On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 01:39:53AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Hm. As it currently looks to me, the decision was delegated to us. If Marco
removes that delegation, that'd be fine with me. If not, we need to
make a decision (at least I believe it's sensible to not wait until
someone just does it for us).
Sorry to jump in, but how so? The last message I can find from the
maintainer to this bug log is 1272368497-1114-bts...@linux.it (dated
27/04/2010), which I agree can be interpreted as a delegation to
tech-ctte to address the issue.
However in 20100614063558.gb28...@bongo.bofh.it, dated 14/06/2010
(which I believe is the message Russ was referring to), the maintainer
claims that the change will be reverted Unless the maintainer [of some
broken packages] believes that we can get a fixed version before the
release. From that, several people included myself deduced that the
default is that the change *will* be reverted.
Maybe Marco, Cc:-ed, can clarify whether he still wants the tech-ctte to
take a decision in place of him or not?
Thanks tech-ctte for your activity on this!
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...| ..: | Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
