Bug#136654: marked as done (Adding missing headers to debbugs-mails)

2004-05-22 Thread Colin Watson
reopen 136654
retitle 136654 encode done/forwarded acks consistently
thanks

On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 07:48:04PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Your message dated Sun, 23 May 2004 04:37:51 +0200
> with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> and subject line doesn't matter so i close the bug
> has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
[...]
> it's not really interesting whether the headers exist or not, so i'll
> close this bug ;)

I'm reopening it again, as the fact that done/forwarded acks don't have
a correct or consistent content-transfer-encoding is a bug. We can
possibly even fix it now that the Maintainers file given to us by the
archive software is guaranteed UTF-8.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Processed: Re: Bug#136654: marked as done (Adding missing headers to debbugs-mails)

2004-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 136654
Bug#136654: Adding missing headers to debbugs-mails
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> retitle 136654 encode done/forwarded acks consistently
Bug#136654: Adding missing headers to debbugs-mails
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)




Bug#136654: marked as done (Adding missing headers to debbugs-mails)

2004-05-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 May 2004 04:37:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line doesn't matter so i close the bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2002 18:25:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 03 12:25:38 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pd958ae80.dip.t-dialin.net (jonas.server0.de) [217.88.174.128] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16hafn-0002R3-00; Sun, 03 Mar 2002 12:25:28 -0600
Received: from jonas.server0.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by jonas.server0.de (8.12.2/8.12.1/Debian -5) with ESMTP id 
g23IPOCb004255
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 19:25:24 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jonas.server0.de (8.12.2/8.12.1/Submit) id g23IPOVW004254
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 19:25:24 +0100
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 19:25:24 +0100
From: Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Adding missing headers to debbugs-mails
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: debbugs
Severity: wishlist
Version: 2.3-4

There is header missing in mails send by debbugs.
Courier grouses:
---
The following message contains 8-bit content, but does not have the
required MIME headers for 8-bit data transport.

See ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2045.txt> for more information.
---

Looking at the mail I found the missing header:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Then I searched the debbugs-code and found the scripts:
At the tar.gz in scripts/[html-control.in|process.in|service.in]
and at installed .deb in /usr/lib/debbugs/[html-control|process|service]
At every mail this header has to be added.

Bye
 Jonas

-- 
Documentation is like sex: when it is good, it is very, very good; and
when it is bad, it is better than nothing. -- Dick Brandon

---
Received: (at 136654-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 May 2004 02:38:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 22 19:38:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (diana50.kidns.de) [62.75.129.11] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BRisF-000609-00; Sat, 22 May 2004 19:38:03 -0700
Received: from pd9e9d17f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.233.209.127] 
helo=resivo.mejo.net)
by diana50.kidns.de with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16)
(Exim 4.32)
id 1BRin5-0002i9-56
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 23 May 2004 04:32:43 +0200
Received: from jonas by resivo.mejo.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BRis3-qj-IK
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 23 May 2004 04:37:52 +0200
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 04:37:51 +0200
From: Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: doesn't matter so i close the bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Sender: jonas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 217.233.209.127
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on diana50.kidns.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

it's not really interesting whether the headers exist or not, so i'll
close this bug ;)

bye
 jonas