Bug#623094: marked as done (desktop-base: Please add GSettings default)

2011-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:47:52 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#623094: fixed in desktop-base 6.0.7
has caused the Debian Bug report #623094,
regarding desktop-base: Please add GSettings default
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
623094: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623094
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: desktop-base
Version: 6.0.7
Severity: wishlist

gnome-settings-daemon in experimental uses GSettings and not GConf to 
store its default.

Please apply the attached patch to handle it.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages desktop-base depends on:
ii  librsvg2-common   2.32.1-1   SAX-based renderer library for SVG

desktop-base recommends no packages.

Versions of packages desktop-base suggests:
ii  gnome 1:2.30+8   The GNOME Desktop Environment, wit

-- no debconf information

-- 
 .''`.  Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'  “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
  `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.”  -- Jörg Schilling
Index: debian/control
===
--- debian/control	(révision 250)
+++ debian/control	(copie de travail)
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 Uploaders: Loïc Minier ,
Fathi Boudra ,
Yves-Alexis Perez 
-Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 6)
+Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.93), debhelper (>= 8.1.3)
 # libusplash-dev, imagemagick, librsvg2-bin
 Standards-Version: 3.9.1
 Homepage: http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop
Index: debian/gsettings-override
===
--- debian/gsettings-override	(révision 0)
+++ debian/gsettings-override	(révision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+[org.gnome.desktop.background]
+picture-options='zoom'
+picture-uri='file:///usr/share/images/desktop-base/desktop-background'
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog	(révision 250)
+++ debian/changelog	(copie de travail)
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+desktop-base (6.0.7) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+  * Build-depend on recent cdbs+debhelper to have dh_installgsettings.
+  * debian/gsettings-override: set the default background using 
+GSettings.
+
+ -- Josselin Mouette   Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:24:02 +0200
+
 desktop-base (6.0.6) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * plymouth/spacefun:
Index: debian/source.lintian-overrides
===
--- debian/source.lintian-overrides	(révision 250)
+++ debian/source.lintian-overrides	(copie de travail)
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-# we ignore ${Misc:Depends} because it would bring gconf
+# we ignore ${Misc:Depends} because it would bring gconf and dconf
 desktop-base source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends desktop-base
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: desktop-base
Source-Version: 6.0.7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
desktop-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

desktop-base_6.0.7.dsc
  to main/d/desktop-base/desktop-base_6.0.7.dsc
desktop-base_6.0.7.tar.gz
  to main/d/desktop-base/desktop-base_6.0.7.tar.gz
desktop-base_6.0.7_all.deb
  to main/d/desktop-base/desktop-base_6.0.7_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 623...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Josselin Mouette  (supplier of updated desktop-base package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 21:43:14 +0200
Source: desktop-base
Binary: desktop-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 6.0.7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gustavo Franco 
Changed-By: Josselin Mouette 
Description: 
 desktop-base - common files for the Debian Desktop
Closes: 623094
Changes: 
 desktop-base (6.0.7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Josse

Accepted desktop-base 6.0.7 (source all)

2011-10-14 Thread Josselin Mouette 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 21:43:14 +0200
Source: desktop-base
Binary: desktop-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 6.0.7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gustavo Franco 
Changed-By: Josselin Mouette 
Description: 
 desktop-base - common files for the Debian Desktop
Closes: 623094
Changes: 
 desktop-base (6.0.7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Josselin Mouette ]
   * Build-depend on recent cdbs+debhelper to have dh_installgsettings.
   * debian/gsettings-override: set the default background using
 GSettings.
   * xy_desktop-base.gschema.override: configure the default background
 for gdm3 using GSettings as well.
   * All of this closes: #623094.
   * Add myself to uploaders.
 .
   [ Yves-Alexis Perez ]
   * debian/control:
 - update standards version to 3.9.2.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 71ef03eff5680c3df259090242edc5f33a0d89f2 1142 desktop-base_6.0.7.dsc
 32781b11f72c6e113b495c555fa958b024ae1648 8130511 desktop-base_6.0.7.tar.gz
 f6830dd7bbdaaa4452d2646a23cc43765167d480 6654344 desktop-base_6.0.7_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 764cb7ef909431a8d85e46ee25719c0052bac6d8f2dbd0b350bfcaf8e283fe47 1142 
desktop-base_6.0.7.dsc
 b4e465a79c764450051cf98eb72a95f98618190b9887831133b94ee3d23a534a 8130511 
desktop-base_6.0.7.tar.gz
 b5a1530163fe86277e0bf379b648301c8471389bc554aa4a042e6231f9ff4a1c 6654344 
desktop-base_6.0.7_all.deb
Files: 
 8a27b68c1f6ba586f697adc428e035d6 1142 x11 optional desktop-base_6.0.7.dsc
 ebab4c8e6a12009c3a5383e453dd8631 8130511 x11 optional desktop-base_6.0.7.tar.gz
 defd4fbe3461e99b0de3a0fdd88d27d2 6654344 x11 optional 
desktop-base_6.0.7_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFOmJIgrSla4ddfhTMRAux6AJ4sWurYLLFVdea0Sl1rWVLds9cckACcDZaz
UbZPdQytbot+hd/218U58qY=
=2ey5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
desktop-base_6.0.7.dsc
  to main/d/desktop-base/desktop-base_6.0.7.dsc
desktop-base_6.0.7.tar.gz
  to main/d/desktop-base/desktop-base_6.0.7.tar.gz
desktop-base_6.0.7_all.deb
  to main/d/desktop-base/desktop-base_6.0.7_all.deb



