Bug#566375: ITP: freeplane -- A Mind Mapping software written in Java.

2010-01-23 Thread Eric Lavarde
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Eric Lavarde 


* Package name: freeplane
  Version : 1.0.38
  Upstream Author : Dimitri Polivaev 
* URL : http://freeplane.org/
* License : GPL
  Programming Lang: Java
  Description : A Mind Mapping software written in Java.

(from <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeplane>)

In July 2009, Freeplane was launched as a fork of the FreeMind project.
Since then, while maintaining file format compatibility with FreeMind,
Freeplane adds many new features.

New features of Freeplane include:

* Export to PNG, JPEG, SVG (in addition to HTML / XHTML and PDF)
* Find / Replace in all open maps
* Paste HTML as node structure
* Outline mode
* Portable version (run from a USB flash drive)
* Scripting via Groovy
* Spell Checker



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#499929: ITP: simplyhtml -- Java word processor based on HTML and CSS

2008-09-23 Thread Eric Lavarde
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Eric Lavarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


* Package name: simplyhtml
  Version : 0.12.3
  Upstream Author : Dimitry Polivaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://simplyhtml.sf.net/
* License : GPLv2+ plus some Sun licensing (Berkeley alike)
  Programming Lang: Java
  Description : Java word processor based on HTML and CSS

 SimplyHTML is an application built for working with text documents.
 Text documents are stored in HTML and CSS format, but the application is
 meant as a word processor rather than a code editor or web site builder.
 .
 SimplyHTML can be used standalone as well like a library/plugin.

(and it's used as a plugin by FreeMind 0.9.0, hence my interest)

Cheers, Eric

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: packages newer in Ubuntu than in Debian (reduced false positives)

2007-05-01 Thread Eric Lavarde

Hello Bart,

is there some kind of agreement between Debian and Ubuntu concerning the 
distribution part of the version?


I ask this because you seem to assume that:
X.Y.Z-K (Debian) << X.Y.Z-L (Ubuntu)
X.Y.Z-K (Debian) << X.Y.Z-KubuntuA (Ubuntu)
(also dfsg stuff doesn't seem to be completely right)

I would suggest that you split your report between:
1) A.B.C << X.Y.Z
and
2) X.Y.Z-KKK << X.Y.Z-LLL

The 2nd part would be a watchout (yellow) whereas the 1st part would 
really mean a different version of the software (red).
Well... Not always true but good enough :-) (check liblog4net-cil with 
1.2.8+1.2.9beta-1 vs. 1.2.9beta-0ubuntu2)


Cheers, Eric

Bart Martens wrote:

On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 11:49 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:

* Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-01 11:21]:

Another approach for identifying packages to be updated in Debian to
newer upstream releases is by comparing Debian with Ubuntu.  Here is a
list of packages that are newer in Ubuntu than in Debian, grouped by
maintainer:
http://people.debian.org/~bartm/borg/outdated.html

The first package in your list shows that you're not handling epochs
properly.  1.0~rc1-13 vs 2:1.0~rc1-0ubuntu9.  Debian isn't out of date
here.  You need to ignore epochs.


The handling of epochs is correct, but some packages have different
epochs in Debian and Ubuntu for the same upstream version.

I have updated the list to hide packages with identical upstream version
numbers but with different epochs.  This might hide some real positives
but most likely hides more false positives.

So thanks for the feedback; this is useful.

Regards,

Bart Martens






--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#320044: ITP: libforms-java -- framework helping you lay out and implement elegant Swing panels quickly and consistently

2005-07-26 Thread Eric Lavarde
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Eric Lavarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


* Package name: libforms-java
  Version : 1.0.5
  Upstream Author : Karsten Lentzsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : https://forms.dev.java.net/
* License : BSD
  Description : framework helping you lay out and implement elegant Swing 
panels quickly and consistently

