Re: Bug#60753: mutt: /etc/Muttrc should not use colors

2000-03-20 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
The /etc/Muttrc in the mutt package makes a fruit salad of mutt.
   Most people like it.
  
  BTW, the default key bindings in mutt are horribly broken. No key does
  what someone would expect.
 
 that depends on what you're used to. if you've been using elm for years
 then mutt's key binding are perfectly 'natural'
 
 i used pine for years before switching to mutt. took me several days to
 re-train my fingers for the right keys, but the effort was worth it. i
 tried using the pine emulation bindings but they were more trouble for
 me than just learning the mutt keys.
 
 i've been using mutt for long enough now that pine's key bindings seem
 clumsy and awkward.
 

 No way, there's no room for discussion. Up and down arrow keys doesn't
scroll a message ap  down? Pg-down advancing to next message?
 The key binding are so insame that prevent people (newbies) fom using mutt,
they first must to learn how to change those defaults to something
acceptable.



Re: Bug#60753: mutt: /etc/Muttrc should not use colors

2000-03-20 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 09:04:24PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
 The /etc/Muttrc in the mutt package makes a fruit salad of mutt.
Most people like it.
   
   BTW, the default key bindings in mutt are horribly broken. No key does
   what someone would expect.
  
  that depends on what you're used to. if you've been using elm for years
  then mutt's key binding are perfectly 'natural'
  
  i used pine for years before switching to mutt. took me several days to
  re-train my fingers for the right keys, but the effort was worth it. i
  tried using the pine emulation bindings but they were more trouble for
  me than just learning the mutt keys.
  
  i've been using mutt for long enough now that pine's key bindings seem
  clumsy and awkward.
 
  No way, there's no room for discussion. 

there's lots of room for discussion. you are inflating minor annoyances
into end-of-the-earth disasters.

 Up and down arrow keys doesn't scroll a message ap  down?

yeah, that's annoying at first. you get used to it, though.

to scroll up and down by a single line, use Enter (down) and Del (up).
this is a reasonably common keybinding - i've seen other programs
(including more) use the same.

personally, i'd like to use the vi-keys 'j' and 'k' for next and prev
messages as they do now, but the arrow keys for scrolling up and down
within a message.

i don't care enough about it though to write a patch...or even to submit
a wishlist bug report. any change like that might make some new users
happier but is bound to piss off long-time users when the program they
have been using for years suddently starts behaving very differently
after an upgrade.


arrow keys suck, anyway. they are unreliable as any extra delays (e.g.
lagged network link) can change the timing between the characters sent
when an arrow key is pressed. if the timing changes too much, then you
don't get an arrow key, you get ESC followed by garbage.

the vi-like keystrokes are safer. they work no matter how lagged your
net link is.


 Pg-down advancing to next message?

PgDn scrolls down the message, as expected.  PgUp scrolls back up.

the only annoying thing is that if you are already at the end of a
message, then PgDn takes you to the next message.

this should be optional behaviour. maybe it already is...it has never
annoyed me enough to find out.

 The key binding are so insame that prevent people (newbies) fom
 using mutt, they first must to learn how to change those defaults to
 something acceptable.

it's not that bad. if newbies can pick up emacs' horribly contorted key
bindings then mutt's a doddle.

craig

--
craig sanders



Re: Bug#60753: mutt: /etc/Muttrc should not use colors

2000-03-20 Thread Jonathan Walther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

I agree.  Mutt should by default be much more like pine. I like
all my multiple folders, each containing the mail from one mailing list,
and I like being able to easily navigate between them like pine allows.

- --sig--
Real Programmers consider what you see is what you get to be 
just as bad  a  concept  in  Text Editors  as  it is in women.  
No, the Real Programmer wants a you asked for it, you  got  it  
text  editor -- complicated, cryptic,  powerful,  unforgiving,  
dangerous.

On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, [iso-8859-1] Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:

   The /etc/Muttrc in the mutt package makes a fruit salad of mutt.
  Most people like it.
 
  BTW, the default key bindings in mutt are horribly broken. No key does what
 someone would expect.
 
 
 -- 
a href=http://master.debian.org/~krooger;debian/a
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBONV9NMK9HT/YfGeBAQHWLwQAlrwhELmKOrpkNnWrsIixfoD3DmHv0MA1
6RgIhlcguNimAJ1IeZjv1x4vAGUnP1ilp94Nyv/llj7g40iz1um3HTTJ4uUiSYFZ
H6hMVt3PMCc7oHhwECLEf9C09x83i50TxZvAi51u1DXt2jtolQCEyytUmfJta49J
ueDn3AQlu/o=
=I1qL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



ITP: javawrapper

2000-03-20 Thread Colin Watson
Hi,

I intend to package javawrapper.

Package: javawrapper
Version: 1.0-1
Section: utils
Priority: optional
Description: A wrapper for kernel execution of Java programs
 javawrapper uses the binfmt_misc feature of newer Linux kernels to execute a
 Java class file directly simply by supplying its filename on the command
 line like a normal executable. It also correctly handles classes contained
 in packages.

I'm also the upstream maintainer for this package, and the source is
already being distributed in the kernel documentation tree.

I'm not yet a developer, so I'm looking for a sponsor - please mail me
if you want to help!

Thanks,

-- 
Colin Watson   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#60753: mutt: /etc/Muttrc should not use colors

2000-03-20 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 05:21:55PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
 I agree.  Mutt should by default be much more like pine. I like all my
 multiple folders, each containing the mail from one mailing list, and
 I like being able to easily navigate between them like pine allows.

huh? mutt's folder navigation/selection ability is much better than
pine's.

when selecting a folder to go to (or to save messages to), you've got a
prompt with command-line history/recall/edit. you can also press TAB and
get a selectable list of all mail folders in mutt's CWD. press TAB again
and you get a list of all defined incoming mailboxes.


mutt also lets you access mail folders anywhere on your disk, and not
just in ~/mail. e.g. run mutt -f /var/spool/mail/www-data as root
(to check the bounces from poorly written cgi formmail scripts)...you
can't do that in pine without copying the file to /root/mail or making a
symlink.


craig

ps: if you prefer pine, then just use it. there's no need to make every
mail client as bad as pine...some of us like mutt the way it is and
don't want to see it mangled into an awkward pine clone.

