Accepted xdkcal 0.9d-2 (i386 source)

2004-06-02 Thread Michael Beattie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu,  3 Jun 2004 08:43:47 +1200
Source: xdkcal
Binary: xdkcal
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9d-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 xdkcal - Desktop Calendar for X
Changes: 
 xdkcal (0.9d-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Actually fixed the month change bug.
Files: 
 b255415b5b92278de9ce9af96e76fb9f 602 x11 optional xdkcal_0.9d-2.dsc
 bb74442eea768efd3973724f63f3d1bb 6048 x11 optional xdkcal_0.9d-2.diff.gz
 93a70d112df53183635922adaf19b58c 15322 x11 optional xdkcal_0.9d-2_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Michael Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iEYEARECAAYFAkC+VB8ACgkQP11OPXNL8MlUGQCeJCR8TgaZBxaYiCUeIf/vO4jt
wkYAn2QTRz3Q85imAjpWLFvqf2Epa/EH
=QOaS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
xdkcal_0.9d-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xdkcal/xdkcal_0.9d-2.diff.gz
xdkcal_0.9d-2.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xdkcal/xdkcal_0.9d-2.dsc
xdkcal_0.9d-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xdkcal/xdkcal_0.9d-2_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Accepted xdkcal 0.9d-1 (i386 source)

2004-05-31 Thread Michael Beattie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 18:59:00 +1200
Source: xdkcal
Binary: xdkcal
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9d-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 xdkcal - Desktop Calendar for X
Closes: 206317 210889
Changes: 
 xdkcal (0.9d-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New Maintainer (Closes: Bug#210889)
   * Added the option to start a week on a Monday, as oppsed to a Sunday
 (Closes: Bug#206317)
   * Fixed a bug where the month data is not changed on the 1st of the month
 on a long running copy of xdkcal.
Files: 
 639a98b6bec617333d4a321d389a30a8 602 x11 optional xdkcal_0.9d-1.dsc
 380344b0d2410a710ab4bf3729c465c3 5547 x11 optional xdkcal_0.9d-1.diff.gz
 53142854533a65925fbc2101f3f4a4ec 15314 x11 optional xdkcal_0.9d-1_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Michael Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iEYEARECAAYFAkC63SEACgkQP11OPXNL8MmWmwCfQM3zPFbTXaVojMrQCV6Ay2B2
l5oAn3oz752WCbZ2pKgolg3yM0VMvJS/
=AIHS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
xdkcal_0.9d-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xdkcal/xdkcal_0.9d-1.diff.gz
xdkcal_0.9d-1.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xdkcal/xdkcal_0.9d-1.dsc
xdkcal_0.9d-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xdkcal/xdkcal_0.9d-1_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#220301: ITP: entropy -- Emerging Network To Reduce Orwellian Potency Yield

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Beattie
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-11-12
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: entropy
  Version : 0.6.1-362
  Upstream Author : Juergen Buchmueller 
* URL : http://entropy.stop1984.com/en/home.html
* License : GPL
  Description : Emerging Network To Reduce Orwellian Potency Yield

 ENTROPY is developed as a response to increasing censorship and surveillance
 in the internet. The program connects your computer to a network of machines
 which all run this software. The ENTROPY network is running parallel to the
 WWW and also other internet services like FTP, email, ICQ. etc.
 
 For the user the ENTROPY network looks like a collection of WWW pages. The
 difference to the WWW however is that there are no accesses to central
 servers. And this is why there is no site operator who could log who
 downloaded what and when. Every computer taking part in the ENTROPY network
 (every node) is at the same time server, router for other nodes, caching proxy
 and client for the user: that is You.
 
 After you gained some experience with the ENTROPY network, there are command
 line tools for you to insert whole directory trees into the network as a
 ENTROPY site. So ENTROPY does for you what a webspace provider does for you in
 the WWW - but without the storage and bandwidth costs and without any
 regulation or policy as to what kind of content you are allowed to publish.
 Everyone can contribute his own ENTROPY site for everybody else to browse
 through. The contents is stored in a distributed manner across all available
 and reachable nodes and no one can find out about who put up what contents
 into the network. Even if your node is not actively running, your contents
 can be retrieved by others -- without knowing that it was actually you who
 published the files. Of course this is only true if you do not publish your
 name (or leave your name or other personal data in the files you publish)