 The FormLayout has been designed to be powerful, flexible, precise and
 easy to learn and understand. It can significantly reduce the time to
 describe a form and to fill it with components. The layout manager
 introduces a unique layout feature: it honors the screen resolution and
 dialog font size to retain the layout proportions in different
 environments.
 .
 Also, we have seperated the layout task from the panel construction.
 Therefore we provide a set of non-visual builders that assist you in
 defining common panel layouts and in filling a form with components.
 The JGoodies Forms ships with general purpose builders and builders for
 specialized layout tasks. For example, the DefaultFormBuilder helps you
 build forms with one, two, three, or four columns. The ButtonBarBuilder
 specializes in building button bars.
 .
 On top of these non-visual builders the JGoodies Forms provides
 factories that create the most frequently used layouts, panels, bars
 and stacks. We recommend to use the factory methods whenever possible;
 future releases may map a logical panel creation to a concrete creation
 method that honors the platform and look&feel, for example the Mac vs.
 Windows button bar layout, where Mac has the default button in the
 right hand side and Windows in the left. 
 .
 Alternative URL: http://www.jgoodies.com/freeware/forms/

(and the main interest for me is that it's a dependency for FreeMind
0.8.0)
The good news is that the library compiles with free java tools (already
succeeded with free-java-sdk).

Cheers, Eric

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: d-i has 99% support for filesystem labels

2005-03-14 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi,
I don't know if my opinion counts but I _did_ notice that d-i creates 
labels, and at the same time broke my parallel Red-Hat FC2 installation, 
which all of soudain tried to use my debian root partition (LABEL=/) as 
its own root partition, without luck of course, and with a lot of really 
strange error messages.
It took me quite a while to figure out the problem, so here is the 
message: labels do only properly work at install time, if no other 
system is using them as well.
(and, no, I didn't think about posting a bug, but I can do. Against 
which package actually?)

Thanks, Eric
Andrew Pollock wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:20:00PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Miros/law Baran wrote:

it worked.  I really regard this problem as serious because it
probably leaves people with SATA hardware with an unbootable system
after kernel-image updates, because the kernel image packages just
reinsert "root=/dev/hda?" into grub's menu.lst. Any idea how to
solve this problem?
...by using partition labels in fstab?
Sorry, I do not know anything about partition labels but if this is
the solution it should be done in the installer and if this works in
Grub menu.lst this should be done here as well.

I gave some of the relevant people in the d-i team an education on the
benefits of filesystem labels, to to the point where partman will create
filesystems with a label, however I didn't manage to convince them to mount
by the label in /etc/fstab
regards
Andrew
--
Gewalt ist die letzte Zuflucht der Inkompetenz.
Violence is the Last Resort of the Incompetent.
Gwalt jest ostatnem schronieniem niekompetencji.
La violence est le dernier refuge de l'incompetence.
~ Isaac Asimov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Problems with - and ' in some man-pages

2005-02-26 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi,
thanks to both Clint and you for the help.
In /etc/groff/man.local, I removed the comments in front of:
.  if '\*[.T]'utf8' \
.char - \N'45'
and removed the negation ! in front of the first condition:
.  if '\*[.T]'utf8' \
.tr \[oq]'
(I could have removed the condition alltogether)
You made my day! :-)
Eric
Adeodato Simà wrote:
* Eric Lavarde [Sat, 26 Feb 2005 10:04:45 +0100]:

I'm pretty sure, it's somehow due to the fact that I have set 
LANG=en_IE.UTF-8 (unicode being important of course).
Nevertheless, I don't know if it's a problem of the manpage system or of 
the manpage writers, and how the writers could circumvent/solve the 
problem. And this information would be useful before I start filing 
bugs, or!?

  Clint already told you how "writers" cand solve the problem. In the
  meantime, you may find useful the workaround described in the last
  paragraph of /etc/groff/man.local.
--
Gewalt ist die letzte Zuflucht der Inkompetenz.
Violence is the Last Resort of the Incompetent.
Gwalt jest ostatnem schronieniem niekompetencji.
La violence est le dernier refuge de l'incompetence.
~ Isaac Asimov


Problems with - and ' in some man-pages

2005-02-26 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi,
in some man pages (e.g. ImageMagick, dh_installmime but I've met other 
ones), the dashes and single quotes are not really what they look like, 
but some other unicode letter.
This has two major drawbacks:
- search for options become nearly impossible (try searching for -m, 
without using -).
- cut&paste doesn't work.
(this has also the drawback that not all fonts have the said characters, 
but that's all right)

I'm pretty sure, it's somehow due to the fact that I have set 
LANG=en_IE.UTF-8 (unicode being important of course).
Nevertheless, I don't know if it's a problem of the manpage system or of 
the manpage writers, and how the writers could circumvent/solve the 
problem. And this information would be useful before I start filing 
bugs, or!?

