Re: Moving /tmp to tmpfs is fine

2012-05-29 Thread Serge
2012/5/30 Thomas Goirand wrote:

>> You mean you know some real applications becoming noticeably faster
>> having /tmp on tmpfs?
>
> No, I mean that writing "nobody can notice that on real applications"
> is a bit too extreme, that's all I'm saying.

Right, sorry. Of course, I may be wrong, there can be such applications.
It's just nobody had suggested them yet.

-- 
Just trying to make the world better,
  Serge


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caovenepexlsxzgvqabqqd-1mr-exryqh4c1kddhno3ppfxw...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Bug#675106: ITP: pgbulkload -- A high speed data loading utility for PostgreSQL

2012-05-29 Thread Ivan Shmakov
> Alexander Kuznetsov  writes:

[…]

(Some wording fixes and suggestions.)

 > Description : A high speed data loading utility for PostgreSQL
 > pg_bulkload is designed to load huge amount of data to a database.
 > You can choose whether database constraints are checked and how many errors 
 > are

If “You can…” here starts a new paragraph, there's ought to be
an empty (“.”) line.  And if not, the linebreak here came a bit
too early than necessary.

 > ignored during the loading. For example, you can skip integrity checks for
 > performance when you copy data from another database to PostgreSQL. On the
 > other hand, you can enable constraint checks when loading unclean data.
 > .

Are “constraint checks” different to “integrity checks” in the
above?  Unless they are, it should rather be, e. g.:

   … For example, you can skip integrity checks for performance when you
   copy data from another database to PostgreSQL, or have them in place
   when loading potentially unclean data.

 > The original goal of pg_bulkload was an faster alternative of COPY command in

   … was /a/ faster…

Or, perhaps: … was to provide a faster…

 > PostgreSQL, but version 3.0 or later has some ETL features like input data
 > validation and data transformation with filter functions.
 > .

   … but as of version 3.0 some ETL features… were added.

And what's ETL, BTW?

 > In version 3.1, pg_bulkload can convert the load data into the binary file
 > which can be used as an input file of pg_bulkload. If you check whether

Perhaps:

   As of version 3.1, pg_bulkload can dump the preprocessed data into a
   binary file, allowing for…

(Here, the purpose should be mentioned.  Is this for improving
the performance of later multiple “bulkloads”, for instance?)

 > the load data is valid when converting it into the binary file, you can skip
 > the check when loading it from the binary file to a table. Which would reduce
 > the load time itself. Also in version 3.1, parallel loading works
 > more effectively than before.

s/effectively/efficiently/.  But the whole sentence makes little
sense, as the earlier versions weren't packaged for Debian.

-- 
FSF associate member #7257


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/86wr3ujphk@gray.siamics.net



Re: Packaging on GitHub ?

2012-05-29 Thread Ivan Shmakov
> Thorsten Glaser  writes:
> Charles Plessy dixit:

 >> upstream source moved to GitHub, and we would like to try to
 >> maintain the Debian package there as well.

 > This is not a good idea: http://mako.cc/writing/hill-free_tools.html

That's why I tend to advocate for the use of Gitorious instead.

--cut: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gitorious --
CAPTION: Gitorious

Developer(s)  Shortcut AS
Written inRuby
Operating system  Cross-platform
Available in  English
Type  Project management software
License   GNU Affero General Public License
Website   https://gitorious.org/gitorious/
--cut: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gitorious --

PS.  An RFP, perhaps?

-- 
FSF associate member #7257


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/861um2l4w9@gray.siamics.net



Re: Orphaning php-codesniffer, then take it over by the PHP PEAR team

2012-05-29 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 05/30/2012 03:51 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I strongly object to this as a general principle: Debian freezing is no 
> excuse for hijacking!
>   

That's not the reason, the reason is that we've been working on tools to
improve
PHP package quality, and recently noticed that php-codesniffer was left
largely
unmaintained since 2008.

> Seems you had several years of solving this issue, yet you waited until 
> just before freeze

No, me and Luis Uribe just recently found interest in it, and thought
it'd be
great to have it in Wheezy too.

> and the option you came up with was to kick a 
> maintainer.
>   

We aren't kicking him, we want to have the package team maintained.
He's fine to come and join!

> Did you consider an NMU?
>   

Yes, but the issue is that there's lots of invasive changes that we would
like to make to the packaging. Having a look to the current state of the
package, it'd be nearly totally re-written. There's not a single line in the
debian/control file that satisfies me, I'd like to move from dh_php_make
to pkg-php-tools (that implies, from CDBS to dh 8 sequencer), etc.

This doesn't really qualify for an NMU, nor does the upgrade to the latest
upstream version.

On 05/30/2012 07:45 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I concur.  It is socially and technically safer to give about two week-ends to
> answer, keeping time zones in mind.

