Cc) Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#584272: Can't start pidgin: bad flagvector, (Pidgin:4135): Json-CRITICAL, jack server is not running
clone 584272 -1 reassign -1 myspell-hu severity -1 critical found -1 0.99.4-1.3 retile -1 dictionary broken, makes hunspell crash (and e.g. enchant/pidgin) reassign 584272 libhunspell-1.2-0 retitle 584272 crashes with malformed dictionaries severity 584272 important block -1 by 476677 thanks Hi, On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 12:02:14AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 10:30:02PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote: On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:06:21PM +0200, Paul Chany wrote: Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote: 1259.08 ari iulian: the problem is in hunspell I doubt that it's a problem of hunspell - but if it is it's a dictionary bug. Paul, I see you use hu_HU as locale, are you also using the hungarian myspell/hunspell dictionary with enchant? If yes, which one? Does it work if you exchange them? Or remove the one you use= I have installed hunspell version 1.2.11-1 but I haven't installed hunspell-hu. And myspell-hu? I have installed myspell-hu version 0.99.4-1.3 Aha. So myspell-hu is buggy. For that case, for reference, we had a discussion on IRC yesterday about that: 17:50 _rene_ ari: looks like a pattern bug to me 17:50 _rene_ eh 17:50 _rene_ s/pattern/dictionary/ 17:51 -!- nthykier [~nthyk...@217.237.166.202] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds] 17:52 -!- guus [g...@234-166.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net] has quit [Quit: Changing server] 17:52 ari right 17:59 _rene_ bu still this is just a HUNSPELL_WARNING(), not a crash which should prevent pidgin from doing something 17:59 _rene_ so I am still not convinced it's a hunspell bug. yes, the dict probably is buggy and hunspell complains, but... 18:00 _rene_ Paul sent no bt with anything hunspellish in it 18:01 ron after its done warning, does it return a NULLish (or just invalid) something back to pidgin? 18:02 ron error handling isn't among bigstar's strong points [...] host closed the connection] 18:05 _rene_ ron: -1 afaics if at all, but that only if malloc() fails. See http://www.google.com/codesearch/p?hl=de#L2WY3uEXPxg/trunk/Hunspell/src/hunspell/hashmgr.cxxq=bad%20flagvectorsa=Ncd=2ct=rc 18:05 zumbi is BTS slowish/dead? 18:08 _rene_ ron: line 505 ff 18:09 ron _rene_: yeah, found it, but that's the most fucked up interface ever. I can't use the normal browser text search in it. yay goog 18:09 ron so what if len == 0 ? 18:09 ron or at least gets turned into it after being 1 18:11 -!- marga [~ma...@190.55.191.246] has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds] 18:11 -!- marga (Margarita Manterola) [~ma...@190.55.191.246] has joined #debian-devel 18:12 -!- sabdfl [~sab...@loquat.canonical.com] has quit [Quit: Leaving.] 18:13 _rene_ ron: yeah, that could be.. 18:14 ron _rene_: or any odd length maybe ...len / 2 * sizeof(short) isn't big enough to hold len if anything tries 18:15 ron dumping the value of len when it fails doesn't sound like useless information to follow in any case 18:16 _rene_ yeah, please write to that bug, will forward that upstream when we know which dict he uses 18:16 ron ari: ^ 18:18 ari i really have no idea at this point if the warning is related to the crash at all 18:19 ari frankly the rest of the replies are just confusing 18:21 -!- sabdfl (Mark Shuttleworth) [~sab...@loquat.canonical.com] has joined #debian-devel 18:22 _rene_ ari: ack 18:22 _rene_ ron: you can't do? ;) Cloning the bug to myspell-hu, making it critical as it breaks unrelated software and downgrading this one to important. Will talk with upstream... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#585979: openoffice.org-thesaurus-fr: French thesaurus does not work on anything other than fr_FR
severity 585979 wishlist tag 585979 + pending thanks On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:34:37PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: Package: openoffice.org-thesaurus-fr Version: 3.2.0~rc2-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable And why on earth is this a grave bug? Correct, it is not. How on earth does it make unusable? Does it work in fr_FR? Yes, it does. +/usr/share/mythes/thes_fr_FR.idx /usr/share/mythes/th_fr_BE_v2.idx +/usr/share/mythes/thes_fr_FR.dat /usr/share/mythes/th_fr_BE_v2.dat +/usr/share/mythes/thes_fr_FR.idx /usr/share/mythes/th_fr_CA_v2.idx +/usr/share/mythes/thes_fr_FR.dat /usr/share/mythes/th_fr_CA_v2.dat +/usr/share/mythes/thes_fr_FR.idx /usr/share/mythes/th_fr_CH_v2.idx +/usr/share/mythes/thes_fr_FR.dat /usr/share/mythes/th_fr_CH_v2.dat +/usr/share/mythes/thes_fr_FR.idx /usr/share/mythes/th_fr_LU_v2.idx +/usr/share/mythes/thes_fr_FR.dat /usr/share/mythes/th_fr_LU_v2.dat +/usr/share/mythes/thes_fr_FR.idx /usr/share/mythes/th_fr_MC_v2.idx +/usr/share/mythes/thes_fr_FR.dat /usr/share/mythes/th_fr_MC_v2.dat Already done so in the 3.2.1 packages (which haven't been uploaded yet due to other reasons, unfortunately) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#561498: log of a rerun
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 04:02:43PM +0100, Anton Ertl wrote: Anyway, you can find the log (created with xterm -l) of the whole session on http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/tmp/Xterm.log.smaug.2010.01.10.13.23.18.28970 | Preparing to replace openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:2.4.1+dfsg-1 (using .../openoffice.org-emailmerge_1%3a3.1.1-8_all.deb) ... | Cannot find /proc/version - is /proc mounted? | javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment! Eh, and you believe that is supported? (But probably is not related) | dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org-emailmerge_1%3a3.1.1-8_all.deb (--unpack): | subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Hmm. The preinst fails. Was a OOo running at that time? The preinst tries to show a error debconf message when it detects a OOo running. For some reason (I just saw it in a chroot), it does not show the debconf message in clean chroots but just fails. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#561498: log of a rerun
Hi, On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 11:37:13PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: The preinst tries to show a error debconf message when it detects a OOo running. For some reason (I just saw it in a chroot), it does not show the debconf message in clean chroots but just fails. Which turned out to be pbuilder setting DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive (what is your setting in the system, please?) and thus not showing the error. unsetting it made it work. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566189: openoffice.org: Openoffice crashes on startup
Hi, On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:38:48PM +0100, Ferry Toth wrote: After upgrading today from openoffice.org (1:3.1.1-8) to 1:3.1.1-14, Openoffice crashes immediately on startup. Starting from the command line lets me pick the document type, then crashes as well with: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'com::sun::star::deployment::DeploymentException' Deleting .openoffice.org did not help. We just had the same case on IRC and it turned out to be a corrupt file. 2:13 _rene_ crashes after/when reading this: 22:13 _rene_ 15252 open(/var/spool/openoffice/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp. 22:13 _rene_ deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend/Linux_x86_.rdb, O_RDWR) = 56 22:13 _rene_ try to remove it 22:13 _rene_ (and then reinstall all extension packages) He removed the whole directory (com.sun.star.comp.deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend; you can also remove everything below cache if you wish) and then it works. (Of course if you want all the extensions then you need to reinstall the packages; ignore the errors about not existing extensions before unpacking, they're expected in this case) I'll now try to debootstrap an old squeeze wizth 1:3.1.1-8, install OOo with some extensions and upgrade... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566189: openoffice.org: Openoffice crashes on startup
forwarded 566189 Thorsten Behrens t...@openoffice.org retitle 566189 openoffice.org: Openoffice crashes on startup with DeploymentException thanks Hi, On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:09:25AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:38:48PM +0100, Ferry Toth wrote: After upgrading today from openoffice.org (1:3.1.1-8) to 1:3.1.1-14, Openoffice crashes immediately on startup. Starting from the command line lets me pick the document type, then crashes as well with: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'com::sun::star::deployment::DeploymentException' Deleting .openoffice.org did not help. We just had the same case on IRC and it turned out to be a corrupt file. ... which according to upstream is a real bug. (set fwd) He removed the whole directory (com.sun.star.comp.deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend; you can also remove everything below cache if you wish) and then it works. (Of course if you want all the extensions then you need to reinstall the packages; ignore the errors about not existing extensions before unpacking, they're expected in this case) Use this hackaround for now. I'll now try to debootstrap an old squeeze wizth 1:3.1.1-8, install OOo with some extensions and upgrade... Interestingly I can't reproduce this in a 1:3.1.1-8-1:3.1.1-14 upgrade (installed: openoffice.org openoffice.org-sdbc-postgresql) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566189: openoffice.org: Openoffice crashes on startup
