Bug#1009221: ITP: pytkdocs -- Legacy Python handler for mkdocstrings

[Carsten Schoenert]

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carsten Schoenert 
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

* Package name: pytkdocs
  Version : 0.16.1
  Upstream Author : Timothée Mazzucotelli 
* URL : https://github.com/mkdocstrings/pytkdocs
* License : ISC
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description : Load Python objects documentation

 This Python library is used to load Python objects documentation. It accepts
 JSON on standard input and writes JSON on standard output.
 .
 It is typically used to read data from standard input while writing
 processed data line by line. Especially mkdocstrings is wanting this
 behavior.

This package is a new indirect dependency for the recent released minor
version of NetBox 3.2.x.

It will be maintained within the Debian Python Team.

Re: rebuild of rpcbind (and other packages?) due to old debhelper bug 993316

[Michael Biebl]

Am 08.04.22 um 21:21 schrieb Paul Gevers:

I recall a binNMU bug was filed against the release.debian.org pseudo 
package to fix all affected packages. I can only assume that somehow 
this package slipped through the cracks.


Hm,...

# apt-file search -x ^/usr/lib/systemd/system/ | wc -l
122

I get the attached list of 65 source packages which install files into 
/usr/lib/systemd/system.


Regards,
Michael
 anacron
 anbox
 arno-iptables-firewall
 boinc
 booth
 btrbk
 caddy
 ceph-iscsi
 chkboot
 clevis
 cloudflare-ddns
 conmux
 conserver
 debomatic
 dkimpy-milter
 erlang
 fail2ban
 freedombox
 fwknop
 galileo
 gammu
 gdnsd
 globus-gridftp-server
 globus-scheduler-event-generator
 hitch
 ifupdown-extra
 ipmitool
 libapache2-mod-tile
 libcharon
 libratbag
 milter-greylist
 molly-brown
 moosefs
 mopidy
 morty
 mpd
 mpdscribble
 msmtp
 netkit-bootparamd
 nextepc
 nordugrid-arc
 onionbalance
 opendnssec
 opensmtpd
 pass-tomb
 pcsc-lite
 policyd-rate-limit
 pvpgn
 qbittorrent
 sec
 shadowsocks-libev
 soapyremote
 sopel
 sreview
 tcmu
 tirex
 tlp
 varnish
 voms
 vrfydmn
 wesnoth-1.14
 wsdd2
 xrootd
 zfs-fuse
 ziproxy


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: rebuild of rpcbind (and other packages?) due to old debhelper bug 993316

[Paul Gevers]

Hi,

On 08-04-2022 19:40, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 05:25:11PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:

Bug 993316 was fixed on 23 September 2021. Any reason why rpcbind
hasn't been rebuilt yet?

Was anything done for that to happen? Because otherwise the answer is
"nobody did that".


I would have assumed that this would be done when bug 993316 was closed.

There is no mechanism to automatically rebuild affected packages when a
bug in debhelper was fixed, or in any similar cases.


I recall a binNMU bug was filed against the release.debian.org pseudo 
package to fix all affected packages. I can only assume that somehow 
this package slipped through the cracks.


Paul


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: rebuild of rpcbind (and other packages?) due to old debhelper bug 993316

[Andrey Rahmatullin]

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 05:25:11PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > Bug 993316 was fixed on 23 September 2021. Any reason why rpcbind
> > > hasn't been rebuilt yet?
> > Was anything done for that to happen? Because otherwise the answer is
> > "nobody did that".
> 
> I would have assumed that this would be done when bug 993316 was closed.
There is no mechanism to automatically rebuild affected packages when a
bug in debhelper was fixed, or in any similar cases.