My reasoning over the one week only was that the package hasn't been
maintained since 2008, so that anyways, it feels like the package isn't
well enough maintained to be left to Jack sole responsibility. Again, he
would be free to join the PKG PEAR team. But I'll wait one more week
as you suggest then, this doesn't mater much...

> If after this delay you have no news, my
> opinion is that hijacking is the best solution.  The maintainer's other
> packages have already attracted three NMUs in total, and I have not seen a bug
> report with his answer after 2009 (although got some packages sponsored in
> 2011).  By the way, perhaps you can keep his sponosor (rmgolbeck) in the loop,
> maybe he knows other ways to contact the maintainer ?
>   
rmgolbeck is Cc: to this mail.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fc59455.9060...@goirand.fr



Re: Moving /tmp to tmpfs is fine

2012-05-29 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 05/30/2012 10:07 AM, Serge wrote:
> 2012/5/28 Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>   
>>> The truth is that tmpfs IS FASTER in some cases. The problem is that
>>> *nobody* can notice that on *real* applications.
>>>   
>> Serge, I'm on your side of the discussion, but the above is simply
>> not truth.
>> 
> You mean you know some real applications becoming noticeably faster
> having /tmp on tmpfs?
>   
No, I mean that writing "nobody can notice that on real applications"
is a bit too extreme, that's all I'm saying.

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fc5905b.3090...@debian.org



Re: Moving /tmp to tmpfs is fine

2012-05-29 Thread Serge
2012/5/27 Ben Hutchings wrote:

>> then /tmp using tmpfs *will* lead to issues that many wont understand.

> As will /tmp on a small root partition.
> As will a small dedicated /tmp partition.

True. But debian does not have small root partition *by default*. And it
does not install with a small dedicated /tmp partition *by default* as
well. Then why does it installs with /tmp on tmpfs *by default*?

Users don't like thinking about partitions size, and they don't care much
about fragmentation or number of I/O. The most common configuration would
probably be entire system on a single partition, optionally in dual-boot
with other OSes (i.e. there could be other FAT/NTFS partitions there).
TMPDIR on a root partition is the best and only option there. It's good
for large files, isn't limited by memory size, don't cause system swapping
and is as fast as cached local storage can be.

> A shared /tmp also results in various security problems

Agree, having a shared /tmp may sometimes be an interesting idea, but it
is also bad to have it *by default*

> We should be thinking about implementing per-user temporary directories

There're a lot of other places where TMPDIR can be. Let's consider all of
them. Where else we can put tmp directory:

1. /tmp (TMPDIR on a root partition)
Good for systems of regular users. But bad for systems with read-only or
small root partition (rare, *never* happens in default install, but still
happens).

2. /home/tmp (TMPDIR on a home partition)
Good for systems that want users to obey /home quotas or having read-only
root. But bad for shared (NFS) /home (not that rare, but still possible).
Also bad for users with separate /home partition, who care about their
data: when / dies you can recover data from your /home, and tmp on /home
will just increase chances of /home death.

3. /home/USER/tmp
Same as above, but in addition it's also bad for ssh servers where users
share files over /tmp directory (they just don't have a choice there).

4. /bin/tmp
Not really useful. But if we name it /bin/trash... hey, we have a trash
in a bin! ;)

5. /var/tmp
Oh, we already have that.

6. /tmp on a separate partition
Common for servers, eats no RAM, have all the limits/quotas working.
But needs some brain work and complex in resizing, so it's bad for regular
users.

7. /OTHERDIR/tmp
Same as above, if OTHERDIR on a separate partition. And same as #1 if
OTHERDIR is on a root partition.

8. /tmp on tmpfs
Bad for large files. Bad for low-memory systems (i.e. routers, cheap
netbooks, tablet PCs, mobiles), which are more and more common nowadays.
But still the only option for systems that have slow (network-mounted)
/home and /var partitions, and read-only root, and need to work FAST with
a lot of small files (I've never seen such case myself, but it is still
possible anyway).

As you can see each of them have problems. So the one, that causes the
fewest problems in default setup should be the default. Isn't it?

People, with some unusual installations are customizing their defaults
anyway, so they can change /tmp location themselves as well (i.e. do a
`mount --bind /tmp /home/tmp` for read-only setup).

> We should be thinking about implementing per-user temporary directories
> and making sure that programs respect $TMPDIR.

That's not enough. Applications need a special temporary directory. The
one that is cleaned on reboot. Of course apps should clean their files
themselves, but they should not worry about cleaning files after i.e.
an unexpected power outage. That's what /tmp is good for.

So if you click on a few files in firefox and then your lights turn off,
on next reboot firefox should not look through $TMPDIR and delete files
that were created by it on last boot. Of course we can write an
additional init-script that will automatically clean all user-specific
TMPDIRs, it would have to be a very smart script, it should work for
local /home as well as i.e. NFS /home, and must not clean all the
directories when one of machines reboots. It should probably support
things like LDAP, or unusual home-directories like /var/guest. It will
surely require a lot of work and probably will cause a lot of problems.
But it is possible... I don't see what for, but it's possible.