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:53:10AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: I'll now try to debootstrap an old squeeze wizth 1:3.1.1-8, install OOo with some extensions and upgrade... Interestingly I can't reproduce this in a 1:3.1.1-8-1:3.1.1-14 upgrade (installed: openoffice.org openoffice.org-sdbc-postgresql) upstream can't either with the rdbs I gave him from above attempt. Can you do a find /var/lib/openoffice /var/spool/openoffice -name *.rdb and send those to us? (And eventually also from your user config) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#565932: libenchant-dev: missing dependencies
[ disclaimer: I am not the maintainer of enchant ] Hi, On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 02:18:57PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: While trying to build a package that uses enchant but does not directly use glib I noticed that libenchant-dev is only depending on libenchant1c2a and not on for example libglib2.0-dev (and possibly others). /usr/include/enchant-provider.h #includes glibh, I don't think we need the various -dev packages for the various engines in there. So libglib2.0-dev should be enough. Grüße/Regards, René -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#559991: libreadline-java: diff for NMU version 0.8.0.1-8.2
tags 559991 + patch thanks Dear maintainer, The fix for this is quite easy, something changed in gcj-jdk so that you explicitely need to add a -I for .../include/linux. I've prepared an NMU for libreadline-java (versioned as 0.8.0.1-8.2) and will upload iti. Grüße/Regards, Rene diff -u libreadline-java-0.8.0.1/src/native/Makefile libreadline-java-0.8.0.1/src/native/Makefile --- libreadline-java-0.8.0.1/src/native/Makefile +++ libreadline-java-0.8.0.1/src/native/Makefile @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ LIB_EXT := dll CFLAGS=-DWIN32=$(WIN32) -D__IBMC__ else -INCLUDES = -I $(JAVAINCLUDE) -I $(JAVANATINC) +INCLUDES = -I $(JAVAINCLUDE) -I $(JAVAINCLUDE)/linux -I $(JAVANATINC) -I $(JAVANATINC)/linux LIBPATH = -L/usr/lib/termcap JavaReadline_LIBS = -lreadline -ltermcap -lhistory JavaEditline_LIBS = -ledit -ltermcap diff -u libreadline-java-0.8.0.1/debian/changelog libreadline-java-0.8.0.1/debian/changelog --- libreadline-java-0.8.0.1/debian/changelog +++ libreadline-java-0.8.0.1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +libreadline-java (0.8.0.1-8.2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload + * also include /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include/linux (closes: #559991) + + -- Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:46:59 +0100 + libreadline-java (0.8.0.1-8.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload.
Bug#549047: magyarispell: diff for NMU version 0.99.4-2.2
tags 549047 + patch thanks Dear maintainer, I think this bug was neglected too long; the workaround is quite easy: build with LANG=C. I don't speak hungarian, though, so I don't know whwther the .hash files are correct with this built too (.aff doesn't differ) IUf you want me to NMU I can upload.. Grüße/Regards, Rene diff -u magyarispell-0.99.4/debian/changelog magyarispell-0.99.4/debian/changelog --- magyarispell-0.99.4/debian/changelog +++ magyarispell-0.99.4/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +magyarispell (0.99.4-2.2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * build with LANG=C to work around build failure (closes: #549047) + + -- Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:00:04 +0100 + magyarispell (0.99.4-1.2) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. diff -u magyarispell-0.99.4/debian/spellhtml.debhelper.log magyarispell-0.99.4/debian/spellhtml.debhelper.log --- magyarispell-0.99.4/debian/spellhtml.debhelper.log +++ magyarispell-0.99.4/debian/spellhtml.debhelper.log @@ -3,0 +4,3 @@ +dh_undocumented +dh_undocumented +dh_undocumented diff -u magyarispell-0.99.4/debian/rules magyarispell-0.99.4/debian/rules --- magyarispell-0.99.4/debian/rules +++ magyarispell-0.99.4/debian/rules @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ # Here are commands to compile the package. #$(MAKE) all - $(MAKE) ispell myspell + LANG=C $(MAKE) ispell myspell touch build-stamp
Bug#566189: openoffice.org: Openoffice crashes on startup
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:11:38PM +0100, Ferry Toth wrote: I get: find /var/lib/openoffice /var/spool/openoffice -name *.rdb /var/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/services.rdb /var/spool/openoffice/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend/common_.rdb /var/spool/openoffice/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend/Linux_x86_.rdb /var/spool/openoffice/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend/common.rdb /var/spool/openoffice/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend/Linux_x86.rdb Good, please send them :-) What do you need from my user config? Sorry, I don't know where to look and what to look for. Any .rdb there if existing/possible. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#552768: patches
Hi, I don't think Hidekis patches are not really solving the problem. It fixes the subdir-in-usr-bin problem but it creates new one by moving quite gerenic names like cserver/tserver etc. to /usr/bin. What about using /usr/lib/kWnn4/bin or so? (That is allowed by the FHS). Though I don't know the exact binaries are called (but they can't really we found right now anyway with the current subdir unless it it in $PATH) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566189: openoffice.org: Openoffice crashes on startup
Hi, On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:08:37PM +0100, Ferry Toth wrote: Moving the folder /var/spool/openoffice/uno_packages/cache/registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend/ out of the way let's Openoffice start without crashing. Yes (as guessed). And I try it again: PLEASE SEND US THIS FILE so this can be debugged. Going to the extension manager shows some extensions with unknown status: mailmerge.py postgresql-sdbc-0.7.6.zip Sun Report builder. My other installed packages report no problem: LanguageTool Nederlands thesaurus Nederlandstalige spellingcontrole... svgimport Of course, that rdb contains some of those infos) Seems I am up and running again, thanks. Hope not to many users will face this problem. Well, many might, so we need the file. Really. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566606: openoffice.org: package synopsis for some l10n packages exceeds limit set by policy
severity 566606 important tag 566606 + wontfix thanks Hi, On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:44:53PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: Package: openoffice.org Version: 1:3.1.1-14 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 3.4.1 Wrong. This is should, not must. How is this serious? :) The l10n packages for OpenOffice.org have a synopsis containing the locale name, as generated by ‘ooo-build/bin/openoffice-xlate-lang’. This can lead to some packages with a synopsis that exceeds the length set by Debian policy §3.4.1. True. The attached Bazaar change bundle (made against the ‘unstable’ repository, at r1472) addresses this bug. It does so by generating package synopses that, instead of the locale name, use the (shorter) locale code. No, please not. Besides that it just would duplicate info from the package file, who knows what bo is? (if bo actually worked). Noone except Tibetans, probably. But it should be obvious what the package is *without* knowing all the locales. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566644: upgrading oo.o-hyphenation-?? from lenny to squeeze fails
retitle 566644 Pre-Depends: on openoffice.org-common makes lenny-squeeze upgrades fail thanks Hi, On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:25:30PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: as discussed on IRC and RL: upgrading openoffice.org-hyphenation-it, -hu, -zu, -sl, -af and -de (at least) from lenny to squeeze fails like this: .. Get:234 http://ftp.fi.debian.org squeeze/main liblapack3gf 3.2.1-2 [4369kB] Get:235 http://ftp.fi.debian.org squeeze/main libneon27 0.29.0-1 [166kB] Get:236 http://ftp.fi.debian.org squeeze/main ttf-liberation 1.05.2.20091019-4 [1031kB] Get:237 http://ftp.fi.debian.org squeeze/main makedev 2.3.1-89 [42.4kB] Fetched 235MB in 6s (37.2MB/s) E: Couldn't configure pre-depend openoffice.org-common for openoffice.org-writer2latex, probably a dependency cycle. 1m20.2s ERROR: Command failed (status=100): ['chroot', '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpsEb3Ml', 'apt-get', '-yf', 'dist-upgrade'] You said I should remind you that openoffice.org-writer2latex is too blame. The problem seems to be that openoffice.org-writer2latex Pre-Depends: on openoffice.org-common because it used the shared openoffice.org/running debconf template and apt-get apparently doesn't know how to handle this on lenny-sid upgrades (aptitude removes openoffice.org-writer2latex) I think this should be fixable by making this a shared/openofficeorg-running template and mirroring the stuff in openoffice.org-writer2latex (and openoffice.org-coooder; but that one's not in lenny) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566829: crashes on startup: pand:$OOO_BASE_DIR/program/cairocanvas.uno.so: No such file or directory.
