Re: Bug#605798: ITP: lldpad -- A Link Layer Discovery Protocol implementation

2010-12-05 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
You should work on this at pkg-fcoe on Alioth.

On 12/03/2010 09:26 PM, liang wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> 
>Package name: lldpad
> Version: 0.9.38
> Upstream Author: Intel Corporation
> URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/
> License: GPLv2
> Description: A Link Layer Discovery Protocol Implementation
> 
> The lldpad package is an implementation of the Link Layer Discovery Protocol
> (LLDP).  It originated from Intel's Data Center Bridging (DCB) software - the
> dcbd package.  The lldpad package adds LLDP support for all ports in addition
> to DCB Exchange protocol (DCBX) support on DCB capable ports (as was provided
> by dcbd).  Also, support for additional LLDP TLVs has been added.
> 
> DCB is a collection of emerging standards-based technologies designed to allow
> Ethernet to support multiple types of traffic classes in the Data Center.
> The DCBX functionality of this package is designed to work with the DCB kernel
> interface (dcbnl in rtnetlink) that is included in the Linux kernel 2.6.29 or
> higher.  The Intel ixgbe driver supports the dcbnl interface.
> 

-- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Bug#605798: ITP: lldpad -- A Link Layer Discovery Protocol implementation

2010-12-05 Thread Liang Guo
Hi, Ritesh,

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf  wrote:
> You should work on this at pkg-fcoe on Alioth.
>
I've applied to pkg-fcoe, would you like to approve my request?

Thanks,
--
Liang Guo
http://bluestone.cublog.cn


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin5egaza7bhv6i2wa64vskxmqbb5a1_xtaqc...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#605985: ITP: gitso -- a frontend to reverse VNC connections

2010-12-05 Thread YunQiang Su
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: YunQiang Su 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256


* Package name: gitso
  Version : 0.8
  Upstream Author : gerberad etc.
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/gitso/
* License : GPLv3
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description : a frontend to reverse VNC connections

 Gitso is meant to be a simple two-step process that connects one person to
 another's screen. First, the support person offers to give support. Second, 
 the person who needs help connects and has their screen remotely visible. 
 .
 Because Gitso is cross-platform (Linux, OS X and Windows) and uses a reverse 
 VNC connection, it greatly simplifies the process of getting support. 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJM+2ywAAoJEGqO9vovZQkS/QUH/jY/h4ZTPf0skcTKP7IexluD
TM930yQMK8V/UJKyynPZtwKsn9JZ3YsYxwFKX9Pm4WU7UxvHYyeJhoWRpXpZZYWY
AxjJ2kbf1JZW3G95zyuD02Ww8c/QhEAYpdLns01GDSXUlyUQM428Ft5q794o2DzB
hSZpC39D71Q+F8DDybyAyLunTEypPR4GvmIPnQX3oTbnplY+z7mgr2Ru6KtW8wJz
zVHx9VDttm4DPj3bGZH1hpxWIBlusjFNjlpUZ+BCbaWlfZNn2sc7fKzFjW6VMVd8
5WQVgF0qiAo1CSc3JMWk8iBHBQ69+Nx2qO5bc77M+32+rrfhjgsGSKBcxTJUZrc=
=N3CB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101205104302.3310.80936.report...@localhost6



Bug#606002: ITP: accountsservice -- query and manipulate user account information

2010-12-05 Thread Alessio Treglia
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia 

* Package name: accountsservice
  Version : 0.6.1
  Upstream Author : Matthias Clasen 
* URL : http://cgit.freedesktop.org/accountsservice/
* License : GPL
  Programming Lang: C
  Description : query and manipulate user account information

The accountsservice project provides a set of D-Bus
interfaces for querying and manipulating user account
information and an implementation of these interfaces,
based on the useradd, usermod and userdel commands.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20101205134459.32663.83679.report...@alessio-laptop



Re: Notification escape sequences

2010-12-05 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 03/12/2010 14:56, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 03, Tollef Fog Heen  wrote:
> 
>> I think having this facility would be great, but the titlebar bugs we
>> saw some years ago showed us, again, that inline signalling is bad.  If
>> there's a way to do this as an out-of-band signal, I'd be all for it.
> Over a generic terminal session? I don't think so. The best I can think
> about is automatically opening a secondary channel to "something" over
> the ssh connection, but this would not work easily with multiple hops.

If you use the 'ProxyCommand' feature of ssh to go through intermediate
hops, your ssh client will talk directly (but tunneled) to the target
server. So multiple hops are not really a problem in this case.

