Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
>> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> We don't enforce it anyway, and all this provision seems to do in
>>> practice is create these annoying arguments periodically.
>> No, that's not all it does. It also has the significant effect that
>> discussions in these forums do not, in the main, generate needless
>> individual copies of messages in the participants's mailboxes. I, and
>> presumably the people who drafted the code of conduct, continue to
>> find that a very favourable outcome of this provision.
>
> Fully agreed. I'd hate to see this dropped from the CoC.
>
> Clint Adams sent a request to d-www to have the CoC changed and I have
> replied with a strong NACK to that suggestion. If the CoC should be
> changed, it should be done after a proper discussion (on d-project
> probably) and at least be done in coordination with the listmasters, not as
> the result of an individual request by a random DD.
>
> Cheers,
> FJP
I believe it could be easier that the mailing list software left the
mailing list in the reply-header. The main issue is that when you hit
"Reply" the only one who is left in the headers is actually who sent the
email and if you hit "Reply All" obviously the author of the last email
is listed too.
There's a good reason why this haven't been done yet? Other mailing
lists which I've been subscribed use this.
Regards.
- --
Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. PGP: 0xCACAB118
http://ghostbar.ath.cx/{about,acerca} - http://debian.org.ve
`ghostbar' @ irc.debian.org/#debian-ve,#debian-devel-es
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIMErPOKCtW8rKsRgRAiieAKCaf3a+JQZhCNQP3/vdvhQpNBgMIACfUBLA
MpQ/DR0Ce5xQj2OZXi2wrkk=
=mtbj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Making contributing to Debian easier ; "gift" bug tag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been thinking about ways to make contributing to Debian easier. I
> sometimes run into the situation where someone asks me "I'd like to
> contribute to Debian, what could I do?", and I have problems directing
> him to things where he could actually help.
>
> So I worked on two things:
>
> == "Help Debian!" web page ==
> I think that we need a page that gives an overview of how a newcomer
> could help. And a sexy one. Christian Perrier's slides from FOSS.in[0] are
> a very good basis, but we need to work on converting this into something
> suitable for a web page.
>
> I started writing some stuff on http://wiki.debian.org/HelpDebian/Start
> . Feel free to improve that, or to point me to pages I could use as a
> basis. The plan is to move this to a separate, stable, web page, with
> pics, etc. There's also a few notes on http://wiki.debian.org/HelpDebian .
>
Well, in Spanish there's a similar initiative, anyone interested can
check http://wiki.debian.org/ComoContribuir that translated is "HowToHelp".
And the tag idea it's very nice.
Regards.
- --
Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. PGP: 0xCACAB118
http://ghostbar.ath.cx/{about,acerca} - http://debian.org.ve
`ghostbar' @ irc.debian.org/#debian-ve,#debian-devel-es
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHb/3UOKCtW8rKsRgRAlaGAJ9MgZzokn0Q/36ClsXiyT8dORCzhgCfasGq
ZsDLm+bkN0XUeQyZN80kzEE=
=QUyh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: old bugs are still shown on the bugs page
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=339581 has been fixed on > Apr 17, 2007. But it still shows up in http://bugs.debian.org/texmacs . Is > this a bug in the BTS or am I missing something stupid? Maybe it's because a version with the bug is still available in oldstable? Not so sure. Regards, Jose Luis. -- ghostbar on debian linux 'sid' 2.6.22 x86_64-SMP - #382503 Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://linuxtachira.org http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es San Cristóbal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve GPG: 0xCACAB118 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#448274: general: Create a meta package named debian-kde-desktop
Rafael wrote: > Package: general > Severity: wishlist > > I suggest the creation of a meta package named for example debian-kde-desktop > which should > install the most common used KDE aplications in a Desktop and KDE Desktop > with Debian artwork. > At style of meta package kubuntu-desktop in Ubuntu project. > A general configuration may be: > -Open Office as office suit. > -Kaffeine as video player. > -Amarok as audio player. > -D3lphin as default File Manager (It is easy configure KDE 3.5 for it). > -Konqueror and Iceweasel web browsers availables. > -Gwenview as image viewer. > -Gimp as image editor. > -Kwrite or kate as text editor. > -Adept suit for Package Management (adept-manager, adept-updater, > adept-notifier, > adept-installer), including software-properties-kde. > -Kmail as mail manager. > -Gdebi-kde for manual installation of Debian Packages. > -Ark for file compression. > -k3b for CD/DVD burning and Audio/Video extraction. > -speedcrunch calculator. > -gtk-qt-engine configured for a well presentation of possible installed gtk > aplications in KDE. > -xmodmap and kmilo well configured for having special keyboard keys available. > -kooka for use scanner. > -kdpf or acroread for PDF viewing. > -qt4-qtconfig installed for configure qt 4 aplications apparience (as > speedcrunch). > -ksystemlog for view system logs. > -kmix for volume management. > > And any other aplication useful for Desktop use and management. The idea is > to install one > aplication for each function trying to choose the best aplication for each > function, > for example is a waste of disk having installed gwenview and kview, > kaffeine + kaboodle + noatun, speedcrunch + kcalc, adept + kpackage ... > > > You shoud do the same for XFCE Desktop and Gnome. I guess you mean like the meta-package `kde', as the meta-package `gnome' and as the meta-package `xfce4' already does? Regards, Jose Luis. -- ghostbar on debian linux 'sid' 2.6.22 x86_64-SMP - #382503 Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://linuxtachira.org http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es San Cristóbal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve GPG: 0xCACAB118 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Is Chris Leishman (masklin) MIA?