Or maybe we can just leave /tmp as a part of / partition *by default*,
since by default it's large enough, cleaned on boot, works for all
programs and causes no worries? ;)

> I'm not sure whether that's compatible with historical use of /tmp by
> the X window system.)

I guess it's not. Because when X starts you don't know what user will log
in there.

PS: see also idea about on-demand mount of /tmp to tmpfs for systems
with disk space check. It would make the defaults working even for small
and read-only root fs.

-- 
  Serge


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/caovenerwrhneye0tbktzr58myipege+75xqrf

Re: Moving /tmp to tmpfs is fine

2012-05-29 Thread Serge
2012/5/28 Thomas Goirand wrote:

>> The truth is that tmpfs IS FASTER in some cases. The problem is that
>> *nobody* can notice that on *real* applications.
>
> Serge, I'm on your side of the discussion, but the above is simply
> not truth.

You mean you know some real applications becoming noticeably faster
having /tmp on tmpfs?

> And by the way, that's not the issue. The issue is potential
> breakage, which we want to avoid *at all costs*.

That does not work. I tried that.

When I say "Hey, a lot of software breaks because of your change", I get
the answer "It's not my change in fault, it's the software, go fix it".
This is exactly what I got in that thread, by the way.

But when I say "Hey, your change have broken a lot of software and
brought nothing good", then people start thinking, why should they mess
with fixing a lot of software, if they get nothing in return anyway.
This is what we have with "/tmp on tmpfs" change.

-- 
  Serge


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAOVenErJhn54esbuqxn6HHARXPJMeDj4WzxCuSf3KXm=n=_...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#675131: ITP: vpnc-scripts -- Network configuration scripts for vpnc and openconnect

2012-05-29 Thread Mike Miller
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Miller 

* Package name: vpnc-scripts
  Version : 20120526
  Upstream Author : David Woodhouse 
* URL : http://www.infradead.org/openconnect/vpnc-script.html
* License : GPL-2+
  Programming Lang: Shell
  Description : Network configuration scripts for vpnc and openconnect

This package contains scripts to configure routing and name services when
invoked by the vpnc or openconnect Cisco VPN clients.  The primary script is
derived from the vpnc source but provides hooks for user customization.
Alternate scripts that keep the VPN configuration in its own network namespace
are also provided.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120530020039.12455.15427.report...@ohm.home.local



Re: Moving /tmp to tmpfs makes it useless

2012-05-29 Thread Toni Mueller

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:26:52AM -0400, Weldon Goree wrote:
> at some point). Much better developers than me seem to have formed
> this opinion too (cf browsers' behavior while it waits for you to tell
> it what to do with an unknown content-type: it's a disk-based pipe to
> whatever program you pick to open it, except now it's a memory-based
> pipe, and I think /tmp on tmpfs is breaking those developers'
> expectations).

As for Iceweasel, there is a bug in Mozilla's database that addresses
exactly this problem. In the overwhelming number of cases of people
downloading large files via their web browser, these files are going to
end up somewhere in their homes, anyway, so the initial downloaded
fragments should be stored there. Although I haven't paid attention to
that bug as of late, I do remember seeing some activity going on there,
and I think the Mozilla developers have been finally convinced to adopt
a different strategy.

> I'd be more comfortable with tmpfs if it could be quota'd with
> standard quota tools.

If this part goes to your home, it's automatically quota'ed.

> > Having /var/run on a tmpfs may be a good idea, though.
> Gah! I want *somewhere* I can park stuff on disk. Why are people so
> against that?

Nobody is against that, only that you insist on using /tmp for it, which
is imho not a good assumption to make.

> we going to do? Right now on my Squeeze laptop I have /lib/init/rw,
> /dev/shm, and /tmp. Do we really need more things that look like
> on-disk directories but aren't? (Then again I'm still grumpy about
> sysfs.) Though actually /var/run makes more sense than /tmp, since
> it's pretty much just for pids and sockets.

Without doing much (that I can remember) to my box, I see this on
Testing:

$ mount|grep tmpfs
udev on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,relatime,size=4018332k,nr_inodes=205757,mode=755)
tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,size=804880k,mode=755)
tmpfs on /run/lock type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,size=5120k)
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,size=307200k)
tmpfs on /run/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,size=1609760k)
$ 

Enjoy!

> dropping arbitrarily large files into it (I'm looking at you,
> Iceweasel...) and as long as there's *some* section of actual disk
> somewhere that's 1777. 

As I said, there was /usr/tmp, but I think it was shot down. But I
suggest /srv/tmp or something like that.