tag 566829 + moreinfo tag 566829 + unreproducible thanls Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:47:26AM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: $ soffice Who says soffice is the launcher to use? (But OK, shouldn't matter) Error while mapping shared library sections: WTF is this? pand:$OOO_BASE_DIR/program/cairocanvas.uno.so: No such file or directory. That file seriously *is* in the package. And I just started OOo out of a testing chroot on a sid system (amd64, though) just yesterday. (And that also works with testing/i386 chroot) Do you have some security features enabled somewhere? What happens if you disabled them? What I also would try is ro check your .rdb files, maybe this is an other symptom of #566189/#566062/#565667... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566829: crashes on startup: pand:$OOO_BASE_DIR/program/cairocanvas.uno.so: No such file or directory.
Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:27:30PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: Do you have some security features enabled somewhere? What happens if you disabled them? What I also would try is ro check your .rdb files, maybe this is an other symptom of #566189/#566062/#565667... Oh, and please try with 3.2, too - though I don't see why this should matter, but.. - as that will be squeezes version if everthing goes OK (note downgrades will be tricky, so so might want to save your user config and/or use a chroot) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566829: crashes on startup: pand:$OOO_BASE_DIR/program/cairocanvas.uno.so: No such file or directory.
forwarded 566829 Thorsten Behrens t...@openoffice.org thanks Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:47:26AM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: $ soffice Error while mapping shared library sections: pand:$OOO_BASE_DIR/program/cairocanvas.uno.so: No such file or directory. upstream means that this is an other incarnation of a broken .rdb file. (That libstore is involved here made it somehow likely) Seee the bugs I showed in my last mail. (You just removed the extensions one, there's far more) This should be expand, and then OOo explands it to the location... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566829: crashes on startup: pand:$OOO_BASE_DIR/program/cairocanvas.uno.so: No such file or directory.
Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:21:07PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:47:26AM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: $ soffice Error while mapping shared library sections: pand:$OOO_BASE_DIR/program/cairocanvas.uno.so: No such file or directory. upstream means that this is an other incarnation of a broken .rdb file. (That libstore is involved here made it somehow likely) Seee the bugs I showed in my last mail. (You just removed the extensions one, there's far more) What I forgot here: please send us /var/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/services.rdb Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566832: openoffice.org: Any OpenOffice application crashes on startup
Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:50:51PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: Please also check /var/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/services.rdb (eventually ^ program/ Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566832: openoffice.org: Any OpenOffice application crashes on startup
forwarded 566832 Thorsten Behrens t...@openoffice.org thanks On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:25:15PM +0100, Ferry Toth wrote: The forwarding adres is incorrect I think: [1]...@openoffixe.org oops, thanks Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566829: crashes on startup: pand:$OOO_BASE_DIR/program/cairocanvas.uno.so: No such file or directory.
Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:21:30PM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: fixed 566829 1:3.2.0~rc3-1 thanks [...] 3.2 in experimental works. Actually that might only be by chance... (as the upgrade of course adds a new services.rdb, and this time a not-broken regcomp created a not-broken rdb...) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566832: reinstalling solved this problem
Hi, On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:35:28PM +0100, MP wrote: I think I encountered same problem, after installing new version in sid (amd64), splash screen briefly blinks and then I got Segmentation fault I have Openoffice.org version 1:3.1.1-14 However, reinstalling both openoffice.org and openoffice.org-core seem to solve the issue for me: #apt-get install --reinstall openoffice.org this is a no-op. openoffice.org doesn't contain any OOo files. #apt-get install --reinstall openoffice.org-core I know, but thanks. It's only a workaround, though, not a fix for the underlying problem (which *is* a bug in the package) (And if you wanted to reach the submitter, you didn't, n...@bugs.debian.org does *not* go to it) The stacktrace from crash: (gdb) bt #0 0x7fffe88ec43b in ?? () from /usr/lib/ure/lib/libstore.so.3 #1 0x7fffe88f4da9 in ?? () from /usr/lib/ure/lib/libstore.so.3 #2 0x7fffe88fa9c2 in store_openStream () from /usr/lib/ure/lib/libstore.so.3 qed. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#558240: followup
clone 558240 -1 severity -1 important reassign -1 libmysqlcppconn4,libmysqlcppconn-stlport4 found -1 1.1.0~r786-2 retitle -1 missing visibility markup makes OOo unable to catch exception - crash block 558240 by -1 tag -1 + pending tag 558240 + pending thanks On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:27:49PM +1100, Tim Richardson wrote: I get this on two servers; one local and therefore using the latest sid packages, but one on my webhoster which is a slightly older version of mysql. So it's not mysql dependant. OK. Repeat but this time choose native driver in step 2. After the password dialog is completed, crash. Same for my localhost server. Upstream had an idea: --- snip --- IIRC, there's one piece on our patch which dealt with this, search for the class declaration of SQLException (and other exceptions): There, we replace CPPCONN_PUBLIC_FUNC with CPPCONN_PUBLIC_EXCEPTION, which ensures the proper export for those exception's type information. I assume you're building with-system-mysqlcppconn. I'd say you need apply some equivalent of this patch to your system-mysqlcppconn. Basically, CPPCONN_PUBLIC_EXCEPTION is defined as SAL_DLLPUBLIC_EXPORT, but not sure what this actually is for your compiler. Probably '__attribute__ ((visibility(default))) --- snip --- and it seems it was it. We need the patch in our libmysqlcppconn4 and OOo needs to be rebuilt. Already verified on amd64 and a rebuilt 1:3.2.0~ooo320m6-1 that it doesn't crash anymore. Need to verify this on i386, too but I think that should be it. Grüße/Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560788: Another followup, to be clear
Hi, On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:19:17PM +1100, Tim Richardson wrote: Sorry, just to be clear: I did already have the package libmysqlclient16 installed. The error goes away only after installing package libmysqlclient-dev (5.1.41-3) Ah, I see. Upstream strikes again by looking for .so instead of .so.X Which of course requires -dev to be installed... (Anyway, the dependency to libmysqlclient16 is also missing either way) Grüße/Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560788: your mail
Hi, On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:14:05PM +1100, Tim Richardson wrote: The file is in the package libmysqlclient-dev (5.1.41-3) which I did not have installed and was not a dependency (I suppose it shouldn't be, being a -dev). Yeah, as said in the other mail upstrema has the habit of relying on .so instead of so.X... Will fix that, although this will cause some headaches for the lenny backport; ah well.. I filed against openoffice.org-base because Base is where I saw the bug, and I assumed it may be related to the efforts of fix the last bug report I filed regarding trying to use the native connector in Base. And those were only affecting -mysql-connector, too because *that* had the bug not Base. Base has no native mysql support without -mysql-connector. Grüße/Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#584322: openoffice.org-writer: writer crashes on startup
severity 584322 important tag 584322 + unreproducible tag 584322 + moreinfo thanks On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 03:23:40AM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: Package: openoffice.org-writer Version: 1:3.2.0-10 Severity: grave Tags: sid That means 3.2.0-9 from testing works?. (That's what those infos say) Justification: renders package unusable For you maybe. There have been 7 days now without a report like this so it doesn't seem to be a general problem. Inflated severities are not good. Nvidia? ATIs fglrx? compiz? Something else broken in use? ckna...@trelane:~$ oowriter ckna...@trelane:~$ X-Error: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) Major opcode: 59 (X_SetClipRectangles) Resource ID: 0x4e000ac Serial No:5542 (5542) -- Works here (tm) I've been trying to find a reference to X_SetClipRectangles in config files, but And why should that be a config option? That's a function in X... Which leads to the question: What X driver do you use? This is a fully up-to-date sid system running on a T61p Thinkpad. dito, on R400. René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#584545: unsatifisable = in .shlibs, makes -gcj packages uninstallable
