Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org wrote: Shoot, I didn't add that, Moritz did. Ah, woops. Which one should we actually use? OngoingTransitions IMO (perhaps it could be renamed too). BTW, found this page too: http://wiki.debian.org/GTK%2B_1.2_leftovers OK, I have created a new page at: http://wiki.debian.org/Gtk1.2ImlibGnome1Removals and linked it to the OngoingTransitions page. Please feel free to update/fix, etc (especially the layout, I'm not happy with). Thanks! Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
Am Mittwoch, den 17.12.2008, 12:03 -0500 schrieb Barry deFreese: Hi folks, Just in case anyone cares/is interested, here is some work I have been doing on packages using Gtk1.2, Imlib, gnome-libs, or any combination thereof. Obviously some packages fall within more than one rdepend/rbdepend. gnome-libs: bluefish Actually built with gtk2 but still build-deps on gnome-bin?? (pinged maintainer). Just a suggests, can probably be removed. It does *not* build-depend on gnome-bin and I already told you this (you simply did not answer). Where do you see this build-dependency? Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
Daniel Leidert daniel.leidert.s...@gmx.net (19/12/2008): bluefish Actually built with gtk2 but still build-deps on gnome-bin?? (pinged maintainer). Just a suggests, can probably be removed. It does *not* build-depend on gnome-bin and I already told you this (you simply did not answer). Where do you see this build-dependency? He probably meant “depends”. Which would be consistent with the “just a suggests:” bits. And for those following at home: | cy...@talisker:~$ apt-cache show bluefish|grep bin | Suggests: galeon | iceape | iceweasel | www-browser, gnome-bin, weblint-perl | weblint, libxml2-utils, php5-cli, tidy Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
On Friday 19 December 2008 21:07:09 Daniel Leidert wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 17.12.2008, 12:03 -0500 schrieb Barry deFreese: Hi folks, Just in case anyone cares/is interested, here is some work I have been doing on packages using Gtk1.2, Imlib, gnome-libs, or any combination thereof. Obviously some packages fall within more than one rdepend/rbdepend. gnome-libs: bluefish Actually built with gtk2 but still build-deps on gnome-bin?? (pinged maintainer). Just a suggests, can probably be removed. It does *not* build-depend on gnome-bin and I already told you this (you simply did not answer). Where do you see this build-dependency? Ok, genuine mistakes happen, gnome-bin is found in Suggests, hence could be easily removed from there = no harm done ;-) I think he did a pretty good job compiling such a list, and I wonder if Alternatives: field would also be helpful for hopeless packages or it would just clutter the data ? -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
Daniel Leidert wrote: It does *not* build-depend on gnome-bin and I already told you this (you simply did not answer). Where do you see this build-dependency? Regards, Daniel Daniel, Sorry about that, I keep going through so many of these, I keep mixing up build-deps/deps in my syntax. But I did have Just a suggests, can probably be removed. in there. Thanks, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org wrote: OK, I have created a new page at: http://wiki.debian.org/Gtk1.2ImlibGnome1Removals and linked it to the OngoingTransitions page. Would it be a good idea to file bugs against all packages depending on the gnome1/gtk1/imlib1 stack? With user debian...@l.d.o (or debian-rele...@l.d.o) and usertag gtk1-removal. This would be a good way to get an overview of the current status of the removal I think. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
Barry deFreese wrote: Just in case anyone cares/is interested, here is some work I have been doing on packages using Gtk1.2, Imlib, gnome-libs, or any combination thereof. Thanks. Could you fold this into a page on wiki.debian.org, so that people can add their specific solution attempts or actions? Such a useful list will likely be lost in the noise in some weeks and through a wiki it can be updated more easily. Actually, it would be nice if we had a decicated cleanups/transitions overview page on wiki.debian.org as a central starting point for people who want to help out. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:40 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote: Actually, it would be nice if we had a decicated cleanups/transitions overview page on wiki.debian.org as a central starting point for people who want to help out. This is the old one: http://wiki.debian.org/OngoingTransitions This is the one that Barry added: http://wiki.debian.org/Transitions -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:40 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote: Actually, it would be nice if we had a decicated cleanups/transitions overview page on wiki.debian.org as a central starting point for people who want to help out. This is the old one: http://wiki.debian.org/OngoingTransitions This is the one that Barry added: http://wiki.debian.org/Transitions Shoot, I didn't add that, Moritz