Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Obviously any patch that is automatically generated in this way is a > work based on A. The license of A permits to use "patch files" for > the purpose of modifying the sources of A at build time. However the > license of A doesn't explicitly permit us to use "patch files" or any > other work based on A for the purpose of modifying the sources of > another program, in our case B.
If the license forbids the use of modified code in other works, then it's plainly not a free license. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