Package: libgcj-bc Version: 4.4.4-1 Severity: serious I was just testing OpenOffice.org 1:3.2.1-1 (built on uptodate sid): r...@frodo:~/Debian/Pakete/openoffice.org$ sudo dpkg -i openoffice.org-gcj_3.2.1-1_amd64.deb Selecting previously deselected package openoffice.org-gcj. (Reading database ... 328585 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking openoffice.org-gcj (from openoffice.org-gcj_3.2.1-1_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of openoffice.org-gcj: openoffice.org-gcj depends on libgcj-bc (= 4.4.4-2); however: Version of libgcj-bc on system is 4.4.4-1. dpkg: error processing openoffice.org-gcj (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: openoffice.org-gcj Let's see: $ cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libgcj-bc.shlibs libgcj_bc 1 libgcj-bc (= 4.4.4-2) $ rmadison -s unstable libgcj-bc libgcj-bc |4.4.4-1 | unstable | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc So the .shlibs adds a dependency on a non-existing version and thus makes built -gcj packages uninstallable. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages libgcj-bc depends on: ii libgcj-common 1:4.4.4-1 Java runtime library (common files ii libgcj10 4.4.4-2Java runtime library for use with libgcj-bc recommends no packages. libgcj-bc suggests no packages. -- no debconf information Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#584545: unsatifisable = in .shlibs, makes -gcj packages uninstallable
Hi, On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 03:38:41PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: So the .shlibs adds a dependency on a non-existing version and thus makes built -gcj packages uninstallable. Thankfully any upload of gcc-defaults would most probably automagically fix this, but I'd still prefer it saying = 4.4.4-1. René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#584272: Can't start pidgin: bad flagvector, (Pidgin:4135): Json-CRITICAL, jack server is not running
Hi, On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:02:25PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote: I have reassigned this bug to hunspell based on the discussion I have just had with Ari Pollak on IRC. Aha. And what was this discussion about? Can you please mention it here and why you and/or Ari think it's a hunspell bug? Currently this bug has no suitable info except not mentioning hunspell at all but pidgin and jack Grüße/Regards, René -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#584272: Can't start pidgin: bad flagvector, (Pidgin:4135): Json-CRITICAL, jack server is not running
Hi, On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 08:23:55PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:02:25PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote: I have reassigned this bug to hunspell based on the discussion I have just had with Ari Pollak on IRC. Aha. And what was this discussion about? Can you please mention it here and why you and/or Ari think it's a hunspell bug? Currently this bug has no suitable info except not mentioning hunspell at all but pidgin and jack Especially as neither pidgin nor pidgin-facebookchat is linked against hunspell. (Ok, there gtkspell - enchant - hunspell, but whether hunspell is used then depends on what you use with enchant) Grüße/Regards, René -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#584272: Can't start pidgin: bad flagvector, (Pidgin:4135): Json-CRITICAL, jack server is not running
Hi, On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:35:11PM +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote: 1245.24 iulian ari: OK. It seems that's not a bug in pidgin-facebookchat. See the comments in the bug report. Any idea to which package I should reassign it? 1259.08 ari iulian: the problem is in hunspel 1336.54 iulian ari: Alright... how did you find out? 1344.18 ari iulian: [2]google.com/codesearch.. maybe you should ask him to get a backtrace I saw that too in the backlog. Here are the logs. I must say that they are not so helpful. Exactly. If there is anything else I can do, please let me know. Yes, helpful info. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#568329: dict installed in wrong dir
Package: hunspell-de-med Version: 20091008-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, $ dpkg -L hunspell-de-med /. /usr /usr/share /usr/share/myspell /usr/share/myspell/dicts /usr/share/hunspell /usr/share/hunspell/dicts /usr/share/hunspell/dicts/de_med.dic ^^ [...] This is wrong; the new path is without dicts/ (there was no dicts/ there in #541909 either) Regards, Rene -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566832: reinstalling solved this problem
Hi, On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 06:33:34AM +0100, Vítězslav Kotrla wrote: I can see the same behaviour on my Sid/Experimental mix: when I run oowriter or oocalc, splash screen shows briefly (just a flicker) and then ... nothing. Output on console: [...] After I did #apt-get install --reinstall openoffice.org #apt-get install --reinstall openoffice.org-core as suggested by MP, problem is gone! (díky, Martine) Thanks for confirmation. This will be fixed in -15 then. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#568772: closed by Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org (Re: Bug#568772: openoffice.org: after last update, oo no longer works at all)
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 09:22:19PM +0100, Marek Poks wrote: i think this is not same as my issue. i have reinstalled entirelly oo with removing previous settings/caches/rdb, i have ceated fresh user for testing purposes. problem still occurs. With -14? Try -15. If it then still doesn't work, please send the usual helpful things: gdb if it crashes, strace if it just fails somewhere (or both), etc. And please try to properly upgrade all packages, I see you have a ure on 3.1.1-8 level. (ure is the exact package which was buggy). How did you upgrade openoffice.org? Surely not with a normal dist-upgrade (that would have also upgraded ure) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#568772: closed by Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org (Re: Bug#568772: openoffice.org: after last update, oo no longer works at all)
Hi, On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 11:00:54PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: And please try to properly upgrade all packages, I see you have a ure on 3.1.1-8 level. (ure is the exact package which was buggy). How did you upgrade openoffice.org? Surely not with a normal dist-upgrade (that would have also upgraded ure) Which BTW also would be done by trying to use -15, as some parts will just conflict against ures older than 3.1.1-15 :-) Grüße/Regards, René -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566832: openoffice.org: Any OpenOffice application crashes on startup
severity 566832 grave close 566832 1:3.1.1-15 thanks Hi, On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 12:53:52PM +0530, Vikram Vincent wrote: ii ure1.5.1+OOo3.1.1-8 OpenOffice.org UNO runtime environ WTF do people (you are the second one) have this installed still? Don't people use proper (dist-)upgrades for upgrading their systems? Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xf4860730 (LWP 16196)] 0xf3f3e0b8 in store::OStorePageCache::find () from /usr/lib/ure/lib/libstore.so.3 Current language: auto; currently c++ (gdb) bt #0 0xf3f3e0b8 in store::OStorePageCache::find () from /usr/lib/ure/lib/libstore.so.3 #1 0xf3f3ea4a in store::OStorePageCache::load () from /usr/lib/ure/lib/libstore.so.3 #2 0xf3f466eb in store::OStorePageManager::load () from /usr/lib/ure/lib/libstore.so.3 #3 0xf3f4694a in store::OStorePageManager::find () from /usr/lib/ure/lib/libstore.so.3 #4 0xf3f46e4b in store::OStorePageManager::load () from /usr/lib/ure/lib/libstore.so.3 #5 0xf3f4241f in __store_iget () from /usr/lib/ure/lib/libstore.so.3 #6 0xf3f43bed in store::OStoreLockBytes::create () from /usr/lib/ure/lib/libstore.so.3 #7 0xf3f4a7a9 in store_openStream () from /usr/lib/ure/lib/libstore.so.3 #8 0xf3f61c67 in ORegKey::getValueInfo () from /usr/lib/ure/lib/libreg.so.3 #9 0xf3f5e829 in getValueInfo () from /usr/lib/ure/lib/libreg.so.3 [...] Already fixed in sid. Obviously you didn't even dare to check the bugs in the BTS for this. And you want to foolow this note# (sorry, ths is unaviodable): Template: ure/possibly_corrupted_rdbs Type: note _Description: Component registries might be corrupted You are upgrading from a version which might have corrupted service/component registry files (*.rdb), especially /var/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/services.rdb and the rdb files in /var/spool/openoffice/uno_packages/cache for installed extensions. . If you experience problems with the component manager or segmentation faults involving libstore in either unopkg or OpenOffice.org, please check these files. Try cleanly reinstalling the packages and/or using a clean user profile. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566832: openoffice.org: Any OpenOffice application crashes on startup