Hi, Checking some things for a build-dependency I will need, I found that Chris Leishman (aka masklin)[0] had not uploaded a package since 27/10/2004[1] and the packages have clearly new updates. I think he's clearly MIA and sending him an email for checking would be a waste of time and his packages should be orphaned as quickly as could. Regards, Jose Luis. [0] http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/libx/libxml++2.6/news/20041027T014703Z.html -- ghostbar on debian linux 'sid' 2.6.22 x86_64-SMP - #382503 Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://linuxtachira.org http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es San Cristóbal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: apt-get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Amir Tabatabaei escribió: > I'm satisfied but I do of course miss this feature. I think I'm too much > used to it that I don't want to try anything else. But you are right, > switching will be hard and after some while everything will be normal > again. I will try to use aptitude from now on. Lets see how nice it > is... No, it's not hard, it's very easy, aptitude seems to much to apt-get so there's no difficult ;) Jose Luis. - -- ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' i686 - #382503 Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://linuxtachira.org http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es San Cristóbal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGTjN4OKCtW8rKsRgRAiYKAKC8BIO3n5ImeSSizXPL/F0cDzqw0ACdGyLV 5grtcNW9sqN1CwqF/AVDZJk= =gf9z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Howard Young escribió: > looking through the list I now see that may be quite possible to achieve > what I wanted using, some sort of match priority command and piping it > back into the remove command. You should try using aptitude, it does what you want ;-) Jose Luis. - -- ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' i686 - #382503 Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://linuxtachira.org http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es San Cristóbal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGTdSDOKCtW8rKsRgRAvbNAKCUCrYD9dUbnEqk4MMvSCigbhLjoQCfYBNl 9RgSNO/Pk7pTIua5llUeblg= =sQur -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#364438: broken afer upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey, this is a very old bug about an upgrade a year ago, no one confirms it, should I close it? Refer to http://bugs.debian.org/364438 for more info. Regards, Jose Luis. - -- ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' i686 - #382503 Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://linuxtachira.org http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es San Cristóbal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGTKDfOKCtW8rKsRgRAqXaAJ9MWbIgyaKPJeDzMkV/iBfbBb05vACfbDBT tCtrhQI8hNz/AGJRr2zD8G4= =Z03x -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian desktop -situation, proposals for discussion and change. Users point of view.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mgr. Peter Tuharsky escribió: > Stanislav, > > > I see Your point, however this is far from "user-friendliness". > > First solution -use other distro. Wow, what a great idea. Looking at > statistics and Linux users in neighborhood, You can be _sure_ they > discovered that way already :-) > > Be also sure, that unwilling to do more for desktop users, Debian will > not be less, but increasingly more server-oriented distro (I like Debian > on server!). I like Debian either. What about maintainer/developer-friendly thing? I mean, you want that us change all our infrastructure, but then he gives you as solution to change one line and exec one command and you think that's not user-friendly? There's no magical ways to do this, if you want newer packages then use lenny and if you want even more newer use sid. I use sid because of that and my system is pretty stable. Jose Luis. - -- ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' i686 - #382503 Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://linuxtachira.org http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es San Cristóbal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGTDSzOKCtW8rKsRgRAv1yAJ9kd5ARNDxEsPct0rIdyyMosRrj2ACfQTRC 7yBRzG5rtH3LptRcnRJ8T7s= =9zdg -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apparently-corrupted-elf-binary lintian problems on recent sid and amd64
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Enrico Zini escribió: > I'm tring to build version -2 for upload, but it's giving me this > problem. Since the changes are very minor, the problem can be > reproduced with the -1 version that is in Debian now. > > What's going on? How can I build this thing correctly here? Hey, I built your package adding a `*/' in lines 85 and 86 of `debian/rules' before of `*.[a|la]'. I got a lintian and linda clean package. Maybe that's your problem. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tests/scim-chewing$ lintian -i /var/cache/pbuilder/result/scim-chewing_0.3.1-1_i386.deb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tests/scim-chewing$ linda -i /var/cache/pbuilder/result/scim-chewing_0.3.1-1_i386.deb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tests/scim-chewing$ Regards, Jose Luis. - -- ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' i686 - #382503 Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://linuxtachira.org http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es San Cristóbal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGRjhSOKCtW8rKsRgRAkPTAJ91alWdwsyT4Ln99BVOq015hSh+TACgt2nM 2qHW9GZlvRsPA1gCk0t4ZZo= =k2k7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' i686 - #382503 Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://linuxtachira.org http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es San Cristóbal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Three-package clearance sale
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Clint Adams escribió: > zsh30 - zsh 3.0 Hi, this includes all zsh packages? or just zsh30?... Jose Luis, - -- ghostbar on Linux/Debian 'sid' i686 - #382503 Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://talug.org.ve http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es San Cristóbal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGGt5fOKCtW8rKsRgRAgaCAJ4yF7MN+9NhduvExlraBVoCTNchKACfV9mH QgVuEj5xTzYe2A0agH4D+4Q= =DWqz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anyone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > Hello, debian-devel. > > Yes, this library needed for generating pdf docs from PHP. > Could you package it into next version? > Hi, 1 - Exists RFP: http://www.us.debian.org/devel/wnpp/requested 2 - We can't guess without hints ;-) Jose Luis, - -- ghostbar @ linux/debian 'sid' x86 - #382503 WeBlog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://talug.org.ve http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve San Cristóbal, Venezuela. Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGDsY8OKCtW8rKsRgRAnypAKCejmcIYCp1LaJt9PJ1H+npcQBwvQCeKOfP qJbz6eoFe6JbVzmltkTIbEc= =Z/kn -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Name of a binary package according to sonames
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Felipe Sateler escribió: > Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: > >> I'm more confused since I renamed the package to libtorrent10-rakshasa >> and libtorrent-rakshasa10 and lintian keeps giving me the warning... > > I am giving a try at the rasterbar's library, and ran into the same issue. I > asked on #debian-mentors and they told me that a lintian override was > needed in that case. > Yes, that's what I will do, that's the only solution. :/ Thanks!! Jose - -- ghostbar @ linux/debian 'unstable' on i686 - Linux Counter# 382503 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - irc.freenode.net #talug #velug #debian-es http://debianvenezuela.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-es #debian-ve CHASLUG -- http://chaslug.org.ve - irc.unplug.org.ve #chaslug San Cristobal - Venezuela. TALUG -- http://linuxtachira.org Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFh1DsOKCtW8rKsRgRAhc2AKCDCWD4D6e10hakmlcMIZKjwP9J8ACgluAq n0s71KCyvGLfYb8BSlEmFcY= =cUuJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Name of a binary package according to sonames
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kurt Roeckx escribió: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:52:40PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: >>> If the soname is set to libtorrent.so.10, it means applications will >>> start to look for a file called "/usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10". That will >>> probably be a symlink in your case to libtorrent-0.11.0, which looks >>> rather confusing to me. >>> >>> In libtorrent9 you have a file called "/usr/lib/libtorrent.so.9". But >>> there doesn't seem to be a file named libtorrent-0.9.0.so or something, >>> so I'm a little confused what changed. >> No, there's only libtorrent.so.10 libtorrent.so.10.0.0 in my build >> (libtorrent-0.11.0) > > So, your source package is "libtorrent" version is 0.11.0, which has a > binary package libtorrent10-rakshasa with a library called > libtorrent.so.10, and also has that soname. Yes > > That all looks good. > >> I'm more confused since I renamed the package to libtorrent10-rakshasa >> and libtorrent-rakshasa10 and lintian keeps giving me the warning... > > I think in this case you can probably ignore the warning. > > Do you conflict with the -dev package of the other libtorrent package? > You'll both want to have a /usr/lib/libtorrent.so, so you should > conflict. - -dev is used just for building rtorrent and -dev needs libtorrent-rakshasa so if I conflict them -dev can't build. > > You probably now don't have a conflict