Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 12:06:09PM +, Jon Dowland wrote: > I've never came across a script on debian or elsewhere that required > this functionality enabled. Indeed I'm horrified to find this feature > enabled on RHEL boxes. FWIW, ksh93 (as packaged in Debian) has this functionality enabled... it seems to be available by default in various *nix incarnations as well, such as Solaris 9 & 10. This doesn't make the feature a good idea, of course, but it does appear to be commonly available. A quick perusal of the zsh manpage seems to indicate that it can do this as well (albeit with quite different syntax), but I didn't take the time to verify. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Making SELinux standard for etch
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 05:35:32PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > As per policy, I am raising a balloon about ths issue; I think > if we ship vacation, finger, and sharutils, we can also ship > mandatory acess controls in the standard distribution :) This would make me very happy! :) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#347469: O: installwatch -- orphaning the installwatch package
Package: installwatch Version: 0.6.3-2 Severity: normal I haven't touched installwatch in quite some time, and no longer have any real interest in the beastie, so I've decided to orphan this package. At one point Matt Hope had expressed interest in taking it over (more recent versions are bundled with checkinstall, which he maintains), but I haven't heard from him in quite some time so I assume that's no longer the case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: per-user temp directories by default?
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:08:41PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > I don't think the suggestion was to make TMP=~/tmp, but TMP=/tmp/$USER, > where /tmp/$USER is owned by the user in question and is inaccessible to > others. Or perhaps I read too much into the proposal? That's pretty close... currently, libpam-tmpdir uses "/tmp/user/$UID". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: per-user temp directories by default?
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:16:43PM -0500, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > I have little operational experience with this PAM module, though. Does > it cause problems for certain apps? If so, could these problems be > solved with a less simplistic PAM configuration? The only one I've encountered so far is gdm[1], although I haven't been using libpam-tmpdir for all that long. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/332466 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 04:10:14PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Greg Norris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.08.1601 +0200]: > > Unless you're offering to provide relevant samples of the messages > > in question, that response is quite worthless from > > a troubleshooting perspective. > > Yes, please forward your spam to debian-devel so that we can all > feel it. > > Not. Exactly where did I say "please send it to the list"?
Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 12:24:18PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > | Can you give some steps to reproduce such memory comsuption. > > Yeah, receive the mail/spam I get and you'll see it within twenty > minutes. Unless you're offering to provide relevant samples of the messages in question, that response is quite worthless from a troubleshooting perspective.