  Regards,
Vincent

-- 
Vincent Danjean   GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 vdanj...@debian.org
GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A  8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87
Unofficial packages: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html
APT repo:  deb http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cfb9c3c.3040...@free.fr



Bug#606023: RFP: identicurse -- A simple Identi.ca client with a curses-based UI.

2010-12-05 Thread Axel Beckert
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: identicurse
  Version : 0.3.2
  Upstream Author : Psychedelic Squid , 
http://psquid.net/ 
* URL or Web page : http://identicurse.net/, http://gitorious.org/identicurse
* License : GPLv3
  Description : A simple Identi.ca client with a curses-based UI.

IdentiCurse is a Python written commandline client for Identi.ca and
other status.net based microblogging sites. It offers tabs for
different microblogging feeds (personal timeline, mentions, direct
messages and public timeline by default) and use IRC like
slash-prefixed commands.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101205162147.bd29d895...@sym.noone.org



Re: screenshots.d.n

2010-12-05 Thread Christoph Haas
[Late response, I know. I'm lagging following email and mailing lists.]

Am 17.11.2010 14:11, schrieb Simon Paillard:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:45:22PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 07:14:41PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>>> Currently packages.d.o does not know if a package has a screenshot or
>>> not. To do that it would need to regularly download the screenshots
>>> metadata and make use of it. Patches welcome if anyone wants to
>>> implement it.
> 
> Proposed by mail to Christoph (but not in a bug tracker, my bad):
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2010/08/msg00164.html
> 
> Making a http redirect to a single picture an screenshots.d.n end would
> increase speed (and it's possible since screenshots.d.n knows itself wheter a
> picture is available or not).

Basically a good idea. The images are used in several places already
though like Synaptic, Ubuntu's Software Center etc. I'm not sure if all
these places handle redirects well. I'll have that checked first.

>> I have no idea how packages.d.o is implemented but if it would be based
>> on the information in UDD the information about screenshots is there.
> 
> It's a static link to
> http://screenshots.debian.net/thumbnail-with-version/${pkg_bin}/${version}

Btw, I'm glad that packages.debian.org finally uses the screenshots.
It's been a struggle for two years. :)

Kindly
 Christoph


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cfbc979.4010...@christoph-haas.de



What to do with “Fix FTBFS with ld --as-needed” bugs ?

2010-12-05 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 02:57:53PM +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Package: samtools
> Version: 0.1.12a-1
> Tags: patch
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: ld-as-needed
> 
> patch at
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/60144486/samtools_0.1.12a-1_0.1.12a-1ubuntu1.diff.gz

Dear Matthias,

thank you for your patch.

I do not know that to do with it since I have difficulties to understand the
context. It is a patch for Ubuntu but it is usertagged with the Debian GCC's
team email. I have a couple of questions, and since some of them may be of
general interst, I am copying debian-devel.

 - Is there a timeline in which the package in Debian will stop to build from
   source if the patch is not applied ?

 - I do not understand what problem the patch solves when reordering ‘-lm -lz
   -L.. -lbam’ to ’-L.. -lbam -lm -lz’. It seems that it is related to the use
   of --as-needed. Is there a general explanation somewhere, that I can use
   when forwarding the patch upstream ?

 - Does such a change represents some best practice that we should put forward
   for our uptreams to be aware of, for instance in 
http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide ?

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101206001415.ga21...@merveille.plessy.net



Re: What to do with “Fix FTBFS with ld --as- needed” bugs ?

2010-12-05 Thread Matthias Klose

On 06.12.2010 01:14, Charles Plessy wrote:

Le Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 02:57:53PM +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit :

Package: samtools
Version: 0.1.12a-1
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ld-as-needed

patch at
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/60144486/samtools_0.1.12a-1_0.1.12a-1ubuntu1.diff.gz


Dear Matthias,

thank you for your patch.

I do not know that to do with it since I have difficulties to understand the
context. It is a patch for Ubuntu but it is usertagged with the Debian GCC's
team email. I have a couple of questions, and since some of them may be of
general interst, I am copying debian-devel.

  - Is there a timeline in which the package in Debian will stop to build from
source if the patch is not applied ?

  - I do not understand what problem the patch solves when reordering ‘-lm -lz
-L.. -lbam’ to ’-L.. -lbam -lm -lz’. It seems that it is related to the use
of --as-needed. Is there a general explanation somewhere, that I can use
when forwarding the patch upstream ?