Accepted xkbset 0.3-3 (i386 source)

2003-10-16 Thread Michael Beattie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:49:21 +1300
Source: xkbset
Binary: xkbset
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 xkbset - Small utility to change the AccessX settings of XKEYBOARD.
Changes: 
 xkbset (0.3-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Orphaning. I do not use this program anymore.
Files: 
 094677ce8ca7bac50ce1e3872ced4e64 618 x11 extra xkbset_0.3-3.dsc
 fc85b061e72bd42712876a2aeb388ac2 2634 x11 extra xkbset_0.3-3.diff.gz
 7ecc281912d8dcd3f8710db56000976d 20794 x11 extra xkbset_0.3-3_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Michael Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iEYEARECAAYFAj+PMbYACgkQ2QocdfkPn/HPeQCgkFOpAGFfyzDnPF+klDgqY4u6
lMQAoJgOQUxpbWWq880IuLl92rHdWqcw
=v+gg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Accepted:
xkbset_0.3-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xkbset/xkbset_0.3-3.diff.gz
xkbset_0.3-3.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xkbset/xkbset_0.3-3.dsc
xkbset_0.3-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xkbset/xkbset_0.3-3_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: New package checkmp3 ???

2000-09-13 Thread Michael Beattie
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 04:16:05PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
 I ran dselect, and lo and behold, checkmp3 appeared. A package
 with the same name, similar version number (1.97.3 vs. 1.97.2),
 same description and same maintainer as mp3check. This is bad -
 should I file a bug on f.d.o, mp3check, checkmp3, or all the 
 above?

How about mailing the maintainer to ask whats up?

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
   Windows: the world's first commercially successful virus!
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpDvpmayIUfK.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: KDE2 - nice demolition job ...

2000-09-13 Thread Michael Beattie
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 02:05:48AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
 ==
 From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:
 
   Rant \Rant\, v. i. [imp.  p. p. {Ranted}; p. pr.  vb. n.
  {Ranting}.] [OD. ranten, randen, to dote, to be enraged.]
  To rave in violent, high-sounding, or extravagant language,
  without dignity of thought; to be noisy, boisterous, and
  bombastic in talk or declamation;
 ==
 
   without dignity of thought. Seems an apt description.

/me looks at Culus.

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
 liw for p in `SELECT people FROM #[sekrit] WHERE personality
   CONTAINS gentle`; do greet  done
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: modutils-2.3.11-8 request change

2000-09-11 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 12:24:51AM -0400, Federico Grau wrote:
 Hello Wichert and debian developers,
 
 I am a relatively new debian user (but long time linux user) and apoligize for
 breaking protocol... I have rtfm'ed a lot of debian documentation but still
 have a lot more.  I have a suggestion to change the package modutils-2.3.11-8
 (from potato).  After (very breifly) scanning my online documentation I could
 not find the procedure to do this, so I am mailing my suggestion to
 debian-devel and the maintainter.

Seems like a worthwhile change.

Since you mention that you were not sure where to send this mail, I'll point
you at the Debian Bug Tracking System (BTS). http://bugs.debian.org/

Your patch would fall perfectly in the wishlist category.

Please dont get me wrong, I am not trying to flame you at all for posting
your patch here.

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
   Cat Game #1:  Hah - made you look!
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpUkYOIeoGHo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Bug#71107: [wmono@debian.org: Re: RFC: removal of libqt1g from woody]

2000-09-09 Thread Michael Beattie
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 06:39:36PM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
 
 As it is now the current package does not work, cannot be installed due
 to dependencies, and it's not part of main.  The last few uploads have
 been done as NMU's...

that in itself could suggest that it could be removed. but...
 
 I understand not removing a package that works without the maintainers 
 approval, but a package that is non-functional and un-installable?
 (not trying to beat you up..just trying to understand...if this is 
 policy then I need to bring this scenerio up to debian-policy...)

The maintainer may be unaware of our conversation, (god knows why) and may
be working on an upload as we speak. IMO, its the same philosophy as doing
a NMU.

 Anyways,  I will continue to look online for this and hope either to get
 it to work or for the Maintainer to pipe up.

Feel free... I would suggest you simply file an RC bug on explorer, so that
when woody comes around to being frozen, it will be removed, if it has not
been resolved.

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
aj i've been doing timing tests while playing mp3s in the background,
 haven't i?
   aj bloody stupid multitasking operating systems
sgore aj: hehe
  tausq aj: here, have a copy of DOS
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpg1XH6EB0tv.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Bug#71107: [wmono@debian.org: Re: RFC: removal of libqt1g from woody]

2000-09-09 Thread Michael Beattie
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 02:01:00AM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
   Oh, yeah.
  
   http://bugs.debian.org/68274
  
   It's orphaned.  And has been for about 7 months.  The maintainer
   should be debian-qa, but it has not been reset to that.
 
 ...that would explain it. :)  

righto then, if people come to a consensus, file a bug on ftp.d.o to get it
moved to project/orphaned/, removed, or have the maintainer overriden.

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
   Drive nail here ( ) to need a new monitor.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgp1smLMO7qtU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: new experimental ISDNUTILS packages available

2000-09-08 Thread Michael Beattie
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 02:52:33PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
 
 [puzzled]
 
 For some reason the .dsc file was the old one. I've uploaded the correct
 one, so everything should be OK now. Thanks for the warning.
 

No problem. I see they have been installed now.

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
 yip yip yip yip yip yip yap yap yip *BANG* NO TERRIER
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpJBh69buxyA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: apt-move problem

2000-09-08 Thread Michael Beattie
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:20:19PM -0400, Steve Robbins wrote:
 On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
 
  My current problem with apt-move is that it wants to delete every
  single deb file I have (instead of only those that have never
  versions on hand).  Also, it makes completely empty Packages.gz
  files for me.
 
 I dunno about the first, but I have seen the second problem.  In my case,
 it was caused by a bug in dpk-scanpackages (from dpkg-dev); see bug #51479
 in BTS.

apt-move does not use dpkg-scanpackages (it used to, but not any more.)

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
 Documentation - The worst part of programming.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpevAraql6f3.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: apt-move problem

2000-09-08 Thread Michael Beattie
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 08:24:09AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
 
  apt-move does not use dpkg-scanpackages (it used to, but not any more.)
 
 Actually apt-move does use dpkg-scanpackages (and dpkg-scansources), but
 it caches their results so they're never run twice on the same package.
 
 This occurs when apt-move first moves the packages in, which is why you must
 never move packages in by hand (at least not without doing an fsck later).

my apologies.. I was under the impression that the new method used dpkg -I
magic.

sorry for confusion.

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
  Bother, said Pooh, as he heard, Will the Defendant please rise.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpbXIH7vd5cT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


ftp.debian.org bug cleanup

2000-09-08 Thread Michael Beattie

# potato bugs for next point release
retitle 58389 [POTATO] Potato has no sdr
retitle 48238 [POTATO] package priorities for potato
retitle 56936 [POTATO] Wrong package priorities in potato.
retitle 70661 [POTATO] pcmcia-cs (= 3.1.19) for potato?
# miscellaneous bug cleanup
# (something has been done, but the bug wasnt closed, the bug 
# doesnt apply anymore, or it is a feature request for dinstall.)
severity 32790 wishlist
retitle 49810 dinstall: check case in non-US uploads
retitle 66531 dinstall: problems when package changes from upstream to native?
retitle 60935 dinstall: mkmaintainers bug
merge 47989 59149

thanks


If anybody has problems with this cleanup, please, go ahead and reopen any
bugs that you feel are not resolved, and post more info.
 ** reopening only is not satisfactory :P **

to have a look, -  http://bugs.debian.org/ftp.debian.org
 and check any resolved bugs by me.


If you recieved a closure message as the submitter, please check what was
done was what you wanted.. since I have done so many in one big foul swoop,
I am almost sure I would have made a mistake somewhere...



