Bug#111910: ITP: libnss-mysql -- NSS library using MySQL
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2001-09-10 Severity: wishlist * Package name: libnss-mysql Version : 0.30 (not yet released) Upstream Author : Guillaume Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/nss-mysql * License : GPL, next release might be licensed under LGPL Description : NSS library using MySQL Current CVS features complete support for passwd and groups. Complete support for shadow will be added before release.
Re: sysctl should disable ECN by default
Dans un message du 06 Sep à 16:58, Eric Van Buggenhaut écrivait : > RFC 793 reserve bits 'for future use'. These bits may not be > touched by a router or a firewall. > The buggy hardware we are talking about zeroes those bits. > Thus they violate RFC793. RFC793 says Reserved: 6 bits Reserved for future use. Must be zero. The last statement is the cause of all confusions. s/Must/Should/ would have been better. -- Guillaume Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> If it doesn't work, force it. If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway.
Re: sysctl should disable ECN by default
Dans un message du 05 sep à 17:30, T.Pospisek's MailLists écrivait : > The question is only if devices should be programmed in order to know > the future and it's potential proposed stadards by the IETF. Mind you I > don't know if the devices in question (websites, routers etc. droping ECN > packets) *are* violating a standard that was current at *their* time. The > routers in particular I think *are* wrong, since they are making decisions > based on bits that at that time were reserved. It is not a good debate. Devices can be upgraded. Net admins should do their job. > With ECN set, Debian's default is to plain *refuse* to talk to all > equipment which, for whatever reason has problems with ECN. Debian default does not refuse to talk, it is the broken routers/firewalls which do. Should we stop progress because admins do not their job. I do not think so. -- Guillaume Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> If you want the answers, you'd better get ready for the fire (System of a Down)
Re: sysctl should disable ECN by default
Dans un message du 05 sep à 14:37, Florian Weimer écrivait : > From a technical behavior, throwing away packets with unknown protocol > flags is perfectly acceptable in any case and even reasonable in some > environments. I would not call reasonable dropping packets carrying bits of a protocol rated as Proposed Standard by IETF. -- Guillaume Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Oh, that is nice out there, I think I'll stay for a while (RHCP)