--
craig sanders



[transcript] source package formats

2000-03-20 Thread Joey Hess
[ This is a transcript of a conversation on the Debian developer irc
  channel. Note that Diziet is Ian Jackson. This transcript has been edited
  for clarity and to remove other simulantaneous conversations. ]

Overfiend since both you dpkg guys are here.
Overfiend Can I ask for something?  How about a flag in the .dsc that tells 
dpkg-source not to untar the .orig?
wichert rmt: you do NOT mail unsuspecing people 4Mb of stuff
Overfiend That would help with pristine source packages and dbs-type stuff
wichert Overfiend: how about a new source format?
Overfiend wichert: as long as it lets me do what I want
seeS Is this correct?
wichert Overfiend: okay. now give me 48-hour days and lots of money and I'll 
make it happen
Overfiend wichert: bah.
Overfiend I asked for what I did because I'd like to see it in woody
Overfiend a new source format, I won't see in woody :)
rcw Overfiend: wichert and guy have had a new dsc format cooking for at least 
a year
Diziet Surely the problem is that dpkg-source trusts the .tar.gz less than 
the untarred original source ?
wichert rcw: oh? we do?
rcw wichert: I certainly remember reading something about it about 6 months 
ago
Diziet If when you did dpkg-source --build it should include the original 
.tar.gz.
Overfiend Diziet: eh?  I just want to delay the untarring of the upstream 
tarball until the rules file is run
Diziet Or does it not do that already ?
rcw wichert: maybe it wasn't you
wichert rcw: that might be klee's stuff
Overfiend rcw: besides, Guy hasn't been SEEN for at least a year :-/
wichert he already did that
Overfiend he and Brian White cancelled each other out about the time of 
glider's fuckup of the slink archive
Diziet overfiend: I don't understand.  The .orig.tar.gz nees to be untarred 
and patched before the debian/rules exists.  Are you talking about at unpack 
time ?
rcw Overfiend: details
Overfiend Diziet: no, it doesn't, and in fact we have several packages that 
don't do it that way
Overfiend Diziet: sendmail, glibc, xfree86, ...
Diziet overfiend: What ??  I'm very confused now.
Diziet overfiend: The debian/rules is in the .diff.gz, right ?
Overfiend Diziet: the orig.tar.gz just contains another tarball in a 
subdirectory
Joey Diziet, these pkg's use redhat type style
Joey Diziet: orig.tgz contains an orig, and diffs that a applied during 
debian/rules
wichert what I'ld like is a .dsc that lists one or more .orig.tar.gz's, and a 
tar of debian/ which can include patches
Overfiend The .diff.gz's for these packages are basically just tar'ed up 
debian/ dirs masquerading as diffs
Diziet Wergh, I've just unpacked the sendmail dsc and it's well weird.
Overfiend wichert: aye
rcw diziet: grab the gnome-napster source package and let doogie's dbs system 
soak into your head. it's a trip
wichert and debian/rules or something else can apply those patches at 
buildtime, no need to clutter the rest with that
Overfiend rcw: no, don't tell him that
Culus_ rcw: Better than, say, acid? :P
Overfiend diziet will corner doogie and demoralize him out of the project :-P
rcw Culus: much better, and cheaper
Overfiend like he tried to do with Culus for writing in C++ :)
rcw Culus: plus every time you look at it you get a bigger trip, it's 
addicting
Diziet overfiend: This package is totally fucked.  I can't edit the source 
and then dpkg-source --build it !
wichert I've also decided that conditional patches are probably the wrong 
approach
* Overfiend notes that the number of compiler warnings in X has not appreciably 
decreased from 3.3.6 to 4.0
Overfiend diziet: what package?
Diziet sendmail
Overfiend ah
Diziet I can't even _read_ the source without executing debian/rules.
Overfiend diziet: well, no, you can't, because people abuse the shit out of 
that system and cause monolithic patches
Overfiend diziet: like when I inherited XFree86
Diziet overfiend: Err, wot ?
Overfiend diziet: 500k of patches, not separated by function or anything else
Diziet What do you mean by monolithic patches ?
Overfiend a nightmare to deal with
Overfiend diziet: duh. .diff.gz
Overfiend it has debian/ + all patches to upstream rolled into one
Diziet That's what a version control system is for, right ?
Overfiend diziet: you can lead developers to cvs but you can't make them 
commit
Diziet Why do the X packages have such a large .diff.gz ?
netgod Overfiend: heh
Overfiend diziet: you get a snowball effect of acculumating, unrelated patches
Overfiend diziet: because we patch the shit out of it
Diziet Well, if they don't like having a single .diff.gz like that then they 
should use CVS.  Making packages that people can't edit is not helpful !
nick Overfiend: do you edit diff files?
Diziet overfiend: 500K?!  That takes some coding !
Overfiend diziet: oh well, I'll let you and wichert duke this out, what he 
proposed will make me happy
Diziet wichert: What are you proposing ?
Overfiend diziet: we didn't originate most of them, we just assimilated them
Culus_ wichert: What now?
Overfiend diziet: a lot of 

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 18, 2000

2000-03-20 Thread Ingo Saitz
MoiN

On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 09:46:25AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote:
 Package: gnofin (debian/main)
 Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   60614  LANG=de_DE gnofin does weird things
[...]
 Package: gnucash (debian/main)
 Maintainer: Tyson Dowd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
   60615  gnucash: LANG=de_DE does weird things

The bug seems to be fixed in woody. Perhaps that version should
go into frozen, too? Changelog says it includes a lot of
bugfixes.

If these bugs can't be solved for potato I suggest the following
wrapper (taken from /usr/bin/X11/netscape):

--8-- cut here --8--
#!/bin/sh
#
# Fix locale problems.
#
# If the locale uses a decimal separator other than a point
printf 
# will complain and it will not return 1.0
#

pnt=$(printf %1.1f 1 2/dev/null)

if [ $pnt != 1.0 ]; then
#   echo 1.0 - $pnt
# Perhaps we have a dangerous value for LANG or LC_NUMERIC. Let's
# try a safe value for LC_NUMERIC.
LC_NUMERIC=C
export LC_NUMERIC
pnt=$(printf %1.1f 1 2 /dev/null)
fi

if [ $pnt != 1.0 ]; then
# No, it is LC_ALL which is bad. Set LC_*=$LC_ALL for every category
# (as expected) except LC_NUMERIC, and then unset LC_ALL.
LC_COLLATE=$LC_ALL
LC_CTYPE=$LC_ALL
LC_MESSAGES=$LC_ALL
LC_MONETARY=$LC_ALL
LC_TIME=$LC_ALL
unset LC_ALL
export LC_ALL LC_COLLATE LC_CTYPE LC_MESSAGES LC_MONETARY LC_CTIME
fi

exec /usr/bin/gnofin
--8-- cut here --8--

Ingo
--
Windows, me?



ITP: eog

2000-03-20 Thread Dan Nguyen
Hello,

I will be packaging eog (Eye of Gnome).

Package: eog
Priority: optional
Section: graphics
Version: 0.2-1
Description: The Eye of Gnome graphics viewer and  cataloging program
  Gnome is the GNU Network Object Model Enviroment
  .
  The Eye of Gnome, an image viewer program.  It is meant to be a fast
  and functional image viewer as well as an image cataloging program.


