Bug#1753: trn recommends, instead of depends
Package: trn Version: 3.6-2 It's not clear to me why trn uses 'recommends' for a mail transport and a news article injector, while tin uses 'depends'. I think that depends makes more sense, so I'm filing this against trn. Bdale
Bug#1753: trn recommends, instead of depends
Bdale Garbee writes ("Bug#1753: trn recommends, instead of depends"):
> Package: trn
> Version: 3.6-2
>
> It's not clear to me why trn uses 'recommends' for a mail transport
> and a news article injector, while tin uses 'depends'. I think that depends
> makes more sense, so I'm filing this against trn.
Recommends is correct. You can read news perfectly happily without
either a mail transport or a news article injector.
I'll reassign the bug report to tin.
Ian.
Bug#1753: trn recommends, instead of depends
On Tue, 24 Oct 1995, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Bdale Garbee writes ("Bug#1753: trn recommends, instead of depends"):
> > Package: trn
> > Version: 3.6-2
> >
> > It's not clear to me why trn uses 'recommends' for a mail transport
> > and a news article injector, while tin uses 'depends'. I think that depends
> > makes more sense, so I'm filing this against trn.
>
> Recommends is correct. You can read news perfectly happily without
> either a mail transport or a news article injector.
>
> I'll reassign the bug report to tin.
Are you sure this is right? Normal functionality of tin allows the user
to mail a response or the article to an address. Would it be correct for
the system to allow someone to install a package where some of the
functionality is missing? This would surely generate another defect
report.
I suppose recommends is a strong enough relationship that the system
maintainer would realize that some functionality may be missing if a
recommended package is missing.
I will make the change to the tin package.
---
Kenny Wickstrom | gnu - a new generation in s/w devel/support
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Linux - a much improved Un*x clone
(708)740-4008 | Debian - a Linux distribution setting the
#include |standard for future distributions
Bug#1753: trn recommends, instead of depends
Kenny Wickstrom writes ("Re: Bug#1753: trn recommends, instead of depends"):
> On Tue, 24 Oct 1995, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Bdale Garbee writes ("Bug#1753: trn recommends, instead of depends"):
> > Recommends is correct. You can read news perfectly happily without
> > either a mail transport or a news article injector.
> >
> > I'll reassign the bug report to tin.
>
> Are you sure this is right? Normal functionality of tin allows the user
> to mail a response or the article to an address. Would it be correct for
> the system to allow someone to install a package where some of the
> functionality is missing? This would surely generate another defect
> report.
No, because it's actually pretty hard to install a package using
dselect and fail to select its Recommended packages too.
You can do it with dpkg, but such bug reports are easy to close (and I
think that most people using dpkg manually will probably have enough
of a clue to think a bit more about what they're doing).
> I suppose recommends is a strong enough relationship that the system
> maintainer would realize that some functionality may be missing if a
> recommended package is missing.
That is part of the definition of the Recommended relationship.
> I will make the change to the tin package.
Thanks,
Ian.