Kind regards,
--Toni++


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120530002030.ga32...@spruce.wiehl.oeko.net



Re: Orphaning php-codesniffer, then take it over by the PHP PEAR team

2012-05-29 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:54:32PM +0200, Arno Töll a écrit :
> 
> Having that said, 5 days of (private) conversation is perhaps really a
> bit too short to hijack a package. I'd expect that process to include
> several weeks of waiting time for an answer at least.

I concur.  It is socially and technically safer to give about two week-ends to
answer, keeping time zones in mind.  If after this delay you have no news, my
opinion is that hijacking is the best solution.  The maintainer's other
packages have already attracted three NMUs in total, and I have not seen a bug
report with his answer after 2009 (although got some packages sponsored in
2011).  By the way, perhaps you can keep his sponosor (rmgolbeck) in the loop,
maybe he knows other ways to contact the maintainer ?

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120529234522.ga...@falafel.plessy.net



Bug#675106: ITP: pgbulkload -- A high speed data loading utility for PostgreSQL

2012-05-29 Thread Alexander Kuznetsov
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexander Kuznetsov 

* Package name: pgbulkload
  Version : 3.1.1
  Upstream Author :
Takahiro Itagakiitagaki.takahiro @nospam@ gmail.com
Masao Fujii masao.fujii @nospam@ gmail.com
Mitsuru Hasegawahasegawa @nospam@ metrosystems.co.jp
Masahiko Sakamoto   sakamoto_masahiko_b1 @nospam@ 
lab.ntt.co.jp
Toru SHIMOGAKI  shimogaki.toru @nospam@ oss.ntt.co.jp
* URL : http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgbulkload/
* License : BSD
  Programming Lang: C, SQL
  Description : A high speed data loading utility for PostgreSQL
 pg_bulkload is designed to load huge amount of data to a database.
 You can choose whether database constraints are checked and how many errors are
 ignored during the loading. For example, you can skip integrity checks for
 performance when you copy data from another database to PostgreSQL. On the
 other hand, you can enable constraint checks when loading unclean data.
 .
 The original goal of pg_bulkload was an faster alternative of COPY command in
 PostgreSQL, but version 3.0 or later has some ETL features like input data
 validation and data transformation with filter functions.
 .
 In version 3.1, pg_bulkload can convert the load data into the binary file
 which can be used as an input file of pg_bulkload. If you check whether
 the load data is valid when converting it into the binary file, you can skip
 the check when loading it from the binary file to a table. Which would reduce
 the load time itself. Also in version 3.1, parallel loading works
 more effectively than before.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120529222006.19901.16867.reportbug@assa103.local



Re: Orphaning php-codesniffer, then take it over by the PHP PEAR team

2012-05-29 Thread Arno Töll
Hi,

On 29.05.2012 21:51, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Seems you had several years of solving this issue, yet you waited until 

Similarly, the maintainer had 4 years to care about his package.

> Did you consider an NMU?

That might be an alternative, but looking at the current bug list people
will argue about the lacking ground to base a NMU on. It does not really
qualify as a typical NMU candidate.

People shouldn't be (so) afraid to hijack and NMU packages if they take
care of virtually unmaintained packages. There is nothing to apologize
or feel sorry about when improving Debian's overall quality.

Having that said, 5 days of (private) conversation is perhaps really a
bit too short to hijack a package. I'd expect that process to include
several weeks of waiting time for an answer at least.

Therefore I can see good reasons to hijack such a package. But not in
such a hurry. If you really care enough, do a minimally invasive but
clearly hostile NMU to start with and give the maintainer a reasonable
time frame to respond.

Do also CC the MIA team in your conversations, there are other packages
Jack maintains which are long outdated and were NMUed already.

-- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Orphaning php-codesniffer, then take it over by the PHP PEAR team

2012-05-29 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-05-30 at 02:49am, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Jack Bates is supposed to maintain php-codesniffer,
[snip]
> this package last upload was from 2008-10-05,
[snip]
> we'd like to see the latest version in Wheezy
[snip]
> We sent a mail 5 days ago to Jack Bates, and he didn't reply. It's 
> currently obvious that there's very few chances that Jack Bates will 
> upload a new version of php-codesniffer before Wheezy freezes.
> 
> So, we'd like to have php-codesniffer orphaned, then taken over by us 
> (eg: the PKG-PHP Pear team). Jack Bates would anyway be very welcome 
> to join the team, and continue to do his packaging (we can add him to 
> the Uploaders: list if he wishes), even after this procedure.
> 
> So, if nobody objects within the next following 2 or 3 days, and if 
> Jack doesn't show up and oppose to this procedure, we'll do that.

I strongly object to this as a general principle: Debian freezing is no 
excuse for hijacking!

Seems you had several years of solving this issue, yet you waited until 
just before freeze, and the option you came up with was to kick a 
maintainer.

