Bug#1027007: ITP: nbfc -- notebook fan control
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bartosz Fenski X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name : nbfc Version : 0.1.7 Upstream Contact: TBD (t...@tbd.tbd) * URL : https://github.com/nbfc-linux * License : GPL 3.0 Programming Lang: C Description : notebook fan control Fan control service for notebooks.
Re: how about telegram channel
Yeah I've just changed it to group instead of broadcasting channel. regards Bartosz Fenski On 20.07.2022 20:06, Nicholas Guriev wrote: On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:01:22 +0200 Bartosz Fenski wrote: I created one https://t.me/debian_devel Of course I'm willing to give admin access to it to whoever we decide is correct person / group to cover that. You created broadcasting channel. Only you and admins can post there.
how about telegram channel
Hey folks. Anyone interested in switching to some more modern channels of communication? I'm tired of keeping VPS just to have IRC client and to be honest I think modern solutions like Telegram are simply easier and much more practical nowadays. I tried to search for "telegram" in archives of this ML but I found just ITPs for some random packages. Did we consider adding (I intentionally try to avoid word switching) some new channels for communication among devs? How about debian-devel channel on Telegram? I created one https://t.me/debian_devel Of course I'm willing to give admin access to it to whoever we decide is correct person / group to cover that. Do we even have people that could do that? I don't want to start flamewar. REALLY. regards Bartosz Fenski
Bug#663184: ITP: httpie -- CLI, cURL-like tool for humans
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo * Package name: httpie Version : 0.1.6 Upstream Author : Jakub Roztocil * URL : http://httpie.org/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: Python Description : CLI, cURL-like tool for humans HTTPie is a CLI HTTP utility that makes CLI interaction with HTTP-based services as human-friendly as possible. HTTPie does so by providing an http command that allows for issuing arbitrary HTTP requests using a simple and natural syntax and displaying colorized responses. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120309072536.25256.35382.report...@fenski.pl
Re: Weather forecast through applet not available in Europe?
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:37:39PM +0100, Merciadri Luca wrote: > From http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/tip/16726.html, it appears to > be possible to show the weather forecast. This seems to rely heavily (if > not entirely) on www.weather.com. However, despite the fact that I am > not in France, but in Belgium (which is pretty the same for the weather > and regional info), I am never able to get weather forecast. Does the > same problem appear in France too? Why is it so? Works fine in Poland. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:fe...@debian.org | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - malopolskie v. - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `-http://fenski.pl | xmpp:fe...@jabber.org | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Roundcube does not create database
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:39:50AM -0800, Frank Niedermann wrote: > I have installed the package roundcube on Debian Squeeze. It does not create > the required database (roundcube-core and roundcube-mysql also installed). I > already tried with dpkg-reconfigure but this does not work either. > > Other packages like phpmyadmin do work fine and are able to create the > database. > > Is this a known issue or should I create a bugreport? Can I fix it on my > own? Why don't you check BTS if it is known issue? Do you really think it's problem for debian-devel mailing list? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:fe...@debian.org | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - malopolskie v. - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `-http://fenski.pl | xmpp:fe...@jabber.org | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#471834: proposition to split /etc/network/interfaces
Package: netbase Version: 4.29 Severity: wishlist I would like to RFC about splitting /etc/network/interfaces to several files ie. one file for each interface. Something like /etc/network/interfaces.d/ with files eth0, wlan0, ppp0, etc. That would make easier to maintain machines with several (or even hundreds) of interfaces which is quite common in big environments. I doubt it's good goal for lenny release, but maybe it would be possible to make it happen between lenny+1? Any comments on that? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - malopolskie v. - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `-http://fenski.pl | xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#439222: ITP: libuninum -- library for converting Unicode strings to numbers and numbers to Unicode strings
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libuninum Version : 2.5 Upstream Author : Bill Poser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://billposer.org/Software/libuninum.html * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : library for converting Unicode strings to numbers and numbers to Unicode strings libuninum is a library for converting Unicode strings to numbers. Internal computation is done using arbitrary precision arithmetic, so there is no limit on the size of the integer that can be converted. The value is returned as an ASCII decimal string, a GNU MP object, or an unsigned long integer. Auto-detection of the number system is provided. The number systems supported include Arabic, Armenian, Balinese, Bengali, Burmese, Chinese, Cyrillic, Devanagari, Egyptian, Ethiopic, Glagolitic, Greek, Gujarati, Gurmukhi, Hebrew, Kannada, Khmer, Klingon, Lao, Limbu, Malayalam, Mongolian, New Tai Lue, Nko, Old Italic, Old Persian, Oriya, Osmanya, Perso-Arabic, Phoenician, Roman Numerals, Tamil, Telugu, Tengwar, Thai, and Tibetan. === I'm going to package it since it's new dependency of msort. -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - malopolskie v. - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 11:52:38PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > gpg --recv-keys A70DAF536070D3A1 && (gpg --export -a A70DAF536070D3A1 | > > > apt-key add -) > > > > Uh, don't forget the part about verifying that the key is actually > > signed by the ftpmasters. Skipping that step pretty much defeats the > > entire point. > > > > gpg --list-sigs A70DAF536070D3A1 > > Try gpg --check-sigs A70DAF536070D3A1 instead. Very useful: ([EMAIL PROTECTED])~$gpg --check-sigs A70DAF536070D3A1 pub 1024D/6070D3A1 2006-11-20 [expires: 2009-07-01] uid Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sig!36070D3A1 2006-11-20 Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2 signatures not checked due to missing keys ([EMAIL PROTECTED])~$ Looks that it's signed by itself. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - malopolskie v. - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 12:09:58PM +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Noone answered, yet, why this key is not in debian-archive-keyring package. > I thought that the whole idea was to make it available before it gets used. > That would be the easiest (install it at installation time) and > "apt-key update" could be used. Worse for me is that I couldn't find *any* official announcement about this new key. I wonder what are our mailing lists and webpage for. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - malopolskie v. - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: apt-file: Looking for a sponsor for NMU (#397381)
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 08:36:08AM -0600, Kevin Glynn wrote: > Is anyone interested in apt-file? I have a proposed NMU that fixes > severity important bug #397381 and I am looking for a sponsor. > > There is also a more detailed patch that closes another four bugs and > (I think) makes apt-file pattern matching much less broken. See the > patch attached to bug #382312. Where can I find fixed package? I'm willing to sponsor it. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - malopolskie v. - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Media players in Debian (was: new mplayer)
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:23:58AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > I agree, but understand and accept that the license issues need to be > checked before it is accepted into debian. I understand that, but mplayer inclusion is a problem since I remember that mplayer exists. I really don't know what have to be checked and why it takes more than 4 years. Many people contributed much time to make mplayer ready to enter our archives and as far as I can see they are simply ignored. Please tell me what's wrong with *current* package and what can we do to make it better and stop saying me it's license issue. That's simply boring. Which part of mplayer is non-free for you? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - malopolskie v. - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Media players in Debian (was: new mplayer)
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:12:10AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > I was wondering, what's so important about mplayer? With totem and > > vlc (and I anticipate there's something similar for KDE) you have > > everything you need. > > I believe kaffeine is the totem equivalent for KDE. And I agree, the > tools in Debian are quite good, and I am not sure if mplayer have much > extra to offer these days. There is the question of libdvdcss2 (for > DVD playing) and some codeces missing, but the situation is improving > there too. :) There is also gnash, the flash player. It is able to > run quite a few flash files, but lack video support still. Mplayer comes with his friend mencoder. I doubt that koffeine, totem, xine, vlc have something to offer in that regard. And if I can't play something with vlc I'm almost sure it's playable with mplayer + w32codecs. Yes, I know there won't be w32codecs package in Debian, but even mplayer would be great addition. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - malopolskie v. - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: A question on setting setuid bit
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 08:37:52PM -0400, LEE, Yui-wah (Clement) wrote: > I am building a package in which one of the binary has > to have the setuid and setgid bits set. I wonder which > one of the following two is the more appropriate method > to use? > > 1. Use "install -m 6755 " in the install >target of the Makefile. > >However, I already tried this method and it did not >work. The "install" program that I am using is part >of the GNU coreutils. I could not find any specific >confirmation that the setuid and setgid bits >(i.e. the first digit "6" in the numeric mode >"6755") can be used with the install program (the >document says only that the -m switch works "as in" >chmod). > > 2. Add a "chmod ug+s" command in the postinst script. 3. Use dpkg-statoverride in your postinst script. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - malopolskie v. - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#372084: ITP: cpm -- console password manager
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: cpm Version : 0.22beta Upstream Author : Harry Brueckner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.harry-b.de/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=harry:cpm * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : console password manager ncurses based console tool to manage passwords and store them in the public key encrypted in a file. The encryption is handled via GnuPG so the programs data can be accessed via gpg as well, in case you want to have a look inside. The data is stored as as zlib compressed XML so it's even possible to reuse the data for some other purpose. Right now it's not possible to build cpm under sid/unstable because of CDK library incompatibilities, but upstream tries to solve these issues. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEh9lXhQui3hP+/EARAt45AJoDjV5PF1bTXaDXC6qUEiaJogNCWgCgjxT2 YnBGXdnJfF6W0cDYTDMu7/E= =XQC8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shouldn't we have more ftp masters ?
