Re: Boost 1.81 in Debian Testing
On 2023-01-04 06:24:38 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > Dear valued contributors, > > I am pleased to announce that the latest version of Boost, version 1.81, is > now > available in Debian Testing [1]. > > We encourage all contributors whose packages depend on Boost libraries to > consider building against Boost 1.81 in order to facilitate a smooth > transition. Please don't switch the dependencies to the versioned version of the -dev packages. This makes future transitions just a lot more work. > Installing the -dev Boost packages from the experimental repository is simple, > as shown in the following command: sudo apt install libboost-dev -t > experimental. > > If you encounter any issues or have suggestions for improvement, please do not > hesitate to file bugs or prepare merge requests on salsa [2]. > > Thank you. As a mor egeneral note, have there been any test builds of the archive with boost 1.81 as default? It's rather late for such a large transition. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Re: Boost 1.81 in Debian Testing
On 2023-01-04 Markus Blatt wrote: > Dear Anton, > Am Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 06:24:38AM +0100 schrieb Anton Gladky: > > I am pleased to announce that the latest version of Boost, version > > 1.81, is now available in Debian Testing [1]. > Thanks a lot. >> We encourage all contributors whose packages depend on Boost libraries to > Just double checking, still a newbie. By that you mean changing to an > explicit dependency on the version in debian/control (e.g. > libboost-system-dev -> libboost-system1.81-dev) and reuploading the > source? After the transition finished I would undo that change again. Helo Markus, Eh, no. You should simply do a *local* test-build (without any upload) after sudo apt install libboost-dev -t experimental cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
Re: Boost 1.81 in Debian Testing
Hi, Am 04.01.23 um 10:18 schrieb Thomas Goirand: The latest update of boost was in late 2020. Why are we waiting so late in the release cycle to do such a transition? The month of the freeze is *NOT* a good moment to do it. Indeed. Regards, Rene
Re: Boost 1.81 in Debian Testing
Hi, Am 04.01.23 um 10:37 schrieb Thomas Goirand: On 1/4/23 06:24, Anton Gladky wrote: apt install libboost-dev -t experimental FYI, Ceph FTBFS with it... :/ As did LibreOffice - already fixed by $ cat debian/patches/boost-1.81.diff From 7e61545966c61102aad56bbf10bae2edfbfa9226 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?=C4=90o=C3=A0n=20Tr=E1=BA=A7n=20C=C3=B4ng=20Danh?= Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 18:59:24 +0700 Subject: i18n: fix build with Boost 1.81.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Boost.Locale since 1.81.0 switch to enum classes for facet type [1]. Switch our resource manager accordingly. 1: https://github.com/boostorg/locale/commit/e5ed439ea39a4de915e9fb939cca95cae7d9d8d1 Change-Id: Ief215363ceb79b2019606b20a7cde55c8df6a042 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/143343 Reviewed-by: Heiko Becker Tested-by: Caolán McNamara Reviewed-by: Caolán McNamara (cherry picked from commit 23dcd4339428e4080029ec5ae658e75f01e79a62) Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/144310 Reviewed-by: Danh Doan Tested-by: Jenkins --- unotools/source/i18n/resmgr.cxx | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/unotools/source/i18n/resmgr.cxx b/unotools/source/i18n/resmgr.cxx index ddedf5b9e8a2..3a7116350062 100644 --- a/unotools/source/i18n/resmgr.cxx +++ b/unotools/source/i18n/resmgr.cxx @@ -127,8 +127,13 @@ namespace Translate if (aFind != aCache.end()) return aFind->second; boost::locale::generator gen; +#if BOOST_VERSION < 108100 gen.characters(boost::locale::char_facet); gen.categories(boost::locale::message_facet | boost::locale::information_facet); +#else + gen.characters(boost::locale::char_facet_t::char_f); + gen.categories(boost::locale::category_t::message | boost::locale::category_t::information); +#endif #if defined(ANDROID) OString sPath(OString(lo_get_app_data_dir()) + "/program/resource"); #else -- cgit v1.2.1 in1:7.4.4~rc2-1 though. But "Boost.Locale since 1.81.0 switch to enum classes for facet type" at least sounds like other packages using Boost::Locale might be affected, too. Regards, Rene
Re: Boost 1.81 in Debian Testing
Dear Anton, Am Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 06:24:38AM +0100 schrieb Anton Gladky: I am pleased to announce that the latest version of Boost, version 1.81, is now available in Debian Testing [1]. Thanks a lot. We encourage all contributors whose packages depend on Boost libraries to Just double checking, still a newbie. By that you mean changing to an explicit dependency on the version in debian/control (e.g. libboost-system-dev -> libboost-system1.81-dev) and reuploading the source? After the transition finished I would undo that change again. Best, Markus signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Boost 1.81 in Debian Testing
On 1/4/23 06:24, Anton Gladky wrote: apt install libboost-dev -t experimental FYI, Ceph FTBFS with it... :/ IMO, this was expected. Help fixing this would be greatly appreciated. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Re: Boost 1.81 in Debian Testing
On 1/4/23 06:24, Anton Gladky wrote: Dear valued contributors, I am pleased to announce that the latest version of Boost, version 1.81, is now available in Debian Testing [1]. We encourage all contributors whose packages depend on Boost libraries to consider building against Boost 1.81 in order to facilitate a smooth transition. Installing the -dev Boost packages from the experimental repository is simple, as shown in the following command: sudo apt install libboost-dev -t experimental. If you encounter any issues or have suggestions for improvement, please do not hesitate to file bugs or prepare merge requests on salsa [2]. Thank you. [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/boost1.81 [2] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/boost Sincerely, Anton Hi, The latest update of boost was in late 2020. Why are we waiting so late in the release cycle to do such a transition? The month of the freeze is *NOT* a good moment to do it. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