-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: rebuild of rpcbind (and other packages?) due to old debhelper bug 993316

[Josue Ortega]

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 03:22:07PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Due to the old bug 993316 in debhelper[*], rpcbind is still buggy as
> it hasn't been rebuilt yet: rpcbind_1.2.6-2_amd64.deb contains
> 
> -rw-r--r-- root/root   626 2021-08-17 17:31:36 
> ./usr/lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.service
> -rw-r--r-- root/root   325 2021-08-17 17:31:36 
> ./usr/lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.socket
> lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2021-08-17 17:31:36 
> ./lib/systemd/system/portmap.service -> rpcbind.service
> 
> thus with a dangling symlink, while this should be
> 
> /lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.service
> /lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.socket
> /lib/systemd/system/portmap.service -> rpcbind.service
> 
> i.e. without the "/usr".
> 
> Bug 993316 was fixed on 23 September 2021. Any reason why rpcbind
> hasn't been rebuilt yet?
> 
> I don't know whether there are other affected packages.
> 
> [*] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993316
> 
> -- 
> Vincent Lefèvre  - Web: 
> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: 
> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
> 


Hi,

I just uploaded rpcbind_1.2.6-3[1], which is rebuilt using the latest
debhelper version.

For future situations like this, I encorage you to fill a bug
against the affected package. Posting it in a mailing list
with such a heavy traffic without copying the maintainer could
make slower the fix.

Cheers,


[1]: 
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1317126/accepted-rpcbind-126-3-source-into-unstable/

---
Josue Ortega
«Happy Hacking»
http://josueortega.org

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: rebuild of rpcbind (and other packages?) due to old debhelper bug 993316

[Vincent Lefevre]

On 2022-04-08 18:55:14 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 03:22:07PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Bug 993316 was fixed on 23 September 2021. Any reason why rpcbind
> > hasn't been rebuilt yet?
> Was anything done for that to happen? Because otherwise the answer is
> "nobody did that".

I would have assumed that this would be done when bug 993316 was closed.
Or should I open a new bug against rpcbind to ask for a rebuild?

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre  - Web: 
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: 
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Re: rebuild of rpcbind (and other packages?) due to old debhelper bug 993316

[Andrey Rahmatullin]

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 03:22:07PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Due to the old bug 993316 in debhelper[*], rpcbind is still buggy as
> it hasn't been rebuilt yet: rpcbind_1.2.6-2_amd64.deb contains
> 
> -rw-r--r-- root/root   626 2021-08-17 17:31:36 
> ./usr/lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.service
> -rw-r--r-- root/root   325 2021-08-17 17:31:36 
> ./usr/lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.socket
> lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2021-08-17 17:31:36 
> ./lib/systemd/system/portmap.service -> rpcbind.service
> 
> thus with a dangling symlink, while this should be
> 
> /lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.service
> /lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.socket
> /lib/systemd/system/portmap.service -> rpcbind.service
> 
> i.e. without the "/usr".
> 
> Bug 993316 was fixed on 23 September 2021. Any reason why rpcbind
> hasn't been rebuilt yet?
Was anything done for that to happen? Because otherwise the answer is
"nobody did that".

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

rebuild of rpcbind (and other packages?) due to old debhelper bug 993316

[Vincent Lefevre]

Hi,

Due to the old bug 993316 in debhelper[*], rpcbind is still buggy as
it hasn't been rebuilt yet: rpcbind_1.2.6-2_amd64.deb contains

-rw-r--r-- root/root   626 2021-08-17 17:31:36 
./usr/lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.service
-rw-r--r-- root/root   325 2021-08-17 17:31:36 
./usr/lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.socket
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2021-08-17 17:31:36 
./lib/systemd/system/portmap.service -> rpcbind.service

thus with a dangling symlink, while this should be

/lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.service
/lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.socket
/lib/systemd/system/portmap.service -> rpcbind.service

i.e. without the "/usr".

Bug 993316 was fixed on 23 September 2021. Any reason why rpcbind
hasn't been rebuilt yet?

I don't know whether there are other affected packages.

[*] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993316

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre  - Web: 
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: 
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)