Re: A short question about apt-get build-dep
Svante Signell, le Fri 19 Aug 2011 11:07:04 +0200, a écrit : > When issuing 'apt-get build-dep opensp' openjade1.3 is installed. The > problem is that opensp does not build with that version. You mean that you get the thread assertion issue? > However it builds OK with openjade (currently 1.4devel1-20). Which could explain why it worked for me: I had installed openjade, not openjade1.3. > Does changing the order prefer openjade before openjade1.3? Yes. But are you implying that you'd want to submit that patch to the maintainer? I guess that if the order is that one, there's a reason. > Or would adding openjade1.3 [!hurd-i386] be a better solution. The better solution would be to actually fix the issue, not hide it. Anyway, to fix your local issue, simply install openjade by hand, and apt-get build-dep will be fine with it. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110819102615.go4...@type.famille.thibault.fr
Re: A short question about apt-get build-dep
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:07:04 +0200 Svante Signell wrote: > Hi, > > I have a slight problem when building opensp for GNU/Hurd. In the > build-dep list for opensp we have: > > apt-cache showsrc opensp|grep Build-Depends > Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 7.0.0), dh-buildinfo, xmlto, poppler-utils, > openjade1.3 | openjade, jadetex, docbook-dsssl To change this, you need to change the listing in /var/lib/apt/lists/, i.e. in the Packages file for the repository/ies you use in your sources list. One way to do that is to use a local repository containing a modified package. That way, the data gets into the apt cache - it is not read from the package. > Doesn't apt-get build-dep read that file, or what is wrong with my > tests? apt uses the cache built from downloaded Packages/Sources files. Use dpkg-checkbuilddeps to work on the currently unpacked package then install the necessary build-deps manually. -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpIn6NzYKMA3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: A short question about apt-get build-dep
> Does changing the order prefer openjade before openjade1.3? Or would > adding openjade1.3 [!hurd-i386] be a better solution. > I believe that changing the order is better. -- YunQiang Su -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKcpw6XCuzQqMAmrUD3r4JyXK=82m13tmz1nf-4hyd_ocok...@mail.gmail.com
A short question about apt-get build-dep
Hi, I have a slight problem when building opensp for GNU/Hurd. In the build-dep list for opensp we have: apt-cache showsrc opensp|grep Build-Depends Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 7.0.0), dh-buildinfo, xmlto, poppler-utils, openjade1.3 | openjade, jadetex, docbook-dsssl When issuing 'apt-get build-dep opensp' openjade1.3 is installed. The problem is that opensp does not build with that version. However it builds OK with openjade (currently 1.4devel1-20). Does changing the order prefer openjade before openjade1.3? Or would adding openjade1.3 [!hurd-i386] be a better solution. I edited the Build-Depends entry of opensp in /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.se.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_main_source_Sources as a test but all the time openjade1.3 was selected. Doesn't apt-get build-dep read that file, or what is wrong with my tests? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1313744824.23232.60.ca...@hp.my.own.domain