Thanks for any help,
Eric
--
Gewalt ist die letzte Zuflucht der Inkompetenz.
Violence is the Last Resort of the Incompetent.
Gwalt jest ostatnem schronieniem niekompetencji.
La violence est le dernier refuge de l'incompetence.
~ Isaac Asimov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: pwc-source headed for unstable this weekend

2005-02-18 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi,
(I assume everybody is on -devel, like I am, and as it seems the problem 
sits between keyboard and chair, no bug report either).

This might very well be, as I didn't compile the kernel myself (I just 
use the standard kernel-image-2.6.10-1-k7 package) but used 
kernel-source-2.6.10 with the .config from the image package, make 
oldconfig and make dep (which I was told is deprecated, so).

So, basically, your saying that the right way to do this kind of things 
is to use the corresponding kernel-headers package, and apt-get tells me 
that I need as well kernel-kbuild to build "out-of-tree kernel modules" 
which seems to be exactly what I need.

Thanks, Eric
Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:08:11PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:

pwc: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.

i'm guessing that this has to do with how you compiled the module.

IME, this message is typically seen when one complies a module against
a 2.6 kernel tree where 'make clean' has been run since the latest
kernel build.
The kernel-headers-2.6.*-foo packages should ship enough intermediate
files in /usr/src/kernel-headers/* to prevent this problem, but one
easily gets in trouble [1] if one compiles custom kernels without
being aware of the problem.
[1] Well, such as it is. As long as one does not get oneself in more
trouble by trying to use the module against a different kernel
build, the warning message at load time seems to be all that
happens.
--
Gewalt ist die letzte Zuflucht der Inkompetenz.
Violence is the Last Resort of the Incompetent.
Gwalt jest ostatnem schronieniem niekompetencji.
La violence est le dernier refuge de l'incompetence.
~ Isaac Asimov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: pwc-source headed for unstable this weekend

2005-02-17 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi,
I confirm that the pwc driver works well.
Only at boot time, I have the following messages:
usb 2-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2
Linux video capture interface: v1.00
pwc: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.
pwc: Unknown symbol video_devdata
pwc: Unknown symbol video_unregister_device
pwc: Unknown symbol video_device_alloc
pwc: Unknown symbol video_register_device
pwc: Unknown symbol video_usercopy
pwc: Unknown symbol video_device_release
pwc: Unknown symbol video_devdata
pwc: Unknown symbol video_unregister_device
pwc: Unknown symbol video_device_alloc
pwc: Unknown symbol video_register_device
pwc: Unknown symbol video_usercopy
pwc: Unknown symbol video_device_release
pwc Philips webcam module version 10.0.6-unofficial loaded.
pwc Supports Philips PCA645/646, PCVC675/680/690, 
PCVC720[40]/730/740/750 & PCVC830/840.
pwc Also supports the Askey VC010, various Logitech Quickcams, Samsung 
MPC-C10 and MPC-C30,
pwc the Creative WebCam 5 & Pro Ex, SOTEC Afina Eye and Visionite 
VCS-UC300 andVCS-UM100.
pwc Trace options: 0x00a1

but without any practical consequence, gnomemeeting works like a charm
(Debian Kernel image 2.6.10-1-k7).
So I welcome pwc!
Eric
sean finney wrote:
i've been using this new pwc driver for a while now and have not had
any problems with it, tested on i386 and amd64 boxen.  