  -dan
  
-- 
   Dan Nguyen  | It is with true love as it is with ghosts;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | everyone talks of it, but few have seen it.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]|   -Maxime De La Rochefoucauld
25 2F 99 19 6C C9 19 D6  1B 9F F1 E0 E9 10 4C 16


pgpLqJqxm83RY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: ITP: eog

2000-03-20 Thread Adam Heath
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Dan Nguyen wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I will be packaging eog (Eye of Gnome).
 
 Package: eog
 Priority: optional
 Section: graphics
 Version: 0.2-1
 Description: The Eye of Gnome graphics viewer and  cataloging program
   Gnome is the GNU Network Object Model Enviroment
   .
   The Eye of Gnome, an image viewer program.  It is meant to be a fast
   and functional image viewer as well as an image cataloging program.

Bzzt.  Not a description.

BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA  3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-



Re: ITP: eog

2000-03-20 Thread Dan Nguyen
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 12:12:45AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
 On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Dan Nguyen wrote:
 
  Hello,
  
  I will be packaging eog (Eye of Gnome).
  
  Package: eog
  Priority: optional
  Section: graphics
  Version: 0.2-1
  Description: The Eye of Gnome graphics viewer and  cataloging program
Gnome is the GNU Network Object Model Enviroment
.
The Eye of Gnome, an image viewer program.  It is meant to be a fast
and functional image viewer as well as an image cataloging program.
 
 Bzzt.  Not a description.


Yes... sorry.  That's what I get for working late... Here's try 2.

Description: Eye of Gnome graphics viewer program
  eog or the Eye of Gnome is a graphics viewer for GNOME which uses
  the gdk-pixbuf library.  It can deal with large images, and zoom and
  scroll with constant memory usage.   The goal is a standard graphics
  viewer for future releases of Gnome.  

-- 
   Dan Nguyen  | It is with true love as it is with ghosts;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | everyone talks of it, but few have seen it.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]|   -Maxime De La Rochefoucauld
25 2F 99 19 6C C9 19 D6  1B 9F F1 E0 E9 10 4C 16



Re: [transcript] source package formats

2000-03-20 Thread Adam Heath
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Joey Hess wrote:

 [ This is a transcript of a conversation on the Debian developer irc
   channel. Note that Diziet is Ian Jackson. This transcript has been edited
   for clarity and to remove other simulantaneous conversations. ]

Thanks Joey for posting that.

Ok, now for some fun stuff.

In the transcript, it is mentioned that I wrote dbs.  It is a multi-tarball,
multi-patch system, that is currently in use by several pkgs.  However, it has
its drawbacks, the 2 most glaring that it hides the source in subtrees, all
packed up, and that it doesn't extract into pkg-ver directly.

So, I decided to do something about that finally.  Below is an example dsc
format that I have come up with.

===
Source: xawtv
Format: 2.0
Version: 3.07-2
Binary: xawtv, fbtv, radio, streamer, webcam, xawtv-tools
Maintainer: Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.1.1
Build-Depends: debhelper, autoconf, xlib6g-dev, xaw3dg-dev, libjpeg62-dev, 
xbase-clients
Files:
 93c152103ca081bd993bb216952a61be 293809 xawtv_3.07.orig.tar.gz
 c2b6e4c24fac3bb6c4318d3281929dba 16046 xawtv_3.07-2.tarballs.tar.gz
 05a79461096e2a1eefaad9ef8d28c421 2452 xawtv_3.07-2.patches.tar.gz
Patches:
 4177fc4c79df8d83eec24e5444064df5 455 000_fbtv_fhs.diff
 eb611f579f3e169c9f0007d76e10acf9 1185 001_i2c_header_fix.diff
 6f4317ba2194792a8b989542095164b2 1048 002_Makefile.in.sanity.diff
 e32cec754188fd133da14740ba91352b 4467 003_autoconf_parallel_compile.diff
Tarballs:
 49d09b3edefb8279dc0ae1df3a42d15b 15908 debian.tar.gz
===

You'll note the addition of 3 fields(Format, Patches, and Tarballs), and the
different files specified for the files field.  The existance of a Format
field can be used to see that this is a new format source package.  Currently,
my script doesn't use that.  It looks for a .diff.gz, and if found, assumes an
old format.

The current format has 3 files that are distributed with a source
package.  The .orig.tar.gz, a .diff.gz, and a .dsc.  With this new format, it
increases that count by 1.  I couldn't see a way around this however, while
still keeping with my intended outcome.

The entries listed in the Patches field are contained in the .patches.tar.gz
file.  Those listed in the Tarballs field are listed in the .tarballs.tar.gz
file.  The files listed are extracted in the sort order produced by ls, so
naming is important.  There is also no distinction between upstream and debian
only patches.

I currently have a script that can parse this new format, and extract both old
and new format archives.  It doesn't yet support building a .dsc from a
directory.  Also, I currently only support tar and gz, with plans for ar, zip,
jar, Z, bz, bz2, and whatever else exists that we can use in Debian.

A transcript of the scripts output follows:
===
$ ./unpack xawtv_3.07-2.dsc
Extracting xawtv in xawtv-3.07.
Extracting tarball debian.tar.gz.
Applying patch 000_fbtv_fhs.diff.
Applying patch 001_i2c_header_fix.diff.
Applying patch 002_Makefile.in.sanity.diff.
Applying patch 003_autoconf_parallel_compile.diff.
===

BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA  3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-



Re: ITP: eog

2000-03-20 Thread Adam Heath
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Dan Nguyen wrote:

 On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 12:12:45AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
  On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Dan Nguyen wrote:
  
   Description: The Eye of Gnome graphics viewer and  cataloging program
 Gnome is the GNU Network Object Model Enviroment
 .
 The Eye of Gnome, an image viewer program.  It is meant to be a fast
 and functional image viewer as well as an image cataloging program.
  
  Bzzt.  Not a description.
 
 
 Yes... sorry.  That's what I get for working late... Here's try 2.
 
 Description: Eye of Gnome graphics viewer program
   eog or the Eye of Gnome is a graphics viewer for GNOME which uses
   the gdk-pixbuf library.  It can deal with large images, and zoom and
   scroll with constant memory usage.   The goal is a standard graphics
   viewer for future releases of Gnome.  

applaud

I hate all those gnome pkgs that are 2 lines long.

BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA  3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-



Re: [transcript] source package formats

2000-03-20 Thread Jason Gunthorpe

On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Adam Heath wrote:

 You'll note the addition of 3 fields(Format, Patches, and Tarballs), and the
 different files specified for the files field.  The existance of a Format

Having a .tarballs.tar.gz seems rather pointless, just have all the tars
seperate - as does including the md5s for patches in the .dsc, have a
manifest file in patch tar. Though the point of that does rather elude me.

Jason



Re: Anyone intents to package Guppi

2000-03-20 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:

 Accoring to http://www.gnome.org/guppi/#get, Cesar Talon
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] has already packaged it. The deb is at
 ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/guppi/Debian
Any reason why this is not included in woody?

Kind regards

Andreas.



Re: Apt-Problem

2000-03-20 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

 On 18 Mar 2000, Brian May wrote:
 
  I believe the original poster used dpkg -i to install the same copy
  that apt had downloaded - ie only one copy ever downloaded.
 
 Then dpkg should have failed to install it since it is a truncated file.
No all the files which dselect wasn't able to install (via apt)
were installable via dpkg -i
  
  Not sure about libtool, but have a look at bugs 60339 and 60399 for a
  similar problem with man-db. This was posted as another thread on
  debian-devel.
 
 This looks like something entirely different
I used libtool and man-db as examples to show that the problem was
caused by apt-get und to post short errormessages (instead of the
output after failing to install 42 packages).  I repeat: All packages
were installable with dpkg -i after apt-get was unable to install
them.  Using another mirror solved this problem.  Two different mirrors
in Germany were affected by this.

Kind regards

  Andreas.



Re: Bug#60753: mutt: /etc/Muttrc should not use colors

2000-03-20 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 05:21:55PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
 I agree.  Mutt should by default be much more like pine. I like

This sounds like a lot of recent threads on debian-devel --
the defaults should suite MY PREFERENCES! That's why they're
defaults -- you can change them.

Personally I can't stand Mutt's default colours (green on blue? ugh!)
but the default keybinds are fine. I have a .muttrc which I copy
around between all my accounts.


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Apt-Problem

2000-03-20 Thread Jason Gunthorpe

On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Andreas Tille wrote:

 output after failing to install 42 packages).  I repeat: All packages
 were installable with dpkg -i after apt-get was unable to install

That doesn't mean anything, if the file was only 1 byte short chances are
it would still be entirely valid, dpkg -i would take it, apt would not due
to a size and md5 mismatch.

Jason



Re: Apt-Problem

2000-03-20 Thread Brian May
 Jason == Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Jason On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Andreas Tille wrote:

 output after failing to install 42 packages).  I repeat: All
 packages were installable with dpkg -i after apt-get was unable
 to install

Jason That doesn't mean anything, if the file was only 1 byte
Jason short chances are it would still be entirely valid, dpkg -i
Jason would take it, apt would not due to a size and md5
Jason mismatch.

I have to agree with Jason here, I was confused. In this case the
error is generating by apt-get, in my case the error was generated by
dpkg.

I will take Jason's word for it that a deb file with bytes missing can
still be valid...
-- 
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#60753: mutt: /etc/Muttrc should not use colors

2000-03-20 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
  I agree.  Mutt should by default be much more like pine. I like
 
 This sounds like a lot of recent threads on debian-devel --
 the defaults should suite MY PREFERENCES! That's why they're
 defaults -- you can change them.
 
 Personally I can't stand Mutt's default colours (green on blue? ugh!)
 but the default keybinds are fine. I have a .muttrc which I copy
 around between all my accounts.

 It's a tough issue, but there's certainly a line somewhere. And mutt does
not have reasonable defaults. In the keyboard, each key has a function,
there are lots of functions that are not directly in the keyboard, that's
why each program has to invent a keybinding. But there are functions that
*are* in the keyboard and so:

 PgUp - must scroll up a page, just that.
 PgDown   - must scroll down a page
 Up Arrow - must scroll up a line
 Up Arrow - must scroll down a line
 Home - must go to the start of something
 End - must go to the end of something

 Using the Space and the Backspace keys for up and down movement is absurd,
it's even stupid. Backspace is back-space. Those keybindings where thought
for keyboards without arrows, and those keyboards no longer exists...

 Besides, configuration should always target the norma-naive user. The tough
user can always edit a configfile.



Re: [transcript] source package formats

2000-03-20 Thread Adam Heath
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

 
 On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Adam Heath wrote:
 
  You'll note the addition of 3 fields(Format, Patches, and Tarballs), and the
  different files specified for the files field.  The existance of a Format
 
 Having a .tarballs.tar.gz seems rather pointless, just have all the tars
 seperate - as does including the md5s for patches in the .dsc, have a
 manifest file in patch tar. Though the point of that does rather elude me.

I had a tarballs.tar.gz to lessen the number of files to download.  Altho,
upon reflection, I could see that would increase bandwidth usage.

A separate manifest file sounds good.

Ok, well, I went and did all that. :)

===
$ ./unpack xawtv_3.07-2.dsc  
Extracting xawtv in xawtv-3.07.
Extracting xawtv_3.07-2.debian.tar.gz in xawtv-3.07.
Applying patch 000_fbtv_fhs.diff in xawtv-3.07.
Applying patch 001_i2c_header_fix.diff in xawtv-3.07.
Applying patch 002_Makefile.in.sanity.diff in xawtv-3.07.
Applying patch 003_autoconf_parallel_compile.diff in xawtv-3.07.
===

===
Files:
 93c152103ca081bd993bb216952a61be 293809 xawtv_3.07.orig.tar.gz
 49d09b3edefb8279dc0ae1df3a42d15b 15908 xawtv_3.07-2.debian.tar.gz
 fbb0a2fdc26934037ad11553f8f19814 2624 xawtv_3.07-2.diffs.tar.gz
===

The script looks for all files matching the pattern *.diffs.tar.gz(yes, it
allows multiple patch archives.  This could be used to share between sources),
then everything else that matches *.tar.gz is placed into a tarballs
variable.  The first listed tarball is assumed to be orig.tar.gz, and special
care is taken to ensure that it unpacks into a properly named directory.

All other tarballs and patches are extracted/applied by cd'ing into the target
directory first.

Each .diffs.tar.gz contains a file named 'dsc' which holds the Patches field
from the first version.

Comments?  Suggestions?

ps: Yes, this script does have a good amount of error/sanity checking.  It
doesn't, however, clean up after itself(I hope to rectify this).

BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA  3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-



Re: Bug#60753: mutt: /etc/Muttrc should not use colors

2000-03-20 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 09:04:24PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
 Up and down arrow keys doesn't scroll a message ap  down?

Nope. But that's the way it is in slrn, too: backspace and enter scroll the
message text, and uparrow and downarrow scroll the message list.

It's good once you get used to it, and that takes about five minutes. :)

 Pg-down advancing to next message?

No, pgdn goes page down in the message text, and if it reaches the end, it
goes on to the next message. Once again, similar to slrn, where space
scrolls one page down in the message text, and if it reaches the end, asks
you to proceed to the next message with another space.

  The key binding are so insame that prevent people (newbies) fom using
 mutt, they first must to learn how to change those defaults to something
 acceptable.

IME it's completely the other way round: they like the mutt keybindings
better.

