Re: PowerPC daily install CDs? [Was: Re: Netinst for testing?]
I have been directing folks to http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/powerpc/iso-cd/ and as of now Sunday 25 October 9:15 Eastern Time I'm seeing a full set of discs dated 19 October, last Monday. All seems right with the world at that url. All my best - Chris Reich; Rochester, New York twittername: chrisreich --- On Sat, 10/24/09, Rick Thomas rbthoma...@pobox.com wrote: From: Rick Thomas rbthoma...@pobox.com Subject: PowerPC daily install CDs? [Was: Re: Netinst for testing?] To: CD List Debian debian-cd@lists.debian.org Cc: PowerPC List Debian debian-powe...@lists.debian.org Date: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 11:25 PM On Oct 24, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Frans Pop wrote: On Saturday 24 October 2009, Dennis Wicks wrote: I thought that I had previously gotten net install CD iso for what was then the testing release of Debian. Links to current images are available from: http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ Cheers, FJP Hmmm... If I follow that link, then click on • netinst ... and businesscard ... CD images ... [powerpc] I get taken to a directory that claims This build finished at Thu Oct 1 23:28:01 UTC 2009. Is it possible that PowerPC CD builds have been down for over three weeks and nobody noticed? !?!?!?! Rick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: PowerPC daily install CDs? [Was: Re: Netinst for testing?]
On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 06:32 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: Looks to me that the general state of builds is rather pathetic ATM: Sorry. I should have just written Looks like there are quite a few problems with builds ATM. Does not change the facts or the likelyhood of a successful upload/release any time soon though. I noticed the i386 failures yesterday. I've no idea when they started, seems like quite a while ago. Would it be worth having a notification of build failures sent to the list? (or even just an occasional summary) i386 is failing with: 3366 symbols, 654 unresolved Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/mklibs, line 538, in module raise No library provides non-weak %s % name No library provides non-weak _nss_files_parse_sg...@glibc_private@libc.so.6 make[2]: *** [stamps/tree-cdrom_gtk-stamp] Error 1 make[1]: *** [_build] Error 2 make: *** [build_cdrom_gtk] Error 2 I only checked the first failure for each arch but this same failure seems to have effected mips (build_r4k-ip22_cdrom), s390 (build_generic) and armel (uild_iop32x_netboot_glantank). The symbol in the mips case is __gnu_local_gp while the others are _nss_files_parse_sg...@glibc_private@libc. I was unable to reproduce in an uptodate i386 sid chroot. I'm not sure which environment these builds occur, maybe it's a testing thing? I'm installing a squeeze VM now to check. powerpc is failing differently with E: Couldn't find package firewire-core-modules-2.6.30-1-powerpc-di or E: Couldn't find package floppy-modules-2.6.30-1-powerpc64-di depending on the flavour. Ian. -- Ian Campbell Q: Why did the astrophysicist order three hamburgers? A: Because he was hungry. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
