Bug#688772: gnome Depends network-manager-gnome

2012-10-23 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Ian Jackson wrote:
 This bug is to track this issue. Please send all discussion on this
 topic only to this bug report. I will make sure that the gnome
 maintainers are pointed to this bug report.

Discussion seems to have stopped on this bug; I have drafted an
additional set of options for discussion, both of which borrow
liberally from ian's draft, and are presented below.

I'd like to either reconcile these options in the next few days so we
can vote on this issue and resolve it before it impacts the release
schedule. [I don't anticipate calling for votes before our meeting on
Thursday, but we should at least try to get any preliminaries out of
the way first if possible.]


Don Armstrong

-- 
When I was a kid I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. Then I 
realized that the Lord doesn't work that way so I stole one and asked
Him to forgive me.
 -- Emo Philips.

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu
1. The TC notes the decision of the meta-gnome maintainers to
   implement the TC decision in #681834 by:
(a) softening the dependency in the gnome-core metapackage
from Depends to Recommends, as required
(b) adding a new dependency in the gnome metapackage,
as a Depends.  (In squeeze, this is where the dependency
was, but it was a Recommends.)

2. Our intent, as stated in the rationale section of our previous
   decision (#681834, paras 3 and 5), is that squeeze users who have
   gnome installed but not network-manager do not find that
   network-manager becomes installed when they upgrade to wheezy.

3. A Recommends from gnome to network-manager-gnome would serve no
   purpose in wheezy as gnome Depends on gnome-core which already
   Recommends network-manager-gnome.

Therefore

A 4. We overrule the decision of the meta-gnome maintainers to add a
Adependency from gnome to network-manager-gnome; this dependency
Ashould be removed for the release of wheezy.
A 
A 5. We request that the Release Team unblock update(s) to meta-gnome so
Athat our decisions may be implemented in wheezy.

B 4. We overrule the decision of the meta-gnome maintainers to add a
Bdependency from gnome to network-manager-gnome; this dependency
Bshould be replaced with a dependecy on network-manager-gnome (=
B0.9.4) | wicd.
B
B 5. Bugs in network-manager-gnome which break the functionality of
Bexisting /etc/network/interfaces rules are to be considered RC.
B
B 6. We request that the Release Team unblock update(s) to meta-gnome so
Bthat our decisions may be implemented in wheezy.
Whereas

1. The TC notes the decision of the meta-gnome maintainers to
   implement our decision in #681834 by:
(a) softening the dependency in the gnome-core metapackage
from Depends to Recommends, as required
(b) adding a new dependency in the gnome metapackage,
as a Depends.  (In squeeze, this is where the dependency
was, but it was a Recommends.)

2. Our intent, as stated in the rationale section of our previous
   decision (#681834, paras 3 and 5), is that squeeze users who have
   gnome installed but not network-manager do not find that
   network-manager becomes installed when they upgrade to wheezy.

3. The actions of the meta-gnome maintainers do not achieve this
   objective.

4. Insofar as any reasons have been advanced for the meta-gnome
   maintainer's decision, we do not find them convincing.

5. A Recommends from gnome to network-manager-gnome would serve no
   purpose in wheezy as gnome Depends on gnome-core which already
   Recommends network-manager-gnome.

Therefore

6. We overrule the decision of the meta-gnome maintainers to add a
   dependency from gnome to network-manager-gnome.  This dependency
   should be removed.

7. We request that the Release Team unblock update(s) to meta-gnome so
   that our decisions may be implemented in wheezy.

8. We specifically forbid anyone from introducing in wheezy, or
   in sid until wheezy is released:
a. Any new or enhanced dependencies, or any other mechanisms,
   which increase the likelihood of network-manager being
   installed;
b. Any new or enhanced user-facing warnings, imprecations, or
   other kinds of message regarding the alleged desirability or
   requirement to install network-manager;
c. Any change which in any way impairs (or further impairs) the
   functioning of systems with GNOME components installed but
   without network-manager;
d. Any change which is contrary to the spirit or intent of either
   our previous resolution in #681834 or this resolution.
   without first obtaining the permission of at least one member of
   the Technical Committee.

Furthermore

9. It is disappointing that this proposed solution to the problem was
   not mentioned during the TC discussion.  If it had been, it could
   have been accepted or rejected by the TC at the time.

10. We remind everyone that the Constitution 

Next CTTE meeting is at date -d 'October 25 2012 17:00 UTC' on #debian-ctte on irc.debian.org

2012-10-23 Thread Don Armstrong
Just a reminder that the next meeting is at 
date -d 'October 25 2012 17:00 UTC' on #debian-ctte on irc.debian.org

The agenda is here:

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/debian-ctte.git;a=blob;f=meetings/agenda.txt;hb=HEAD

feel free to update it if necessary.


Don Armstrong

-- 
Maybe I did steal your heart
and I am such a perfect criminal
that you never noticed
 -- a softer world #481
http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=481

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121023223720.gs11...@rzlab.ucr.edu



Bug#688772: gnome Depends network-manager-gnome

2012-10-23 Thread Sam Hartman
Don, in your option 4B, I wonder if it would be a good idea to  have the
depend be something like g-n-m|wicd|no-network-manager

ANd have an empty extra package that users can install if they really
want neither n-m or wicd?

While I don't get a vote, I think that would be a reasonable option if
you buy the idea that you want to install n-m for people who uninstalled
it for squeeze, but you still want a way for people to say no I hate
n-m.

I think 4A is a better option, bum my proposal may help the question of
whether the TC missed another case where n-m is the wrong answer.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/tslzk3ck67s@mit.edu



Re: Next CTTE meeting is at date -d 'October 25 2012 17:00 UTC' on #debian-ctte on irc.debian.org

2012-10-23 Thread Russ Allbery
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes:

 Just a reminder that the next meeting is at 
 date -d 'October 25 2012 17:00 UTC' on #debian-ctte on irc.debian.org

 The agenda is here:

 http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/debian-ctte.git;a=blob;f=meetings/agenda.txt;hb=HEAD

 feel free to update it if necessary.

I'm on vacation (through the 31st) and only intermittantly on-line, so I
won't be able to make it this month.

-- 
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)   http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/873914wshm@windlord.stanford.edu



Bug#688772: gnome Depends network-manager-gnome

2012-10-23 Thread Michael Biebl
On 24.10.2012 03:29, Sam Hartman wrote:
 Don, in your option 4B, I wonder if it would be a good idea to  have the
 depend be something like g-n-m|wicd|no-network-manager

The gnome meta-package certainly won't get an alternative dependency
on wicd. That would be completely stupid and miss the point of this
dependency. The GNOME desktop has zero integration with wicd, so this
alternative dependency is completely backwards.
Why don't you force a dependency on ifupdown on us, or ifplugd or whatever.

This whole crusade by the ctte is so ridiculous, but unfortunately I
can't laugh about that anymore.

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature