Re: Bug#1071528: ITP: hardinfo2 -- Hardinfo2 offers System Information and Benchmark for Linux Systems
Em 20/05/2024 22:53, xiao sheng wen(肖盛文) escreveu: Hi, I had report bug #1070830[1], hardinfo package change upstream repo to hardinfo2 also is a better way. IMHO, hardinfo2 only is the new version of hardinfo, it's not necessary to ITP a new hardinfo2 src package in Debian. The new version has a new binary package named hardinfo2 is no problem. I had mentioned that with upstream, but no response from Debian actual maintainer. There's some ways to solve that. Regard, atzlinux [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070830 在 2024/5/20 23:01, Lucas Castro 写道: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lucas Castro X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name : hardinfo2 Version : 2.1.2 Upstream Contact: Name * URL : https://hardinfo2.org/ * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: C Description : Hardinfo2 offers System Information and Benchmark for Linux Systems Hardinfo2 is based on hardinfo, which have not been released >10 years. Hardinfo2 is the reboot that was needed. Hardinfo2 offers System Information and Benchmark for Linux Systems. It is able to obtain information from both hardware and basic software. It can benchmark your system and compare to other machines online. Features include: - Report generation (in either HTML or plain text) - Online Benchmarking - compare your machine against other machines Status -- - Capabilities: Hardinfo2 currently detects most software and hardware detected by the OS. - Features: Online database for exchanging benchmark results. - Development: Currently done by contributors, hwspeedy maintains Hardinfo2 is based on hardinfo, which have not been released >10 years. Hardinfo2 is the reboot that was needed. OpenPGP_0x42F79A5E0A4D5598.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1071528: ITP: hardinfo2 -- Hardinfo2 offers System Information and Benchmark for Linux Systems
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lucas Castro X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: hardinfo2 Version : 2.1.2 Upstream Contact: Name * URL : https://hardinfo2.org/ * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: C Description : Hardinfo2 offers System Information and Benchmark for Linux Systems Hardinfo2 is based on hardinfo, which have not been released >10 years. Hardinfo2 is the reboot that was needed. Hardinfo2 offers System Information and Benchmark for Linux Systems. It is able to obtain information from both hardware and basic software. It can benchmark your system and compare to other machines online. Features include: - Report generation (in either HTML or plain text) - Online Benchmarking - compare your machine against other machines Status -- - Capabilities: Hardinfo2 currently detects most software and hardware detected by the OS. - Features: Online database for exchanging benchmark results. - Development: Currently done by contributors, hwspeedy maintains Hardinfo2 is based on hardinfo, which have not been released >10 years. Hardinfo2 is the reboot that was needed.
Re: Bug#995189: RFH: isc-dhcp
Em 28/09/2021 03:29, Richard Laager escreveu: On 9/27/21 9:15 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Sep 28, Noah Meyerhans wrote: Should it be mentioned what the new recommended DHCP server for general use will be? ISC Kea? I haven't converted to it, but that's their replacement for dhcpd. I had never experience ISC Kea, but its features don't mention ldap support, I don't think good idea deployment in ISP and enterprise deployment. BTW I don't think the thread focus is on the server side. By default on debian installation, my guess is the tiniest, better. I think that a good default would be systemd-networkd for servers and NetworkManager for systems with Wi-Fi or a GUI. Would systemd-* just wapped what service/system/command and run what it's needed? If so, It should still required service/system behind the scene. That seems reasonable. I don't think we should install something like netplan by default. I agree: it only adds complexity. I personally use netplan everywhere. As to what should be the distro default, I'm not sure I am convinced either way, but to argue the other side... There is some value in using netplan by default. Some random thoughts: This default would match Ubuntu. (I value reducing that delta. Not everyone does, and that's fine.) netplan can configure both systemd-networkd and NetworkManager (though I've only used it with systemd-networkd). In my non-trivial configurations, the netplan YAML input is half as many lines as its networkd output. This is with the input including a bit of comments and the boilerplate, disabling dhcp, and using YAML's more verbose list syntax (separate lines vs one line). I don't see anything wrong with its output that I could simplify. Again, in this non-trivial configuration, I think it's more useful to have one netplan YAML file than 24 separate networkd files. This is especially true when I'm building this file from an Ansible template and most of it (by volume) is built by loops. In the trivial case, it's 19 lines of netplan (16 if you exclude the stock comment) vs 25 lines of systemd-networkd, both in single files. That's not a huge difference. OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#1017079: ITP: netbox -- WebUI based tool designed to manage and document computer networks
Carsten, It seems like a good project, Tell me if you need on this. Em 13/08/2022 04:59, Carsten Schoenert escreveu: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Carsten Schoenert X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: netbox Version : 3.2.8 Upstream Author : Jeremy Stretch * URL : https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox * License : Apache-2.0 and MIT/X Programming Lang: Python Description : WebUI based tool designed to manage and document computer networks NetBox is a Django based web application, initially conceived by the network engineering team at DigitalOcean, NetBox was developed specifically to address the needs of network and infrastructure engineers. It encompasses the following aspects of network management: . * Hierarchical regions, site groups, sites, and locations * Racks, devices, and device components * Cables and wireless connections * Power distribution * Data circuits and providers * Virtual machines and clusters * IP prefixes, ranges, and addresses * VRFs and route targets * FHRP groups (VRRP, HSRP, etc.) * AS numbers * VLANs and scoped VLAN groups * Organizational tenants and contacts . In addition to its extensive built-in models and functionality, NetBox can be customized and extended through the use of: . * Custom fields * Custom links * Configuration contexts * Custom model validation rules * Reports * Custom scripts * Export templates * Conditional webhooks * Plugins * Single sign-on (SSO) authentication * NAPALM integration * Detailed change logging . NetBox also features a complete REST API as well as a GraphQL API for easily integrating with other tools and systems. . While NetBox strives to cover many areas of network management, the scope of its feature set is necessarily limited. This ensures that development focuses on core functionality and that scope creep is reasonably contained. To that end, it might help to provide some examples of functionality that NetBox does not provide: . * Network monitoring * DNS server * RADIUS server * Configuration management * Facilities management I plan to maintain netbox within the Debian Python Team ideally together with some more interested people in managing the maintenance. Right now all needed build and binary package dependencies are fulfilled, as NetBox is getting actively developed it constantly bugfixes and new added features which might need new dependencies in the near future which are not packed yet. I'd like to see (if possible) the netbox package within the bookworm release. The NetBox UI is using some comprehensive JS files which are shipped as minimized files. Currently I'm unable to drop the shipped minimized code and rebuild all the needed files from scratch. If possible I'd like to get some help on this, currently netbox will need to go into non-free due the non rebuild-able minimized files. OTOH netbox can't go into main as it requires at least one package from non-free, it requires drf-yasg-nonfree for some Swagger functionality. Regards Carsten
Re: wiki.d.o returns "403 Forbidden"
Em 23-02-2018 01:51, Georg Faerber escreveu: ...at least for me. Could someone forward this to DSA? Everything just just fine for, is it really on home page? (I would have contacted them directly via ITC, but currently traveling without access to IRC.) Thanks, Georg -- Lucas Castro
Bug#852835: ITP: sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw -- Firmware for Cypress FX2(LP) based logic analyzers
Package: wnpp Followup-For: Bug #852835 Owner: Lucas Castro
Bug#842857: ITP: node-js-tokens -- Regex that tokenizes JavaScript
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lucas Castro * Package name: node-js-tokens Version : 2.0.0 Upstream Author : Simon Lydell <> * URL : https://github.com/lydell/js-tokens/blob/master/readme.md * License : MIT/X Description : Regex that tokenizes JavaScript js-tokens provides a regex with the g flag that matches JavaScript tokens.
ITP: node-babel -- Generic multi-purpose compiler for JavaScript
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lucas de Castro Borges * Package name: node-babel Version : 6.5.2 Upstream Author : Sebastian McKenzie * URL : https://babeljs.io/ * License : Expat Programming Lang: JavaScript Description : Generic multi-purpose compiler for JavaScript Babel is a generic multi-purpose compiler for JavaScript. Using Babel you can use (and create) the next generation of JavaScript, as well as the next generation of JavaScript tooling. . Node.js is an event-based server-side JavaScript engine. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#808414: ITP: ms-sys -- Program for writing Microsoft compatible boot records
Thanks Andrew about information, I'll take a look at ms-sys-free. On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote: > On 19 December 2015 at 22:25, Lucas Castro > wrote: > > * Package name: ms-sys > > Version : 0.0.28 > > Upstream Author : Henrik Carlqvist > > * URL : http://ms-sys.sourceforge.net/ > > * License : GPL-2+ > > Programming Lang: C > > Description : Program for writing Microsoft compatible boot records > > > > The program does the same as Microsoft "fdisk /mbr" to a hard disk > > or "sys d:" to a floppy or FAT partition except that it does not copy > > any system files, only the boot record is written. > > > > It's usual in day-to-day of sysadmin the OS installation, > > and with this package become easier to write boot record > > for MS OSes on flashs and so create MS OS bootable flash. > > I'll maintain this package by myself. > > I'm quite certain this software can't enter Debian main, and I'm > unsure about non-free, as in includes dumps of boot records apparently > copyrighted by Microsoft, and even if there wasn't this they don't > come with the complete source code. > > You may try packaging ms-sys-free instead, but I don't know how useful > that package would be. > > -- > Cheers, > Andrew > -- contatos: Celular: ( 99 ) 99143-5954 - Vivo skype: lucasd3castro
Bug#808414: ITP: ms-sys -- Program for writing Microsoft compatible boot records
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lucas Castro * Package name: ms-sys Version : 0.0.28 Upstream Author : Henrik Carlqvist * URL : http://ms-sys.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C Description : Program for writing Microsoft compatible boot records The program does the same as Microsoft "fdisk /mbr" to a hard disk or "sys d:" to a floppy or FAT partition except that it does not copy any system files, only the boot record is written. It's usual in day-to-day of sysadmin the OS installation, and with this package become easier to write boot record for MS OSes on flashs and so create MS OS bootable flash. I'll maintain this package by myself.
Bug#699116: ITP: libpam-ldap -- Pluggable Authentication Module for LDAP
Package: wnpp Followup-For: Bug #699116 Owner: Lucas Castro