Hi, On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 09:06:45AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: Already fixed in sid. Obviously you didn't even dare to check the bugs in the BTS for this. Oh, I take this back; you even did reply to one of the closed bugs Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566832: openoffice.org: Any OpenOffice application crashes on startup
Hi, On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 02:39:51PM +0530, Vikram Vincent wrote: On 9 February 2010 13:36, Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 12:53:52PM +0530, Vikram Vincent wrote: ii ure 1.5.1+OOo3.1.1-8 OpenOffice.org UNO runtime environ WTF do people (you are the second one) have this installed still? Don't people use proper (dist-)upgrades for upgrading their systems? No. I have 'testing' set in my sources.list file and simply install newer versions with Synaptic. Don't. If you use synaptic, then properly upse upgrade features of it (if it has some, I don't use it) Selectively ugrading packages (imho) is broken. Already fixed in sid. Thanks. No thanks for the unneeded reply to a bug which already states exactly this :-) Of course, this fix is only in -15 and to be sure you want -15s packages (which also will force ure to be upgraded, the bug actually is in the ure package anyway) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566189: Bug #566189 on testing (i386)
Hi, On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 02:16:41PM +0100, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: I have an (experimental) squeeze installation, which has been crippled by something suspiciously looking like this bug for a couple of weeks. The announced fix (packages update to 1.3.1.1-15) does not (yet ?) seem to be available on testing repositories, nor on the squeeze backports repositories. There is no squeeze backports. If you mean lenny-backports, it will be in some days. Can someone suggest a workaround for squeeze users ? (No, I'd rather *not* go for unstable. Been there, done that, got the T-shirt...). Yes. Read -15s debconf message (which is a big part of the fix): _Description: Component registries might be corrupted You are upgrading from a version which might have corrupted service/component registry files (*.rdb), especially /var/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/services.rdb and the rdb files in /var/spool/openoffice/uno_packages/cache for installed extensions. . If you experience problems with the component manager or segmentation faults involving libstore in either unopkg or OpenOffice.org, please check these files. Try cleanly reinstalling the packages and/or using a clean user profile. Not that it wasn't mentioned in other bugs already... (But note -14 still will write bogus files in some cases...) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#569840: [openoffice.org] Could not update from 1:3.1.1-14
severity 569840 serious tag 569840 + moreinfo tag 569840 + unreproducible thanks Hi, On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote: Package: openoffice.org Version: 1:3.1.1-15 Severity: critical How does it break the whole system? Correct, it doesn't. Read bugs severities before you file a bug thanks. If anything, this is serious. aziz:~# LANG=C aptitude upgrade Works here. Clean squeeze chroot + OOo + aptitude - sid Preparing to replace ure 1.5.1+OOo3.1.1-14 (using .../ure_1.5.1+OOo3.1.1-15_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/ure_1.5.1+OOo3.1.1-15_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 30 That is your fundamental problem. Anything later doesn't install because that one does not install. Now the question is why debconf returns 30. I only see some 30 in debconfs doc: Then after each go command, you must test to see if the user hit the back button, and if so jump back to the previous question. If the user hit the back button, the go command will return 30. There's no Back button here, so this is not relevant. Another fix is to check the return code of the input command. If it is 30 then the user is not being shown the question you asked them, and you should break out of the loop. OK, so db_input shows 30 if the stuff is not shown. Err, why? I mean it's set to high. Did you configure your system to not display even high notes? (Besides that, the db_go (which actually shows the question has a || true as mandated by the doc, but the db_input not, yes) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100214191908.gb5...@rene-engelhard.de
Bug#569903: SEGFAULT while copying from web
severity 569903 + important tag 569903 + moreinfo thanks On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:36:13PM +0100, Jessica Wrobel wrote: Justification: Renders package unusable for copypaste I am sorry, but no. a) it probably is only cut'n'paste from web b) assuming that copy/paste works for the rest it's not grave at all, but important. A short note how to reproduce this issue (copypaste from the above mentioned bug): Steps to reproduce the bug: 1. Use firefox to go to http://www.lerucher.com/dossiers/0400/creation2.asp?from=preparer_creation 2. Copy the text starting at Executive Summary until the end of the list (including the list item icon) 3. Open OpenOffice.org writer 4. Paste in a new document what you copied from the website 5. SIGSEGV ! --- This can be reproduced on several webpages. One which is very nasty is the online exam webpage of my university where I would like to copy over exam questions into a document. Another page where I can confirm this is taz.de... I've currently no idea what is going wrong there exactly. OK. Did you by chance try whether 3.2 has the same problem? ps: answers and further questions please to win...@debian.org winnie: Give me a backtrace if possible, please, I'd bet neon is involved. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100214231759.gc5...@rene-engelhard.de
Bug#569840: [openoffice.org] Could not update from 1:3.1.1-14
Hi, On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:54:08AM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote: aziz:~# LANG=C aptitude upgrade Works here. Clean squeeze chroot + OOo + aptitude - sid Here I have it reproduced in multiple machines. These are sid machines updated very often, but not particular configuration. Just default maintainers scripts in /etc Hmm. Another fix is to check the return code of the input command. If it is 30 then the user is not being shown the question you asked them, and you should break out of the loop. OK, so db_input shows 30 if the stuff is not shown. Err, why? I mean it's set to high. Did you configure your system to not display even high notes? (Besides that, the db_go (which actually shows the question has a || true as mandated by the doc, but the db_input not, yes) I don't remember I played with such config. Could you please give more details on how change this? dpkg-reconfigure debconf. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100216092853.gb14...@rene-engelhard.de
Bug#570254: openoffice.org-calc: consistently crashes on sheet operations
# maybe even 3.1.0, but of course the info is not enough... found 570254 1:3.1.1-8 reassign 570254 openoffice.org-kde # maybe even earlier, but this is tested close 570254 1:3.2.0-1 thanks On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 02:49:30PM -0200, pedro bulach gapski wrote: Package: openoffice.org-calc Version: 1:3.1.1-15+squeeze1 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss oocalc consistently crashes on Sheet operations. For instance, open a new calc window, and drag Sheet1 to between Sheets 2 and 3: it crashes with the following message on de console: gap...@kalma:~$ SAL_SYNCHRONIZE=1 oocalc gap...@kalma:~$ QPixmap: It is not safe to use pixmaps outside the GUI thread QPixmap: It is not safe to use pixmaps outside the GUI thread QPixmap: It is not safe to use pixmaps outside the GUI thread QPainter::begin: Cannot paint on a null pixmap X-Error: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter) Major opcode: 62 (X_CopyArea) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No:23130 (23130) Aha. KDE. This bug is not new for me, although I have not reported it earlier. This behavior has been present at least in the last 3 squeeze versions. Aha. OK. WTF did you then not mark that as such instead of marking it as a version not even in testing but blocking -16 with loads of other fixes from entering testing? Last three squeeze versions? So this dates back to 3.1.0 or so? (The versions which migrated to testing were 3.1.1-8 and 3.1.1-14 and what you report against is the version in testing-security) And of course this is all not helpful at all then since how should it *now* be able to trace back when this was introduced? Anyway, can confirm this crash in a squeeze/i386 chroot with OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP=kde. Interestingly, it works in 3.2.0-1 for me. Thus closing. I'll not debug this any further. I'll not do anything anymore for 3.1.1 and thnakfully this bug will not block future versions from entering testing as it's no regression anymore. If you want to see it fixed, use 3.2.0. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100217175340.gc16...@rene-engelhard.de
Bug#570254: openoffice.org-calc: consistently crashes on sheet operations