These bugs have had action taken, and are being closed.
  (Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 65994, 70758, 64828, 62849, 63330, 61676, 48902, 58306, 60334, 64894,
 64936, 65024, 65380, 65766, 66710, 66977, 67183, 69342, 69349, 69460,
 69492, 69549, 69574, 69683, 69883, 69987, 60205, 70393, 70511, 70532,
 70538, 64454

All of these are slink only and are being closed.
  (Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 62796, 39939, 66565, 52776, 53967, 54195, 55094, 57301, 62169, 48225,
 53900, 53683

miscellaneous bug cleanup (something has been done, but the bug
 wasnt closed, the bug doesnt apply anymore, or it is a feature
 request for dinstall) (Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 42599, 69318, 48920, 53412, 53942, 55168, 55629, 57506, 59163, 60888,
 61652, 69850, 69878, 61994, 62259, 62552, 63793, 64765, 68870, 69680,
 70449


-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
  If it can't be fixed with Vise-Grips  duct tape, it can't be fixed.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



OT: Re: apt-move problem

2000-09-08 Thread Michael Beattie
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 02:04:29PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
 
  my apologies.. I was under the impression that the new method used dpkg -I
  magic.
 
 dpkg-scanpackages actually calls dpkg-deb -I :)

bah.. the bug was said to be in dpkg-scanpackages

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
 liw for p in `SELECT people FROM #[sekrit] WHERE personality
   CONTAINS gentle`; do greet  done
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgp6Ais0O3YNk.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: ftp.debian.org bug cleanup

2000-09-08 Thread Michael Beattie
  wasnt closed, the bug doesnt apply anymore, or it is a feature
  request for dinstall) (Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]):

er... the feature requests for dinstall were in the control stuff at the
top.. sorry, I didnt close them :P

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
With code like Microsoft's, who needs viruses???
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpJnzdjuNzfP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: new experimental ISDNUTILS packages available

2000-09-07 Thread Michael Beattie
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:40:02AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
 These packages have been uploaded to the experimental distribution
 (but not yet installed at this moment, maybe today?),
 but are also available by using the following line in /etc/apt/sources.list:

I added the override entries last night I think...
I dont see them installed.. - not sure why..

...but your new upload will be rejected :)

isdnutils_3.1pre1b-1_i386.changes
REJECT
Rejected: md5sum failed
md5sum: MD5 check failed for 'isdnutils_3.1pre1b-1.dsc'

(not me, dinstall)

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
   CONNECT 300...   Connect 300?!?!?! #%^# NO CARRIER
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgp6RigeYCvqM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Archive maintainers: Please relocate tpctl package

2000-09-06 Thread Michael Beattie
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 05:05:35PM -0400, Thomas Hood wrote:
 The tpctl packages still haven't been relocated.  Is there 
 some holdup?

Time. sorry, I'll take a look this afternoon.

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
  Don't force it, use a bigger hammer.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpnoYJO0xZ53.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: ITP lame

2000-09-05 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 01:03:15PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 lame/vorbis works alright. The problem I'm facing is lack of a good CLI
 ogg player.

Whats wrong with ogg123?

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
   Def: Password: The nonsense word taped to the CRT.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgp3TjLjQeKal.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Qt going GPL ...

2000-09-05 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 04:05:27PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
   I guess RevKrusty may want to put his packages into Debian?
  
  He already uploaded kdelibs, I didn't see if it was installed.
 
 I was wondering what happened to it? It didn't appear in the
 archives, it wasn't moved to REJECT or DONE, it just disappeared.
 I was wondering if there was some long flame war on debian-private 
 that I was missing.

Still in incoming...  dont look at me :)

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
  From a 1996 MicroSloth ad campaign:
The less you know about computers the more you want MicroSoft!
  -- See!  They do get some things right!  (I gotta stop stealing Sigs)
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpH3zVWsSxQg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: ITP lame

2000-09-05 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 02:35:00PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I have one wav file that when vorbis-encoded does not play correctly with
 ogg123 but plays with the xmms plugin. Plus there is not any native esd
 support.
 

My memory is flakey, but I believe there *is* esd support, (libao, a part of
the vorbis cvs tree, has multiple output formats)

anyway, if you say that the wav file does not play properly, contact the
vorbis development team. They would love to hear from you.

I will look at a new upload soon

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
   Where am I? Who are these people?
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpM0yLDRMDQe.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: X and runlevels

2000-09-05 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 04:43:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
 The code to do this has existed in xdm for a very long time, but XFree86
 always shipped with it turned off.  I turned it back on (it just involves a
 few resource settings for the display manager, see the xdm manpage), and
 sent patches to XFree86 a long time ago, but the patch was ignored, and
 Dirk Hohndel basically told me I was an idiot for doing so, because it
 might unexpectedly terminate the server in the quite common case of four X
 session logins in a row that averaged less than 6 seconds each...
 
 If you're saying, Huh? right about now, that's okay, because I did too.