so, after looking over the latest version, assuming there are no
new issues i'll plan on uploading the pwc-source package to unstable.
i don't think this really warrants a cool off period in experimental,
but if someone has a reasonable objection then i will put it there instead.
i'll probably do this on saturday.
quoth teemu:
Since this package claims to be GPL (although there might be issues with the
reverse engineering which this code is based on) is there any reason not to
integrate this code into the kernel-source package and have the pwc.ko
module compiled automatically to kernel-packages?
The kernel-package-2.6.10-1-686 package already contains several usb-webcam
drivers in the /drivers/usb/media/ directory which are approximately the
same size as pwc.ko.

i suppose it could be added to the debianized kernel source package,
but since the original author asked to have it yanked from the mainline
kernel and it is now itself forked and maintained outside of the kernel,
i think this approach makes the most sense.  at least for the time being.
 

sean
--
--
Gewalt ist die letzte Zuflucht der Inkompetenz.
Violence is the Last Resort of the Incompetent.
Gwalt jest ostatnem schronieniem niekompetencji.
La violence est le dernier refuge de l'incompetence.
~ Isaac Asimov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Who could be able to help SW vendors to support Debian?

2005-02-03 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi,
as I understand myself as someone aware of the support problems of 
software problems, I would like to point to 2 problems:

1. the Debian Kernel is a bit different from the kernel.org Kernel; 
example: at work we used the Apani VPN client, which did work under all 
kind of RedHat/SuSE kernel, but not under the Debian kernel, even though 
 there is some compiling done at installation time (i.e. not only 
binary modules delivered).

2. as a software provider, you need to be able to reproduce the problem 
of your customer to solve it (at least for non-obvious problems), so 
that you can reproduce the problem in your environment, debug, correct 
and test again. (I would also imagine there could be some legal 
implications if you are officially supporting a certain setup, but 
practically aren't able to support it properly; but we want to stay out 
of the court ;-) ).
What is the consequence? you need a limited amount of possible 
combinations, you need to have a stable system (in the sense: not 
changing every three weeks) and you would greatly appreciate to be 
informed of changes that might break your system before your customer 
actually installs the patch/update/whatever.
Imagine a customer doing regularly an apt-get update & upgrade in order 
to be sure to have the latest security fixes, and all of a sudden, your 
expensive software stops to work, at all of your customers, almost at 
once. You're out of business! Game over!
I'm exagerating a bit but that's what they want: no surprise, be able to 
clearly define what is supported and what not (e.g. self compiled kernel 
or not?!), have a chance to test before their own customers do.

This said, I don't have a clue who at Debian could provide this to them; 
though I'd think Debian is probably best in these aspects than some 
other platforms starting with W. Probably some training to understand 
how Debian is working and structured might just be what they need.

Cheers, Eric
Tim Cutts wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 07:37:27PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Would any people around have pointers which could be given to such
people?? Do we already have an entry point for such technical issues
as proprietary SW vendors needing technical information about the way
to support Debian??

The first thing I would do is to try to convince the vendor not to get
so hung up on supporting different distributions.  If their product
depends tightly on kernel stuff, then they should base their support
matrix on kernel version, not on distribution.
Point them at Platform Computing as an example of how to do it with LSF.
They support Linux, and they don't give a stuff what distribution you're
running.  They support certain kernels, and certain C libraries, and
other than that they don't care.  And they're not too precise about
kernel version - on X86 you can run any 2.4 or 2.6 kernel, and any 2.1,
2.2 or 2.3 glibc.  They're a little pickier on other architectures (they
don't support 2.6 on either Alpha or Itanium yet).
Tim

--
Gewalt ist die letzte Zuflucht der Inkompetenz.
Violence is the Last Resort of the Incompetent.
Gwalt jest ostatnem schronieniem niekompetencji.
La violence est le dernier refuge de l'incompetence.
~ Isaac Asimov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


see with URL support or agnostic konqueror?

2005-01-16 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hello,
I'm maintaining the freemind package and currently 'sensible-browser' is 
used to open links (which are always absolute, either file:/... or http, 
ftp, whatever). It works well for remote links (http etc.) but is not 
the best solution for file: links, if a true browser is behind 
sensible-browser.
'see' would be a better solution because it handles file types properly, 
but it doesn't understand URL notation and doesn't handle remote links.
konqueror would handle everything well but is not so nice for non-KDE users.

