Re: Bug #23877: Include autoup.sh and apt in hamm/hamm
On 25 Jun 1998, Ben Gertzfield wrote: Subject: please include apt and autoup in hamm/hamm/upgrade-i386/ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Package: ftp.debian.org,apt,autoup Version: N/A Well, let's just do it! I see no problem with making such a directory for final hamm. imo this directory should also be populated with symlinks to all the packages which autoup.sh needs to do the upgrade. there should also be a copy of the the bo libc5 dpkg in there, to assist with upgrades from rex/buzz. craig -- craig sanders -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug #23877: Include autoup.sh and apt in hamm/hamm
Andreas [EMAIL PROTECTED] filed this against ftp.debian.org: Subject: please include apt and autoup in hamm/hamm/upgrade-i386/ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Package: ftp.debian.org,apt,autoup Version: N/A i think this is the right location. if people want to get all files they need to install or burn a cdrom, they should have one source, and not collect the files from several servers (which might be down or unreachable or ...). this bug should be either wishlist and ignored or marked grave IMO. andreas I think this needs a thorough discussion here, too, that´s why I forward it here. Jens --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key ID: 2048/E451C639 Jens Ritter Key fingerprint: 5F 3D 43 1E 24 1E CC 48 1E 05 93 3A A7 10 73 37 Nothing works better as it is supposed to. (Steven Chu) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug #23877: Include autoup.sh and apt in hamm/hamm
Jens == Jens Ritter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jens Andreas [EMAIL PROTECTED] filed this against Jens ftp.debian.org: Subject: please include apt and autoup in hamm/hamm/upgrade-i386/ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Package: ftp.debian.org,apt,autoup Version: N/A i think this is the right location. if people want to get all files they need to install or burn a cdrom, they should have one source, and not collect the files from several servers (which might be down or unreachable or ...). this bug should be either wishlist and ignored or marked grave IMO. andreas Jens I think this needs a thorough discussion here, too, that´s Jens why I forward it here. Well, let's just do it! I see no problem with making such a directory for final hamm. Ben -- Brought to you by the letters J and O and the number 6. We are the music makers. And we are the dreamers of dreams. -- Willy Wonka Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/ I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]