Re: About 1st debian CD

2002-05-04 Thread Raphael Hertzog

Le Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:57:57PM -0500, Chris Lawrence écrivait:
 2. (To whomever is responsible for these images:) You probably should
 update your copy of debian-cd from CVS and remove base-woody from
 the task file you are using.  This will eliminate a lot of stuff
 that's allegedly base but unimportant.  Pick a 2.2 and a 2.4 kernel
 image and put them in your task file.

Hey, certainly not ... base-woody is what debootstrap needs to be able
to install a new system. If you remove base-woody, you can't guarantee
that the install will go ok.

I'm sure you meant task-woody instead.

What needs to be done, is that someone should come up with a new
tasks/exclude-woody  tasks/unexclude-CD2-woody ... the first one
would be used to remove the cruft from CD1, while the other to add back
the files that should be on the CDs but not on CD1. Maybe this could
be sorted out by reordering the packages in tasks-woody too ... i don't
know which is best.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://strasbourg.linuxfr.org/~raphael/
Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: About 1st debian CD

2002-05-04 Thread Philip Charles

On Sat, 4 May 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:


 Please commit your task-woody on the CVS, and also commit the
 exclude-woody and unexclude-CD2-woody ... thanks !

I am doing another rebuild at the moment with a few improvements.  At this
stage it seems that tex, fortran and i18n will be on CD2.

Phil.

--
  Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin, New Zealand
   +64 3 488 2818Fax +64 3 488 2875Mobile 025 267 9420
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - preferred.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I sell GNU/Linux  GNU/Hurd CDs.   See http://www.copyleft.co.nz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: About jigdo test on cdimage.d.o

2002-05-04 Thread Heikki Vatiainen

Philip Hands [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 18:19, Heikki Vatiainen wrote:
  The images were built correctly once maxMissing was raised above 25,
  just as Mattias noted. It looks like about 80 files were fetched from
  the snapshot archive for e.g. i386 disk 3.  This was the reason why I
  only built three CDs since downloading hundreds of files for just
  testing seemed like waste of bandwidth when an up-to-date mirror is
  sitting on the same disk. Phil, are you planning to update the
  snapshot soon?
 
 Yeah, will do tonight probably.  open's currently fscking it's /home,
 having marked /home read-only after finding a broken directory inode
 this afternoon.

Looks like 3.0-pre3 for i386 and source have been made available. I
gave them a try and now everything was taken from the local mirror
except of one file. This is
pool/main/g/geomview/geomview_1.8.1.orig.tar.gz and it looks like you
still have a corrupted file in your mirror. Please see my mail to
debian-cd on 11 April, you may have missed it then.

I am also interested in the general opinion if the test images should
be made publicly available. I have only built the images but I have not
otherwise tested them by burning them on a CD and trying to do the
actual installation.

-- 
Heikki Vatiainen  * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tampere University of Technology  * Tampere, Finland


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




cvs commit to debian-cd/tasks by philipc

2002-05-04 Thread Debian Boot CVS Master

Repository: debian-cd/tasks
who:philipc
time:   Sat May  4 06:24:13 PDT 2002
Log Message:
  
  Corrected error in Debian_woody
  

Files:
changed:Debian_woody


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




cvs commit to debian-cd by hertzog

2002-05-04 Thread Debian Boot CVS Master

Repository: debian-cd
who:hertzog
time:   Sat May  4 06:25:03 PDT 2002
Log Message:
  * Applied patch for #145318.
  * Updated README.sbm.
  

Files:
changed:Makefile


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




cvs commit to debian-cd/data/woody by hertzog

2002-05-04 Thread Debian Boot CVS Master

Repository: debian-cd/data/woody
who:hertzog
time:   Sat May  4 06:25:03 PDT 2002
Log Message:
  * Applied patch for #145318.
  * Updated README.sbm.
  

Files:
changed:README.sbm


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




cvs commit to debian-cd/tools/boot/woody by hertzog

2002-05-04 Thread Debian Boot CVS Master

Repository: debian-cd/tools/boot/woody
who:hertzog
time:   Sat May  4 06:25:03 PDT 2002
Log Message:
  * Applied patch for #145318.
  * Updated README.sbm.
  

Files:
changed:boot-mipsel

added:  post-boot-mipsel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: About 1st debian CD

2002-05-04 Thread Mantas K.

Hi again,

I'm talking about semi-official (?) prerelease CD's from:
http://cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/
(pre2) and from:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pre-release-jigdo/
(pre1, See http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2002/18/ and 
http://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2002/debian-cd-200204/msg00435.html)

Now I see pre3 in http://cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/ and there is anarchy 
in 1st CD too :( for example now mc-common and gmc are included in 1st CD, 
but there is no mc package and no xserver (now xfonts-75dpi are included in 
first CD, this is good, but all kernel-images-2.4.16 are still in 1st CD and 
maybe because of this full x-window-system does not fit in 1st CD)

See list of packages, included in 1st CD on 
http://cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/3.0-pre3/jigdo/i386/woody-i386-1_NONUS.jigdo
(this is gzipped text file)

Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In previous prelelease (debian-30pre1-i386-binary-1_NONUS.iso) almost all 
 x-window-system packages were in the 1st CD, why in pre2 most X packages 
 are moved in second CD ?
 
 1. What CD images are you referring to?  The ones on ftp.fsn.hu are
 unofficial, as are any other CD images floating around on the net.

OK, I think that full x-window-system is most important (the majority of 
games, junior and science packages are not usefull without full 
x-window-system (xserver-xfree86, xserver-common, xfonts-base, 
xfonts-100dpi, xfonts-75dpi, maybe xfonts-*-transcoded, etc)

Philip Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks for the tip about the kernel images, this could mean that all of
 games, junior and science will end up on the first CD.


I don't know about true Depend (I've not tested, because my debian system is 
full of packages and I don't know how to make a test without reinstaling OS.
Maybe we just need to set the priorities differently for which packages to 
go on which CD.

Philip Hands [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Is that actually true do the Depend or are you just saying that most
 people won't have much use for abiword if they don't have an xserver on
 the same machine.

Sorry, I did some manual tests of second CD (with mc) and didn't find any 
packages that really Depends on packages not from first or second CDs :( 
Maybe this is my mistake ?
We need to do some automated test to ensure.

 second CD contains packages, that depends on other packages  that are not in 
 the first and second CD's and so on :(
 
 Could you cite some examples please.


Mantas K. [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: About 1st debian CD

2002-05-04 Thread Raphael Hertzog

Le Sat, May 04, 2002 at 04:09:33PM +, Mantas K. écrivait:
 Sorry, I did some manual tests of second CD (with mc) and didn't find any 
 packages that really Depends on packages not from first or second CDs :( 
 Maybe this is my mistake ?

Well, debian-cd will never include a package without its dependencies.
So theoretically, you can't find such a package. However it's true that
some indirect (ie not codified via Depends field) depends may be wrong.
For example, you may have an X app on CD1 which depends on xlib6g but
without any xserver on that CD. This needs to be taken care of manually.

Thanks to Philip Charles, this has been done now.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://strasbourg.linuxfr.org/~raphael/
Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Debian 3.0

2002-05-04 Thread Chaz Kiser

Where could I procure me a download of Debian 3.0?

Chaz Kiser


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]