No, I can understand that. - that exact circumstance would occur in our
University computer science lab. Regularly too, I might add.

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
 Games?  Did someone say games? -- Q
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpTYHvnXdZkM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: X and runlevels

2000-09-05 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 05:05:09PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
  No, I can understand that. - that exact circumstance would occur in our
  University computer science lab. Regularly too, I might add.
 
 I take it this is LART-worthy incident, as I don't think I can
 load my .xsession in under 6 seconds. Since *dm requires you get a 
 username and password (bwahaahaa!), use it.

yeah, I'll LART you...

lab == lots of people == lots of NCD xterms == lots of quick logins to the
DEC Unix server at the beginning of a lab... sheesh

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
  Bother, said Pooh, as he heard, Will the Defendant please rise.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpvlM500Al5O.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Qt2.2 released under the GPL

2000-09-05 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 06:02:01PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
   Does anyone else find it ironic that licq-plugin-gtk+ was finally installed
 into the archive today?  Guess it wouldn't be Debian if it was on time ;-)

IIRC, I added the override entry for that within 24 hours of it arriving :P

(or was this not a dig at the ftpmasters?)

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
  Sometimes I think that the surest sign that intellegent life exists
 elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpR9jFnIuwEc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Qt2.2 released under the GPL

2000-09-05 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 06:32:10PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
   No, it was just an observation of a coincidence that my twisted mind
 found amusing. :)

Yes, I suppose it was amusing :)

   Away put your flamethrowers!  I mean you no harm!

I didnt have it out :)
-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
 Games?  Did someone say games? -- Q
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgp6uYg0uV2dP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: ITP lame

2000-09-05 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 05:48:36PM -0300, Rogerio Brito wrote:
   But I'd really love to see an MP3 encoder in Debian. On the
   other hand, we now have Vorbis (players, plugins for XMMS and
   encoders) on woody, so the situation is alleviated.

If it was legal for lame to be distributed with debian, I can tell you now,
it would be in the archive overnight. - But it isnt, so it wont.

*please* go and read up on the whole issue before complaining.. this topic
almost arises more often than the When will kde be in Debian? thread.

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
   If at first you don't succeed, you must be using Windows.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpojyJk8Ikfq.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: X and runlevels

2000-09-05 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:36:00PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
  lab == lots of people == lots of NCD xterms == lots of quick logins to the
  DEC Unix server at the beginning of a lab... sheesh
 
 Quick logins don't trigger the termination of the server.
 
 It's a login, followed by an immediate logout, followed by an immedate
 login, repeat 4 times, that causes it.

Okay, my error, I was under the impression that it was fast spawning of
whatever it is that supplies the display to a client.

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
  From a 1996 MicroSloth ad campaign:
The less you know about computers the more you want MicroSoft!
  -- See!  They do get some things right!  (I gotta stop stealing Sigs)
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgp8r84lmI67r.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Qt going GPL ...

2000-09-05 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 05:29:44PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
 
 I looked again, and http://incoming.debian.org still doesn't show it.
 The only things I can think of is that RevKrusty removed the packages
 himself (to upload versions that don't worry about the QPL-GPL
 problems), or some terribly freaky bug in the software that writes
 the webpage.

kdesupport is on auric, kdelibs is on pandora (non-us) (dont ask me why, I
dont know)

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
Trees moving back and forth make the wind blow.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpnD01wXiky9.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: OT Re: /bin/ksh as a default POSIX shell

2000-09-05 Thread Michael Beattie
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 10:03:56AM +0200, Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler wrote:
 Saved to branden.asc and 'gpg -d branden.asc' results in
 
 gpg: CRC error; 72a653 - dc372a
 gpg: quoted printable character in armor - probably a buggy MTA has been used
 
 
 Well, I was able to repair and read it. Even if I wanted to tell you,
 I'm afraid I can't. Or is there a difference between private-mail and
 privately-encrypted-mail-on-a-public-forum in this regard?
 
 Besides, you don't really want to know - it's a somehow, hmmm, strange (to
 say the least) choice of language ;-)

It was meant as a joke... so go ahead :)

Im not sure why he encrypted to you though.

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
  Don't force it, use a bigger hammer.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpGQlAwiAtFC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: /bin/ksh as a default POSIX shell

2000-09-04 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 01:19:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
 On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 08:54:25AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
  Um, why send such a message to a widely-read mailing-list?
 