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 08:27:26PM +0200, Hans Kroegle wrote: >It seems that the ftp-masters haven't looked at the NEW queue > during the last month (or maybe only for java), and its size is still > increasing (see http://haydn.debian.org/~corsac-guest/new/ ). I agree > that they may want to take vacations, but IMHO, NEW is such an > important process for Debian that it shouldn't be left aside like this > for a so long time. It's why I think that if there isn't currently > enought ftp-masters to ensure that the NEW process will work without > interruptions, we should have more ftp-masters. > > What do you think about that ? I think it's debconf time and everything is slower, but will be as usual when it's end and everyone came back to his/her normal work. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - malopolskie v. - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: gpg
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 04:50:23PM +0200, Tamas SZERB wrote: > Hey Guys, could you CC-me if you continue the thread, > > Could you tell me what to do if it seems I just forgot my passphrase > for my GPG key, and it blocks me to upload/fix my outstanding bugs on > different packages? You can try to crack it. I suppose you remember at least some characters from password. That should be easy with john or something like that. Otherwise revoke it and create new key. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - malopolskie v. - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: MIA Christoph Wegscheider?
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 04:48:56PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > Does anyone know the current status of maintainer Christoph Wegscheider? I didn't hear anything for a long from him although there were some releases of potracegui I sponsored some time ago. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Downtime for some debian.org machines (people, db, buildd, etc.)
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 11:57:58PM +, James Troup wrote: > This Saturday (2006-03-25) between 13:00 - 21:00 UTC, the debian.org > machines hosted by HP are going down due to maintenance in their cage > on the power systems. The following machines and services are > affected: > > o gluck - people.d.o, planet.d.o, cvs.d.o, lintian.d.o, etc. > o raff - buildd.d.o > o merkel - qa.d.o, nm.d.o > o samosa - db.d.o > o merulo - ia64 porter box > o paer - hppa porter box > o peri - hppa 2nd buildd > > Apologies for the short notice and any inconvenience. I suppose this should be also send to user related mailing lists and published on webpage. It's going to affect not only developers. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#357299: ITP: o3read -- standalone converter for OpenOffice.org documents
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: o3read Version : 0.0.4 Upstream Author : Ulric Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://siag.nu/o3read/ * License : GPL Description : standalone converter for OpenOffice.org documents o3read is a collection of utilities that helps convertion of OpenOffice.org Writer and Calc documents to the one of the three output formats: * o3read - displays a dump of the parse tree * o3totxt - creates plain text * o3tohtml - creates html code These utilities don't depend on OpenOffice nor any other external tools/libraries. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEGY7QhQui3hP+/EARAt4/AKCrz8BTeqpAqD+NdNgj3eJJQpEJKQCg1hTW OolOa5LbhNn2I80F4T36ips= =iL3T -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian developer
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:27:23PM +0100, Mark Walter wrote: > Hi all, Hello. > I want to step in to be a debian developer. That's rather question for debian-mentors mailing list. > While processing the new maintainer's guide I need to cross checked > boxes to apply. > > Two of them are not true for me at all and I can't apply as a developer :-( > > Here are the two point's: > > *** > If you intend to package software, do you have a Debian package in the > archive through a sponsor? And if you intend to do other things (e.g. > port Debian to other architectures, help with documentation, Quality > Assurance or Security), do you have experience in those things and have > already participated in such activities for Debian? > > *** > Has an existing Debian developer agreed to be an advocate and verify > your application > > Here is my question: > > Can anybody help to me to satisfy the demand for the two point's as I'am > interested to be a debian developer ? > > What can I do to arrive the point's mentioned above ? Point 1. Find some useful software that isn't already packaged for Debian and package it. Or adopt some unmaintain one. You can take a look at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ for that. Then ask on debian-mentors mailing list for upload of it to the archive. Point 2. Assuming you'll be doing your job well maybe your sponsor will agree to be your advocate. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: debian version for kernel 2.6.0 ?
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:45:07PM +0530, madhan raman wrote: > can i know which debian version released came with linux kernel 2.6.0... There was no release of Debian with kernel 2.6.0. Sarge has 2.6.8 kernel, etch have something much newer and it's not yet decided what will be released with it. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: New packages.debian.org
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 03:11:30PM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > It checks the User-Agent string. > > What are the expected results for a user accessing the following URL > from IE running on a W2K terminal server? I didn't notice any > restrictions. > > http://packages.debian.org/tuxpaint Maybe because it was rather ironic answer. At least for me ;) regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: How to identify distro, lsb-release is broken
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 12:34:00AM -0800, Stephen Birch wrote: > I don't pretend to understand the reason for this change but I do know > that my identification mechanism is now broken on etch. > > Can anyone suggest a more reliable mechanism? I think that the most reliable will be checking libc version. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: For those who care about lesbians
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 03:00:40PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: > Since this sort of thing is apparently okay nowadays, and I know that > a lot of you like looking at lesbians, I'd like to share this with > you: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/81351129/in/photostream/ > > [And for the sarcasm-impaired: debian-devel-announce is for Debian > development, not anything that you (or any other group of people) > happen to be interested in. Don't post irrelevant stuff here. It would > be a real shame if the list had to be moderated because people can't > exercise good judgement. Anything sent here should be of interest to > an overwhelming majority of Debian developers, *at least* - if you're > using phrases like "for those who care about X", it belongs somewhere > else, like X-announce.] I got you sarcasm, but I still think that messages posted to debian-devel-announce should be more official. Even I you wanted to inform everybody that it's not proper place to post information not related to Debian itself you could do it in more formal language... otherwise we're going to have more ironic posts here, and that's not what most people expect subscribing to this list. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: How the kernel firmware loader works
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 12:05:48AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > (#104) How the kernel firmware loader works > > fEnIo[0] learnt an important lesson about the kernel firmware loader: > it (usually) does not work as expected for non-modular drivers. Yeah... thanks a lot for your explanation. I'm now a little smarter. > The reason is that the request_firmware()[1] interface is synchronous. > Since it's usually called in the initialisation section of drivers, the > userspace firmware loader is not available yet if the calling driver is > built-in in the kernel. The request_firmware_nowait()[2] asynchronous > interface was designed to replace it, but most drivers have not been > ported yet. > > When a driver calls request_firmware(), a uevent[3] is sent by the > kernel to udev over a netlink(7) socket, requesting that a specific > file is uploaded. udevd runs /lib/udev/firmware.agent, a simple shell > script which will look for the $FIRMWARE file in a few directories and > then copy it to the designated place in the driver $DEVPATH in sysfs. > > If the driver is initialised before userspace is started then the > loader will not be available, and the request will fail. A possible > solution is to run udev in the early userspace environment (initramfs), > but just compiling the driver as a module is usually simpler. So I suppose that it shouldn't be possible to compile in such drivers, if they work only as a module. At least since they aren't ported to new interface. Anyway, once again thanks for explanation, and now I'm glad that I posted this question in blog, otherwise I would probably lost more time to figure out what's going on. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: APT public key updates?