-- 
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name



Re: blue on black is unreadable (was Re: Bug#60753: mutt: /etc/Muttrc should not use colors)

2000-03-20 Thread Radovan Garabik
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 10:31:40AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
 
 lynx has the same problem. hyper links are blue on black, which makes it
 very difficult to see where you are going. fixed with:
 
   COLOR:1:cyan:black
   COLOR:5:brightcyan:black

I wonder who made up the default lynx colours... it is totally nauseating!
the first think I do when installing new debian, I always reconfigure lynx
to have saner colours (e.g. highlighted links are inverse)

COLOR:0:lightgray:black
COLOR:1:yellow:black
COLOR:2:brightred:blue
COLOR:3:green:black
COLOR:4:magenta:black
COLOR:5:blue:black
COLOR:6:black:lightgray
COLOR:7:magenta:cyan


-- 
 ---
| Radovan Garabik http://melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk/~garabik/ |
| __..--^^^--..__garabik @ melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk |
 ---
Antivirus alert: file .signature infected by signature virus.
Hi! I'm a signature virus! Copy me into your signature file to help me spread!



Re: Bug#60753: mutt: /etc/Muttrc should not use colors

2000-03-20 Thread Luca Filipozzi
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 02:30:55AM -0600, Zed Pobre wrote:
 From my experiments with the above, only two things behave in a
 way that I would expect an unfamiliar user to find strange: asymmetry
 in PgUp/PgDown behaviour, and maybe UpArrow and DownArrow moving
 between messages instead of up and down single lines in a viewed
 message.  That can be fixed with three lines:
 
 set pager_stop
 bind pager up previous-line
 bind pager down next-line

These lines are great for a new mutt user. They really should be in the
/etc/Muttrc file... at least commented out and documented. postinst could
even mention that such sane bindings exist.

LeftArrow goes to previous message when in paged view... so why does
UpArrow? It's very intuitive to use UpArrow to scroll up the current
screen.  ditto for RightArrow/DownArrow.

 On the other hand, maybe the project really would find those three
 lines more convenient to have as defaults.  How about it, folks,
 anyone in favor of adding the three lines above to the default
 /etc/Muttrc?

Yes!

-- 
Luca Filipozzi


pgpbKfDHff2M7.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Bug#60753: mutt: /etc/Muttrc should not use colors

2000-03-20 Thread Craig Sanders
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 02:30:55AM -0600, Zed Pobre wrote:
   Besides, configuration should always target the norma-naive
  user. The tough user can always edit a configfile.
 
 From my experiments with the above, only two things behave in a
 way that I would expect an unfamiliar user to find strange: asymmetry
 in PgUp/PgDown behaviour, and maybe UpArrow and DownArrow moving
 between messages instead of up and down single lines in a viewed
 message.  That can be fixed with three lines:
 
 set pager_stop
 bind pager up previous-line
 bind pager down next-line
 
 [...]

 On the other hand, maybe the project really would find those three
 lines more convenient to have as defaults.  How about it, folks,
 anyone in favor of adding the three lines above to the default
 /etc/Muttrc?

nope, not me.

i am in favour of adding them as comments in /etc/Muttrc, along with an
explanation of what they do and why someone might choose to uncomment
them - a summary of your comments in this thread would be perfect.

craig

--
craig sanders



Re: Apt-Problem

2000-03-20 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

 That doesn't mean anything, if the file was only 1 byte short chances are
 it would still be entirely valid, dpkg -i would take it, apt would not due
 to a size and md5 mismatch.
Do you expect a file of size 1 byte to install and work without
problems?

I repeat:  The files I've got worked and are working up to this very moment.
I havn't any problems with them except that apt-get refused to install them.

Kind regards

   Andreas.



Re: Bug#60753: mutt: /etc/Muttrc should not use colors

2000-03-20 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 For an example why I think this is really a bug with severity normal, and 
 not a wish or feature request, see 
 http://duckman.blub.net/~wouter/muttdefaults.png
Seen. My xterms are *very* different, even with a white background.

Looks like wh needs to upgrade his ncurses-base and ncurses-term
packages. Perhaps xterm as well.

Mike.
-- 
How do you eat soup in the matrix...?



Re: Apt-Problem

2000-03-20 Thread Andreas Tille
On 20 Mar 2000, Brian May wrote:

 I have to agree with Jason here, I was confused. In this case the
 error is generating by apt-get, in my case the error was generated by
 dpkg.
 
 I will take Jason's word for it that a deb file with bytes missing can
 still be valid...
OK, I take the word as you, but what should I do if I detect such
kind of problem.  Who should I inform and which information should
I ship.

By the way.  Shouldn't dpkg at least warn that md5 sums are wrong?

Kind regards

Andreas.



bug postgresql-client

2000-03-20 Thread grover
I am having trouble installing postgresql in woody.  I try to install the 
postgresql package and it asks for postgresql-client.  Postgresql-client gives 
the following error:-
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
  postgresql-client: Depends: libreadlineg2 (= 2.1-13.5) but 2.1-12 is to be 
installed
If I try to install libreadlineg2  it tells me that it is already the latest 
package.  
Please don't make me use mysql.. :/

Neil

-- 
Neil Hunt   
HuntCorp Enterprises
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
0414 306 238



Re: bug postgresql-client

2000-03-20 Thread grover
Sorry, submitted where it should've gone..

Neil
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 05:57:13PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am having trouble installing postgresql in woody.  I try to install the 
 postgresql package and it asks for postgresql-client.  Postgresql-client 
 gives the following error:-
 Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
   postgresql-client: Depends: libreadlineg2 (= 2.1-13.5) but 2.1-12 is to be 
 installed
 If I try to install libreadlineg2  it tells me that it is already the latest 
 package.  
 Please don't make me use mysql.. :/
 
 Neil
 
 -- 
 Neil Hunt 
 HuntCorp Enterprises  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 0414 306 238  
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-- 
Neil Hunt   
HuntCorp Enterprises
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
0414 306 238



Re: Apt-Problem

2000-03-20 Thread Petr Cech
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 10:29:35AM +0100 , Andreas Tille wrote:
 By the way.  Shouldn't dpkg at least warn that md5 sums are wrong?

It can't. dpkg doesn't know the md5sum of the .deb.

Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#60753: mutt: /etc/Muttrc should not use colors

2000-03-20 Thread Colin Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Sanders) wrote:
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 09:04:24PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
 Pg-down advancing to next message?

PgDn scrolls down the message, as expected.  PgUp scrolls back up.

the only annoying thing is that if you are already at the end of a
message, then PgDn takes you to the next message.

this should be optional behaviour. maybe it already is...it has never
annoyed me enough to find out.

'set pager_stop=yes'?

 The key binding are so insame that prevent people (newbies) fom
 using mutt, they first must to learn how to change those defaults to
 something acceptable.

it's not that bad. if newbies can pick up emacs' horribly contorted key
bindings then mutt's a doddle.

FWIW, I picked up mutt's keybindings from pine inside two days. I don't
find them a problem.

