Re: I2O specs mailed to webmaster

1998-10-12 Thread Gregory S. Stark 

Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 it was mailed from a dummy hotmail account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), and the
 originating IP was from an ISP in Norway.

On the off chance that the original sender is reading this, or looking at the
e-mail archive: Hotmail is not an anonymous mailing system, and makes no
pretense of such. They will happily hand over records if needed.

If you want to send something anonymously I suggest using the cypherpunk PGP
remailers. Of course there's no reason not to combine that with sending from
hotmail or something like that, but don't count on a system like hotmail for
your anonymity.

greg

Re: I2O specs mailed to webmaster

1998-10-12 Thread Thomas Lakofski 
On 12 Oct 1998, Gregory S. Stark wrote:

 On the off chance that the original sender is reading this, or looking at the
 e-mail archive: Hotmail is not an anonymous mailing system, and makes no
 pretense of such. They will happily hand over records if needed.

Equally the information you supply to hotmail can be complete garbage and
you can access their servers via an anonymizing proxy.

-thomas

I2O specs mailed to webmaster

1998-10-08 Thread treacy 
Version 2.0a of the I2O spec (dated 3 Feb 1998) has been sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this the same version that was made available
before?

Jay Treacy

Re: I2O specs mailed to webmaster

1998-10-08 Thread David Welton 
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 05:18:01PM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote:
 Version 2.0a of the I2O spec (dated 3 Feb 1998) has been sent to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this the same version that was made available
 before?

Did it come from anyplace interesting, out of curiousity?

Ciao,
-- 
David Welton  http://www.efn.org/~davidw 

Debian GNU/Linux - www.debian.org

Re: I2O specs mailed to webmaster

1998-10-08 Thread Craig Sanders 
On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, David Welton wrote:

 On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 05:18:01PM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote:
  Version 2.0a of the I2O spec (dated 3 Feb 1998) has been sent to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this the same version that was made available
  before?

no, that was version 1.5.

 Did it come from anyplace interesting, out of curiousity?

it was mailed from a dummy hotmail account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), and the
originating IP was from an ISP in Norway.

it contained the following message, along with .pdf files for version 2 of
the spec.

   I am sending the latest spec. on I2O.
   I belive this psec should be open.
   
   This is part #1 due to max. 1000k attachment using hot-mail.
   
   
   Best regards
   Free software lowers


looks like good intentions, legally questionable, and bad spelling :-)

craig

--
craig sanders

Re: I2O specs mailed to webmaster

1998-10-08 Thread Ben Pfaff 
[EMAIL PROTECTED](James A. Treacy) writes:

   Version 2.0a of the I2O spec (dated 3 Feb 1998) has been sent to
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this the same version that was made available
   before?

No, that was version 1.5, at least according to the filename.  The
date of download I have is 3 March 1997.