Re: Any Progress?
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:21:44AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:43:02PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:12:29AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote: > > > > Can you supply some message-ids or subject lines or something so that we > > > > can investigate? master's e-mail doesn't appear to be generally broken. > > > > I wonder, though, if all five (!) MXs are doing the right thing. > > > > > > I've had at least 5 BTS mails bounced back to me, and master continues > > > to reject with '451 rejected: temporarily unable to verify sender > > > address'. > > > > > > I suspect that this message will never reach [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I haven't noticed it bouncing but it has yet to process the bug email I > > mentioned in my other post. Also, I have not heard back from anyone as > > to why that might have happened. > > Clint's problem turned out to be due to an unreadable home directory on > master. Your case is different: it appears that the mail you reported > (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) was erroneously caught by our spam > filters. I've reinjected it by hand and the bugs are now closed. > > Content analysis details: (4.3 points, 4.0 required) > > pts rule name description > -- -- > 4.3 SORTED_RECIPS Recipient list is sorted by address > > Note that this has nothing to do with the recent compromise. I've > dropped the SORTED_RECIPS score to 3.8 to try to reduce false positives > here; I hope that doesn't result in too much more mass spam. Thanks for the quick response and remedy. > > Add to that the fact that the developer.php summary page is still > > fubar, I think I'll take a vacation from Debian until things are back > > to normal. > > I think things are fairly normal right now to be honest, but if you do > take a vacation at least please make sure somebody uploads kdebase. :) > > I guess one of the QA group will have a look at developer.php soon. I guess I can live without having up to date information on the qa page for now, it does make life much easier though. Now that at the bug reports aren't being lost anymore I can upload without having to constantly double check myself. :) Thanks! Chris signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Any Progress?
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:43:02PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:12:29AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote: > > > Can you supply some message-ids or subject lines or something so that we > > > can investigate? master's e-mail doesn't appear to be generally broken. > > > I wonder, though, if all five (!) MXs are doing the right thing. > > > > I've had at least 5 BTS mails bounced back to me, and master continues > > to reject with '451 rejected: temporarily unable to verify sender > > address'. > > > > I suspect that this message will never reach [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I haven't noticed it bouncing but it has yet to process the bug email I > mentioned in my other post. Also, I have not heard back from anyone as > to why that might have happened. Clint's problem turned out to be due to an unreadable home directory on master. Your case is different: it appears that the mail you reported (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) was erroneously caught by our spam filters. I've reinjected it by hand and the bugs are now closed. Content analysis details: (4.3 points, 4.0 required) pts rule name description -- -- 4.3 SORTED_RECIPS Recipient list is sorted by address Note that this has nothing to do with the recent compromise. I've dropped the SORTED_RECIPS score to 3.8 to try to reduce false positives here; I hope that doesn't result in too much more mass spam. > Add to that the fact that the developer.php summary page is still > fubar, I think I'll take a vacation from Debian until things are back > to normal. I think things are fairly normal right now to be honest, but if you do take a vacation at least please make sure somebody uploads kdebase. :) I guess one of the QA group will have a look at developer.php soon. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Any Progress?
Jamin W Collins writes: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:43:02PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote: >> >> I haven't noticed it bouncing but it has yet to process the bug >> email I mentioned in my other post. Also, I have not heard back >> from anyone as to why that might have happened. With the BTS being >> broken (or at least appears to be) working on packages becomes a >> lot more of a pita. You have to fix the bugs, close them, and then >> go back later and make sure they actually got closed, which isn't >> happening. > This seems to be hit and miss. All the bugs I've recently > update/closed on my packages have processed fine. same here. cheers domi
Re: Any Progress?
