Cosing ITA bugs when you've changed your mind.
reopen 180993 ! thanks Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote: I've never agreed to leave phpgroupware to any maintainer, and i'm now back and actively working on my package, so I'm closing this report. You have RFA'd phpgroupware and I've ITA'd it. Waiting until the ugly work (i.e. the security update to stable) is getting done by others and then popping back out of your hole to say April fools is not acceptable. Your maintainance of phpGroupWare has been limited to yelling at people wanting to finally do something about the embarrassingly poor state of Debian packages, and it's time to let that go. [0] (In private mail, one of the upstream developers who uses Debian told me that he would not use those debs, even if someone paid [him], I've been getting private mails form other users with the same bad experience with phpgroupware.) Maybe you are one of the examples on why the NM process isn't thorough (slow) enough at present. If you cannot incorporate a simple patch in BTS fixing RC bugs into your packages [1], how will you collaborate using alioth? Ever wondered why your appeals for cooperation have no response? Look at #164354. Have I ever received a response to my offer to help (along with patch) in #183896? No. Cheers T. 0. See http://bugs.debian.org/164354 http://bugs.debian.org/phpgroupware (esp. #183896) http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2003/debian-mentors-200306/msg00049.html 1. http://bugs.debian.org/183896 pgpnaYhg62CMw.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Cosing ITA bugs when you've changed your mind.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:27:06AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: You have RFA'd phpgroupware and I've ITA'd it. Waiting until the ugly work (i.e. the security update to stable) is getting done by others and then popping back out of your hole to say April fools is not acceptable. Your maintainance of phpGroupWare has been limited to yelling at people wanting to finally do something about the embarrassingly poor state of Debian packages, and it's time to let that go. [0] (In private mail, one of the upstream developers who uses Debian told me that he would not use those debs, even if someone paid [him], I've been getting private mails form other users with the same bad experience with phpgroupware.) Maybe you are one of the examples on why the NM process isn't thorough (slow) enough at present. Your ideas of hindering people contributing is a non-sense i've already told you. There is no benefit in this for anyone. We have never discussed about your adoption of phpgroupware, so i don't see why you felt free to adopt it. I've already told you, and i'm writing it publically, that an infrastructure to cooperate is up in place and i've already told you i would have let you contribute beside your almost intent to hijack. I wrote it publically in _many_ ways i wanted people to help me, but the only answares i got was to take over the packges (and many fake intent to contribute). This really make me sick. If you cannot incorporate a simple patch in BTS fixing RC bugs into your packages [1], how will you collaborate using alioth? I would let people apply their patch to the cvs directly being able to catch diffs and reviewing work and seeing people really contribute. Ever wondered why your appeals for cooperation have no response? Look at #164354. Have I ever received a response to my offer to help (along with patch) in #183896? No. You still do not understand what is being busy might mean (apart the fact that you patch didn't provide a real solution to the bug). I don't know how to demonstrate any more that your opinon about me are faulty. I supposed my self to be the last person who would not let people work with me. I'm still here saying that i'll be happy to cooperate and let you in, but i'm wandering if i'm doing the right thing. ciao, -- Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy''. | something in common: they local LANG=[EMAIL PROTECTED] | don't depend on the language. pgpSwDLH1yhE5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Cosing ITA bugs when you've changed your mind.
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:27:06AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: You have RFA'd phpgroupware and I've ITA'd it. Waiting until the ugly work (i.e. the security update to stable) is getting done by others and then popping back out of your hole to say April fools is not acceptable. Your maintainance of phpGroupWare has been limited to yelling at people wanting to finally do something about the embarrassingly poor state of Debian packages, and it's time to let that go. [0] (In private mail, one of the upstream developers who uses Debian told me that he would not use those debs, even if someone paid [him], I've been getting private mails form other users with the same bad experience with phpgroupware.) Maybe you are one of the examples on why the NM process isn't thorough (slow) enough at present. Your ideas of hindering people contributing is a non-sense i've already told you. There is no benefit in this for anyone. We have never discussed about your adoption of phpgroupware, so i don't see why you felt free to adopt it. I've already told you, and i'm writing it publically, that an infrastructure to cooperate is up in place and i've already told you i would have let you contribute beside your almost intent to hijack. I wrote it publically in _many_ ways i wanted people to help me, but the only answares i got was to take over the packges (and many fake intent to contribute). This really make me sick. Maybe he was confused and thought that you wanted someone to adopt phpgroupware because you'd filed a Request For Adoption on it? -- Keith
Re: Cosing ITA bugs when you've changed your mind.
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:27:06AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: Hmm. I guess I've somewhat misunderstood the RFA and your comments on it. Cheers T. pgpMzr4ymt2hX.pgp Description: PGP signature