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-desktop-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1reofy-0002bn...@franck.debian.org

Re: desktop artwork for wheezy

2011-10-14 Thread Tyler Rusk 
Are the colors Debian has been using(in Gnome) something that Debian has
decided on and set in stone or can we play with them too? The reason I ask
is that the default light blue is kind of harsh on the eyes. (please excuse
me if I am doing this wrong, I am new to mailing lists). When I asked my
girlfriend, a regular PC user with the overall goal to get her stuff done
and get off the computer about the default Debian Gnome she said that she
thought it was ugly in comparison to Ubuntu which looked "cool". I set her
up with a shiki-brave-theme and the Flow.png background as well as a dock on
the left(gnome-shell will supply that in testing(i hope...)). I told her I
was switching to Ubuntu, but the install failed, so I did that redesign and
she hasn't complained since. Maybe darker colors are in order?



On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Paul Wise  wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > There are less than 8 months until the wheezy freeze, it is probably
> > time we had some new artwork in development.
>
> Some further thoughts...
>
> I have always been strongly opposed to adding any Debian branding to
> any package; if we add any branding it should be in a separate
> optional package, possibly installed by default, possibly not.
>
> I personally disable the branding Debian currently does where possible
> and stick with the upstream branding if there is any.
>
> Through my work on the Debian derivatives census I've found that
> Debian needs to work a lot on de-branding; splitting out branding
> information into separate packages so that derivatives don't have to
> patch that information out.
>
> desktop-base has always been a badly named package and IMO the
> implementation leaves a bit to be desired; one monolithic package
> isn't the best idea, especially as Debian moves into more mobile and
> space restricted devices like phones and tablets.
>
> There is a certain class of user that will always want to use a
> different wm/icon/cursor/etc theme from the default, no matter what it
> is.
>
> There will also be a certain class of user who feels a certain loyalty
> towards the distro they use and want to use branded themes.
>
> There is also the case of demonstration machines at conferences, expos
> etc, probably those should be more identifiable as Debian.
>
> Therefore branding should be optional (possibly with a question in d-i
> or a task in tasksel). Whether it gets installed by default I guess is
> a question for each team maintaining a task in tasksel. For example a
> hypothetical debian-edu pure blend might want to install a set of
> *-branding-debian-edu packages.
>
> Clearly, Debian branded artwork is a useful thing for us to have.
>
> The places I can think of where we currently have branding are:
> website/wiki front page, d-i, bootloader, base-files, login manager,
> desktop wallpaper. Are there more?
>
> Is anyone willing to analyse and report how other distributions handle
> branding/artwork?
>
> --
> bye,
> pabs
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-desktop-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive:
> http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6HMW2Ptbwvjt=cuzhakwiiw_y2khc0lhpe_pgxc1-u...@mail.gmail.com
>
>

Re: GUI Applications slow after dist-upgrade

2011-10-14 Thread dE . 

On 10/14/11 18:29, Sanjoy Das wrote:

Hi!

After a recent dist-upgrade, some GUI applications on my system have
become unacceptably slow and choppy.  This is unlikely to be GPU
problem since I can still play HD videos and use GPU-heavy
applications like projectM without trouble.

Is anyone facing similar issues?  My primary problem is that I cannot
isolate the issue to a specific subsystem (so that I can file a bug
report).

I am on an Intel Core i7 and nVidia 9500GT.

Thanks!
It sounds like a graphics problem, while playing videos you use 
extensively the XV extension of the graphics hardware/drivers. What do 
you mean by 'some', can you place some examples?



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-desktop-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e984e8e.3070...@gmail.com

Bug#623094: desktop-base: Please add GSettings default

2011-10-14 Thread Michael Biebl 
Package: desktop-base
Version: 6.0.6
Followup-For: Bug #623094

The following keys need to be added so that the default background in gdm3 is
set:

[org.gnome.desktop.background]
picture-uri='file:///usr/share/images/desktop-base/login-background.svg'
picture-options='zoom'




-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-2-486
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages desktop-base depends on:
ii  librsvg2-common  2.34.1-2

desktop-base recommends no packages.

Versions of packages desktop-base suggests:
ii  gnome  1:2.30+11
ii  xfce4  4.8.0.3  

-- no debconf information




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-desktop-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20111014124418.2566.47160.report...@pluto.milchstrasse.xx