did. I didn't see the other one when I was poking around wiki.d.o today though. Which one should we actually use? Sorry, Barry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org wrote: Shoot, I didn't add that, Moritz did. Ah, woops. Which one should we actually use? OngoingTransitions IMO (perhaps it could be renamed too). BTW, found this page too: http://wiki.debian.org/GTK%2B_1.2_leftovers -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org wrote: Shoot, I didn't add that, Moritz did. Ah, woops. Which one should we actually use? OngoingTransitions IMO (perhaps it could be renamed too). BTW, found this page too: http://wiki.debian.org/GTK%2B_1.2_leftover Yeah, I just found that too thanks. It's a bit cluttered though. Barry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
Hi folks, Just in case anyone cares/is interested, here is some work I have been doing on packages using Gtk1.2, Imlib, gnome-libs, or any combination thereof. Obviously some packages fall within more than one rdepend/rbdepend. gnome-libs: bluefish Actually built with gtk2 but still build-deps on gnome-bin?? (pinged maintainer). Just a suggests, can probably be removed. mrwtoppm GTK2 app but still build-depends on libart-dev. NMU'd removing build-dep on libart-dev and gdk-pixbuf-dev. ogle-gui GTK2 app but still build-depends on libart-dev. NMU'd removing build-dep on libart-dev. swftools Build depends on libart-2.0-dev | libart-dev digitaldj Will need ported or removed. gwc False positive? slmon Build-depends on libgnome-dev. Will need ported or removed. Upstream inactive since 2004. synce-trayicon New in Lenny. Unneeded build-dep on libgnome-dev? Bug Filed. xpuyopuyo Needs ported or removed. soundtracker Supposedly upstream is working on it gnome-lokkit PROP_RM Filed. gfslicer Started working on a patch but is it worth keeping? gbib Will need ported or removed. Upstream has a newer release candidate but still not gtk2. gnomekiss Games team package. Uploaded new release without libgtkhtml-dev. gsnes9x Should probaby just be RM'd. snes9express seems a replacement that is gtk2.0. directory-administrator PROP_RM filed by Frank. powershell E-mailed maintainer about removal. gtkgo PROP_RM bug filed gtkfontsel Orphaned but a fairly significant popcon. I can't find new upstream source. Could probably be ported or RM:d. gtkglarea Orphaned (now new maintainer) and I can't find any upstream source yet but has a few r(b)depends. gtkglarea5: celestia New in Lenny vertex RM: Filed. xt Needs ported or removed. worlded Needs ported or removed. Upstream seems inactive since 2003. (Pretty low popcon). python-visual Needs ported or removed. There is a new upstream beta 5.0, not sure if it requires gtkglarea. imlib: chinput Hasn't seen an upload since 2006. Needs transition to imlib2. Can't find upstream source. e16menuedit e16menuedit2 a gtk2.0 replacement? gkrellm Bug filed to remove unneeded build-dep on gdk-imlib1-dev gkrellmitime Bug filed to remove unneeded build-dep on gdk-imlib1-dev. gretl Unnecessary build-dep? Maintainer is uploading new version without build-dep. qtpixmap Binary gtk-engines-qtpixmap uses gdk-imlib11 sylpheed-gtk1 PROP_RM filed. RM: filed by maintainer. gkrellm-snmp NMU'd removing unneeded imlib build-dep gkrellweather NMU removing unneeded imlib build-dep. icewm Ugh kdegraphics 4.x version in experimental doesn't use imblib11 libgtkimreg Another one for Andreas Tille (Mailed Andreas for thoughts). Started on porting. mgp Not well maintained. Newer upstream but still not imlib2. (Can be built without imlib though). paul Another one for Andreas Tille (Mailed Andreas for thoughts). Started on porting. pixelize PROP_RM filed qiv E-mailed Bart Martens for opinion. Replied, now have e-mailed upstream to see if they are doing any porting work. qvwm PROP_RM filed wallp RM: Filed. xteddy E-mail Andreas Tille (taken over upstream). Sent partial patch. Still needs some work. Peter De Wacther fixed up patch. ygraph Gtk1.2 and imlib. Will need ported or removed. netdude ITA'd. There is a new upstream available. I've pinged the ITAer to see if the new upstream is GTK 2.0. sqlrelay Some of the binaries have decent popcons. We could probably either port sqlrelay-config-gtk or just remove that binary for now. Thanks, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Barry deFreese wrote: sqlrelay Some of the binaries have decent popcons. We could probably either port sqlrelay-config-gtk or just remove that binary for now. I'd also strongly vote for only droping this specific binary in case this would be a Gtk 1.2 removal blocker but keeping sqlrelay in any case. It works perfectly without the config-gtk thingy . Thanks for your investigation and patches Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org wrote: Just in case anyone cares/is interested, here is some work I have been doing on packages using Gtk1.2, Imlib, gnome-libs, or any combination thereof. The playdv binary from libdv-bin can be dropped until it is ported to GTK+ 2, bug filed upstream: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1925173group_id=4393atid=354393 PS: cult?? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
