Gradual mass bug filing for C++ transition / gcc-4.0 issues
I'm planning to start making sure every package which fails to build with the current toolchain has an RC bug submitted against it. In most cases, this should simply involve setting Andreas Jochens' already existing bugs to serious, although I'll confirm each before doing this. Exceptions will include: - Packages waiting on other packages to transition. - Failures clearly due to glibc issues (e.g. invalid lvalue errors caused by rpc/xdr.h). I might also do NMU's for some of the more important packages, with a delay of 2 days, or 5 days minus the time since the last dependent package transitioned, whichever is longer. Right now I have my eyes on jade/opensp/openjade, and possibly db*. By the way, any estimates on how long it will be before we get a glibc upload correcting the problems mentioned above? -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gradual mass bug filing for C++ transition / gcc-4.0 issues
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 11:00:08AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: package transitioned, whichever is longer. Right now I have my eyes on jade/opensp/openjade, and possibly db*. I have already NMUed opensp, but it is still in incoming because of the new libosp4c2 package. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gradual mass bug filing for C++ transition / gcc-4.0 issues
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 11:00:08AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: package transitioned, whichever is longer. Right now I have my eyes on jade/opensp/openjade, and possibly db*. I have already NMUed opensp, but it is still in incoming because of the new libosp4c2 package. All right, I guess I should have checked that first. Anyway, jade is now in DELAYED/2-day/. -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gradual mass bug filing for C++ transition / gcc-4.0 issues
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 11:00 -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: I might also do NMU's for some of the more important packages, with a delay of 2 days, or 5 days minus the time since the last dependent package transitioned, whichever is longer. Right now I have my eyes on jade/opensp/openjade, and possibly db*. I am currently working on getting Bradley Bell's C++ packages transitioned. These include[1] the following: gconfmm*, glademm*, glibmm*, gnome-vfsmm*, gnomemm*, gtkmm* and several other *mm* libs. On some I am waiting for the dependencies. But please contact Bradley and me if you intend to NMU any of these. Kind regards, Philipp Kern Debian Developer [1] The complete list: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=btb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