Hi, On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 04:50:58PM -0200, Pedro Bulach Gapski wrote: This bug is not new for me, although I have not reported it earlier. This behavior has been present at least in the last 3 squeeze versions. Aha. OK. WTF did you then not mark that as such instead of marking it as a version not even in testing but blocking -16 with loads of other fixes from entering testing? I am not sure I understand what you mean. Today I upgraded my system from squeeze and squeeze/updates, which included the oo version reported above. I checked that the crash behavior was still there and reported the bug. OK. And I never saw it because I simply don't use (and don't test under) KDE. What do you mean by not mark that as such? Which procedure should I have used (so this does not happen again)? Marked it in a version you found it. If possible the earliest. Which in your case is not the version you updated from. Last three squeeze versions? So this dates back to 3.1.0 or so? (The versions which migrated to testing were 3.1.1-8 and 3.1.1-14 and what you report against is the version in testing-security) And of course this is all not helpful at all then since how should it *now* be able to trace back when this was introduced? I migrated from lenny to squeeze some months ago (december, I guess), and the bug has been here since the migration. And you should have filed it there, or you should have marked it so that the BTS know it's in testing (aka. Version: 1:3.1.1-14, -15+squeeze1 is not in testing but only in testing-updates) But OK, you said in the next, so I marked it as such now. Anyway, can confirm this crash in a squeeze/i386 chroot with OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP=kde. Interestingly, it works in 3.2.0-1 for me. Thus closing. I'll not debug this any further. I'll not do anything anymore for 3.1.1 and thnakfully this bug will not block future versions from entering testing as it's no regression anymore. If you want to see it fixed, use 3.2.0. I will as soon as it enters sid. Unfortunately 1:3.1.1-16 probably should migrate first (fixes other important bugs)[1] and I got the epxlicit veto from the release team to upload 3.2.0 to sid unless *explicit* approval. Grüße/Regards, René [1] Which will take some time, because mips* have a enormous backlog, and it would not migrate until all archs are there. That all assuming there are no new RC bugs affecting sid only... -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100217192046.ga21...@rene-engelhard.de
Bug#570361: openoffice.org-core: aptitude refuses upgrade from 3.1.1-15 to 3.2.0-1
severity 570361 serious thanks On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:43:19PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: I'll not fix it as this bug is nonsense anyway, so I'll just close it It actually turned out that it isn't... And that one is unfixable. Unless you want to revert the RC bugfixes from 3.1.1-15 Well, actually it can be fixed like we did for openoffice.org-writer2latex http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566644 but that bears the risk that the upgrade process will either fail or work and runtime fail But I guess we need to live with that and just support upgrades from 1:3.1.1-15 (and lenny of course) upwards... In any case, a aptitude dist-upgrade witn on-par priorities *does* work, as does a apt-get -t experimental openoffice.org (just tried yesterday evening). Hmm, no, actually it doesn't, damnit. Yesterday I did it just with -calc which of course didn't install -filter-binfilter or involved it in the upgrade.. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#577045: libmodern-perl-perl and libmodern-perl: error when trying to install together
Hi, On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 06:24:36PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: $ apt-cache show libmodern-perl Package: libmodern-perl (snip) Homepage: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Modern-Perl/ and $ apt-cache show libmodern-perl-perl Package: libmodern-perl-perl (snip) Homepage: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Modern-Perl/ [...] Please talk, merge and discard which package not needed. The proper package name is libmodern-perl-perl, so... (however ugly that looks ;)) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#578251: [ure] amd64 version missmatch will not install openoffice.org
reassign 578251 openoffice.org-core retitle 578251 depends on non-existant yet (OOo 3.2.1) ure version close 578251 thanks On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 02:50:39AM -0700, Jonathan A. wrote: Package: ure Version: 1.6.0 Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable Wrong. I Cannot install openoffice on the amd64 platform due to it requireing ure v. =1.6.1 which doesn't exist. I'd assume its ether a misstake in the depends off openoffice-core or ure 1.6.1 didn't get packaged The first one. In any case, if I count right you filed that bug as the fixed version already was ACCEPTED. Didn't reportbug tell you? Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#580148: gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory
Package: gcj-4.4-jdk Version: 4.4.4-1 Severity: grave Hi, Seen this on the s390 build of openoffice.org 1:3.2.0-9 (https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=openoffice.orgarch=s390ver=1%3A3.2.0-9stamp=1272919681file=logas=raw): [...] AOT_MAKEFLAGS=-j1 aot-compile -L /usr/lib/gcj/openoffice \ debian/tmp/native-jars debian/tmp/native-jars/gcj make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-openoffice.org_3.2.0-9-s390-2XT8Hj/openoffice.org-3.2.0/debian/tmp/native-jars/gcj' /usr/bin/gcj -c -g -O2 -fPIC -findirect-dispatch -fjni LuceneHelpWrapper.jar.1.jar -o LuceneHelpWrapper.jar.1.o gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [LuceneHelpWrapper.jar.1.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-openoffice.org_3.2.0-9-s390-2XT8Hj/openoffice.org-3.2.0/debian/tmp/native-jars/gcj' aot-compile: error: /usr/bin/make exited with code 2 make: *** [debian/stampdir/native-jars] Error 1 Regards, Rene -- Grüße/Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#580148: gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory
Hi, On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 11:07:10PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Seen this on the s390 build of openoffice.org 1:3.2.0-9 (https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=openoffice.orgarch=s390ver=1%3A3.2.0-9stamp=1272919681file=logas=raw): [...] AOT_MAKEFLAGS=-j1 aot-compile -L /usr/lib/gcj/openoffice \ debian/tmp/native-jars debian/tmp/native-jars/gcj make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-openoffice.org_3.2.0-9-s390-2XT8Hj/openoffice.org-3.2.0/debian/tmp/native-jars/gcj' /usr/bin/gcj -c -g -O2 -fPIC -findirect-dispatch -fjni LuceneHelpWrapper.jar.1.jar -o LuceneHelpWrapper.jar.1.o gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [LuceneHelpWrapper.jar.1.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-openoffice.org_3.2.0-9-s390-2XT8Hj/openoffice.org-3.2.0/debian/tmp/native-jars/gcj' aot-compile: error: /usr/bin/make exited with code 2 make: *** [debian/stampdir/native-jars] Error 1 Same on armel. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#580148: gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory
Hi, On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:38:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: tag 580148 + moreinfo thanks Which info do you need? I can try on my armel sid when the currently running testbuild for an other thing is over. according to http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contentskeywords=libgcj.specmode=pathsuite=unstablearch=s390 this is part of the package. Maybe, but apparently gcj doesn't find it... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#580148: gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:53:18PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:38:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: tag 580148 + moreinfo thanks Which info do you need? I can try on my armel sid when the currently running testbuild for an other thing is over. And contrary to your statement that it should just work, there's apparently even more archs than just s390 and armel affected, I just stumbled over http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580007 Whatever the reason is, but something *is* broken... openoffice.org built (including -gcj) on kfreebsd-amd64, though... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#580148: gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory