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 11:13:06PM +0100, Michael Vogt wrote: > > These are all notable in > > > > a) being RC > > b) not having any response from an apt maintainer > > Sorry for the delay. I'm preparing a new upload that adds the 2006 > archive key to the default keyring. Does it mean we need new version of apt everytime when key changes? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFT: new fuse package(s)
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 06:39:25PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > They fix many bugs wrt debconf by dropping it at all. In addition > > fuse-utils should create /dev/fuse or /dev/.static/dev/fuse device now. > For the benefit of the other debian-devel@ readers: no package other > than udev and makedev should ever look at /dev/.static/. > The correct method to create a device node in postinst is: > > cd /dev && ./MAKEDEV name > > This will take care of creating the device(s) in /dev if it is static or > in the underlying static /dev if udev is active (or do nothing if you > still live in 2001 and have not yet stopped using devfs). Yes after some talks on #debian-devel I'm now aware of it, and I won't upload package using mknod instead of makedev. I hope that new version of makedev will appear quite soon. In addition I've filled bugreport against lintian which threated using mknod as warning and not critical error. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFT: new fuse package(s)
Hello. I would like to request for tests before I'll upload new fuse[1] packages. They fix many bugs wrt debconf by dropping it at all. In addition fuse-utils should create /dev/fuse or /dev/.static/dev/fuse device now. It also includes mount.fuse script which is preferred way to mounting fuse resources. Please test these packages if you're using fuse. If there won't be any issues I'm going to upload them in the short term (let's say two days). regards fEnIo [1] - http://people.debian.org/~fenio/fuse/ -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: c2a transition: libraries still needing transition
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 08:58:08AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > rlog -- old version is in testing > > Depends on the update of fuse. I am waiting for any reaction from Bartosz > and I am going to NMU fuse next week or so if nothing happens. I'm working on it, but in the same time I'm going to remove whole debconf stuff, so it needs more tests than usual. I hope that'll be enough to put information in NEWS.Debian that administrator has to clean up mess after previous fuse packages himself/herself. Because of many debconf configuration issues it's not possible to do it automatically, and trying to determine it can lead to non-working system, so I prefer to leave it as is. BTW: there are in bts some translations of fuse's debconf templates... may I close these bugs with the upload which will remove templates at all or should I close them manually with explanation that there won't be any questions since now? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
${Source-Version} without revision
Hello.
Is there any variable similar to ${Source-Version} which would allow me to
use version of the upstream sources in control file?
I have packages where program and data are distributed separately and
usually there are no need to change data package, but using:
Depends: foo-data (= ${Source-Version})
leads to the situation when I have to bump version of the -data package.
Would be great to have ${Upstream-Version} for such purposes.
Is there something like that I'm not aware of?
I couldn't find anything like that in `man dpkg-gencontrol`.
regards
fEnIo
--
,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo
: :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland
`. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user
`- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Intel notebooks for needy developers in developing countries
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 12:14:59AM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > > having commercial relationships is forbidden for american companies, apply > > for this offering? > > I got some wise advice about not to make the contry the ulitmate > critera (and to NOT give a list of countries). > > So if there would live a person in cuba working hard on debian > and being unable to afford a computer, I would not exclude him > because the US government does not like cuba. (I come from the > old europe myself, after all. :-) > > I am not the one makeing the ulitmate decision, though. I just > put together the list. Yeah that would be a real pain to exlude countries because of stupid political 'correctness'. All in all in Free Software movement we don't know what the borders are, do we? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Intel notebooks for needy developers in developing countries
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:08:58PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > Intel is so generous to provide Debian with ten notebooks (besides > some server hardware), which we would like to give to developers > in developing countries who What exacly did you mean writing about 'developing countries'? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
how to deal with screwed up package
Hello. I'm working on new package for FUSE[1]. Sad to come clean, but I screwed previous package(s) up. There are plenty of bugs wrt debconf questions and actions after them. There is also request[2] to simplify or even remove questions at all. Now I'm undecided what to do. The idea was to ask user for the group (gid) that members will be able to use fusermount (sgid). If group was absent, then postinst script was creating it, and put its name in /etc/default/fuse-utils. But if chosen group existed already, then its name is also in mentioned file. Let's say I'm going to remove debconf questions at all. To keep user's system clean I should remove chosen group, but... because of some bugs[3][4][5] it's possible to leave system non-working after that. What should I do? Is NEWS.Debian file and leaving that mess enough? I'll be very thankful for any hints/comments. regards fEnIo [1] - http://fuse.sf.net [2] - http://bugs.debian.org/337572 [3] - http://bugs.debian.org/306281 [4] - http://bugs.debian.org/307624 [5] - http://bugs.debian.org/307627 -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: getting unstable lintian & linda into stable
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:28:31PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote: [...] > So what about a special exception which provides updated > lintian & linda packages for the stable distribution? > Is it technical possible? I mean becaused it should be > fixed. That's imho wrong idea because of at least one very important reason. Let's say that policy of unstable has changed and now it is required to put some kind of binaries in /foo/bar/, and lintian warns if you're going to put them in other place. It's possible that stable distribution even doesn't contain /foo/bar/ directory or some other needed tool which are now required in unstable. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:21:12AM +0100, Torreggiani Marcello wrote: > hi! Hello. > I had just installed Debian-Netinst, because I would a minimal installation > of Debian. > > I have a wish, I would add a new partition profile to the installation > (when the installer program askes if you want an automatic partition > and it displays only one choice,computer Desktop) > > How can I do? I'm not sure wether you want to add partition after installation or during it. Anyway in both cases that's not proper mailing list for such questions. Please post them on debian-user or debian-itialian mailing list. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: todos: command not found
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:24:16PM +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: > >Anyone knows what package brings the todos command? > >I had this error in a debian-cd try: > >tools/add-bin-doc: line 42: todos: command not found > > sysutils > > try something like 'apt-file search todo | grep bin' Dead grep. `apt-file search bin/todos` regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Build packages for Debian on Ubuntu
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:50:33AM +0200, Mikael Olenfalk wrote: > I have built ubuntu-hoary packages for anjuta 2.0.1 for amd64, which I > have made available in my repository at: http://mikael.is-a-geek.org/. > > I want to build the packages for Debian SID also and now I am > wondering if it is possible to build packages for debian sid on > ubuntu. I do not have another machine and wonder if it is possible to > do this using a special chroot or something (what is this pbuilder > thing btw?). pbuilder is something you're looking for. `apt-get install pbuilder` `pbuilder create --distribution sid` `pbuilder build anjuta_blablabla.dsc` > I could of course just install VW-Ware or something, but it would of > course be nice it I could build everything on the "same" machine. You can also use debootstrap to make chrooted sid on your Ubuntu, but pbuilder is more automated tool (it's a wrapper around debootstrap). regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Standardizing ~/.cache/ and similar things.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 02:01:56PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > What about home-etc[1] approach? > Anything which requires a distribution to modify a very large number of > applications is evil and not worth a discussion. Everything which could make users' headache less nagging is worth discussion. I don't say it's the only solution, but imho something has to be done to start fixing mess in ~/. Of course would be great to see some policy in LSB probably. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Standardizing ~/.cache/ and similar things.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:32:21AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > PROPOSAL 2: ~/.etc/${package_name}/
> Renaming every configuration file is insane. Not even worth discussing.
What about home-etc[1] approach?
This way applications need patches, but it doesn't break anything, and in
the same time if someone wants to switch to ~/.etc/ he/she can simply set
$HOME_ETC variable or put directory name in ~/.home-etc file.
[...]
regards
fEnIo
[1] - http://www.pld-linux.org/Docs/home-etc
--
,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo
: :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland
`. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user
`- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Re: Which CD is a package on?