-- 
Colin Watson   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ITP: javawrapper

2000-03-20 Thread Kristoffer . Rose
Dear Colin,

 I intend to package javawrapper.
 
 Package: javawrapper
 Version: 1.0-1
 Section: utils
 Priority: optional
 Description: A wrapper for kernel execution of Java programs
  javawrapper uses the binfmt_misc feature of newer Linux kernels to execute a
  Java class file directly simply by supplying its filename on the command
  line like a normal executable. It also correctly handles classes contained
  in packages.
 
 I'm also the upstream maintainer for this package, and the source is
 already being distributed in the kernel documentation tree.
 
 I'm not yet a developer, so I'm looking for a sponsor - please mail me
 if you want to help!

I will be happy to sponsor javawrapper that I have used and installed
locally.

The challenge, as I see it, is to write an /etc/init.d/javawrapper script
that ensures that binfmt_misc is installed and registers/unregisters
javawrapper with the kernel.

Sincerely,
Kristoffer
-- 
Kristoffer Høgsbro Rose, phd, prof.associé  http://www.ens-lyon.fr/~krisrose
addr. LIP, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 46 Allée d'Italie, F-69364 Lyon 7
phone +33(0)4 7272 8642, fax +33(0)4 7272 8080   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp f-p: A4D3 5BD7 3EC5 7CA2 924E D21D 126B B8E0   [EMAIL PROTECTED],tug}.org



SuSe proxy suite

2000-03-20 Thread Michael Meskes
What happened to the ITP for it? I didn't see a package yet.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz| Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael@Fam-Meskes.De   | Use PostgreSQL!



Re: Bug#60753: mutt: /etc/Muttrc should not use colors

2000-03-20 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 02:30:55AM -0600, Zed Pobre wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 04:46:04AM -0300, Nicol?s Lichtmaier wrote:
 
   It's a tough issue, but there's certainly a line somewhere. And mutt does
  not have reasonable defaults. In the keyboard, each key has a function,
 
 I (along with others) dispute that the defaults are not
 reasonable.  Out of curiosity, I moved my .muttrc out of the way so I
 could examine the native keybindings.

I concur. My .muttrc does not contain any new keybindings, and I work
with mutt all day. It only contains colour changes and status line
changes etc. Things where I don't expect others to like my preferences.


Cheers
Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [transcript] source package formats

2000-03-20 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 01:51:08AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
 Comments?  Suggestions?

You still owe me documentation for this :-) bug#52351 on xawtv.


Cheers
Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [transcript] source package formats

2000-03-20 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Adam Heath wrote:
 However, it has its drawbacks, the 2 most glaring that it hides the
 source in subtrees, all packed up, and that it doesn't extract into
 pkg-ver directly.

You conveniently ignored Ian's biggest con: it does not gave you a way
to get to the source as it is compiles without running a script. This is
bad, since it means you have to run an untrusted script in order to get
to the source. Imagine the unpack-rules doing something like 
sudo rm -rf /. Oops...

Wichert.

-- 
   
 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |



Re: [dickey@clark.net: Re: http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=59191]

2000-03-20 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Darren O. Benham wrote:

  Anyway... there is a second problem you mentioned that deserves to be 
  addressed.  Bugs should either be dealt with by the maintainer (if they're 
  involved with mods they made or the packaging) or the bugs are supposed to 
  be forwarded upstream (with a patch if one is available).  That is part of 
  the Debian philosophy.

Perhaps we should open the Bug System to upstream maintainers by adding a
flag to every package. If this flag is on, reports are automatically
forwarded to a given upstream email address. I'm sure many upstream
authors would ask this flag to be enabled for their packages, even if this
means a small percentage of received bugs happen to be packaging bugs
which would not have to be forwarded in normal circumstances.

Thanks.

-- 
 1eecd7e6dc4c525a66434ff1e829bb20 (a truly random sig)



Re: Single architecture on -announce lists

2000-03-20 Thread Colin Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess) wrote:
Ben Collins wrote:
 The lists already exist, they are just not used at all. Maybe it would be
 easier to keep just the one debian-devel-changes list to send to and write
 some extra procmail stuff into sending it to the write outlist.

Well, we could just sign everyone who is currently subscribed to
debian-devel-changes up to debian-devel-*-changes, and obsolete
debian-devel-changes. Then post an announcement that people can easily
selectively filter mail by unsubscribing from architectures they're not
interested in.

Although I guess that might mess with some people's mail filters, to change
list names behind their backs..

A little, yes ... Couldn't we keep debian-devel-changes as is and simply
copy the mail to debian-devel-*-changes, for backward compatibility?

-- 
Colin Watson   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#60753: mutt: /etc/Muttrc should not use colors

2000-03-20 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 02:30:55AM -0600, Zed Pobre wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 04:46:04AM -0300, Nicol?s Lichtmaier wrote:

   Using the Space and the Backspace keys for up and down movement is absurd,
  it's even stupid. Backspace is back-space. Those keybindings where thought
  for keyboards without arrows, and those keyboards no longer exists...

 Or for terminals without valid cursor-key translations, and those
 terminals and connections DO exist.  Or for people who don't want to
 have their hands leave the home position, and those people DO exist.

It also gets used in things like newsreaders (well, Gnus at least) where 
the cursor keys move something other than the text of the message being 
viewed.

 I almost exclusively use the spacebar to page down, and I sometimes
 use backspace to page backwards.  Different != stupid, and I'd point
 out that your attitude is probably offending people by now.

Indeed.  Besides, putting too many changes into the default
configuration is only going to irritate people - a package should
probably behave much as a user familiar with the program from elsewhere
would expect.  Old users get confused, and new users get confusing help
from old users.

-- 
Mark Brown  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   (Trying to avoid grumpiness)
http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/
EUFShttp://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/filmsoc/


pgpd2BtnVEEIR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [transcript] source package formats

2000-03-20 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 11:55:27PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
 
 On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Adam Heath wrote:
 
  You'll note the addition of 3 fields(Format, Patches, and Tarballs), and the
  different files specified for the files field.  The existance of a Format
 
 Having a .tarballs.tar.gz seems rather pointless, just have all the tars
 seperate - as does including the md5s for patches in the .dsc, have a
 manifest file in patch tar. Though the point of that does rather elude me.

Yeah, tk would be a lot easier to build this way.

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Libc6 functions such as wprintf() (widechar/multibyte/UNICODE support)

2000-03-20 Thread Jerry Lundström
Ive been looking around the manual pages of wprintf and
include files of the latest potato.
Widechar/Multibyte support exist (wchar.h) but almost all
the usefull function is not in the libc distribution of
potato. Functions like wprintf that a vital is no where
to be found and still they have manual pages for the
function.
Has the widechar/multibyte printing support been removed
for som resone or just missed?

Im hopeing for a quick response on this matter because its
very VITAL for my project!

