Re: bash readline
On 31 January 2013 21:24, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: but on ubu^H^H^Hdebian, rlwrap uses the vanilla readline and it's really annoying that i can't get the same line editing features with rlwrap (and, i expect, readline). I can confirm that. I suspect libreadline differs from bash’s readline. for the benefit of people finding this thread and looking for more vi-mode features in rlwrap, look at tecla and its 'enhance' which is a replacement for rlwrap. it has the vi key bindings i want. or look at the GNU readline links in the wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_readline#External_links ta, jack. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cajvhtnzdeckpoo2kpp6ob91e8qa3pnmgun4tfst_ky9kycs...@mail.gmail.com
bash readline
hi dd, i really like the readline in bash - it seems bash is vi complete in vi mode. now, i haven't looked closely, but i think the good vi mode is a patch on (bash?) readline in debian? in centos, i can't df; and delete up to next semicolon. but on ubu^H^H^Hdebian, rlwrap uses the vanilla readline and it's really annoying that i can't get the same line editing features with rlwrap (and, i expect, readline). what are my options? patch readline? ta, jack. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cajvhtnyg7qrna_yj6b5mmpddtsb5nar8zw+gea7wzcobeah...@mail.gmail.com