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:21:17PM -0400, Mike O'Connor wrote: > > (00:58:29) *cheal:* cd contents > > (00:58:29) *dpkg:* To find out what is on what cd, download the .jigdo > > template, and zless fooimage.jigdo. In the [Parts] section you will see > > the list of packages that are contained in the cd. stew has created a > > searchable index of the sarge cds: http://vireo.org/~stew/jigdo > > <http://vireo.org/%7Estew/jigdo> > > > > stew is a regular on #debian. I just tested the interface quickly, and > > it's not bad. While the interface doesn't point to the code used, I > > guess he would accept to give anyone his code if asked by email. Perhaps > > a DD will want to use the code instead of starting from scratch. > > In any case, I think work on this issue would have a high use/effort > > ratio ;) > > It will be great if building an index can be part of the CD build process. > > > here's a url to the code I wrote: > > http://vireo.org/~stew/jigdoindex.tar.gz > > Its a perl module that inserts rows into a table and a php page that > searches and displays results. quick, dirty, and working... > > Feel free to use the code, and let me know how I could help. Here's another engine for searching jigdo files made by Richard Atterer: http://atterer.net/jigdo/jigdo-search.php AFAIR it's going to be included on Debian webpages. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#325935: ITP: warzone2100 -- 3D realtime strategy on a future Earth
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: warzone2100 Version : 0.2.2 Upstream Author : originaly Pumpkin Studios, now developed by: Roman C., Denis Dupeyron, Mike Gilmore, Marcus Hast Adam Holland, Kevin Malec, Per I Mathisen Dion Mendel, Kim Metcalfe, Christian Ohm Victor Qamly, Ben Russon, Rodolphe Suescun * URL : http://www.realtimestrategies.net/forums/index.php * License : GPL + some files that need to be checked Description : 3D realtime strategy on a future Earth Upon entering the game you land from your transport and establish your base. Here you conduct research, design and manufacture vehicles, build new structures and prepare your plans of global conquest. If the game goes badly you'll end up fighting last ditch battles here to defend your base from enemy attacks. Combat is frenetic, with extensive graphical effects and damage to the terrain and buildings giving rise to flying shrapnel and boulders. Within the game are many different structures and vehicles. From an initial Command Centre, you then go on to build Resource Extractors to provide fuel for Power Generators, which in turn supply energy to Factories, Research Facilities and weapons emplacements to protect your base. Features: * 400+ Technologies to research * 2,000+ different units to design * 3 Large campaign maps to conquer * 24 Fast play mission maps for extra action * Intelligence Display sets objectives dynamically * Interactive message system * Fast Play Interface graphically Based * Quick Screen Navigation * Fast Find System for units & structures * Set Factories to constant production * Automatically send each factory's units to where you want them I don't intend to upload this game anytime soon. Some license issues have to be fixed first. In fact this ITP is mainly to avoid someone else is duplicating work. I'll make unofficial package to easy installation procedure for Debian/Ubuntu users. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDFiFChQui3hP+/EARAmxZAJ9+EQ3fXkkpXFbouHwm3tSlEx29aQCfSQW8 i39QmQ+ai5S38yMpH9DKrrc= =GkPW -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#321022: ITP: msort -- utility for sorting records in complex ways
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: msort Version : 8.4 Upstream Author : William J. Poser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~wjposer/msort.html * License : GPL Description : utility for sorting records in complex ways msort is a program for sorting files in sophisticated ways. It was originally developed for alphabetizing dictionaries of "exotic" languages, for which it has been extensively used, but is useful for many other purposes. msort differs from typical sort utilities in providing greater flexibility in parsing the input into records and identifying key fields and greater control over the sort order. Its main distinctive features are: * Msort can be used as a command-line program or via a graphical user interface that is helpful not only to those who find a complicated command line difficult to deal with but also to those unfamiliar with the finer points of sorting. * Records need not be single lines of text but may be delimited in a number of ways. * Key fields may be selected either by position in the record (counting from the beginning or the end) or by matching a regular expression to a tag. * For each key an arbitrary sort order may be specified. * For each key an effectively unlimited number of multigraphs (sequences of characters to be treated as a single unit for purposes of sorting) of effectively unlimited length may be defined. * In addition to the usual lexicographic and numerical orderings, msort supports sorting by date, time, and string length. * For each key a distinct set of characters may be excluded from consideration when sorting in any combination of initial, final, and medial position in the key field. * Lexicographic keys may be reversed, allowing the construction of reverse dictionaries. * Any or all keys may be optional. For optional keys, the user may specify how records missing the key field should compare to records in which the key field is present. msort understands UTF-8 Unicode. Unicode may be used anywhere that text is entered: in the text to be sorted, in sort order and exclusion definitions, as a field or record separator, or as a field tag. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC7+LqhQui3hP+/EARAvygAJ4wj9WsxYMqmfIgekhRH+TZm44eGwCfTs3u 1KmBwuhy2RsgHqeZ+z2FCvc= =RaI+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jigdo-search
Hello. After last talk about searching for packages on CDs Gaëtan Frenoy wrote some shell script along with PHP script for such purposes and sent me it todays morning. I made some modifications to it (support for DVDs and get rid of some temporary files), and it's now at my people.d.o page[1]. Any comments/requests are welcome. regards fEnIo [1] - http://people.debian.org/~fenio/jigdo-search.php -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: fresh blood gets congested: long way to become DD
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 01:59:12PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > > (Are you a girl maybe?) > > > > What does that have to do with anything? Stop being male-chauvanistic. > > > > Maybe Laszlo wants to know which would be the proper pronoun reference. > It is better to ask and be certain than to err and offend. Another reason to include sex in db.debian.org which seems to be easy to implement, and not implemented becouse of uknown reasons. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Which CD is a package on?
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 07:38:30PM -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote: > Sorry, it doesn't work. Just replace the name of the service with the > real name of the machine currently hosting it. [...] Sorry I was first with previous mail ;) regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Which CD is a package on?
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 07:33:10PM -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote: > The (ugly) script that generated it is on > http://alioth.debian.org/~ftlerror-guest/cdpkglist.sh. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])~$wget http://alioth.debian.org/~ftlerror-guest/cdpkglist.sh --00:39:29-- http://alioth.debian.org/~ftlerror-guest/cdpkglist.sh => `cdpkglist.sh' Resolving alioth.debian.org... 192.25.206.28 Connecting to alioth.debian.org|192.25.206.28|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 00:39:30 ERROR 404: Not Found. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])~$ regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Which CD is a package on?
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 02:25:41PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: > I wonder if it is possible to find out on which CD of a stable release > the package I look for is? > > I guess it is possible, as apt can do it. > But is it available somewhere online? Right now it's possible only by looking jigdo files. Online browser/search engine is on my TODO list :/ regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: bugs2ldap gateway down - wnpp, bts.turmzimmer.net broken
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 10:38:58PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > on request of Ryan Murray I stopped the bugs2ldap-gateway on > bugs.debian.org. I'll move that gateway to some other host as soon as I > have time. At least the following services are broken by that: > - the wnpp bug list > - bts.turmzimmer.net > > I am sorry for that. I'll follow up as soon as this service runs on > another host. I'll just use this thread for another question regarding qa.debian.org. Could someone tell me why: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?gpg_key=13FEFC40&comaint=yes doesn't contain links to "Excuses" since... hmm... yesterday? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Problemes with the debian archives or apt?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 08:57:20AM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > Hello, Hi. > I notive that for about a week there is NO package upgrade in sid. This > is realy unusual. > > Is there any problem with the package servers or with apt (version > 0.6.38)? Two of Debian's machines were being moved in that time to their new location. On of them is responsible for NO package upgrade. You should read debian-devel-announce list if you want to know about such issues: Info about relocation: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg00013.html Info about its finish: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg00018.html There should be new packages todays evening. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 06:54:42PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: [...] > libparagui1.0 Uploaded. [...] regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed)
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 11:07:41AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > > > apt-get remove --purge libssl0.9.7 gives me tons of packages. Just > > > an estimation: We need to repack half of all packages then? > > > > NO.[1] > > > > All that needs to happen is that GPLed packages without an OpenSSL > > linking exception either need to: > > > > 1) Get a linking exception. > > 2) Stop linking with OpenSSL. > > How about indirect linking with OpenSSL? I'd really like to have libldap > use OpenSSL again but I was told this breaks the LDAP support of a lot > of packages since linking LDAP would pull OpenSSL. Seems that part of developers think that indirect linking with OpenSSL is ok, and part think it's not. What is an official statement? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
skills of developers
Hello. I would like to move one subject. What are the required skills of the developers/developers-to-be? Debian Policy, Developers' Reference, New Maintainers' Guide and most documentation describe only _how to make a good package_. Good package in that case means it will comply with Debian Policy. That's great, but that doesn't ensure us that maintainer know anything besides mentioned documents. That's not big deal to create Debian package. That's example: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2005/07/msg00254.html Nothing against poster of this document... that's only example which is the most up-to-date one. Please read whole thread to get know about rationale. Don't lie ourselves. Everyone who know where to put binary and architecture independent data and a little of bashism can became Debian developer. In general there's nothing wrong with that, but... yes there's BIG BUT here, should everyone be able to maintain every package on the world? Or should we split duties and call persons repectively to their knowlegde? To be honest I intended to join Debian project mainly to work on documentation/translation efforts. I was HIGHLY SURPRISED that my application manager (greetings to him) asked me how to create Debian package. For Christ's sake who the f*** I am to know about it if I'm going only to translate some stupid documents huh? Yep, I learned that and I passed "the exam". Sure I know C/Python/Perl/ but I hate that. Yes not everone in the Unix/Linux world loves to hack. I'll be never good programmer and I'm aware of it. Knowing C and knowing C can be two different things. In sum. Maybe it's time to create additional positions in Debian project? Maybe something like Packager (with knowledge about Bash and Debian Policy), Translator (with knowledge about some particular language and English), Helper (with knowledge about Debian in general), and finally DEVELOPER which develops software and is able to fix it if it's broken. Developers could be splitted to Python/Perl/C/C++/Java/Mono/and so on... I suppose we're going to have flamewar here as usual, so please... oh nevermind :P regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Section for a new package
