Re: my thoughts on the Vancouver Prospectus
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 18:44 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: D) How will the exercise of a veto be communicated to the Project? An announcement mail with Subject: Vancouvered: $arch, of course. Snort Damn, I love this list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New stable version after Sarge
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 20:25 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: Marcelo [0] Besides learning that there is still people in this world who seem to think that feminism is actually a solution to something. I am still amazed by that one. Not trying to start a subthread, but problem was legal paternalism, the solution was ?
Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 21:49, Riku Voipio wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:28:50AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote: What comes to encouraging other people - guess what I'm doing right now. No you are definetly not. You are pissing people off. Other platforms aren't nearly as significant as i386 (not many users, no much new hardware). You're arrogance makes me wonder if George W. Bush is related to you. I'll give you a hint: we are volunteers, and we do this because it's fun. Messages like yours, that demand service for free just disgust. I guess after seeing your messages Branden goes out for a beer rather an opens a editor to serve ungrateful kids. I'll chip in to pay for the beer, as long as he comes back. (I'm just a user, and buying beer for developers could be my best contribution :) -- first impressions are bunk (unknown) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#128396: general: /usr/lib/menu/doc-base-happydoc breaks update-menu
Package: general Version: N/A; reported 2002-01-08 Severity: normal Tags: patch -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux aias 2.4.16 #3 Tue Nov 27 09:14:26 PST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE= dpkg -S /usr/lib/menu/doc-base-happydoc does not return any package owning this file, so I'm submitting this as general; please reassign as needed. For edification: rich: ~ $ dpkg -S *happy* dpkg: *doc-base-happydoc* not found. rich: ~ $ dpkg -l *happy* No packages found matching doc-base-happydoc. Well, the above I don't understand at all :) Currently, the file on my box contains: ?package(doc-base):needs=dwww section=\ title=HappyDoc Source Documentation\ description=This is the Source documentation for HappyDoc\ command=/usr/share/doc/python-happydoc-doc/srcdocs/index.html With this file in place, update-menu complains that 'section' is empty and fails out, leaving the Debian sub-menu in my Gnome menu empty. After examining other python doc packages, I modified as follows: ?package(doc-base):needs=dwww section=Apps/Programming\ title=HappyDoc Source Documentation\ description=This is the Source documentation for HappyDoc\ command=/usr/share/doc/python-happydoc-doc/srcdocs/index.html After adding Apps/Programming to 'section', update-menus succeeds, and the Debian submenu is populated.