  - Does such a change represents some best practice that we should put forward
for our uptreams to be aware of, for instance in 
http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide ?


the order of objects on the command line is significant for traditional linkers, 
and older binutils.  So while this kind of failures may not seen with current 
binutils, you may see this with other linkers or older binutils. Such changes 
are safe to make.


For further reference please see my email to debian-gcc and debian-ports, and
http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking

  Matthias


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cfc401f.7010...@debian.org



Re: List of FTBFS in Ubuntu

2010-12-05 Thread Matthias Klose

On 03.12.2010 22:54, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:

Lucas Nussbaum wrote:


Hi,

> From time to time, I do archive rebuilds for Ubuntu too, and I thought
that the results would be interesting for DDs as well, since a FTBFS in
Ubuntu might indicate that the package will FTBFS in the future in
Debian, due to toolchain changes for example.

Below is a dd-list of the failures.





Erik de Castro Lopo
haskell-llvm (U)


That couldn't build because llvm-2.7-runtime wouldn't install.

 Setting up llvm-2.7-runtime (2.7-6ubuntu1) ...
 FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.32-5-amd64/modules.dep: No such 
file or directory
 update-binfmts: warning: Couldn't load the binfmt_misc module.

Erik


this did succeed to build:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-llvm/0.8.0.2-2ubuntu1

For now I cannot reproduce this in a local build on natty.

  Matthias


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cfc4317@debian.org



Re: What to do with “Fix FT BFS with ld --as-needed” bugs ?

2010-12-05 Thread Michael Bienia
On 2010-12-06 09:14:15 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>  - I do not understand what problem the patch solves when reordering ‘-lm -lz
>-L.. -lbam’ to ’-L.. -lbam -lm -lz’. It seems that it is related to the use
>of --as-needed. Is there a general explanation somewhere, that I can use
>when forwarding the patch upstream ?

Here is a part of the build log from Lucas' Ubuntu archive rebuild:
,[ 
http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~lucas/ubuntu-nbs/32/samtools_0.1.10-1_lubuntu32.buildlog
 ]-
| gcc -g -Wall -O2 -I.. calDepth.c -o calDepth -lm -lz -L.. -lbam
| ../libbam.a(bgzf.o): In function `deflate_block':
| /build/user-samtools_0.1.10-1-i386-phvH6d/samtools-0.1.10/bgzf.c:272: 
undefined reference to `deflate'
| /build/user-samtools_0.1.10-1-i386-phvH6d/samtools-0.1.10/bgzf.c:274: 
undefined reference to `deflateEnd'
| /build/user-samtools_0.1.10-1-i386-phvH6d/samtools-0.1.10/bgzf.c:266: 
undefined reference to `deflateInit2_'
| /build/user-samtools_0.1.10-1-i386-phvH6d/samtools-0.1.10/bgzf.c:290: 
undefined reference to `deflateEnd'
| /build/user-samtools_0.1.10-1-i386-phvH6d/samtools-0.1.10/bgzf.c:306: 
undefined reference to `crc32'
| /build/user-samtools_0.1.10-1-i386-phvH6d/samtools-0.1.10/bgzf.c:307: 
undefined reference to `crc32'
`

I'm no expert on this topic but as far as I understand it it's because
-lbam (libbam.a) uses symbols from -lz and order matters with
--as-needed.

,[ 3rd paragraph for '-l' in 'man ld' ]-
| The linker will search an archive only once, at the location where
| it is specified on the command line.  If the archive defines a
| symbol which was undefined in some object which appeared before the
| archive on the command line, the linker will include the
| appropriate file(s) from the archive.  However, an undefined symbol
| in an object appearing later on the command line will not cause the
| linker to search the archive again.
| [...]
| This type of archive searching is standard for Unix linkers.
`

Changing the order makes -lz gets processed after -lbam (which needs symbols
from -lz).

Michael


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101206021528.ga26...@vorlon.ping.de



Re: List of FTBFS in Ubuntu

2010-12-05 Thread Matthias Klose

On 03.12.2010 08:43, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:

Hi,


From time to time, I do archive rebuilds for Ubuntu too, and I thought

that the results would be interesting for DDs as well, since a FTBFS in
Ubuntu might indicate that the package will FTBFS in the future in
Debian, due to toolchain changes for example.

Below is a dd-list of the failures.

The full list and the logs can be found on
http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu_ftbfs.cgi.


thanks for doing this.  The tendency of these reports is correct, although there 
are some which are neither reproducible on the Ubuntu buildds nor with local 
builds (e.g. apport).