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 07:57:44PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > > I have been thinking about packaging DBDesigner, a GUI tool for > > database design. It's GPL but it requires Borland Kylix to > > compile. Is this contrib, non-free, or not suitable for inclusion in > > Debian? > > contrib Really? Is it possible at all to have software which need non-free compiler in Debian? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Referring http://debblue.debian.net
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 04:25:14PM +0200, Jaap Haitsma wrote: > Hi, Hello. > A while ago I sent a mail to this list if anybody could host debblue for > me. Alexander Wirt was so kind to do this for me. What still needs to be > done is that http://debblue.debian.net has to be set to it's new > webserver location. The new webserver location is > http://ned.snow-crash.org/debblue > > The guy, amu at debian dot org who setup the http://debblue.debian.net > unfortunately does not react to my mails asking him to redirect > http://debblue.debian.net to it's new home. > > Is there anybody else who can redirect this address? I'm regularly > getting mails of users who are looking for debblue. It can be changed via mail2ldap gateway. More information at http://db.debian.org/doc-mail.html regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#315877: ITP: initng -- next generation init system
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: initng Version : 0.1.3 Upstream Author : Jimmy Wennlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://initng.thinktux.net/index.php/Main_Page * License : GPL Description : next generation init system Initng is a full replacement of the old and in many ways depricated sysvinit tool. It is designed with speed in mind, doing as much as possible asynchronously. In other words: It will boot your unix-system much faster, and give you more control and statistics over your system. == Not sure how hard would be to integrate this with Debian (had to tune some files by hand on test box), but it's definitely worth trying. On my test box it started system almost *three* times faster. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCvuF0hQui3hP+/EARAnwRAKC9Ia0Uo3SR4P9WcGnnwLNDdpx1GwCfdr5M /wbpOPFhLYds5cjzj+/qfRQ= =vrvb -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linking to libssl makes non free?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 02:24:44PM -0400, Jiann-Ming Su wrote: > I was looking in the squid changelog and noticed the following: > > squid (2.5.5-4) unstable; urgency=low > > * debian/control > - Removed depdendecies on libssl-dev (linking GPL with SSL is not free) > (Closes: #251988) > > * debian/rules > - Removed --enable-ssl from configure > > But, OpenSSL's FAQ seems to address this: > > http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#LEGAL2 > > Anybody have any insight into this? http://www.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: TODO for etch ?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:15:00PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote: > > - Change boot system, to one capable of handling dependencies and > > parallell invocation, to speed up the boot process. > > > Err.. Why? The current "slow" bootup is caused mostly by hardware > detection from my experience. Speeding up hardware detection or remove > it in favour of manual /etc/modules entries would speed up the boot > process a lot more than changing the boot process. If it ain't broke, do > not fix it. I don't use any hardware detection and my boot process _is_ slow. I tried on some test machine initng[1] once and it really speeds up boot process. It can be viewed on some charts[2]. regards fEnIo [1] - http://initng.thinktux.net/ [2] - http://initng.thinktux.net/index.php/Boot_charts_Official -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: splitting package on arch-dependant and arch-independant part s
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:08:37PM -0300, Humberto Massa Guimar?es wrote: > > Who moved binary (_architecture_ dependent binary) to -data > > package? Basically you don't have to split package if there are > > Since when are manpages architecture dependent binaries? I didn't say anything about manpages, did I? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: splitting package on arch-dependant and arch-independant parts
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:39:09PM +0600, Sergey Fedoseev wrote: > > There's only one rule. Architecture dependent files go to binary package, > > and architecture independent to data package. > > I consider some common procedures should exist anyway. For example ones > move manpage to binary package and others move it to data package. Who > is right? Who moved binary (_architecture_ dependent binary) to -data package? Basically you don't have to split package if there are no architecture dependent data in it (or such data is very small). Maybe you should tell us what program are you going to package. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: splitting package on arch-dependant and arch-independant parts
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 08:35:36PM +0600, Sergey Fedoseev wrote: > How exactly package should be splitted on data and binary parts? Which > files should be moved to binary package and which to the in data one? > > Any standart procedures/recommendations/suggestions? There's only one rule. Architecture dependent files go to binary package, and architecture independent to data package. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: co-maintainers sought
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 02:57:38PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > - ipcalc - Parameter calculator for IPv4 addresses > : http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ipcalc.html I would be interested in adoptioning or co-maintaining this package, since I'm using it quite often. So please decide whether you want to stay as co-maintainer or give me its maintainence. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: cogito no longer conflicts with git or cgvg
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:21:54PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > The new cogito package (0.11.3+20050610-1) is on its way into sid. > It does not install /usr/bin/git or /usr/bin/cg, and so it does not > conflict with git or with cgvg. > > I made a note about this in /usr/share/doc/cogito/README.Debian, and I > updated the git docs to remove all the mentions of those programs. > > I guess I just prefer getting flamed by the git/cogito people rather > than the Debian people. :-/ Maybe we should rename project to Debian Cogito? This way you wouldn't have to write about this cogito all the time :P debian-devel nor debian-mentors isn't cogito announce list as far as I know. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: And now for something completely different... etch!
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 05:55:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > guidelines like
> > "3 is multi-user with no X" "5 is full gui, etc."
> > Remember, init 0 and 6 are well-defined already
>
> OK. Where, pray tell, is a newbie going to learn about that? Most
> newbies that come from MS Windows and Mac OS understand three modes of a
> computer, to us run levels 0, 6 and {2,3,4,5}. Personally, I think it
> is much more newbie friendly to have run levels 2-5 be the same. It is
> also more expert friendly since you can tweak to your heart's content.
Newbie caming from MS Windows knows nothing about runlevels. The problem
are users caming from other distros. They used more runlevels almost for
sure, although they probably still don't know about it cause their newbies
right? ;)
regards
fEnIo
--
,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo
: :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland
`. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user
`- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#311321: RFP: redet -- regular expression development and execution tool
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: redet Version : 6.5 Upstream Author : William J. Poser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~wjposer/redet.html * License : GPL Description : regular expression development and execution tool Redet allows the user to construct regular expressions and test them against input data by executing any of a variety of search programs, editors, and programming languages that make use of regular expressions. When a suitable regular expression has been constructed it may be saved to a file. redet stands for Regular Expression Development and Execution Tool. For each program, a palette showing the available regular expression syntax is provided. Selections from the palette may be copied to the regular expression window with a mouse click. Users may add their own definitions to the palette via their initialization file. Redet also keeps a list of the regular expressions executed, from which entries may be copied back into the regular expression under construction. The history list is saved to a file and restored on startup, so it persists across sessions. So long as the underlying program supports Unicode, redet allows UTF-8 Unicode in both test data and regular expressions. Comparision with other similar tools: * Redet supports many programs. Most other regexp tools are aimed at a single language or style of regular expression. * Redet determines the properties of the programs that actually execute the regular expressions empirically. This guarantees that the version of the program you are using will actually behave as described. It also makes it likely that if new features are added to a program's regular expression repertoire, they will be detected and shown on the palette without any modification to the program. * Redet is explicitly designed for use in a variety of languages and writing systems. It provides the ability to change locale without exiting and reports whether Unicode support is available for each combination of program and locale. It provides special support for Unicode, such as lists of Unicode ranges and character properties. Redet itself is fully internationalized. By adding a suitable translation catalogue, buttons, labels, and messages may all be provided in any language. * Most regular expression tools are useful for constructing and understanding regular expressions but are not designed for use as search environments. Redet provides a number of facilities that make it a good search environment, including a relatively large, re-sizable text window, the ability to enter both regular expressions and data in various ways and to save them to files, editable, persistent history, and journalling. * Redet handles both matching and substitution. Most programs deal only with matching. * Redet allows the user to define named character classes and to intersect them. - -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686 Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCnBLshQui3hP+/EARAnkUAKDNprseGrGeNATPicQxvNNnG3sGewCfUdQM ZJlUrRXg/M72XnsBhtKuGNU= =+8ki -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian sarge is 3.2 or 4 ?
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:53:45AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > I would prefer to be maintainer of the well known distribution which > > *doesn't* bump versions only for the fun of it. > > > > I know that for most people numbers have some magic meaning, but please can > > we try to provide stable OS by its quality and not version number? > > > > Calling sarge 4.0 won't make it better. > > No but it will show that many things changed. Normally if I > see software for exampled which increases the version number > to 0.1 it shows that only minor fixes were done or small new > features are available. I don't think that the new installer > for instance is only a minor change. I suppose it's hard to find people thinking that we didn't change many things. All in all it's almost 3 years since last release, so that's natural that most things has been changed. Trusted users know what sarge is and how long it took to prepare it so the version number is probably the least significant part of it. New users don't know our numbering scheme so this fact doesn't matter for there too. And in fact Debian is more known for its toy-story-based naming. How many times did you hear that someone said that he/she is using Debian 3.0? Most people say they use potato/woody/sarge. > Anyway, time is too late and there are things more important > to be done. ACK ;) regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: debian sarge is 3.2 or 4 ?