My best guess currently would be a small wrapper script that calls 'see' 
for file: links (removing the file: prefix), and 'sensible-browser' for 
all other kind of links. Not very difficult but I have the feeling this 
must have been needed by others as well.

So my questions:
- is there already an "agnostic" utility that does this kind of thing?
- would the 'mime-support' maintainer be interested in adding URL 
handling to the 'see' utility? (would this be at all a good idea?)

Thanks, Eric
--
Gewalt ist die letzte Zuflucht der Inkompetenz.
Violence is the Last Resort of the Incompetent.
Gwalt jest ostatnem schronieniem niekompetencji.
La violence est le dernier refuge de l'incompetence.
~ Isaac Asimov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SVG icons

2004-12-08 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi,

isn't the actual underlying problem that the Debian Policy only accepts
XPM icons (and lintian with it)? I don't know the background of this
decision, but could imagine:
- broad acceptance (aside from GNOME and KDE), PNG should be fine on this
one, SVG not yet.
- text oriented format: SVG OK, PNG not.
- free: SVG and PNG OK.

To summarize, I think recommending SVG would require a change to the policy.

Cheers, Eric

> Le mardi 07 décembre 2004 à 23:51 -0500, James A. Treacy a écrit :
>> SVG use is increasing and I have seen nothing in Debian about how they
>> should be handled. So,
>
> I don't think that's much different from PNG icons.
>
>> What is the proper way to handle svg icons?
>> For example, where should they be placed?
>
> GNOME places them under /usr/share/icons/$THEME/scalable.
>
>> How well are they supported?
>
> Support is increasing; but at least all GTK+ stuff supports them,
> including as toolbar icons, provided that librsvg2-common is installed.
>
>> Should a non-svg icon also be included?
>
> Not necessarily.
> --
>  .''`.   Josselin Mouette/\./\
> : :' :   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
>


-- 
Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre




Re: Bug#280324: ITP: freemind -- A Java Program for creating and viewing Mindmaps

2004-11-10 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi,
hope this is OK to reply-to-all in such cases...
Hilko Bengen wrote:
Eric Lavarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

the package does already exist actually (see
http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/FreeMind_on_Linux for
details), I'm the maintainer of the package for the FreeMind project
and I'd like to have it in the official Debian repository (contrib
Section).

Have you tried to compile/run freemind with any of the available
DFSG-free JREs so far?
Not personally, but some users have unintentionally and unsuccessfully 
tried to start FreeMind with kaffe and gcj. Would I get a different 
result if I would try to _compile_ first FreeMind with whatever free JDK?

I'm not yet a Debian developer, going through the documentation and
the process of becoming one.

Recently I spent a few hours on creating a freemind package myself,
since I hadn't seen the links to your package so far. If you want,
I'll be happy to sponsor your package.
It would be a pleasure, I just need to find a key signer nearby. Anybody 
living around BÃblingen (or Stuttgart)?
So, what would be the next steps? Remember: I'm still going through the 
documentation (and I didn't think it would be so quick to get a sponsor 
:-) ).

Thanks, Eric
Cheers,
-Hilko

--
Gewalt ist die letzte Zuflucht der Inkompetenz.
Violence is the Last Resort of the Incompetent.
Gwalt jest ostatnem schronieniem niekompetencji.
La violence est le dernier refuge de l'incompetence.
~ Isaac Asimov



Bug#280324: ITP: freemind -- A Java Program for creating and viewing Mindmaps

2004-11-08 Thread Eric Lavarde
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist


* Package name: freemind
  Version : 0.7.1
  Upstream Author : Christian Foltin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://freemind.sf.net/
* License : GPL
  Description : A Java Program for creating and viewing Mindmaps

Hi,

the package does already exist actually (see
http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/FreeMind_on_Linux for
details), I'm the maintainer of the package for the FreeMind project and
I'd like to have it in the official Debian repository (contrib Section).
I'm not yet a Debian developer, going through the documentation and the
process of becoming one.

Cheers, Eric

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8