Bug#1086608: ITP: kjournald -- tool to browse journald databases

2024-11-01 Thread Simon Quigley

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Quigley 
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

* Package name: kjournald
  Version : 24.08.2
  Upstream Contact: KDE
* URL : https://apps.kde.org/kjournaldbrowser/
* License : GPL-3
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description : tool to browse journald databases

 Journald-browser is a reference implementation of the kjournald
 library and provides a flexible tool to browse in local, remote and
 offline journald databases.
 .
 This package will be maintained under the umbrella of the Debian 
Qt/KDE Team.


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1086534: ITP: miriway -- Mir based Wayland compositor

2024-10-31 Thread Simon Quigley

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Quigley 
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

* Package name: miriway
  Version : 24.10
  Upstream Contact: Alan Griffiths 
* URL : https://github.com/Miriway/Miriway
* License : GPL-3
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description : Mir based Wayland compositor

 Miriway is a starting point for creating a Wayland based desktop 
environment using Mir.

 .
 This package will be maintained under the umbrella of the Debian Mir Team.


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Change in Lintian behavior: more granular exit code statuses

2020-05-25 Thread Simon Quigley
Hello,

A change that I have been working on with Felix Lechner[1] has now been
merged into the master branch of Lintian and should be landing within
the next several weeks. We expect this change to land in Bullseye.

This change adds the --fail-on option to Lintian[2], and drastically
changes exit code handling. Now Lintian will exit 1 on internal errors
and there is *no default behavior* to exit 2. Specifying the --fail-on
option allows the user to specify under which conditions Lintian should
exit 2.

If you have any questions, please let us know.

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/311
[2]
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/commit/2dd15ad2a5265807fadb9735994891b3414b68bb

Thanks,
-- 
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@debian.org
tsimonq2 on freenode and OFTC
5C7A BEA2 0F86 3045 9CC8
C8B5 E27F 2CF8 458C 2FA4



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#914853: ITA: yaml-cpp

2018-11-27 Thread Simon Quigley
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org ti...@debian.org

This is being filed to publicly state what I have discussed in private
with Andreas Tille (and what he recently publicly stated[1]), that I
plan on adopting this package.

I understand that a recent upload has triggered a transition, and I plan
on helping finish that before proceeding with a 0.6.2 upload.

Thanks.

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911956#30

-- 
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on freenode and OFTC
5C7A BEA2 0F86 3045 9CC8
C8B5 E27F 2CF8 458C 2FA4



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Sending using my @debian.org in gmail

2018-10-03 Thread Simon Quigley
Hello,

On 10/02/2018 09:00 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote:
>> I'll add that to the wiki page in case somebody else gets the issue.
> 
> FYI: updated https://wiki.debian.org/MigrateToDDAccount with the details.
> Not sure if that would be an issue to mention gmail specifically there
> as it's vendor-specific. Feel free to remove it if it's a problem.

Ubuntu has some very detailed Gmail-specific documentation, I would
recommend that you grab relevant information from that as well:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuEmail

-- 
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on freenode and OFTC
5C7A BEA2 0F86 3045 9CC8
C8B5 E27F 2CF8 458C 2FA4



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: autopkgtest results influencing migration from unstable to testing

2018-05-02 Thread Simon Quigley
Hello,

Thanks for the work on this; it will make things on (at minimum) the
Ubuntu side of things much, much better and will hopefully ensure higher
quality Debian packages.

On 05/02/2018 04:09 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:

> For several years already, maintainers can add autopkgtest test cases to
> their packages, which are then run on the continuous integration
> platform on ci.debian.net [ci]. debci, the framework that runs that site
> has recently been enhanced to test individual packages from unstable in
> testing. We have enabled logic in britney to talk to debci to trigger
> tests for packages that are candidate for migration from unstable to
> testing and use the results to influence the required age in unstable
> before the package can migrate to testing. The idea is that a package
> that is candidate for migration is updated in testing to its candidate
> version and that the autopkgtest case(s) of the package *and* those of
> all reverse dependencies are run. Regression in the results with respect
> to the current situation in testing will *add* to the required time a
> package needs to be in unstable (via the age policy). This extra time
> can then be used to investigate the situation and file proper bugs to
> the appropriate package(s), if there is a bug somewhere. On the
> other hand, if a package has (a) successful autopkgtest(s) and no
> regression otherwise, it will be rewarded with a reduced required age.
> Information on what happens is added to the excuses [excuses].

What are the added delays as of today, and is this effective immediately?

> It is the intention that in the (far) future regressions will become
> blocking for migration, but until then the added age will probably be
> raised over time as a semi-block.

What is the reasoning for not making these blocking sooner? In my honest
opinion, passing autopkgtests should be a release migration requirement,
and not just with my Ubuntu hat on (because it has a correlation to
higher quality packages).

Thanks,
-- 
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on freenode and OFTC
5C7A BEA2 0F86 3045 9CC8
C8B5 E27F 2CF8 458C 2FA4



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Plasma 5.8 LTS in debian 9(Stretch)

2016-10-04 Thread Simon Quigley
Looping in the related people.

AFAIR from discussions on IRC, yes.

On 10/04/2016 03:16 PM, Bradley Robert Baago wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Quick question. Will the new plasma LTS release make it into the next stable? 
> I think it would be a mistake if it did not.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Brad
> 

-- 
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on freenode and OFTC
5C7A BEA2 0F86 3045 9CC8
C8B5 E27F 2CF8 458C 2FA4



Re: APT 1.2 preview uploaded to experimental -- please test

2016-01-13 Thread Simon Quigley
I have been testing APT 1.2 under the ppa:deity/sid PPA in Ubuntu
Xenial. It seems to be working very well, and I am really liking the
various improvements.

Thanks for all the hard work! Keep it up! :)

-- 
Have a nice day,
Simon Quigley
tsimonq2
Contact for the Ubuntu US Wisconsin LoCo Team
Lubuntu Quality Assurance Tester