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:17:45AM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote: > Considering that woody was released 19 Jul 2002, it took us > ~3 years to release; in the meantime, all most important > components changed completely; and we did a lot of work > in Sarge, that I do not want to see numerically > represented as > sarge = woody + 0.1 > > So I would much prefer if sarge would be called "Debian 4" > > Do you agree? I would prefer to be maintainer of the well known distribution which *doesn't* bump versions only for the fun of it. I know that for most people numbers have some magic meaning, but please can we try to provide stable OS by its quality and not version number? Calling sarge 4.0 won't make it better. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Ubuntu and its "appropriation" of Debian maintainers
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:59:55PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > > https://launchpad.ubuntu.com/people/adamm/ > > They have a similar page for me. Nothing there indicates that I am not an > Ubuntu employee. The same for me. And the funny thing is that https://launchpad.ubuntu.com/people/fenio/+packages shows: Bartosz Fenski is not currently recorded as the maintainer of any packages in the Launchpad system. But checking http://packages.ubuntu.com/hoary/utils/fuse-utils I'm listed as a maintainer of this package. > > What do other DDs think about this problem (or is it even a problem?)? > > Personally, I believe Ubuntu must either change the Maintainer field of > > all packages such that it points to Ubuntu Developers *or* get > > permission to keep the Maintainer field as is from the Debian package > > maintainer. > > I mostly agree with you. I don't mind at all if they want to identify me > as the upstream _Debian_ maintainer (or author in some cases) of my > packages, but if I'm an Ubuntu maintainer where is my paycheck? I hope that some developers of Debian and of Ubuntu at the same time, are reading this thread and forward it to the people responsible for current situation. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#305985: ITP: pystatgrab -- python bindings for a libstatgrab library
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: pystatgrab Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.i-scream.org/pystatgrab/ * License : GPL Description : python bindings for a libstatgrab library pystatgrab contains python bindings for libstatgrab library. libstatgrab is a library which provides an easy to use interface for accessing system statistics. Available statistics include CPU, Load, Memory, Swap, Disk I/O, and Network I/O. - -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686 Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCajoLhQui3hP+/EARAqnZAJsE2OpNe9FMjEycrsoOQbTxFwvTnQCeIULy 8hVAMrOpAiyJpFKXx7XEH44= =y21F -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: upload problems, public key not found
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 09:30:39PM +0200, Juergen Strobel wrote: [...] > I tried to upload an up to date version of this package today, but got > denied again. I can't remember how I got the initial version in. > > Questions: > > 1. Where does Katie look for public keys? In debian-keyring. > 2. How can I get my key to such a place (it *is* on most public > keyservers)? You must be DD. > 3. If I cannot get upload permission, does anyone else want to take > over? I don't want to take over it. Usually if someone is not a DD he/she has to find sponsor for upload. That's what probably happened with your first upload. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#304401: ITP: libstatgrab -- library providing interface to system statistics
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 12:43:44PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > > It would be great, if you package pystatgrab > > (http://www.i-scream.org/pystatgrab/) as well. > > I'm packaging libstatgrab only because pystatgrab needs it ;) If someone is interested in new packages they're available at my homepage[1]. I think they're in overall good shape, but there are not manpages for utilities, thus I didn't uploaded it yet. Otherwise I think packages are in good shape to be included in Debian. I'll try to write manpages during weekend or so. regards fEnIo [1] - http://skawina.eu.org/libstatgrab/ -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#304401: ITP: libstatgrab -- library providing interface to system statistics
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 04:54:54PM +0200, W. Borgert wrote: > Webpage: http://www.i-scream.org/libstatgrab/ > not www.example.org :-) Blah overlooked it ;) > It would be great, if you package pystatgrab > (http://www.i-scream.org/pystatgrab/) as well. I'm packaging libstatgrab only because pystatgrab needs it ;) regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#304401: ITP: libstatgrab -- library providing interface to system statistics
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: libstatgrab Version : 0.11.1 Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.example.org/ * License : LGPL (GPL for tools) Description : library providing interface to system statistics library which provides an easy to use interface for accessing system statistics. Available statistics include CPU, Load, Memory, Swap, Disk I/O, and Network I/O. In addition ncurses-based utility and sysctl-style access is provided. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCXD6whQui3hP+/EARAplmAKDR22317Db3OiS+qkLrbMJwIDE6eQCgqgmw 5zlbe60xcoQGztvx9VxcKmg= =U/AX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: lintian & linda
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:26:43PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > Sure, but only if two projects have at least some differences; in 'The > > Cathedral and the Bazaar' popclient becomes fetchmail. > > > > Whenever someone submits an ITP for the software A, whose functionality > > is already provided in Debian by B, the standard question is "Why is A > > better than B? From your long description it is not clear which are the > > aspect that make them different." > > Thats what I think too. What do others think about this? I think it's a person decision what is he/she doing with his/her free time. If someone wants to create third policy checker in Ruby, then I have nothing against it. Sure there are many other more important things to do, but hey, don't demand particular tasks from someone who wants to do something else. Just my $0,03. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
duplicates of fonts in some packages
Hello. I'm packaging adesklets stuff, and it cames with Vera.ttf font included. We've got this font in ttf-bitstream-vera package, so I was wondering if is it ok to duplicate it, since some packages are doing it already. At least that's something what I got after `apt-file search Vera.ttf`. wesnoth-data and epplets are not a case cause they using symlink to the font from ttf-bitstream-vera and depend on it. But widelands-data has its own copy. In addition its copyright file doesn't mention about different license for this font than for the rest of package. I assume that symlink is a good way (tm) for such situations, and that widelands is buggy, but I'm here to ensure myself and maybe others ;) Also maybe writing some script for finding such duplicates would be reasonable, it could in addition finds conflicting files in other packages, but that's only idea ;) regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#295131: JFTR: sdl(glib2.0) vs. wx2.4(glib1.2) only affects scorched3d
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:11:32PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
[...]
> Sarge and sid have the same SDL version. You are basically comparing
> libsdl1.2debian-all and libsdl1.2debian-oss.
Yes you're right. I didn't notice that I'm using -all on my box.
> > Any reason for such huge disproportions? That's where we got libglib2.0.
> > Scorched3D built on sarge works fine and doesn't link against libglib2.0.
>
> That's an indirect dependency (brought by libarts), that you won't see
> if you pass --as-needed to ld. However, this is not enough, as users
> having libsdl1.2debian-{all,arts} installed will still get this
> dependency at runtime, probably leading to segfaults.
So I suppose that Conflicts: libsdl1.2debian-{all,arts} isn't a solution?
ARTS users won't be able to use Scorched3D then :/
> > Also seems that other distros have wxgtk2.4 linked against libglib2.0 and
> > libsdl doesn't linked against any libglib.
> > This way most other distros have scorched3d linked against libglib2.0, but
> > only because wxgtk2.4 and not libsdl.
>
> This may be because they are building a GTK+2.0 version of libwxgtk2.4.
>
> > I'm not sure what to do now. Is it possible to link our wxgtk2.4 against
> > glib2.0? Or unlink libsdl from using libglib?
>
> I'm afraid there is no miracle solution. Getting wxgtk2.5 to install
> together with wxgtk2.4, if possible, would be a good option. IIRC, it's
> possible to rebuild WxWidgets 2.4 against GTK+ 2.x, but it requires
> changes in the applications because of the move to UTF8.
Hmm, so I wonder how it's done in other distros where wxwidgets uses
gtk2.x. Or maybe they don't use `apt-cache rdepends libwxgtk2.4`?
