Re: Bug#141686: xbase: name clash with old XFree86 package

2002-04-08 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 07:24:47PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Package: xbase
> > Version: 2.0.0-1
> > Severity: normal
> > 
> >  xbase |2.0.0-1 |  unstable | source
> >  xbase | 3.3.6-11potato32 |stable | all
> > 
> > This seems pretty broken to me ... it's a source package, so the lower
> > version number doesn't cause the upgrade troubles it might otherwise do,
> > but it *is* confusing the BTS into thinking Branden is the maintainer of
> > the source package currently in unstable (hence the X-Debbugs-Cc:).
> > Wouldn't it be better to rename the current xbase?
> 
> The BTS is brain damaged about this, too.  Very convenient for the
> maintainer of this new "xbase" package, I will see all his bug reports.
> :-P

It's not actually BTS' fault; the part of dinstall that generates the
Maintainers file would need to be changed to fix this.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Bug#141686: xbase: name clash with old XFree86 package

2002-04-07 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:59:37PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Package: xbase
> Version: 2.0.0-1
> Severity: normal
> 
>  xbase |2.0.0-1 |  unstable | source
>  xbase | 3.3.6-11potato32 |stable | all
> 
> This seems pretty broken to me ... it's a source package, so the lower
> version number doesn't cause the upgrade troubles it might otherwise do,
> but it *is* confusing the BTS into thinking Branden is the maintainer of
> the source package currently in unstable (hence the X-Debbugs-Cc:).
> Wouldn't it be better to rename the current xbase?

The BTS is brain damaged about this, too.  Very convenient for the
maintainer of this new "xbase" package, I will see all his bug reports.
:-P

FWIW, I no longer ship any package called "xbase" post-woody.  However I
agree that this package should change its name.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|Somewhere, there is a .sig so funny
Debian GNU/Linux   |that reading it will cause an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |aneurysm.  This is not that .sig.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |


pgp2OQdD9O08h.pgp
Description: PGP signature