--
Name:Work:Work phone:Mobile:
Jerry Lundström  DaCapo Infix AB  +46 (0)31 - 710 72 00  +46 (0)739 87 60 53
Occupation:Knowledge:
System Developer/Consult   C/C++, COM/DCOM, ASP, SQL, PHP, MySQL, Linux/UNIX



motors for Washing Machine, Electrical Fan, Refrigerator, Fume Hood, Food Blender, etc

2000-03-20 Thread Yuan Feng

Yuanfeng Motor Company is a professional motor manufacturer and are dedicated 
to developing and researching high efficient products. Various types of motor 
with different specification are for Washing Machine, Electrical Fan, 
Refrigerator, Fume Hood, Food Blender, etc. All motors we manufacture are with 
high quality, high efficiency, high torque, low defect rate and low-noise 
stable quality.

If interested, please contact us for full information. OEM orders are welcome.

contact:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
 Above supply information is provided by Gold Line Business Information 
Service Company. 

 Our service mainly includes:  to help all the manufacturers in mainland of 
China with sales promotion and overseas marketing. And meanwhile we offer 
Chinese market and products information consulting service for foreign buyers 
or importers.  If you are now looking for any product in good quality and at 
favorable price, it is the great opportunity to be of your service with 
manufactures and products as well as other related information.  Any inquiry, 
please feel free to 
contact us know.

Gold Line Business Information Service Company Limited
Address: 
7/F, Science  Technology Center, 
No. 3, Nanxing San Road,
Guicheng District,
Nanhai City 528200,
Guangdong Province,
China 
Tel: +86-757-6336 141 / 6239 656  
Fax: +86-757-6336 141
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Person: Mr Wang Dong
  

--´ËÓʼþÓÉÍòÏó»Ã¾³³öÆ·µÄÓʼþÅú·¢Õ¾·¢ËÍ---
ÍòÏó»Ã¾³Óлú·¿¾ÖÓòÍø¹ÜÀíÈí¼þÕÂÓãÖúÀí¡¢ÓʼþÅú·¢Õ¾¡¢
¶ÔÑÛÉñ¹¦¡¢Ð£Ô°³©ÏëÇúµÈÈí¼þ£¬»¶Ó­¹âÁÙÏÂÔØ£º
 http://cookey.126.com 



»¶Ó­Ê¹Óà http://2888.com Ãâ·Ñµç×ÓÐÅÏä¼°·ÖÀàÐÂÎÅ¡¢¸öÐÔ»¯±¨¿¯¡¢
¾«ÃÀºØ¿¨¡¢×Ô¶¯ÃØÊé¡¢ËæÉíÐÅÏä¡¢ËæÉí±Ê¼Ç¡¢¹©Çó¡¢ÕÐƸÇóÖ°ÐÅÏ¢µÈ¡£
-



Re: ITP: solfege

2000-03-20 Thread Ben Armstrong
Tom,

I'm looking forward to it very much.  This is on Debian Jr.'s list of
programs suitable for children that we'd like to see packaged.  (My
children are not yet old enough to make use of it, I think, but it won't
be long.)  I'm a programmer and musician.  I could've used something like
this back in high school when I studied music theory.

Ben

On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
 Solfege is an eartraining program for GNOME written in python.
 (http://solfege.sourceforge.net)
 
 I'm the author of the program and Olav Stetzer will be sponsoring me.
 The package will be called  solfege
 
 Tom Cato Amundsen
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-- 
nSLUG   http://www.nslug.ns.ca  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian  http://www.debian.org   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ pgp key fingerprint = 7F DA 09 4B BA 2C 0D E0  1B B1 31 ED C6 A9 39 4F ]
[ gpg key fingerprint = 395C F3A4 35D3 D247 1387  2D9E 5A94 F3CA 0B27 13C8 ]



Re: Debian and GNOME, partnership with Helixcode?

2000-03-20 Thread Miguel de Icaza

Hello guys,

  I just got forwarded a few messages from a discussion that is going
on at the Debian lists, let me reply:

First of all, this fragment --which started the whole debate-- is
completely wrong:

   I assisted today to a conference by Miguel de Icaza here in Madrid,
 it seems he is running a new business namde Helixcode
 (http://www.helixcode.com) which will be working for GNOME. In the
 conference he said that the GNOME developers do not want to make debian
 packages because they are too difficult. But he also did not understand
 why distributions carry out old version of GNOME.

What I said was that Helix could not make GNOME packages for Debian
for the Helix GNOME Preview Release 1, not that the GNOME developers
did not want to make them.

I am going to repeat because it seems Javier did not understand even
when I spoke in spanish:

  Helix Code could not produce Debian packages for Helix GNOME Preview 1
  because it was too hard to get them on time.

  The GNOME project is a completely different entity.  

  GNOME is the project to bring new technologies to Unix

  Helix Code is the company that is writing GNOME-based productivity
  applications for GNOME, and happens to have a binary distribution of
  GNOME for various GNU/Linux distributions.

  Helix Code is the one that could not produce the Debian packages on
  time. 

  The GNOME project does not produce binaries.  Not for Debian, not
  for Red Hat, not for anything else.  From time to time we get .spec
  files and debian/ directories, but we do not maintain them, nor do
  we keep track of them.

More:

   There seems to be a lack of communication.  Either the Debian packagers
   are not contributing their work upstream or the Gnome hackers are refusing
   to take it.  I'm sure neither group really wants that.
  
  See my comment previously. I really think that if a developer can't
  follow closely a distribution, she should let the distribution maintainers
  do the work.
 
 Miguel said they didn't make .debs because it was too hard.  What is so
 hard that intelligent people can't follow?  We have lots of documentation.  
 development tools like dh_make and debhelper, QA tools like Lintian, lot's
 and lots of prior art.

I have to point out a few things:

  1. Debian directories exist for all packages that the Debian
 maintainers have requested to maintain in the GNOME CVS.

  2. I do not have anything to do with those packages.

  3. My comment on Debian packages that I made in the Spain conference
 was that Helix did not release in the Helix GNOME Preview 1
 GNOME packages for Debian because it was too hard for us to make
 them.  We did not have the resources to attack the problem,
 although that was one of the original plans.

If you want to help the Helix hackers to get Helix GNOME packages for
Debian, then subscribe to the spidermonkey mailing list at Helix Code,
and offer your help to our developers.

Our developers (the Helix developers) were working around the clock
(Jacob even spent one day 56 hours awake) to get Helix GNOME out.  And
yes, supporting Debian for preview 1 would have just delayed Preview 1
a few weeks for no good reason.  In the future, there will be time to
handle Debian.

I do not know why you guys did not contact me directly if you had any
doubts. 

Miguel.