Did you consider an NMU?


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: bitbucket is lock in? (was: Re: Packaging on GitHub ?)

2012-05-29 Thread Carsten Hey
* Martin Bagge / brother [2012-05-29 21:01 +0200]:
> On Tue, 29 May 2012, Brian May wrote:
>
> >I don't see the problem, github is just a hosting provider. Unlike,
> >say Bitkeeper, ...
>
> Can you elaborate on the bitbucket case there? How am I not allowed
> to do a git clone from my git repo on bitbucket ...

"Bitkeeper" is proprietary software, "Bitbucket" is a hosting service.
Besides the "Bit" in their name, they have not much in common.


Carsten


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120529193418.ga...@furrball.stateful.de



Re: bitbucket is lock in? (was: Re: Packaging on GitHub ?)

2012-05-29 Thread The Fungi
On 2012-05-29 21:01:24 +0200 (+0200), Martin Bagge / brother wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2012, Brian May wrote:
> 
> >I don't see the problem, github is just a hosting provider. Unlike,
> >say Bitkeeper, you are free to make git clones anywhere, entirely with
> >open source software, and are in no way locked down to using github.
> 
> Can you elaborate on the bitbucket case there? How am I not allowed
> to do a git clone from my git repo on bitbucket account? Where the
> same just works in github?

Bitbucket is not BitKeeper:

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitbucket

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitKeeper

-- 
{ IRL(Jeremy_Stanley); WWW(http://fungi.yuggoth.org/); PGP(43495829);
WHOIS(STANL3-ARIN); SMTP(fu...@yuggoth.org); FINGER(fu...@yuggoth.org);
MUD(kin...@katarsis.mudpy.org:6669); IRC(fu...@irc.yuggoth.org#ccl); }


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120529193034.gn...@yuggoth.org



Re: bitbucket is lock in? (was: Re: Packaging on GitHub ?)

2012-05-29 Thread Michael Hanke
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 09:01:24PM +0200, Martin Bagge / brother wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2012, Brian May wrote:
> 
> >I don't see the problem, github is just a hosting provider. Unlike,
> >say Bitkeeper, you are free to make git clones anywhere, entirely with
> >open source software, and are in no way locked down to using github.
> 
> Can you elaborate on the bitbucket case there? How am I not allowed
> to do a git clone from my git repo on bitbucket account? Where the
> same just works in github?

He was talking about BitKEEPER not BitBUCKET.

Cheers,

Michael

-- 
Michael Hanke
http://mih.voxindeserto.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120529192603.GA17658@meiner



bitbucket is lock in? (was: Re: Packaging on GitHub ?)

2012-05-29 Thread Martin Bagge / brother

On Tue, 29 May 2012, Brian May wrote:


I don't see the problem, github is just a hosting provider. Unlike,
say Bitkeeper, you are free to make git clones anywhere, entirely with
open source software, and are in no way locked down to using github.


Can you elaborate on the bitbucket case there? 
How am I not allowed to do a git clone from my git repo on bitbucket 
account? Where the same just works in github?


--
/brother
http://martin.bagge.nu
Whitfield Diffie and Martin Hellman use only their surnames out of fear of 
Bruce Schneier


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.00.1205292058060.13...@salyut.bsnet.se



Orphaning php-codesniffer, then take it over by the PHP PEAR team

2012-05-29 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi,

Jack Bates is supposed to maintain php-codesniffer, available from:
http://pear.php.net/package/PHP_CodeSniffer

Unfortunately, the PTS for this package shows that this package last
upload was from 2008-10-05, few months after version 1.1.0 was released
upstream (on the 2008-07-14). Upstream has been releasing every 3 to 6
months since, but none of the upstream versions have been released.

PHPUnit has been uploaded to SID, and will soon migrate to testing. This
PHP_CodeSniffer is a good QA tool as well, and we'd like to see the
latest version in Wheezy as well.

We sent a mail 5 days ago to Jack Bates, and he didn't reply. It's
currently obvious that there's very few chances that Jack Bates will
upload a new version of php-codesniffer before Wheezy freezes.

So, we'd like to have php-codesniffer orphaned, then taken over by us
(eg: the PKG-PHP Pear team). Jack Bates would anyway be very welcome to
join the team, and continue to do his packaging (we can add him to the
Uploaders: list if he wishes), even after this procedure.

So, if nobody objects within the next following 2 or 3 days, and if Jack
doesn't show up and oppose to this procedure, we'll do that.

If anyone doesn't agree, please raise your concern *now* (including you,
Jack).