with other library package now, > but at some point this might happen. And I think this should be > avoided. > > I think either one or both should really change the name of the library > itself, to avoid all confusion, and also make them not conflict. For > instance, you could name it librakshasatorrent (or librtorrent). Well, the one with rasterbar will name it libtorrent-rasterbar and I will name the library libtorrent-rakshasa, so, I think there's no conflict. > > The ideal solution would be that there really was only 1 libtorrent > package, and that both current of them worked on 1 library. Well, rakshasa is used by rtorrent, and rasterbar is used by another bittorrent clients. > > > Kurt > > Thanks!! Jose - -- ghostbar @ linux/debian 'unstable' on i686 - Linux Counter# 382503 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - irc.freenode.net #talug #velug #debian-es http://debianvenezuela.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-es #debian-ve CHASLUG -- http://chaslug.org.ve - irc.unplug.org.ve #chaslug San Cristobal - Venezuela. TALUG -- http://linuxtachira.org Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFh1C2OKCtW8rKsRgRAkYVAJ4rDfVvgxvmuaJ6ueZ12nj2KtRHIACg0l+l dEBZkTiLNTrVxh5fJ6ywrZ4= =eh+/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Name of a binary package according to sonames
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kurt Roeckx escribió: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:09:13PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: >>>>>> The version I'm building is libtorrent-0.11.0 so I don't think I should >>>>>> call the binary libtorrent10. >>>>> Please check the real soname with objdump -p libtorrent-0.11.0 |grep >>>>> SONAME >>>> The real soname is libtorrent.so.10 >>>> >>>> So, should I name it libtorrent10? >>> Either the soname should be libtorrent.so.11, or you might >>> want to rename libtorrent-0.11.0 to libtorrent-0.10.0 or something. >> I can't that version already pass... > > If the soname is set to libtorrent.so.10, it means applications will > start to look for a file called "/usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10". That will > probably be a symlink in your case to libtorrent-0.11.0, which looks > rather confusing to me. > > In libtorrent9 you have a file called "/usr/lib/libtorrent.so.9". But > there doesn't seem to be a file named libtorrent-0.9.0.so or something, > so I'm a little confused what changed. No, there's only libtorrent.so.10 libtorrent.so.10.0.0 in my build (libtorrent-0.11.0) I'm more confused since I renamed the package to libtorrent10-rakshasa and libtorrent-rakshasa10 and lintian keeps giving me the warning... Jose - -- ghostbar @ linux/debian 'unstable' on i686 - Linux Counter# 382503 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - irc.freenode.net #talug #velug #debian-es http://debianvenezuela.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-es #debian-ve CHASLUG -- http://chaslug.org.ve - irc.unplug.org.ve #chaslug San Cristobal - Venezuela. TALUG -- http://linuxtachira.org Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFhsdYOKCtW8rKsRgRAg2iAKCqVE6x7lYUQoSKGvBsUrA4q4kdwgCfVRZ/ SRiDJbmdP0TU7pDbvE1Tbkc= =oOay -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Name of a binary package according to sonames
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kurt Roeckx escribió: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:14:33AM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 06:07:18PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: >>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>> >>>> I'm maintaining libtorrent package, this source builds 2 binaries, >>>> libtorrent-rakshasa (is libtorrent9 last version in debian archive) and >>>> libtorrent-rakshasa-dev (is libtorrent9 last version in debian archive), >>>> I get this warning from lintian when I build the package. >>>> >>>> Now running lintian... >>>> W: libtorrent-rakshasa: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libtorrent10 >>>> Finished running lintian. >>>> >>>> The version I'm building is libtorrent-0.11.0 so I don't think I should >>>> call the binary libtorrent10. >>> Please check the real soname with objdump -p libtorrent-0.11.0 |grep >>> SONAME >> The real soname is libtorrent.so.10 >> >> So, should I name it libtorrent10? > > Either the soname should be libtorrent.so.11, or you might > want to rename libtorrent-0.11.0 to libtorrent-0.10.0 or something. I can't that version already pass... > > If the soname really is and should be libtorrent.so.10, you want to name > it libtorrent-rakshasa10 or something. But it should have the 10 in it. Ok, so I'm renaming the package to libtorrent10-rakshasa and -dev. > >>From what I understand there are 2 incompatible libtorrent packages, so > you want to reflect that in the name of the package. > Yes, there's libtorrent-rasterbar (in a RFP, but I want to avoid problems in a near future), my packages were libtorrent9 and libtorrent9-dev, so I add to the name of the libraries "-rakshasa" to reflect that in the name. Thanks and Cheers!! - -- ghostbar @ linux/debian 'unstable' on i686 - Linux Counter# 382503 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - irc.freenode.net #talug #velug #debian-es http://debianvenezuela.