Accepted jbofihe 0.38-5 (i386 source)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 20:56:37 -0700 Source: jbofihe Binary: jbofihe Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.38-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Theodore Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Theodore Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: jbofihe- A parser for the lojban language Changes: jbofihe (0.38-5) unstable; urgency=low . * s/lujvo-list/lujvo.txt/ in the rules file and Makefile.in to match a change in the lojban-common package. * Update build-depends to lojban-common 1.4 to reflect this change. Files: cbc698c038154dbc01ab08fc9f4046b2 597 misc optional jbofihe_0.38-5.dsc 4d7d3072c6fd6bada8863bfcfe38086c 3960 misc optional jbofihe_0.38-5.diff.gz 2b21b9dfde596412faf91ec33de3dbe6 621254 misc optional jbofihe_0.38-5_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCnm0jXrnnKiKKOuQRAg3FAJ0bKyKRuD1s0h/yQuIDkquwzkAEeACfXjDO hqSmA6Um4TwVF/UDV8Ne5jo= =dEZP -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: jbofihe_0.38-5.diff.gz to pool/main/j/jbofihe/jbofihe_0.38-5.diff.gz jbofihe_0.38-5.dsc to pool/main/j/jbofihe/jbofihe_0.38-5.dsc jbofihe_0.38-5_i386.deb to pool/main/j/jbofihe/jbofihe_0.38-5_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted jbofihe 0.38-4 (i386 source)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:06:21 -0700 Source: jbofihe Binary: jbofihe Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.38-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Theodore Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Theodore Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: jbofihe- A parser for the lojban language Closes: 189911 221307 258923 276677 Changes: jbofihe (0.38-4) unstable; urgency=low . * New maintainer. (closes: #221307) * Change build depends to flex. Unsure why flex-old was needed. * Similarly with bison. Not sure why bison-1.35 was needed. * Apply mmap patch. (closes: #276677) * Apply FTBFS fix patch. (closes: #258923, 189911) Files: ebe40ef659d9bf0659b22d5a533e8b33 597 misc optional jbofihe_0.38-4.dsc 16c62d524fe5bf783c4a7081a2d4b62c 3897 misc optional jbofihe_0.38-4.diff.gz 1e30a5dccd6edf94aad5e022f2009a69 621182 misc optional jbofihe_0.38-4_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCW2voXrnnKiKKOuQRAjDSAJ0fulvepFA3DjJDvQlZ4IBcInIFeACghjW5 oe+NmB6hnF0pn1Ad4DL6kIs= =EEIz -END PGP SIGNATURE- Accepted: jbofihe_0.38-4.diff.gz to pool/main/j/jbofihe/jbofihe_0.38-4.diff.gz jbofihe_0.38-4.dsc to pool/main/j/jbofihe/jbofihe_0.38-4.dsc jbofihe_0.38-4_i386.deb to pool/main/j/jbofihe/jbofihe_0.38-4_i386.deb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Are we losing users to Gentoo?
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:59:48 -0500 H. S. Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:41:21PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: [snip] No, it doesn't. It shows that the most frequently viewed distribution pages on distrowatch.com are: 1) Mandrake 2) Red Hat 3) Gentoo 4) Debian And the sample size is approximately 56000 page views. [snip] And with enough obsessively reloading Debian users, we can easily skew the figures in Debian's favor. But that doesn't mean that Debian has suddenly become more popular. Who says we need users. Python (or hell, even bash), wget and cron would work nicely to the same effect. ;) -- Theodore Reed (rizen/bancus) -==- http://www.surreality.us/ ~OpenPGP Signed/Encrypted Mail Preferred; Finger me for my public key!~ Like a man who has worn eyeglasses so long that he forgets he has them on, we forget that the world looks to us the way it does because we have become used to seeing it that way through a particular set of lenses. -- Kenich Ohmae pgptp2AljHKzc.pgp Description: PGP signature