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fc51a32.2020...@debian.org



Bug#675078: ITP: overlay-scrollbar -- scrollbar overlay

2012-05-29 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ritesh Raj Sarraf 

* Package name: overlay-scrollbar
  Version : 0.2.16
  Upstream Author : Andrea Cimitan 
* URL : http://launchpad.net/ayatana-scrollbar
* License : LGPL-2.1+
  Programming Lang: C
  Description : scrollbar overlay

Overlay scrollbar is a GtkModule enabling a dynamic overlay behavior
It strives in providing the user with more screen space



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120529184022.16498.64333.report...@champaran.researchut.com



Bug#675066: ITP: fonts-moe-standard-song -- Chinese TrueType font, standard Song (non-free)

2012-05-29 Thread Kan-Ru Chen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Kan-Ru Chen" 

* Package name: fonts-moe-standard-song
  Version : 1.00
  Upstream Author : mandr _at_ mail.moe.gov.tw
* URL : http://www.edu.tw/mandr/content.aspx?site_content_sn=3786
* License : CC-BY-ND 3.0
  Programming Lang: truetype font
  Description : Chinese TrueType font, standard Song (non-free)

MOE Std Song is released by Taiwan Ministry of Education. It covers the
characters plane 1 to 7 defined by CNS11643.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120529164151.13676.74285.report...@isil.kanru.info



Bug#675065: ITP: fonts-moe-standard-kai -- Chinese TrueType font, standard Kaiti (non-free)

2012-05-29 Thread Kan-Ru Chen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Kan-Ru Chen" 

* Package name: fonts-moe-standard-kai
  Version : 3.00
  Upstream Author : mandr _at_ mail.moe.gov.tw
* URL : http://www.edu.tw/mandr/content.aspx?site_content_sn=31322
* License : CC-BY-ND 3.0
  Programming Lang: truetype font
  Description : Chinese TrueType font, standard Kaiti (non-free)

MOE Std Kai is released by Taiwan Ministry of Education. It covers the
characters plane 1 and 2 defined by CNS11643.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120529163706.12723.89616.report...@isil.kanru.info



Re: Packaging on GitHub ?

2012-05-29 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 05/29/2012 08:07 AM, Yao Wei (魏銘廷) wrote:
> I am thinking about a more general topic like:
> Managing packaging on VCS services other than Alioth

The other way rounds works well, too - package wherever you like to and
mirror it on Alioth, for example in your personal git folder in your home.

-- 
 Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485  DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fc4f13a.1070...@bzed.de



Re: Bug#675033: ITP: kgraphviewer -- KGraphViewer is a GraphViz dot graph viewer for KDE 4.

2012-05-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 02:54:40 PM w.goesgens wrote:
...
> Already packaged for ubuntu by Scott Kitterman; compiles on debian wheezy.
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kgraphviewer/4:2.1.1-0ubuntu1

For the record, it is already packaged in Ubuntu, but not by me.  I touched it 
there to do some fix ups, but it's most certainly not my package.

Scott K

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Moving /tmp to tmpfs makes it useful

2012-05-29 Thread Aneurin Price
On 26 May 2012 19:20, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez  wrote:
> *Important*: use "df -h /tmp" NOT "du -hs /tmp", since the flash player
> deletes the file entry from /tmp as soon as it gets the inode allocated.
> I believe this a measure to "prevent" piracy (people ripping the video
> from /tmp)

I think you're too willing to assume bad faith. If I were writing
similar software, that's exactly what I'd do: create a temporary file,
which will be in /tmp except in the marginal corner-case that the user
has set another $TMPDIR, then unlink it and continue using it. This
means that you don't need to worry about deleting it afterwards, even
if your application crashes or is killed, and has no obvious
downsides.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cahb+spdrxfpd1e6dovwfg8pttbezduqgchskcwb0l+oc3p3...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#675033: ITP: kgraphviewer -- KGraphViewer is a GraphViz dot graph viewer for KDE 4.

2012-05-29 Thread w.goesgens

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Wilfried Goesgens 

* Package name: kgraphviewer
  Version : 2.1.1
  Upstream Author : Gaël de Chalendar 
* URL : http://extragear.kde.org/apps/kgraphviewer/
* License : (GPL2)
  Programming Lang: (C, C++, QT)
  Description : KGraphViewer is a GraphViz dot graph viewer for KDE 4.

Already packaged for ubuntu by Scott Kitterman; compiles on debian wheezy.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kgraphviewer/4:2.1.1-0ubuntu1



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120529125440.11867.71483.report...@o3sis.com



Bug#675032: ITP: iipmooviewer -- Ajax-based Internet Imaging Protocol (IIP) client

2012-05-29 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre 


* Package name: iipmooviewer
  Version : 1.0
  Upstream Author : Ruven Pillay 
* URL : http://iipimage.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
  Programming Lang: JavaScript
  Description : Ajax-based Internet Imaging Protocol (IIP) client