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-es #debian-ve CHASLUG -- http://chaslug.org.ve - irc.unplug.org.ve #chaslug San Cristobal - Venezuela. TALUG -- http://linuxtachira.org Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFhr0pOKCtW8rKsRgRAr5zAJ4qLKHfOrr9fe3C2lcJpU4F62KkTgCg0eMF UGHUzA0TBliBAp4kbZTrj+0= =ZJAe -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Name of a binary package according to sonames
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kurt Roeckx escribió: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 06:07:18PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> I'm maintaining libtorrent package, this source builds 2 binaries, >> libtorrent-rakshasa (is libtorrent9 last version in debian archive) and >> libtorrent-rakshasa-dev (is libtorrent9 last version in debian archive), >> I get this warning from lintian when I build the package. >> >> Now running lintian... >> W: libtorrent-rakshasa: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libtorrent10 >> Finished running lintian. >> >> The version I'm building is libtorrent-0.11.0 so I don't think I should >> call the binary libtorrent10. > > Please check the real soname with objdump -p libtorrent-0.11.0 |grep > SONAME The real soname is libtorrent.so.10 So, should I name it libtorrent10? - -- ghostbar @ linux/debian 'unstable' on i686 - Linux Counter# 382503 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - irc.freenode.net #talug #velug #debian-es http://debianvenezuela.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-es #debian-ve CHASLUG -- http://chaslug.org.ve - irc.unplug.org.ve #chaslug San Cristobal - Venezuela. TALUG -- http://linuxtachira.org Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFhrBZOKCtW8rKsRgRAneOAJ94txj+uSnxu4NWWF+nB3+ZzHT4ZQCfQnM4 8WYy9Hb8+jyzwpbjzIo09qw= =zZr/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug is very vague, should I close it?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben Finney escribió: > Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> >> So, should I close this bug? There's a lot of bugs requesting >> specific features[1] so I don't think this bug it's necessary. > > You could enlist the bug submitter's help. Ask them to retitle the bug > and be more specific about a particular feature, or to close it and > submit separate wishlist bugs for each feature they want. > So I will close the bug since all the features are already requested in another wishlist bugs. Thanks!! - -- ghostbar @ linux/debian 'unstable' on i686 - Linux Counter# 382503 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - irc.freenode.net #talug #velug #debian-es http://debianvenezuela.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-es #debian-ve CHASLUG -- http://chaslug.org.ve - irc.unplug.org.ve #chaslug San Cristobal - Venezuela. TALUG -- http://linuxtachira.org Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFhq8EOKCtW8rKsRgRAjlgAKCuqnyeHA1b44sGJKxPem8ogQFqmwCdEIK9 7JaeIq6lvHejrmNO9JB9RaU= =RENe -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Name of a binary package according to sonames
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm maintaining libtorrent package, this source builds 2 binaries, libtorrent-rakshasa (is libtorrent9 last version in debian archive) and libtorrent-rakshasa-dev (is libtorrent9 last version in debian archive), I get this warning from lintian when I build the package. Now running lintian... W: libtorrent-rakshasa: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libtorrent10 Finished running lintian. The version I'm building is libtorrent-0.11.0 so I don't think I should call the binary libtorrent10. What should I do? Thanks and Cheers!! - -- ghostbar @ linux/debian 'unstable' on i686 - Linux Counter# 382503 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - irc.freenode.net #talug #velug #debian-es http://debianvenezuela.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-es #debian-ve CHASLUG -- http://chaslug.org.ve - irc.unplug.org.ve #chaslug San Cristobal - Venezuela. TALUG -- http://linuxtachira.org Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFhb+VOKCtW8rKsRgRAm69AKCWHPwAP31Vj3yGDcS/xTILRwa4ngCeMPSH eSc1P96vM8AavyzfsvQxY8Y= =rZbg -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#403506: ITP: fdisk -- linux fdisk replacement based on libparted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ron Johnson escribió: > On 12/17/06 09:43, Julien Louis wrote: >> Package: wnpp >> Severity: wishlist >> Owner: Julien Louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> * Package name: fdisk >> Version : 0.9.1 >> Upstream Author : Leslie P. Polzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> * URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/fdisk/ >> * License : GPL >> Programming Lang: C >> Description : linux fdisk replacement based on libparted > > Since util-linux already has /sbin/fdisk, naming a package fdisk > seems ambiguous. Should be named something like `fdisk-gnu` or `fdiskgnu`, the binary too for avoid problems with the `fdisk` binary that already exists. Cheers!! - -- ghostbar @ linux/debian 'unstable' on i686 - Linux Counter# 382503 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - irc.freenode.net #talug #velug #debian-es http://debianvenezuela.