This report was taken at the beginning of the natty release cycle, just the 
first alpha was released, so the number of the build failures is somehow expected.


At this stage, toolchain changes are somewhat expected.  I hope the majority of 
these changes are reported in Debian, and in fact a large percentage is already 
addressed in Debian, either in unstable or experimental.


 - GCC-4.5: Natty started to use GCC-4.5.  Issues are reported in Debian
   as [1], these are reproducible by installing gcc/g++ and gcc-4.5/g++-4.5
   from experimental).
 - Build failures with the Gold linker, or with ld --no-add-needed.
   Reported as [2], reproducible by installing gcc/g++ and gcc-4.5/g++-4.5
   from experimental or by installing binutils-gold from experimental.
 - Build failures with ld --as-needed. Issues found at [3].
 - Build failures with glibc-2.12, currently not tracked with user tags,
   although I cannot remember more than a few issues.
 - Build failures with more recent kernel headers, currently not tracked
   with user tags.

The linking changes were proposed on debian-gcc and debian-ports, a wiki page 
with more detailed information can be found at [4].


Some if these issues will be certainly needed for wheezy, some may be needed on 
a package per package basis.


  Matthias

[1] 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-gcc-4.5;users=debian-...@lists.debian.org
[2] 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=no-add-needed;users=peter.fritzs...@gmx.de

[3]http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ld-as-needed;users=debian-...@lists.debian.org
[4] http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cfc4b7e.8050...@ubuntu.com



Re: List of FTBFS in Ubuntu

2010-12-05 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Vie 03 Dic 2010 04:43:23 Lucas Nussbaum escribió:
> Hi,
> 
> >From time to time, I do archive rebuilds for Ubuntu too, and I thought
> 
> that the results would be interesting for DDs as well, since a FTBFS in
> Ubuntu might indicate that the package will FTBFS in the future in
> Debian, due to toolchain changes for example.

[snip]
 
> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer 
>netemul

And as I stated in the bug [0], I don't have a clue on what may be happening 
here :-/

Of course, any enlightment will be higly appreciated :-)

Regards, Lisandro.


[0] 


-- 
Tiempo para el tiempo y un rato mas.
  Profecías, Vox Dei, basado en Eclesiastes 3:1-9

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: List of FTBFS in Ubuntu

2010-12-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 06/12/10 at 02:57 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 03.12.2010 22:54, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> >Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>> From time to time, I do archive rebuilds for Ubuntu too, and I thought
> >>that the results would be interesting for DDs as well, since a FTBFS in
> >>Ubuntu might indicate that the package will FTBFS in the future in
> >>Debian, due to toolchain changes for example.
> >>
> >>Below is a dd-list of the failures.
> >
> >
> >
> >>Erik de Castro Lopo
> >>haskell-llvm (U)
> >
> >That couldn't build because llvm-2.7-runtime wouldn't install.
> >
> > Setting up llvm-2.7-runtime (2.7-6ubuntu1) ...
> > FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.32-5-amd64/modules.dep: No such 
> > file or directory
> > update-binfmts: warning: Couldn't load the binfmt_misc module.
> >
> >Erik
> 
> this did succeed to build:
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-llvm/0.8.0.2-2ubuntu1
> 
> For now I cannot reproduce this in a local build on natty.

Apparently this package needs a populated 
/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-amd64/modules.dep,
which is not available in my build chroot.

- Lucas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101206073115.ga5...@xanadu.blop.info



Re: List of FTBFS in Ubuntu

2010-12-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 06/12/10 at 03:33 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 03.12.2010 08:43, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >>From time to time, I do archive rebuilds for Ubuntu too, and I thought
> >that the results would be interesting for DDs as well, since a FTBFS in
> >Ubuntu might indicate that the package will FTBFS in the future in
> >Debian, due to toolchain changes for example.
> >
> >Below is a dd-list of the failures.
> >
> >The full list and the logs can be found on
> >http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu_ftbfs.cgi.
> 
> thanks for doing this.  The tendency of these reports is correct,
> although there are some which are neither reproducible on the Ubuntu
> buildds nor with local builds (e.g. apport).

As I already told you on IRC, given that I could make apport fail two
times on both i386 and amd64, and provided the build log, I think that
the next step is for you to provide a build log, so we can diff them.

The one from launchpad is two weeks old and shows significant
differences. Like, why does my build try to copy
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/mimetypes/text-x-apport.svg, while
the one from launchpad doesn't?


Any other unreproducible failures?

- Lucas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101206074327.gb5...@xanadu.blop.info