severity 580148 serious thanks On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 06:45:25PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:53:18PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:38:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: tag 580148 + moreinfo thanks Which info do you need? I can try on my armel sid when the currently running testbuild for an other thing is over. And contrary to your statement that it should just work, there's apparently even more archs than just s390 and armel affected, I just stumbled over http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580007 Whatever the reason is, but something *is* broken... openoffice.org built (including -gcj) on kfreebsd-amd64, though... Aha, we get nearer to it: The failed builds all had one in common: one part 4.4.3-9, the other one 4.4.4-1. Indeed, I was just able to reproduce the FTBFS of sacjava on my armel chroot with exactly that constellation. Then did a dist-upgrade. Then it works again. So it's either a too lax depends or a missing Breaks:, depending on how you want to see it... I attach the diff between dpkg -l before and after for gc*-related packages.. Grüße/Regards, René --- packages.old 2010-05-06 10:48:46.0 + +++ packages.new 2010-05-06 10:56:18.0 + @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ ii comerr-dev 2.1-1.41.11-1 common error description library - headers a ii coreutils8.5-1 GNU core utilities ii cpp 4:4.4.3-1 The GNU C preprocessor (cpp) -ii cpp-4.4 4.4.3-9The GNU C preprocessor +ii cpp-4.4 4.4.4-1The GNU C preprocessor ii dash 0.5.5.1-3 POSIX-compliant shell ii dbus 1.2.24-1 simple interprocess messaging system ii dbus-x11 1.2.24-1 simple interprocess messaging system (X11 de @@ -64,10 +64,10 @@ ii fontconfig 2.8.0-2.1 generic font configuration library - support ii fontconfig-config2.8.0-2.1 generic font configuration library - configu ii g++ 4:4.4.3-1 The GNU C++ compiler -ii g++-4.4 4.4.3-9The GNU C++ compiler +ii g++-4.4 4.4.4-1The GNU C++ compiler ii gcc 4:4.4.3-1 The GNU C compiler -ii gcc-4.4 4.4.3-9The GNU C compiler -ii gcc-4.4-base 4.4.3-9The GNU Compiler Collection (base package) +ii gcc-4.4 4.4.4-1The GNU C compiler +ii gcc-4.4-base 4.4.4-1The GNU Compiler Collection (base package) ii gcc-mingw32 4.4.2-5The GNU Compiler Collection (cross compiler ii gcj-4.4-base 4.4.4-1The GNU Compiler Collection (gcj base packag ii gcj-4.4-jdk 4.4.4-1gcj and classpath development tools for Java @@ -209,7 +212,7 @@ ii libformula-java-openoffice.org 0.2.0-OOo31-2 Excel(tm) style formula expressions library ii libfreetype6 2.3.11-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared library files ii libfreetype6-dev 2.3.11-1 FreeType 2 font engine, development files -ii libgcc1 1:4.4.3-9 GCC support library +ii libgcc1 1:4.4.4-1 GCC support library ii libgcj-bc4.4.3-4Link time only library for use with gcj ii libgcj-common1:4.4.2-1 Java runtime library (common files) ii libgcj10 4.4.4-1Java runtime library for use with gcj @@ -426,8 +459,8 @@ ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8n-1 SSL shared libraries ii libstartup-notification0 0.10-1 library for program launch feedback (shared ii libstax-java 1.2.0-1StAX
Bug#580148: [s390, armel] gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory
retitle 580148 gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory thanks On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 12:53:16PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: I do not have access to those boxes, but IMHO gcj does not find libgcj.spec because gcj from gcj-4.4-jdk_4.4.4-1 looks for /usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.4.4/libgcj.spec whereas it ships /usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.4/libgcj.spec, and the 4.4.4 - 4.4 symlink is provided by gcc-4.4-base_4.4.4-1 but not gcc-4.4-base_4.4.3-9. Thus gcj is broken when compiling with gcj-4.4-jdk_4.4.n and gcc-4.4-base_4.4.(n-1). Yeah, just had the same occurance on the try - dist-upgrade - try again test I just did. The same problem occurs when compiling code wrapped by jni: on my x86 box $ ls -l /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj-4.4/include total 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 6 mai 12:08 gcj - ../../../gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.4/include/gcj lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 6 mai 12:08 jawt.h - ../../../gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.4.4/include/jawt.h lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 47 6 mai 12:08 jni.h - ../../../gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.4.4/include/jni.h drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 6 mai 12:08 linux Aha. So this explains also the problem I described on http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2010/05/msg00013.html rüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#490680: does not work due to dangling symlink/missing dependency
Package: icedtea-gcjwebplugin Severity: grave Hi, after installing icedtea-gcjwebplugin about:plugins in iceweasel didn't show the Java plugin. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins$ ls -l insgesamt 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 24. Mai 17:46 gtk-vnc-plugin.so - ../../gtk-vnc/plugins/gtk-vnc-plugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 41 21. Jan 11:00 libjavaplugin.so - /etc/alternatives/iceweasel-javaplugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 41 13. Jul 15:52 libnpsoplugin.so - ../../openoffice/program/libnpsoplugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 57 6. Jul 16:11 npwrapper.libflashplayer.so - ../../nspluginwrapper/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 21. Apr 01:27 opensc-signer.so - ../../opensc-signer.so [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins$ (libjavaplugin.so in red for danglings symlinks) OK, let's look at /etc/alternatives/iceweasel-javaplugin.so: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins$ ls -l /etc/alternatives/iceweasel-javaplugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 21. Jan 11:00 /etc/alternatives/iceweasel-javaplugin.so - /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/jre/lib/libgcjwebplugin.so dangling, too. It points to the libgcjwebplugin.so java-gcj-compat-plugin installs, but does not depend on java-gcj-compat-plugin. But I don't think this is intended, given that icedtea-gcjwebplugin itself contains /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/amd64/gcjwebplugin.so FWIW: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins$ sudo update-alternatives --config iceweasel-javaplugin.so Es gibt nur 1 Programm, welches iceweasel-javaplugin.so bereitstellt (/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/amd64/gcjwebplugin.so). Nichts zu konfigurieren. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins Regards, Rene -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages icedtea-gcjwebplugin depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.22.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.7-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.6.4-6The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libgcc1 1:4.3.1-6 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.16.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.12.11-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libnspr4-0d 4.7.1-3NetScape Portable Runtime Library ii libpango1.0-0 1.20.5-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libstdc++64.3.1-6The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii openjdk-6-jre 6b10dfsg-1 OpenJDK Java runtime icedtea-gcjwebplugin recommends no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#488895: please move to main
Hi, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: But seriously, what's the ETA for Sun Java to enter main? Fedora is already shipping it, right? That doesn't say anything, we all know that other distributions are sloppy with license issues. But that said, openjdk entered Debian now (yay!). But *if* you move lucene2 to main, pleae DO NOT depend on openjdk. Would make people having it installed besides java-gcj-compat when they want it/need it becasue OpenJDK is not available. And some stuff of lucene (like the OOo things) seem to work with java-gcj-compat.. Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#417256: Accepted reportbug-ng 1.0.1 (source all)
Hi, Bastian Venthur wrote: * Send the output of /usr/share/bug/PACKAGE/script if available (Closes: #417256, #422085, #434212) #417256 is about presubj. did you also finally fix reportbug-ng to show that one? You didn't say that in the changelog. #422085 main point is presubj, too. #434212, too. If not, those bugs should be reopened. Regad -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#434212: Accepted reportbug-ng 1.0.1 (source all)
Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: Bastian Venthur wrote: * Send the output of /usr/share/bug/PACKAGE/script if available (Closes: #417256, #422085, #434212) #417256 is about presubj. did you also finally fix reportbug-ng to show that one? You didn't say that in the changelog. #422085 main point is presubj, too. #434212, too. If not, those bugs should be reopened. Oh, and of course control. Especially important there: report-with: Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#491623: openoffice.org_1:3.0.0~beta2-1(experimental/alpha/ds10): configure: error: Python headers not found
retitle 491623 python-dev builddep still has unneeded [$(OOO_ARCHS])
severity 491623 minor
found 491623 1:2.4.1-6
tag 491623 + pending
tag 491623 - experimental
thanks
Hi,
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.0.0~beta2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
No.
