Re: Non-US Incoming
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 06:38:38PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 07:51:14PM +0400, Michael Sobolev wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 08:54:53AM -0700, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > > Previously Michael Sobolev wrote: > > > > Is it possible to access this for non-developers? > > > > > > No. > > Hmm.. And what's the reason of that? > > Any reason why you need it? Yes. As time to time, I may find a newer version of a given package in incoming.debian.org, it would be very convenient to have the same possibility for non-us archive. -- Misha
Re: Non-US Incoming
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 08:54:53AM -0700, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Michael Sobolev wrote: > > Is it possible to access this for non-developers? > > No. Hmm.. And what's the reason of that? -- Misha
Non-US Incoming
Is it possible to access this for non-developers? Thanks, -- Misha
Re: Strange behaviour
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 07:48:00PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > I usually run my shell with LC_ALL set to de_DE. Usually using LC_ALL is not a very good idea. It's better to use LANG, or, if you want only particular aspects of the program behaviour to be localized, LC_CTYPE, LC_MESSAGE, LC_TIME, LC_NUMERIC. > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ printf "%1.1f\n" 1 > 1,0 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ unset LC_ALL > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ printf "%1.1f\n" 1 > 1,0 I'd execute `locale' command at this point. More information about the issue is available as locale(7) (i.e. `man 7 locale') -- Mike
Re: Announcing debconf, configuration management for debian
[ announce for debconf skipped ] Is i18n going to be supported by debconf? If yes, how? Thanks, -- Mike (who thinks i18n should be considered from the very beginning)
Re: GPG as a PGP replacement
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 09:25:49AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > gpgm is not available anymore. I don't have an idea whether this is by > > design. > > Oh? Hmm that I should look into, I've been using it :| It is by desing. As of version 0.9.6. -- Mike
Re: Slang libraries
On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 11:04:40PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > We won't keep both; slang0.99.38 was still around because until two > days ago we didn't have a proper source package for slang1. Now that > we do, we have a source package for slang1 but no longer one for > slang0.99.38. This means another set of packages to recompile. So bugs should be submitted against appropriate packages? -- Mike
Slang libraries
At the moment, we have two packages for slang libraries: slang0.99.38 slang1 What is the difference between two? And why we have to keep the both? -- Mike
Re: latest sysklogd broken?
Same things happens to me. Today I upgraded two things sendmail and syslogd (what a coincidence! :). After few minutes I found that `ps ax' shows a lot of sendmail processes. Everything looks like that after restarting *syslogd* information goes into appropriate files for few minutes. Then it stops, what results in sendmail (and, I believe, other processes that make us of syslog) to wait forever. When I downgraded sysklogd back to -26, everything runs fine. -- Mike
Re: Anybody tried to compile COAS ?
I did. What I have: home brewed python 1.5b2 (I did not try to package it, so I just run ./configure ..., make install to get it on my computer). Since almost everything else is installed from hamm on ftp.debian.org, I do not have appropriate libpthreads for libc6. As result, my python is compiled without threading support. Results: everything in tests works fine for me, except for `tests/persist', which I found a point of crash (and a simple fix) for, and qt ui interface. Specifically, when a table should appear on screen, the program shows the empty window, then pauses for a while, and core dumps. As for python programs in `tests' tree, all of them work fine, except for UI stuff. Having issued `make install' in root of coas distribution, I got a lot of good and different files on my disk. But I was unable to get anything meaningful from it. So, I am trying to understand the underlying ideology. :) --Mike -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Re: status of bzip
> Whoops, forget I said the above sentence, I can't seem to find bzip > anywhere in Debian... My fingers automatically typed gzip instead of > bzip when searching :-( The last time it was seen in non-us distribution. --Mike -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
