Re: Bits from the armel porters
Hi, On Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 12:31:23 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > For the second point, armel must keep up-to-date and must not have > > build failures affecting armel. The current buildds are struggling to > > keep upto date, so 4 new Thecus machines have now been ordered to be set > > up as normal/testing/security buildds and porter machines in the near > > future. > > The machines have now arrived. After the fitting disks and memory > modules have been delivered, these boxes will get installed and shipped > to their final hosting locations. This should take about one or two > weeks. After that, DSA can do the debian.org setup and leave them to the > buildd admins. Debian Developer accessible machine in place now. For details see: http://lists.debian.org/debian-infrastructure-announce/2008/03/msg3.html Greetings Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bits from the armel porters
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 11:39:24PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > Now that armel is becoming official, could someone involved with the port > please look at updating the info about the port on the website [1] in the > run-up to Lenny? Yeah, I sent a update for that page earlier, but it seems to have slipped from the radar. Resending.. > (Info for a lot of other ports could do with some updates as well.) The whole website needs more love. :( -- "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bits from the armel porters
Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For the second point, armel must keep up-to-date and must not have > build failures affecting armel. The current buildds are struggling to > keep upto date, so 4 new Thecus machines have now been ordered to be set > up as normal/testing/security buildds and porter machines in the near > future. The machines have now arrived. After the fitting disks and memory modules have been delivered, these boxes will get installed and shipped to their final hosting locations. This should take about one or two weeks. After that, DSA can do the debian.org setup and leave them to the buildd admins. Marc -- BOFH #114: electro-magnetic pulses from French above ground nuke testing. pgpAT0GWhrAmZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bits from the armel porters
[Sune Vuorela] > My impression of the state of armeb fits quite well with a "500 result" Almost, but not quite. There are four machines reporting to popcon.debian.org. :) This is the latest architecture distribution list as reported to popcon.debian.org: 2 0.00% i486 2 0.00% hurd-i386 3 0.00% ppc64 4 0.01% armeb 5 0.01% kfreebsd-amd64 8 0.01% kfreebsd-i386 10 0.01% s390 11 0.01% m68k 20 0.03% armel 25 0.03% mips 49 0.06% ia64 69 0.09% hppa 77 0.10% mipsel 83 0.11% alpha 291 0.38% sparc 829 1.09% arm 879 1.16% powerpc 10016 13.20% amd64 63480 83.68% i386 75863 100.00% total (ignored 235 without arch info) Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bits from the armel porters
On 2008-03-06, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 12:15:09AM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: >> Hello dear developers, >> >> As you may have noticed, a new architecture, armel, has been added to >> Debian. Here are some highlights and a bit of information in a nutshell. >> For more details, refer to the wiki pages[0]. > > Can someone give us an update on armeb? > > www.debian.org/ports refers to debonaras.org which is currently giving a > 500 result. My impression of the state of armeb fits quite well with a "500 result" /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bits from the armel porters
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 12:15:09AM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > Hello dear developers, > > As you may have noticed, a new architecture, armel, has been added to > Debian. Here are some highlights and a bit of information in a nutshell. > For more details, refer to the wiki pages[0]. Can someone give us an update on armeb? www.debian.org/ports refers to debonaras.org which is currently giving a 500 result. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bits from the armel porters
On Thursday 06 March 2008, Riku Voipio wrote: > As you may have noticed, a new architecture, armel, has been added to > Debian. Here are some highlights and a bit of information in a nutshell. > For more details, refer to the wiki pages[0]. Now that armel is becoming official, could someone involved with the port please look at updating the info about the port on the website [1] in the run-up to Lenny? (Info for a lot of other ports could do with some updates as well.) TIA, FJP [1] http://www.debian.org/ports/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