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:43:02PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote: > > I haven't noticed it bouncing but it has yet to process the bug email > I mentioned in my other post. Also, I have not heard back from anyone > as to why that might have happened. With the BTS being broken (or at > least appears to be) working on packages becomes a lot more of a pita. > You have to fix the bugs, close them, and then go back later and make > sure they actually got closed, which isn't happening. This seems to be hit and miss. All the bugs I've recently update/closed on my packages have processed fine. -- Jamin W. Collins Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. --Aldous Huxley, "Proper Studies", 1927
Re: Any Progress?
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:12:29AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote: > > Please cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] about bugs.debian.org problems in future. > > > > Can you supply some message-ids or subject lines or something so that we > > can investigate? master's e-mail doesn't appear to be generally broken. > > I wonder, though, if all five (!) MXs are doing the right thing. > > I've had at least 5 BTS mails bounced back to me, and master continues > to reject with '451 rejected: temporarily unable to verify sender > address'. > > I suspect that this message will never reach [EMAIL PROTECTED] I haven't noticed it bouncing but it has yet to process the bug email I mentioned in my other post. Also, I have not heard back from anyone as to why that might have happened. With the BTS being broken (or at least appears to be) working on packages becomes a lot more of a pita. You have to fix the bugs, close them, and then go back later and make sure they actually got closed, which isn't happening. Add to that the fact that the developer.php summary page is still fubar, I think I'll take a vacation from Debian until things are back to normal. Chris signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Any Progress?
> Please cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] about bugs.debian.org problems in future. > > Can you supply some message-ids or subject lines or something so that we > can investigate? master's e-mail doesn't appear to be generally broken. > I wonder, though, if all five (!) MXs are doing the right thing. I've had at least 5 BTS mails bounced back to me, and master continues to reject with '451 rejected: temporarily unable to verify sender address'. I suspect that this message will never reach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Any Progress?
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 10:36:30PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 03:35:53PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote: > > It also appears master's email is broken. Bugs I tried closing in one > > email yesterday (via multiple [EMAIL PROTECTED]) have yet to be closed and > > an email I sent to debian-qt-kde still hasn't appeared after 2 hours. > > Also bugs I tried to close individually about 1 hour ago have yet to > > be closed as well. > > Please cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] about bugs.debian.org problems in future. > > Can you supply some message-ids or subject lines or something so that we > can investigate? master's e-mail doesn't appear to be generally broken. > I wonder, though, if all five (!) MXs are doing the right thing. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The other bug reports from earlier today seem to have been processed but took an hour to do so. Actually from looking at the timestamp they were processed 1min after I sent my previous email, heh. The message to debian-qt-kde that was clogged up by murphy for ~ 2hrs was: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks, Chris signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Any Progress?
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 03:35:53PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote: > I noticed that http://qa.debian.org/developer.php still isn't > updating. See debian-qa. It looks as if this can be re-enabled soon, but the primary author of developer.php currently doesn't have a key in the keyring. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Any Progress?
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 03:35:53PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote: > It also appears master's email is broken. Bugs I tried closing in one > email yesterday (via multiple [EMAIL PROTECTED]) have yet to be closed and > an email I sent to debian-qt-kde still hasn't appeared after 2 hours. > Also bugs I tried to close individually about 1 hour ago have yet to > be closed as well. Please cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] about bugs.debian.org problems in future. Can you supply some message-ids or subject lines or something so that we can investigate? master's e-mail doesn't appear to be generally broken. I wonder, though, if all five (!) MXs are doing the right thing. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any Progress?
I was wondering if there is any progress in getting the servers back to normal. I noticed that http://qa.debian.org/developer.php still isn't updating. Also how long until the buildd's are back online? I only see 3 archs that have online buildds right now. It also appears master's email is broken. Bugs I tried closing in one email yesterday (via multiple [EMAIL PROTECTED]) have yet to be closed and an email I sent to debian-qt-kde still hasn't appeared after 2 hours. Also bugs I tried to close individually about 1 hour ago have yet to be closed as well. Its been 3 weeks now since Debian was compromised, hopefully it won't take too much longer for Debian to return to normal... Thanks, Chris Cheney signature.asc Description: Digital signature