 As a joke...

Im damned curious.. what did it say?

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
   In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people
  very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpvT4x2qPgtH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: X and runlevels

2000-09-04 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 11:30:06AM +0200, Per Lundberg wrote:
  EB == Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 EB perhaps because in the default configuration there is no
 EB display manager, and thus no automatic runage of X.
 
 Sure. But whenever you install something that gets you a display
 manager, your system will boot up in X. To get it to boot up in
 console mode, you have to manually remove the symlinks in your
 runlevel's script directory. The next time you update the display
 manager, you'll have to do this again. It is not really convenient.

I find commenting out the display line in /etc/X11/[xwg]dm/Xservers is
sufficient.

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
Are the noises in my head bothering you?
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpCUwbmMjtHH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: X and runlevels

2000-09-04 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 12:48:24PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
 
   In the circumstance when you are serving a flock of dumb clients 
 from a single machine. NCD Xterms for example. In this case you *NEED* a *dm 
 running with network access turned on but the machine itself may not even 
 have 
 a video.
   This setup is a small percentage of the installed base but it does 
 exist and is used.

Then disable the local display by commenting the server line in
/etc/X11/xdm/Xservers

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
  God's last name is not damn.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpRRZu4gBgkU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: location of non-debian deb package?

2000-09-03 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 12:45:48PM +0200, Vincent Zweije wrote:
 Hello Debian developers.
 
 I have a program for which I wish to build a .deb package.  However, I
 do not wish this to be in Debian proper[*].  Should this package install
 under /usr/local or simply under /usr?  I think under /usr/local, as it
 won't be part of the distribution.

As was mentioned before, /usr/local is for stuff that dpkg does not know
about. It would not harm anything, if you used /usr .
 
 [*] It has a limited target user group (dyndns.org users) and I expect
 it to be superseded by an incompatible upgrade soon.

since when has a limited target user group stopped something being in
debian proper ?  (Take a look at all the other dynamic dns tools)

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
aj i've been doing timing tests while playing mp3s in the background,
 haven't i?
   aj bloody stupid multitasking operating systems
sgore aj: hehe
  tausq aj: here, have a copy of DOS
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpXpAiOVUHjM.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: /bin/ksh as a default POSIX shell

2000-09-03 Thread Michael Beattie
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:12:30PM +0200, Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler wrote:
 
 P.S.: Please can you go without the PGP stuff for the mailing list? It
   seems to double the size of your messages. Thanks.
 

I'd like to see Overfiends response to this.

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
  Friends are relatives you make for yourself.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpkftLsobExA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: dpkg-scanpackages arguments, output Packages files, and apt

2000-09-03 Thread Michael Beattie
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 08:44:16PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
  This was what I had to write to make a Packages file in a flat dir:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/public_html/debian$ dpkg-scanpackages . override ./  
  Packages
 
 You don't have to supply a third argument.

and /dev/null works fine for the override file.

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
   DOS never says EXCELLENT command or filename...
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpCDVE4cLdWu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: My recent bug's and continuing effort to debconf-ize Debian

2000-09-03 Thread Michael Beattie
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 06:49:22PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
 Roland Bauerschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 07:10:30PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
  As I said above, debconf is in standard.
 
  Sorry. I didn't know that. Dpkg and apt-cache still claim that it is
  in optional:
 
 Someone needs to update the override file for debconf to become standard.

which I will do when auric decides to show its face.

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
  There is an old saying that if a million monkeys typed on a million
 keyboards for a million years, eventually all the works of Shakespeare
 would be produced.   Now, thanks to Usenet, we know this is not true.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpbBlqlVDnLv.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: APT problem

2000-09-03 Thread Michael Beattie
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:32:26PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
 On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:49:27PM -0700, Michael Meskes wrote:
  Could anyone please explain this to me? Did Corel do anything to their files
  that makes apt think it has to upgrade although its up-to-date? Or is this
  a bug in apt?
 
 I see this quite often, so it is a bug in the curret apt lib. aptitude is
 even more vulnerable to this... at least the cache does work so u d/l it
 only once.

Yes, I saw something similar in today's upgrade session.. I'll have a look
next time around.