 IIPMooViewer is a high performance Ajax-based javascript image streaming and
 zooming client for the IIPImage system compatible with Firefox / Mozilla (and
 other gecko-based browsers), Internet Explorer versions 6 & 7, Safari and
 Opera. It is based on the Mootools javascript framework. Version 1.1 of
 IIPMooViewer requires Mootools version 1.2. The distribution contains all the
 necessary library files in both compressed and uncompressed formats. Modify the
 parameters in the iipmooviewer.html example file provided.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120529125849.9303.14698.report...@maester.malat.net



Bug#675018: ITP: python-pycalendar -- iCalendar/vCard Library

2012-05-29 Thread Rahul Amaram

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

--- Please fill out the fields below. ---

Package name: python-pycalendar
Version: 0.2~svn188
Upstream Author: Cyrus Daboo
URL: http://svn.mulberrymail.com/repos/PyCalendar/
License: Apache 2.0
Description: iCalendar/vCard Library

This package is needed for Darwin Calendarserver 3.2.0 (currently in 
process of packaging).





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fc48f48.6080...@users.sourceforge.net



Processed: merge

2012-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> merge 601455 661496
Bug #601455 [general] can't stop daemon using /etc/init.d/foo stop when 
disabled via /etc/default/foo
Bug #661496 [general] multiple, annoyingly different ways to disable an init 
script
Merged 601455 661496
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
601455: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601455
661496: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661496
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13382809822686.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#480925: marked as done (support for playing blu-ray discs)

2012-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 29 May 2012 10:01:02 +0200
with message-id <201205291001.03726.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line closing, supported as much as we can
has caused the Debian Bug report #480925,
regarding support for playing blu-ray discs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
480925: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=480925
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: general
Severity: wishlist

I'm creating this bug to track support for playing blu-ray discs in Debian's
default desktop install.

I'll add related bugs as blockers to this one (and welcome others to do the
same).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-amd64
Locale: LANG=ca_AD.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_AD.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=480914#32
thus closing.


cheers,
Holger

--- End Message ---


Processed: downgrading

2012-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 637232 important
Bug #637232 [general] general: Multiarch breaks support for non-multiarch 
toolchain
Bug #639214 [general] eglibc: changes to paths concerning crt1.o, crti.o and 
crtn.o breaks building LLVM Trunk
Bug #644986 [general] i386: Compiling gcc-snapshots from upstream with 
multiarch-toolchain?
Bug #648889 [general] /usr/include/features.h(323): catastrophic error: could 
not open source file "bits/predefs.h"
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> # this bug is mainly ment to document a decission, so why critical?
> severity 652011 important
Bug #652011 [debian-policy] general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: 
Dependencies of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> # this is mainly disagreeing with the status-quo, so I dont think thats
> # serious either
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
637232: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637232
639214: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639214
644986: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644986
648889: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648889
652011: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652011
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13382783597.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#669108: marked as done (general: assorted segfault)

2012-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 29 May 2012 09:38:44 +0200
with message-id <201205290938.44884.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line not a bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #669108,
regarding general: assorted segfault
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
669108: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669108
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: general
Severity: normal

Hi there,

I'm using debian testing. Lately I've been experiences frequent segfaults with
eventual complete freeze. I attach evidence found in kern.log.

Is there anybody out there who could guide me to collect further information to
investigate the problem?

So far I've done a complete disk scan using smarttools, but the disk seems ok.