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-es #debian-ve CHASLUG -- http://chaslug.org.ve - irc.unplug.org.ve #chaslug San Cristobal - Venezuela. TALUG -- http://linuxtachira.org Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFhbdzOKCtW8rKsRgRAjlOAKDOtfOBx5aTjMmLffHANMwUjMa50wCfSgQf 9lI9jYhW178b5+JxZcaht6M= =wfgt -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug is very vague, should I close it?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >Package: rtorrent >Version: 0.4.1-1a0.mrvn.1 >Severity: wishlist > >Hi, > >I would like to see some features like DHT in rtorrent to make it more >competitive with other clients. For an overview see > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_BitTorrent_software > >MfG > Goswin This bug probably will never be solved until rtorrent get all features of all torrent clients... So, should I close this bug? There's a lot of bugs requesting specific features[1] so I don't think this bug it's necessary. Please CC answers to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=rtorrent&archive=no&pend-exc=pending-fixed&pend-exc=fixed&pend-exc=done&sev-inc=minor&sev-inc=wishlist#_0_6_3 - -- ghostbar @ linux/debian 'unstable' on i686 - Linux Counter# 382503 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - irc.freenode.net #talug #velug #debian-es http://debianvenezuela.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-es #debian-ve CHASLUG -- http://chaslug.org.ve - irc.unplug.org.ve #chaslug San Cristobal - Venezuela. TALUG -- http://linuxtachira.org Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFhZX3OKCtW8rKsRgRAuFuAKCoVlUqjyyTgD9BSmz/nUODxVDRVQCgyirN 029JDSq7b3bgUHnB073Dn2E= =wp9R -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFA libtorrent and rtorrent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Arnaud Fontaine escribió: >> "Qingning" == Qingning Huo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Qingning> Because of recent changes in my Real Life, I cannot spend > Qingning> enough time on libtorrent and rtorrent as I would like. > Qingning> Whoever want to adopt are welcome to take over their > Qingning> maintenance. I would recommend them be adopted together, > Qingning> because they are closely related (same author), and new > Qingning> upstream versions are always released at the same time. > > Hey, > > I'm interesting by taking care of this package. Is it still possible ? > Will you fill a RFA ? > > Regards, > Arnaud Fontaine > > Hi Arnaud, I already take both, thanks anyway. - -- ~ghostbar @ linux/debian 'unstable' on i686 - Linux Counter# 382503 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - irc.freenode.net #talug #velug #debian-es http://debianvenezuela.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-es #debian-ve San Cristobal - Venezuela. TALUG -- http://linuxtachira.org CHASLUG -- http://chaslug.org.ve - irc.unplug.org.ve #chaslug Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFE1jkOKCtW8rKsRgRArnKAKDbK5obZmBIGQrZwkkDFNWkBpsjmQCfSZMX 5EWUSDo0QzFh+85FrDAPRUk= =6EkA -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFA libtorrent and rtorrent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Qingning Huo escribió: > Hi, > > Because of recent changes in my Real Life, I cannot spend enough time on > libtorrent and rtorrent as I would like. Whoever want to adopt are > welcome to take over their maintenance. I would recommend them be > adopted together, because they are closely related (same author), and > new upstream versions are always released at the same time. > > Regards, > > Qingning > Hi Qingning, I want to take both packages. Please write me in private wherever I need to know exactly about something weird on this packages. Cheers, - -- ~ghostbar @ linux/debian 'unstable' on i686 - Linux Counter# 382503 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - irc.freenode.net #talug #velug #debian-es http://debianvenezuela.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-es #debian-ve San Cristobal - Venezuela. TALUG -- http://linuxtachira.org CHASLUG -- http://chaslug.org.ve - irc.unplug.org.ve #chaslug Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFEbEfOKCtW8rKsRgRAg4JAJ9iwXVZRzsdR/qQDOQfqy84FnHy7gCgn6a5 ydNuJQbWI/UvLfPcHi2i/+I= =yvYH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