regards
fEnIo
--
,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo
: :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland
`. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user
`- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#295131: JFTR: sdl(glib2.0) vs. wx2.4(glib1.2) only affects scorched3d
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:42:48AM +0100, David Schmitt wrote: > zion:~# apt-cache showpkg libsdl-mixer1.2 libsdl-net1.2 libsdl1.2debian-all | > grep '^ ' | sort -u | cut -d ',' -f 1 > /tmp/sdldeps > zion:~# apt-cache showpkg libwxgtk2.4 | grep '^ ' | sort -u | cut -d ',' -f > 1 > > /tmp/wxdeps > zion:~# diff -u /tmp/sdldeps /tmp/wxdeps | grep '^ ' >scorched3d > zion:~# > > It seems that this conflict only affects scorched3d. Yep since nothing else depends on libwxgtk2.4 and libsdl in the same time. > Is there a possibility to check for these things on a global level? Thanks David for checking this. I made further checks and here's what I got: [ sid / unstable ] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])~$ldd /usr/lib/libSDL.so libartsc.so.0 => /usr/lib/libartsc.so.0 (0x40103000) libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0x40109000) libgthread-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 (0x4010e000) libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x40113000) libesd.so.0 => /usr/lib/libesd.so.0 (0x40193000) libaudiofile.so.0 => /usr/lib/libaudiofile.so.0 (0x4019b000) libaudio.so.2 => /usr/lib/libaudio.so.2 (0x401bf000) libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x401d4000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x40226000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x402ed000) libvga.so.1 => /usr/lib/libvga.so.1 (0x402fb000) libaa.so.1 => /usr/lib/libaa.so.1 (0x4036) libasound.so.2 => /usr/lib/libasound.so.2 (0x4037c000) libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4042f000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40452000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x40455000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x404a6000) libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x405d9000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x405e2000) libncurses.so.5 => /lib/libncurses.so.5 (0x405fa000) libslang.so.1 => /lib/libslang.so.1 (0x40639000) libgpm.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgpm.so.1 (0x406ac000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x8000) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])~$ [ sarge / testing ] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])~$ldd /usr/lib/libSDL.so libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x400ad000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x400cf000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x400d2000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x4019a000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x401a8000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x401f9000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x8000) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])~$ Any reason for such huge disproportions? That's where we got libglib2.0. Scorched3D built on sarge works fine and doesn't link against libglib2.0. I asked some of mine friends using other distros for pasting me output of `ldd /usr/lib/libSDL.so | wc -l` Here are some stats [ we've got in sid 23 ] slackware current - 11 gentoo - 14 (we know this could vary a lot) Also seems that other distros have wxgtk2.4 linked against libglib2.0 and libsdl doesn't linked against any libglib. This way most other distros have scorched3d linked against libglib2.0, but only because wxgtk2.4 and not libsdl. I'm not sure what to do now. Is it possible to link our wxgtk2.4 against glib2.0? Or unlink libsdl from using libglib? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: NEW-queue handling after extending group of ftp-master
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:09:17PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > Usually NEW-queue was handled by the date of first upload of some package. > > After tracking of debian-bugs and/or debian-wnpp mailing lists last days > > I can say it's not true anymore. > > > So could someone explain what are the criterions now? > > There are criterions for the order? > Well, ok. Lets define some: > - How much money did you sent to one ftpmaster/assistant? > - How much do you intent to send? > - Are you a girl? > - Alcohol level? > - Random picking. I could apply for fourth alternatively. Or maybe fifth but with the 1/4 probability :P > Actually there are none, as the queue should be (soon) small enough to > not need any. So we havent bothered too look for rules, just started. > The reason for the "random" order is just me, approving old and new > uploads - to get the queue smaller and not let newer uploads rot in the > queue as long as some old stuff. Ok. That's something what I wanted to hear. Great to see that NEW queue is handled at all and that I had to wait for answer so short ;) > Looking at the queue noone needs to worry about that, so please do > something more useful like RC bug fixing. :) Believe me I'm trying to investigate and fix #295131. Btw any ideas/help are welcome. Second RC bug for scorched3d is fixed both in upstream and on my box, but without fixing first one there's no need to upload. Once again hints for #295131 are welcome, since afaik it works on sarge, and not on sid so we've got probably some interesting bug in libglib or something relevant. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
NEW-queue handling after extending group of ftp-master
Hello. Usually NEW-queue was handled by the date of first upload of some package. After tracking of debian-bugs and/or debian-wnpp mailing lists last days I can say it's not true anymore. So could someone explain what are the criterions now? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Found an http SourceForge archive mirror
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:24:21AM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > For who cares.. > > I've noticed that my old sf ftp mirror [0] is down/broken/unmaintained. > > After googling a bit I found a new one: > > http://sf.gds.tuwien.ac.at/ > > Thus a debian/watch like: > > version=2 > http://sf.gds.tuwien.ac.at/a/al/alsamodular/ams-(.*)\.tar\.bz2 debian uupdate > > is working for my ams package. What about prdownloads.sourceforge.net? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#300595: ITP: adesklets -- interactive Imlib2 console for the X Window system
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: adesklets Version : 0.4.6 Upstream Author : Sylvain Fourmanoit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://adesklets.sourceforge.net * License : GPL Description : interactive Imlib2 console for the X Window system [ grabbed from project's page ] adesklets is an interactive Imlib2 console for the X Window system. It provides to scripted languages a clean and simple way to write great looking, mildly interactive desktop integrated graphic applets (aka "desklets") -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCPalvhQui3hP+/EARAvCFAKCizZ74oD3xlM94g1RJc6L3BgHk+ACfYoCR bTZaRV5xXfdkI069z52b+Dw= =zRsC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Restrictive SMTP server
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 04:18:06PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > I'm with a problem about sending emails @debian.org. My ESP (email > service provider) has a restrictive rule about sending emails with a > >From header different of the account you actually have. > > This wouldn't be a problem, as I could set up a mail server in my > machine, but I am in a DSL network which is completely blacklisted due > to spammers. > > The fact is that I am unable to send emails with my debian.org address. > Does someone has some idea of how can I fix that? `apt-get install msmtp` and use some other account where such problem doesn't exist. That's what I'm using ;) regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2005
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:48:49PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > > The candidates are: > > > > o Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ^^ Is the email address wrong? > There is no entry for http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] But there is such entry in http://db.debian.org/ Noone force you to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] to maintain your packages, although it's AFAIR recommended. Matthew uses the following: http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
list of packages on private website
Hello. That's rather OT, but I wanted to target my question at developers, cause I suppose that's the only group which would be able to help me. I would like to put on my homepage list of packages that I maintain. I suppose that the easiest way would be to fetch this information from ldap database. I don't want to reinvent the wheel, and I'm sure some of you have already similar lists on your websites. I'm also quite sure you want to share your code with others, don't you? ;) So if someone could announce that he/she has some code, and in turn makes my life easier, then it's time to do that. The perfect solution would be some script which would download these information once a week and build static pages from it. This way I wouldn't overload database. So... who wants to share his code? ;) regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Clanlib 0.7
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 07:28:51PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote: > Hi all, Hello. > This is just a note for anyone who's looking for a project. I was just > trying to compile some software, and it bombed out because I didn't have the > right ClanLib version installed. I looked into the matter a little, and > found a nearly two-year-old bug (#188449) asking for the library to be > updated to the latest version. > > For people not familiar with it, ClanLib is a moderately popular high-level > game programming library used by a number of different games. It has had a > tendency to break API compatibility in the past, and it appears that the > latest release is binary and source incompatible, so a lot of recent software > is not compilable on Debian at all. Because the incompatibility is two-way, > anyone who packages this will have to make allowances for installing both > versions at once. Unofficial packages are available (see the bug), but will > have to be reviewed for policy compliance and so on. ClanLib0.7 is already uploaded to experimental branch. It waits for ftp-master approval for almost two months now. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: apt-src cannot build
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 06:19:59AM +0200, Marcus Sundman wrote: > I do the following (irrelevant output omitted): > 8< > /usr/src/tmp$ apt-src install foo > /usr/src/tmp$ cd foo-version > /usr/src/tmp/foo-version$ apt-src build foo > E: Not installed > /usr/src/tmp/foo-version$ > >8 > > Any idea what might be wrong? You don't have to enter to foo-version directory. Anyway it should work even with that... both ways works for me. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#294161: ITP: sshfs-fuse -- filesystem client based on SSH File Transfer Protocol
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: sshfs-fuse Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://fuse.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : filesystem client based on SSH File Transfer Protocol [grabbed from README] This is a filesystem client based on the SSH File Transfer Protocol. Since most SSH servers already support this protocol it is very easy to set up: i.e. on the server side there's nothing to do. On the client side mounting the filesystem is as easy as logging into the server with ssh. The idea of sshfs was taken from the SSHFS filesystem distributed with LUFS, which I found very useful. There were some limitations of that codebase, so I rewrote it. Features of this implementation are: - Based on FUSE (the best userspace filesystem framework for linux ;) - Multithreading: more than one request can be on it's way to the server - Allowing large reads (max 64k) - Caching directory contents -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCCIY8hQui3hP+/EARAu5NAKCTxMVtOTwCPLEwpbWZEuYUX3+qFACfR1dq hLb9KNXUSZVWgXMQe4X1xsw= =CvAh -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: list what's in the NEW queue?