Thank you anyway,
Carlo.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Apr 15 11:55:13 Uranus kernel: [ 7811.496368] gnome-shell[2831]: segfault at 
2c41eb008 ip 7fe95070b618 sp 7fff05951020 error 4 in 
libglib-2.0.so.0.3000.2[7fe9506a9000+f6000]
Apr 15 11:58:15 Uranus kernel: [ 7993.284366] gnome-shell[14406]: segfault at 
2acc04008 ip 7f09d2731618 sp 7fffa776bb40 error 4 in 
libglib-2.0.so.0.3000.2[7f09d26cf000+f6000]
Apr 15 12:03:00 Uranus kernel: [ 8278.234638] gnome-shell[14591]: segfault at 
38f481008 ip 7f3cbc453618 sp 7fffe71da900 error 4 in 
libglib-2.0.so.0.3000.2[7f3cbc3f1000+f6000]
Apr 15 12:03:33 Uranus kernel: [ 8310.267483] gnome-shell[14735]: segfault at 
441790008 ip 7f97dbf07618 sp 7fffc73dce10 error 4 in 
libglib-2.0.so.0.3000.2[7f97dbea5000+f6000]
Apr 15 12:03:37 Uranus kernel: [ 8314.168806] eclipse[14252]: segfault at 18 ip 
7fbc8d48168e sp 7fff6b7246c0 error 4 in 
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.10[7fbc8d40d000+af000]
Apr 15 12:09:24 Uranus kernel: [ 8661.053917] gnome-shell[14956]: segfault at 
257726008 ip 7f8cab08a618 sp 7fff71a34e80 error 4 in 
libglib-2.0.so.0.3000.2[7f8cab028000+f6000]
Apr 15 12:09:56 Uranus kernel: [ 8692.919917] gnome-shell[15288]: segfault at 
43886d107 ip 7f2faaf01618 sp 7fff1d200520 error 4 in 
libglib-2.0.so.0.3000.2[7f2faae9f000+f6000]
Apr 15 12:10:01 Uranus kernel: [ 8697.826674] eclipse[15082]: segfault at 18 ip 
7fcbd766f68e sp 7fff8a2c6550 error 4 in 
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.10[7fcbd75fb000+af000]
Apr 15 12:20:24 Uranus kernel: [ 9319.582410] colord-sane[2541]: segfault at 48 
ip 7f18f220a54c sp 7f18f21e0b78 error 6 in 
libdbus-1.so.3.7.0[7f18f21e2000+44000]
Apr 15 12:28:04 Uranus kernel: [  359.145923] colord-sane[2568]: segfault at 28 
ip 7f8e8996f54c sp 7f8e89945b78 error 6 in 
libdbus-1.so.3.7.0[7f8e89947000+44000]
Apr 15 14:21:19 Uranus kernel: [ 6756.627363] gnome-shell[3291]: segfault at 
272610008 ip 7f74eca328fc sp 7fff0c8b3df0 error 6 in 
libglib-2.0.so.0.3000.2[7f74ec9d+f6000]
Apr 15 14:33:18 Uranus kernel: [ 7474.194557] gnome-shell[6935]: segfault at 
2afaf3008 ip 7fa09f200618 sp 7fff7c5d9640 error 4 in 
libglib-2.0.so.0.3000.2[7fa09f19e000+f6000]
Apr 15 14:46:38 Uranus kernel: [ 8271.319739] gnome-shell[7196]: segfault at 
399fac008 ip 7f229be22618 sp 7fff01ef0df0 error 4 in 
libglib-2.0.so.0.3000.2[7f229bdc+f6000]
Apr 15 15:29:11 Uranus kernel: [  396.505177] gnome-shell[2676]: segfault at 
40e3c4008 ip 7f2adf2ee618 sp 7fff4710f9a0 error 4 in 
libglib-2.0.so.0.3000.2[7f2adf28c000+f6000]
Apr 15 15:31:00 Uranus kernel: [  504.643880] gnome-settings-[2593]: segfault 
at 7f8ef4849040 ip 7f8efcba0630 sp 7fffab382eb0 error 4 in 
libglib-2.0.so.0.3000.2[7f8efcb5a000+f6000]
Apr 15 15:31:12 Uranus kernel: [  516.305883] colord-sane[2451]: segfault at 28 
ip 7f2e4a6ba54c sp 7f2e4a690b78 error 6 in 
libdbus-1.so.3.7.0[7f2e4a692000+44000]
Apr 15 15:32:31 Uranus kernel: [   65.084537] gnome-panel[2721]: segfault at 
7f3a599b130f ip 7f3a56b89f0f sp 7fff971d0960 error 7 in 
libglib-2.0.so.0.3000.2[7f3a56b27000+f6000]
Apr 15 15:39:36 Uranus kernel: [  196.276033] colord-sane[2424]: segfault at 8 
ip 7ffc0462054c sp 7ffc045f6b78 error 6 in 
libdbus-1.so.3.7.0[7ffc045f8000+44000]
Apr 15 15:43:05 Uranus kernel: [  191.206854] gnome-shell[2897]: segfault at 
3cee58008 ip 7f6485577618 sp 7fff10e8c7f0 error 4 in 
libglib-2.0.so.0.3000.2[7f6485515000+f6000]
Apr 15 15:43:52 Uranus

Bug#672147: marked as done (general: restart desktop when i press cdrom icon)

2012-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 29 May 2012 09:41:23 +0200
with message-id <201205290941.24260.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line crystal ball is broken
has caused the Debian Bug report #672147,
regarding general: restart desktop when i press cdrom icon
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
672147: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672147
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: general
Severity: normal

When i want play a cdrom mounted and ready for use , my desktop is restarted
 and this operation does not have any effect. Is not a serious problems,
 the totem program can play music with your graphical interface,
 but is some tedious.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_AR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_AR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

sorry, but Debians crystal ball to magically gather missing information in bug 
reports is broken, so we cannot help you with this bugreport. Feel free to 
provide more information (like used desktop environment...) and we might 
reopen the bugreport.


cheers,
Holger

--- End Message ---


Processed: debian-policy is the place to discuss this

2012-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 652011 debian-policy
Bug #652011 [general] general: Repeated pattern of FHS violation: Dependencies 
of /sbin and /bin, belong in /lib
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'debian-policy'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #652011 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #652011 to the same values 
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
652011: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652011
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133827707514826.transcr...@bugs.debian.org