Bug#203046: RFA: doc-linux -- Linux HOWTOs and FAQs

2003-07-27 Thread Colin Watson
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

Hi folks,

I've been maintaining doc-linux for nearly two years now. While I'm
satisfied that it's in a much better state than when I took it on,
during that time it's consumed pretty much a solid day or two of effort
every month, and I'm now getting busy enough that retrieving that day or
two for other projects would be very welcome. Furthermore, the whole
non-free split and GFDL issues have been a source of angst for quite a
while, and I haven't really had the time required to chase up document
authors about the huge pile of forwarded bugs.

I'm therefore looking for a new primary maintainer. I originally took
the package on (some might say hijacked ...) because it was Priority:
standard, unmaintained, and broken, so I am *not* orphaning it; I'd like
to know that the new primary maintainer has the commitment required to
make sure it doesn't end up that way again, and in fact I'd rather like
to stay on as a backup or co-maintainer for a while. I have a Subversion
repository for the last few months' worth of packaging which should be
moved somewhere more public and used.

Anyone taking this on should be willing to deal with legal issues in a
way that both satisfies debian-legal and doesn't infuriate members of
the Linux Documentation Project, which is not always an easy task. You
should also have the energy to ping authors about forwarded bugs, and
ideally eventually let the LDP know when some of them don't respond and
new maintainers for those documents need to be found. The ability to
make the build system less mad would probably be good too. :)

David Harris has expressed an interest in this job, and I've talked to
him about it on IRC, so if he still wants it he's welcome. If anyone
else is interested, then contact me: a small team would be a good idea
anyway.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Bug#203046: RFA: doc-linux -- Linux HOWTOs and FAQs

2003-07-27 Thread David B Harris
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 11:47:06 +0100
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 David Harris has expressed an interest in this job, and I've talked to
 him about it on IRC, so if he still wants it he's welcome. If anyone
 else is interested, then contact me: a small team would be a good idea
 anyway.

I'll wait and see if anybody else, perhaps more suitable, will
volounteer to be the primary maintainer before considering taking on a
package this large. I'd have to think about it at any rate.

I'd also be more comfortable in a team environment, I find that more
work gets done that way.

P.S.: The packages look to be in great shape now, so either way, thanks
for the work :)


pgpVhwgnaWuis.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#203046: Info received (was Bug#203046: RFA: doc-linux -- Linux HOWTOs and FAQs)

2003-07-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s)
and to other interested parties to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)