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 05:45:56AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > And while we are on the subject, what's with NEW not being > > > processed? Or are we again in the usual "I'll process any package > > > that I feel like processing" situation? > > > Is it not just that there's too few hands to do the processing? > > > Recently our DPL assigned extra man-power to the "New Maintainers Front > > Desk" and to the "Debian Account Managers" and with very good results, > > for what I know. It would be great if he would assign more people to > > process the NEW queue as well (in context hereto - do all current > > members of ftp-masters process the NEW queue?). > > Increasing the rate at which new packages flow into unstable is NOT > something that should be a priority when we're trying to get the RC bug > count down in preparation of a release. Show me that there are enough > people working on release-critical issues for sarge, which requires no > imprimatur from the DPL, before you start throwing packages that have never > even been tested by their maintainer at us faster than we already get them. Ok. So maybe ftp-masters shouldn't accept NEW packages, but accept new binary packages (from existing source). This would allow me to close some "unfortunatelly" non-critical bugs, and improve overall sarge quality. I'm sure that I'm not the only one waiting for approval of splitted packages. This way we're back to the NEW queue discussion and some automatic checks for packages which only incorporate new binary ones. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#293292: ITP: btexmms -- XMMS plugin to use some (Sony) Ericsson phones as a remote control
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 11:47:50PM +0100, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote: > > > * Package name: btexmms > > > > xmms plugins would be better named xmms- (btexmms for the > > source should be fine though) > > > > So xmms-btexmms would be better ? Yep. Just take a look at other xmms plugins. `apt-cache --names-only search xmms` Three of them seem to have xmms names, and I would consider this as a bug. However only wishlist bug, cause it's ok with policy... it's just different than most xmms related packages. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: non-ftp way to upload packages
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:12:45PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > | > ,>scp to a Debian host (like gluck or merkel) and ftp from there. Or > | > >just scp it to the DELAYED queue on gluck (1day) and let it ftp it for > | > >you ;) > | > | > Does it ftp in time for the daily dinstall? > | > | The 0-day queue is ftp-ed about 1 hours before dinstall, IIRC. > > No, it runs every 15 minutes. > > Somebody could probably document all this somewhere else than in my > ~/bin and my crontab. :P Developers' reference and your mail about this queue says that it's run 1 hour before dinstall ;) Anyway, your mail also says that if someone send you config for dupload then you are going to include it in some README. Is this README available somewhere? Also I saw dput's config and it seems to be somehow universal, I mean it doesn't include anything about [0123456789] queues... is it mean I have to use some additional options in command line or maybe I should customize this example config? I'm asking cause testing it on "live organism" doesn't seem to be good idea ;) regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: non-ftp way to upload packages
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:24:22AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > ,>scp to a Debian host (like gluck or merkel) and ftp from there. Or > > >just scp it to the DELAYED queue on gluck (1day) and let it ftp it for > > >you ;) > > > Does it ftp in time for the daily dinstall? > > The 0-day queue is ftp-ed about 1 hours before dinstall, IIRC. Yep. That's what dev-ref says. Ok thanks everyone for suggestions. 0-day queue along with scp seems to be soomething I was looking for ;) regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
non-ftp way to upload packages
Hello. Is there any way to upload packages without using FTP? My provider has some queueing stuff and ftp has very low priority... this way I get many timeouts uploading packages. The I have to use .commands files and try to upload one more time. SSH/SCP has very high priority in our LAN, so this way would be great for me... is it possible to use it? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: NEW queue and ftp-master approval
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:28:25PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Our NEW queue is quite big and time needed to get package into unstable is > > rather long. Nothing wrong with that for me, I know that ftp-masters are > > busy and that approving these packages is very important and responsible > > task. > > > > But there are two kind of packages in NEW queue. > > > > "Totally" new packages and old one that only incorporate new binary > > package(s). These old packages has already source package in archive. > > > > I think the latter should be handled first, and then if ftp-master has > > some spare time he/she could handle totally new packages. > > I think ftp-master already has a more complex prioritizing than > that. Adding a new kernel images deb tends to be real fast (with > exceptions), adding a new deb to old source reasonable fast and > completly new source can take forever if questionable (e.g. mplyer). Is he really got _any_ prority? Sure packages like mplayer are in NEW queue for very long time, but seems that rest of packages is handled without any priority and fact that package had already source in the archive doesn't matter. At least that's something what I think after tracking http://developer.skolelinux.no/~pere/debian-NEW.html Some packages are being hold (probably forever), but rest seems to be approved in the order they appeared in NEW queue. > > Any comments on that? > > Why is manual intervention needed at all? > > On a recent discussion about this on irc several things were said that > have to be done for NEW packages, e.g. inform some U.S. government > agency about the new deb, add an override entry into the db. The only > thing that wasn't easily scriptable was: > > ftp-master might reject the new package name > > Someone said ftp-master might want to check the source for the NEW deb > but that would apply to any source upload just as well IMHO. Debian > already trusts DDs to not mess up existing debs so it should be simple > to trust them not to mess up when splitting debs or adding more to an > existing source. > > Overall, in my eyes, the question becomes: Does Debian trust DDs not > to add debs with silly names to existing sources? Who can we trust if not DDs? > Why not automate the NEW queue for packages with prior source versions > in the archive? Worst case ftp-master has to remove a deb with silly > name from archive and kick the DD for it. > > Correct me if I'm wrong. I think you're right. There is always way to remove wrong packages, and developer which uploaded it could be warned if that case. It's still better than waiting for approval for a month, like it is already. regards fEnIo -- _ Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo _|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska (0 0)phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
NEW queue and ftp-master approval
Hello. Our NEW queue is quite big and time needed to get package into unstable is rather long. Nothing wrong with that for me, I know that ftp-masters are busy and that approving these packages is very important and responsible task. But there are two kind of packages in NEW queue. "Totally" new packages and old one that only incorporate new binary package(s). These old packages has already source package in archive. I think the latter should be handled first, and then if ftp-master has some spare time he/she could handle totally new packages. Any comments on that? regards fEnIo -- _ Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo _|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska (0 0)phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Do all frontends use the dpkg binary?
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 06:11:42PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > In my quest to log package installation, I wrote a wrapper script for
> > dpkg.
>
> $ tail -1 /etc/apt/apt.conf
> DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs {"logger -t DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs";};
I wonder if it would be possible to set is as default behaviour along with
some logrotate scripts. Users quite often ask where are dpkg's actions
logged so I think this would be good idea.
Or at least we could ask using debconf if they want to log its tasks.
regards
fEnIo
--
_ Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo
_|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska
(0 0)phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user
ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: MPEG in general Was: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 12:06:53PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > Is only MPEG Layer III patent encumbered ? > > > How about the other MPEG stuff ? > > > I find it hard to believe that it is all patent-free. > > > > It's all encumbered with patents. Encoders *and* decoders. > > Encoders only, not decoders. Decoders for anything probably cannot be > patented. Really? AFAIR every producent of mobile mp3 player had to pay patent grants, to be able to distribute his device. regards fEnIo -- _ Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo _|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska (0 0)phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian developer and user ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
ClanLib 0.7 branch.
Hello. ClanLib 0.7.8+svn20041230 has been uploaded to experimental. If someone wants to test these packages before ftp-master approval, fell free to fetch them from http://people.debian.org/~fenio/clanlib/ Any comments appreciated. regards fEnIo -- _ Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo _|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska (0 0)phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian developer and user ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#286027: ITP: ms-sys -- tool for writing Microsoft compatible boot records
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 01:56:43PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > | * Package name: ms-sys > | Version : 2.0.0. > | Upstream Author : Henrik Carlqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | * URL : http://ms-sys.sourceforge.net/ > | * License : GPL > | Description : tool for writing Microsoft compatible boot records > > http://packages.debian.org/ms-sys Geee I had to be blind yesterday ;) Ok I'm closing this bugreport, and sorry for confusion. regards fEnIo -- _ Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo _|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska (0 0) phone:+48602383548 | Slackware - the weakest link ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#286027: ITP: ms-sys -- tool for writing Microsoft compatible boot records
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 09:21:03PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > > This is a Linux program for writing Microsoft compatible boot records. The > > program does the same as Microsoft "fdisk /mbr" to a hard disk or "sys d:" > > to a floppy or FAT partition except that it does not copy any system files, > > only the boot record is written. > > Where is the included boot block code from? According to the author's page it's taken from: http://www.geocities.com/thestarman3/asm/mbr/MBR_in_detail.htm > I'd also like to point out that the boot block source code is not > included, certainly making this package non-DFSG-free, and probably > making it undistributable by us under the GPL. Boot blocks are included as a series of properly ordered bytes, so yes... seems that it's not DFSG free. Don't know however if it makes it totally undistributable. Author chose GPL and it's his decision. You can always change those boot blocks by changing bytes listings. Anyway... if it's impossible to put it in non-free then I'm going to close that bugreport. regards fEnIo -- _ Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo _|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska (0 0) phone:+48602383548 | Slackware - the weakest link ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#286027: ITP: ms-sys -- tool for writing Microsoft compatible boot records
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: ms-sys Version : 2.0.0. Upstream Author : Henrik Carlqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://ms-sys.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : tool for writing Microsoft compatible boot records Grabbed from homepage: This is a Linux program for writing Microsoft compatible boot records. The program does the same as Microsoft "fdisk /mbr" to a hard disk or "sys d:" to a floppy or FAT partition except that it does not copy any system files, only the boot record is written.