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
   CONNECT 300...   Connect 300?!?!?! #%^# NO CARRIER
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpq4g8QsB1w7.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Where's the prc-tools package?

2000-09-01 Thread Michael Beattie
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 10:38:25AM -0400, Brian Almeida wrote:
 
 dinstall has a bug where if it gets uploaded to frozen it gets removed from 
 unstable...  Someone just needs to re-uploaded a recompiled version for woody.
 

I *really* should get around to reviewing that patch I did, and apply it.

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
  WinErr: 005 Multitasking attempted - System confused
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgpC11wtQCOUD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


incoming is strange! (REQUEST)

2000-08-20 Thread Michael Beattie
The following was once heard around here...


  I've uploaded some packages that have been stuck in incoming for 3
  weeks. The automatic from the installer claims that someone must edit
  the override file. So who is this person ? Is that normal ?
 
 One of the FTP admins has to do it.  Three weeks isn't an unheard-of delay.

Anyway, this weekend, james and I cleaned incoming, so, currently, incoming
will be empty after the dinstall run (approx 6 hours away).


What I would like to ask... 

I noticed during this stint that several libraries got upgraded from things
like libfoo0 to libfoo1.

If this is one of your packages, please file a bug on ftp.debian.org to have
the obsolete packages removed. this will not happen for some time, to allow
for packages to be recompiled for the new library.

I'd like to get woody decrufted!

-- 

   Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
Bother, said Pooh, as he was assimilated by the Borg.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!



pgp4uEJ3Vjbnc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: ITP: buglist?

1999-10-05 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Joey Hess wrote:

 Thomas Schoepf wrote:
  Have you tried Ben's getbugs.pl? Is it good enough?
 
 I looked at it briefly, but it seemsed very slow. wget is easier.

I get:

Error: IO::Socket::INET: Connection refused
(use --help for usage)

... any comments? Ben? (I am most definitely, NOT a perl guru.)

 Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
Of all the things I have lost, I miss my mind the most!
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!




Re: slink - potato

1999-10-04 Thread Michael Beattie
On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Herbert Xu wrote:

 If anyone has seen an existing connection die, please report that as a bug.

what against? internet ??

The issue is more about connectivity stability.

 Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
I couldn't shoot a game of pool with a shotgun. -- Sam Beckett
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!




Re: libc6 is too large?

1999-09-27 Thread Michael Beattie
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Michael Meskes wrote:

  Fuck off and die.
 
 I have no idea what happened before but I strongly dislike a wording like
 this. This list is a public forum and mails like Joel's do not create a good
 image for Debian at all.

Maybe he had PMS?


 Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

 -
   Drive nail here ( ) to need a new monitor.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!




re: ITP: netleds [retract]

1999-05-19 Thread Michael Beattie

Um, It is very similar to tleds, and it is not really worth it, tleds has
many more better features...

Therfore, I hereby retract my ITP netleds.


 Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

   PGP Key available, reply with pgpkey as subject.
 -
Bother, said Pooh, as he was assimilated by the Borg.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!




Re: VX Chipsets and 2.2.5

1999-05-18 Thread Michael Beattie
On Sun, 16 May 1999, Phillip R. Jaenke wrote:

 On Sun, 16 May 1999, Robert Woodcock wrote:
 
  Michael Beattie wrote:
  I have been told by an aquaintance that linux 2.1.x or greater kernels are
  unlikely to boot on a Motherboard that uses a VX Chipset. I have a
  VXPro...
  Well at least your friends know where to get good crack.
 
 Aye.

Ahhh... The reason he said this was that OS/2 wouldnt boot... but that was
the latest version... beta even.
  
  2.2.5 runs fine on VX boards, and oh, BTW, the VXPro is absolutely not a VX.
  It's a clone with a similar feature set.
 
 Former VXpro owner here. It's a similar feature set, yes. But not
 implemented anything like VX. Be prepared for a nightmare of IDE resets
 (which are a *REAL* bad thing) and kernel Oopses every few days. I'd
 suggest replacing the board. Super7's are really cheap now; FIC VA-503+ is
 down to about $60.

US$?  Double it for me. And I am a student... :(  no money.

I get the occasional IDE reset at the moment but only when my 32x
CDROM drive decides it doesnt want to spin up that dodgey written CD.