Re: [dickey@clark.net: Re: http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=59191]

2000-03-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 03:38:34PM +0100, Santiago Vila écrivait:
 Perhaps we should open the Bug System to upstream maintainers by adding a
 flag to every package. If this flag is on, reports are automatically
 forwarded to a given upstream email address. I'm sure many upstream
 authors would ask this flag to be enabled for their packages, even if this
 means a small percentage of received bugs happen to be packaging bugs
 which would not have to be forwarded in normal circumstances.

I can't believe it, usually I don't agree with you but here I do ! That's a
pretty good idea. I'm sure that for most of the packages, there aren't
that much Debian specific bugs and since the author can choose I don't see
a reason not to implement it. Even better anybody should be able to
register himself in the BTS so that he'll get all the bugreports for
a specific package (or source package, but that's something more difficult
to implement I guess) ... this would allow several maintainer to maintain
the same package without using an alias or a list. 

Adding to this the possibility to have architecture specific bugs, and
distribution specific bugs, and we'll have the best BTS around the world.
Ok, who does it ? ;-)

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog  0C4CABF1  http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/
pub CD Debian : http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/debian/#cd
  Formations Linux et logiciels libres : http://www.logidee.com /pub



Re: Bug#60753: mutt: /etc/Muttrc should not use colors

2000-03-20 Thread Jacob Kuntz
Hamish Moffatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Personally I can't stand Mutt's default colours (green on blue? ugh!)
 but the default keybinds are fine. I have a .muttrc which I copy
 around between all my accounts.
 

i bet most people do. probably a .bash{rc,_profile} and .joerc too. that's
why everything stores globals and per-user settings seperatly. i can't
believe anyone even suggested that the system wide defaults be changed to
suit one user's preferences. i'd have to say that the system Muttrc is
pretty damn ugly tho. my .muttrc changes only a few settings besides color.

-- 
(jacob kuntz)[EMAIL PROTECTED],underworld}.net [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
(megabite systems) think free speech, not free beer. (gnu foundataion)



Re: [transcript] source package formats

2000-03-20 Thread Adam Heath
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:

 Previously Adam Heath wrote:
  However, it has its drawbacks, the 2 most glaring that it hides the
  source in subtrees, all packed up, and that it doesn't extract into
  pkg-ver directly.
 
 You conveniently ignored Ian's biggest con: it does not gave you a way
 to get to the source as it is compiles without running a script. This is
 bad, since it means you have to run an untrusted script in order to get
 to the source. Imagine the unpack-rules doing something like 
 sudo rm -rf /. Oops...

Are you being purposefully obtuse, or just not following along?

I mention what the current state of dbs is.  That was a summary for those who
couldn't see that in the transcript.  That was NOT a summary of what this new
script does.

You complain about problems in the old dbs, without commenting at all about
anything in this new thing I have come up with.  Ian's complaint was that he
would have to check each src pkg that comes with dbs, to make sure it was
secure.  This new way puts dbs-like functionality into dpkg-source itself, so
he would only have to check it once.

I say again.  This is a .dsc unpacker, in the same way dpkg-source is.

BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-END GEEK CODE BLOCK-
BEGIN PGP INFO
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA  3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-END PGP INFO-



Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 18, 2000

2000-03-20 Thread Kevin Dalley
BugScan reporter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Bug stamp-out list for Mar 18 09:21 (CST)
 
 Total number of release-critical bugs: 192
 Number that will disappear after removing packages marked [REMOVE]: 9
 
 Package: clisp (debian/main)
 Maintainer: Kevin Dalley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   46059  package fails to build on sparc
 [WAITING] Maintainer was contacted on Dec 12, awaiting reply.

This bug only affects the sparc distribution, where clisp doesn't
appear, because it won't build.  In fact, it has never built under
sparc.

The bug *may* be fixed in the near future.

-- 
Kevin Dalley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 18, 2000

2000-03-20 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 02:41:45AM -0800, Kevin Dalley wrote:
[sth]

Is it just me or did something make this message go out like 12 times?

Each time it had more and more of these:

MBOX-Line: From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Mon Mar 20 13:55:55 2000
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MBOX-Line: From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Mon Mar 20 13:55:50 2000
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MBOX-Line: From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Mon Mar 20 13:55:45 2000
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MBOX-Line: From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Mon Mar 20 13:55:41 2000
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MBOX-Line: From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Mon Mar 20 13:55:36 2000
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

WTF? :)

-- 
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name



Re: Bug#60753: mutt: /etc/Muttrc should not use colors

2000-03-20 Thread Steve Greenland
On 20-Mar-00, 01:46 (CST), Nicolás Lichtmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
  Using the Space and the Backspace keys for up and down movement is absurd,
 it's even stupid. Backspace is back-space. Those keybindings where thought
 for keyboards without arrows, and those keyboards no longer exists...

While I agree with most of what you wrote, you're wrong on this one.
There's a *lot* of history of using the space bar to do the next thing
in Unix console programs (more/less, most news readers and existing mail
readers). And there's no reason *not* to use them -- what else would you
bind to the space key? You're right: the defaults should cater to the
new user, but there's no reason to deliberatly aggravate the experienced
user.

Steve

-- 
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read
every list I post to.)



Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 18, 2000

2000-03-20 Thread David Starner
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 09:10:08PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 02:41:45AM -0800, Kevin Dalley wrote:
 [sth]
 
 Is it just me or did something make this message go out like 12 times?

Just you. At least, I didn't get more than one copy of it, so I would
guess it's something on your side.

-- 
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a nerd would worry about wrong parentheses with
square brackets. But that's what mathematicians are.
   -- Dr. Burchard, math professor at OSU



Re: ITP: Kannel, open source WAP and SMS gateway

2000-03-20 Thread Stefan Hornburg
Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Kannel is an open source WAP and SMS gateway. It's what I do for a
 living. I intend to make Debian package for it. See http://www.kannel.org
 for more.

This is fine. WAP programming is on my schedule for April. As 
a Debian user it would be nice to package kannel.
If you need help for this, you can mail me off the list.

Ciao
Racke

-- 
LinuXia Systems, eCommerce and more = http://www.linuxia.de/ or 0511-3941290.
Unsere Partner: Cobolt NetServices (http://www.cobolt.net), CAPCON Systemhouse
(http://www.capcon-systemhouse.com), ecoservice gmbh (http://www.ecoservice.de)
Unser Fokus liegt auf Open-Source-Software (MiniVend, Debian GNU/Linux, etc.)



Re: Bug#60753: mutt: /etc/Muttrc should not use colors

2000-03-20 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Mar 19, Nicolás Lichtmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  BTW, the default key bindings in mutt are horribly broken. No key does what
 someone would expect.
mutt does what I expect, and I think what every former elm user expects.
PINE sucks.

If newbies don't have the correct expectations to use mutt, they can
read the help line in each screen and get used to the default.

I'm not going to change the default keybindings, no matter how much
some people will scream. I will add (to the woody package, I will not
upload anything new for potato) the commented settings somebody posted.

-- 
ciao,
Marco