Re: 0.01-6 > 0.1-3 ?????
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 09:58:21AM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote: > Agustin Martin Domingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > point in versions is not decimal separator, but major or minor version > > separator. So > > > > 0.1 == 0.01 == 0.1 > > > > all means > > > > major version=0 > > first minor version=1 > > Many developers don't consider those identical, though. I wonder if > fields should be zero-padded to equal width before comparison? So > comparing 0.01 and 0.1, you'd zero-pad 0.1 -> 0.10, and get the right > comparison. 0.9 compared to 0.89 would then be the same as 0.90 compared to 0.89? Not good. -- Rune B. Broberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Faster Release Cycle = More Up to date Packages...
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote: > Thank you Joey for being so obliging to a constructive proposal, and > thank you for your polite way of replying to my proposal. > > Do you think you could put your 6 year old attitude aside for a few > moments and take this as a contructive proposal as other normal > grownups would do? This gets you right about nowhere, fighting flame with fire. I think Torsten has a much, much better point here - get rid of the current RC-bugs now, and find out how woody+1 is going to be done in the weeks following the Woody-release - with the new DPL. -- Rune B. Broberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