OO.org failed to build on alpha:
And no one claims OOo supported alpha.
I've already told lamont (Cc'ed AGAIN) several times that he should
upate Packages-arch-specific to reflect that (allow all archs but
alpha/hppa). Maybe m68k, but 3.0.0 is from m24 onwards actually ported
to m68k ;-)
But Frank tells me the experimental buildd network doesn't honor P-a-s
anyway.
| checking which python to use... external
| checking for a Python interpreter with version = 2.2... python
| checking for python... /usr/bin/python
| checking for python version... 2.5
| checking for python platform... linux2
| checking for python script directory...
${prefix}/lib/python2.5/site-packages
| checking for python extension module directory...
${exec_prefix}/lib/python2.5/site-packages
| checking Python.h usability... no
| checking Python.h presence... no
| checking for Python.h... no
| configure: error: Python headers not found
| make[1]: *** [stamp/build] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd/openoffice.org-3.0.0~beta2/ooo-build'
| make: *** [debian/stampdir/build] Error 2
| dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
|
**
But back to the bug, the bug is that the python-dev (= 2.4) build
depends is python-dev (= 2.4) [i386 powerpc sparc mips mipsel armel
s390 m68k amd64 ppc64 ia64] (which is a bug) and thus python-dev isn't
installed on alpha. Will fix that in the next 3.0.0 upload (probably too late
for lenny)
It's only minor, though, as architectures where OOo is enabled to be built
do have the correct build-deps.
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#561498: openoffice.org-emailmerge: Fails to install
tag 561498 + unreproducible tag 561498 + moreinfo # fix version. if at all applicable, we'll see.. notfound 561498 3.1.1-8 found 561498 1:3.1.1-8 thanks On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 06:55:23PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: While doing a dist-upgrade from lenny to squeeze, I got the following error: Preparing to replace openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny3 (using .../openoffice.org-emailmerge_1%3a3.1.1-8_all.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org-emailmerge_1%3a3.1.1-8_all.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 I just tried a dist-upgrade (and also did so around a week ago) from lenny to squeeze and it suceeded. We discussed it a bit on IRC and found nothing which can cause this: - procps and debconf were both unpacked and configured before this package (openoffice.org-emailmerge depends on them, as well as on python) - there's no info in this output what exactly went wrong and sh -x could not be given as a second attempt already worked for Kurt - debconf works and shows stuff too so it cannot be that it's set to something which prohibits showing the error if OOo was running when the dist-upgrade happens, - it might be unopkg, but unopkg doesn't seem to be ran at all... (and now it's too late anyway to check the extension info in OOo) Though, a few weeks ago I *did* see this too but I didn't see this on later tries either... - unreproducible, moreinfo Grüße/Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#562058: function: not found
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.98~20091221-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
sorry, german dpkg output, but you probably get it anyway:
Richte grub-pc ein (1.98~20091221-1) ...
Installation finished. No error reported.
Generating grub.cfg ...
Found background image: moreblue-orbit-grub.png
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-trunk-amd64
Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-trunk-amd64
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-1-amd64
Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.31-1-amd64
Found memtest86+ image: /boot/memtest86+.bin
/etc/grub.d/30_os-prober: 40: function: not found
dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von grub-pc (--configure):
Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 127
zurück
Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von:
grub-pc
-- Package-specific info:
*** BEGIN /boot/grub/device.map
(hd0) /dev/sda
*** END /boot/grub/device.map
*** BEGIN /boot/grub/grub.cfg
#
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE
#
# It is automatically generated by /usr/sbin/grub-mkconfig using templates
# from /etc/grub.d and settings from /etc/default/grub
#
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/00_header ###
set default=2
insmod ext2
set root=(hd0,5)
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set a8a2a6c1-2789-49c1-9454-5b4f99186d0f
if loadfont /usr/share/grub/unicode.pf2 ; then
set gfxmode=640x480
insmod gfxterm
insmod vbe
if terminal_output gfxterm ; then true ; else
# For backward compatibility with versions of terminal.mod that don't
# understand terminal_output
terminal gfxterm
fi
fi
set locale_dir=/boot/grub/locale
set lang=de
insmod gettext
set timeout=5
### END /etc/grub.d/00_header ###
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme ###
insmod ext2
set root=(hd0,5)
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set a8a2a6c1-2789-49c1-9454-5b4f99186d0f
insmod png
if background_image /boot/grub/moreblue-orbit-grub.png ; then
set color_normal=black/black
set color_highlight=magenta/black
else
set menu_color_normal=cyan/blue
set menu_color_highlight=white/blue
fi
### END /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme ###
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/10_linux ###
menuentry Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 {
insmod ext2
set root=(hd0,5)
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set a8a2a6c1-2789-49c1-9454-5b4f99186d0f
linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-trunk-amd64
root=UUID=a8a2a6c1-2789-49c1-9454-5b4f99186d0f ro vga=871 usbcore.autosuspend=1
initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-trunk-amd64
}
menuentry Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 (recovery mode) {
insmod ext2
set root=(hd0,5)
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set a8a2a6c1-2789-49c1-9454-5b4f99186d0f
linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-trunk-amd64
root=UUID=a8a2a6c1-2789-49c1-9454-5b4f99186d0f ro single vga=871
usbcore.autosuspend=1
initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-trunk-amd64
}
menuentry Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.31-1-amd64 {
insmod ext2
set root=(hd0,5)
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set a8a2a6c1-2789-49c1-9454-5b4f99186d0f
linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-1-amd64
root=UUID=a8a2a6c1-2789-49c1-9454-5b4f99186d0f ro vga=871 usbcore.autosuspend=1
initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.31-1-amd64
}
menuentry Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.31-1-amd64 (recovery mode) {
insmod ext2
set root=(hd0,5)
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set a8a2a6c1-2789-49c1-9454-5b4f99186d0f
linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-1-amd64
root=UUID=a8a2a6c1-2789-49c1-9454-5b4f99186d0f ro single vga=871
usbcore.autosuspend=1
initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.31-1-amd64
}
### END /etc/grub.d/10_linux ###
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/20_memtest86+ ###
menuentry Memory test (memtest86+) {
insmod ext2
set root=(hd0,5)
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set a8a2a6c1-2789-49c1-9454-5b4f99186d0f
linux16 /boot/memtest86+.bin
}
menuentry Memory test (memtest86+, serial console 115200) {
insmod ext2
set root=(hd0,5)
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set a8a2a6c1-2789-49c1-9454-5b4f99186d0f
linux16 /boot/memtest86+.bin console=ttyS0,115200n8
}
### END /etc/grub.d/20_memtest86+ ###
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/30_os-prober ###
menuentry Windows 7 (loader) (on /dev/sda1) {
insmod ntfs
set root=(hd0,1)
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 30049ef8049ebff0
chainloader +1
}
menuentry Windows 7 (loader) (on /dev/sda2) {
insmod ntfs
set root=(hd0,2)
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 726aa1cb6aa18c83
chainloader +1
}
### END /etc/grub.d/30_os-prober ###
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/40_custom ###
# This file provides an easy way to add custom menu entries. Simply type the
# menu entries you want to add after this comment. Be careful not to change
# the 'exec tail' line above.
### END /etc/grub.d/40_custom ###
*** END /boot/grub/grub.cfg
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy:
Bug#562058: function: not found
Hi, On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:49:25AM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote: /etc/grub.d/30_os-prober: 40: function: not found Anyway, just remove the function keyword from line 40 in 30_os-prober. I already fixed that upstream. Actually not, you also need to add (). Grüße/Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