Anyway, It's VERY hard to find PI motherboards now, (In my city anyway) so
I might just see how long an uptime I get with my potato box running
2.0.36


 Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

   PGP Key available, reply with pgpkey as subject.
 -
   A feature is a bug with seniority.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!




Re: VX Chipsets and 2.2.5

1999-05-18 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, 17 May 1999, Phillip R. Jaenke wrote:

 On Tue, 18 May 1999, Michael Beattie wrote:
 
  Ahhh... The reason he said this was that OS/2 wouldnt boot... but that was
  the latest version... beta even.
 
 Uhm. FYI, Warp5 *DOES* boot on VXpro, thank you muchly. I used my screwed
 up VXpro for a Warp5 machine for a few days. (Then I realized it was just
 too slow and unreliable.)

Hmmm, so why didnt it work here?  Beyond my technical knowledge... :(

  US$?  Double it for me. And I am a student... :(  no money.
 
 Ouch. :(

You're telling me?


  I get the occasional IDE reset at the moment but only when my 32x
  CDROM drive decides it doesnt want to spin up that dodgey written CD.
  Anyway, It's VERY hard to find PI motherboards now, (In my city anyway) so
  I might just see how long an uptime I get with my potato box running
  2.0.36
 
 *shrug* I'd reboot it bi-weekly. Those things *will* kill themselves if
 you have something 60 days of uptime. (That's how I killed two of them, a
 TXpro, and several other boards.) Just won't boot again. Don't ask me why.
 ;P


Ahhh... thanks for the tip :)  I'll just look forward to when I can
afford my PIX.


 Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

   PGP Key available, reply with pgpkey as subject.
 -
 Cat Game #3: Take up most room on bed.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!




VX Chipsets and 2.2.5

1999-05-17 Thread Michael Beattie

I have been told by an aquaintance that linux 2.1.x or greater kernels are
unlikely to boot on a Motherboard that uses a VX Chipset. I have a
VXPro...

Comments?

 Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

   PGP Key available, reply with pgpkey as subject.
 -
   Cat Game #1:  Hah - made you look!
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!




ITP: netled

1999-05-15 Thread Michael Beattie

This is to be my first real package once my maintainer info has been sent
to me.. (James has spoken to me by phone)

I just found this, so I am just about to play with it.

From the Web Page:
http://mars.ark.com/~mbevan/products/netled.shtml

Summary 
 NetLED is a program that monitors an interface using the keyboard
 leds.

Documentation 
 The package contains a manpage, text documentation, and a
 configuration file.

Distribution 
 Contains source and binaries for i386 ELF Linux.

Platforms 
 i386 Linux. Source is included and should be portable to most UNIX
 flavours and probably MS-DOS compilers too.

Copying Policy 
 GPL - GNU General Public License.

 ^

I think this is Good :)


 Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

   PGP Key available, reply with pgpkey as subject.
 -
  Friends are relatives you make for yourself.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!




Re: ITP: netled

1999-05-15 Thread Michael Beattie
On 14 May 1999, Ben Pfaff wrote:

 Michael Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
Summary 
   NetLED is a program that monitors an interface using the keyboard
   leds.
 
 Is it different from tleds which is already packaged?

I found tleds not all that easy to use, and I only had to type `make` and
`./netleds console ppp0 ` and it is still running, even after a
disconnect or two...

But, I will have another look at tleds, to see if it is worth me packaging
netleds.

 Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

   PGP Key available, reply with pgpkey as subject.
 -
  God's last name is not damn.
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!




Re: Current problems with libc6_2.1.1-2

1999-05-11 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:

 On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 09:58:16AM -0400, Collins M.  Ben  wrote:
  glibc 2.1+ in potato is going to require a 2.2 kernel so this wont help.
  To be honest I am not sure how you passed the preinst phase since it
  should fail to even unpack the glibc 2.1.1. I'll look into why that
  happened.
 
 What?
 
 Linux apocalypse 2.0.36 #1 Mon Nov 16 21:24:03 EST 1998 i586 unknown
^^

 
 ii  libc6   2.1.1-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries and 
 timezone
 
 Is my machine a ticking time bomb or something?  Will it not boot up next
 time I have to reboot?


Well.

 Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

   PGP Key available, reply with pgpkey as subject.
 -
   CONNECT 300...   Connect 300?!?!?! #%^# NO CARRIER
 -
Debian GNU/Linux  Ooohh You are missing out!