Your message dated Thu, 31 Jul 2014 19:36:30 -0700 with message-id <20140801023630.gf12...@teltox.donarmstrong.com> and subject line [CTTE #746715] Continuing support for multiple init systems has caused the Debian Bug report #746715, regarding the foreseeable outcome of the TC vote on init systems to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 746715: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746715 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: tech-ctte An Ubuntu developer just brought the following Debian changelog entry to my attention: tftp-hpa (5.2-17) experimental; urgency=low * Removing upstart hacks, they are ugly and upstart is dead now. Since various members of the Technical Committee argued that choosing a default would not prevent Debian from supporting other init systems, I would like to hear from those members how they think this should be addressed. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.orgsignature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---The technical committe was asked in #746715 to address the removal of support for upstart in a package. ==== RESOLUTION ==== The issue of init system support recently came to the Technical Committee's attention again.[1] For the record, the TC expects maintainers to continue to support the multiple available init systems in Debian. That includes merging reasonable contributions, and not reverting existing support without a compelling reason. [1] See #746715 for background. ==== END OF RESOLUTION ==== Please see http://bugs.debian.org/746715 for discussion of this bug.signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---