Re: ITO several packages
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 01:35:39AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > * Sebastien J. Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-14 00:08]: > > AFAIK cvs-conf had been odopted. > > He told me in private mail that he doesn't have the time for it. Ok due to its unconformity to many standards you can remove it too. -- Sebastien J. Gross| Debian GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]| http://www.debian.org GPG: 1024g/AF0DDC9A AB35 1FFB 1268 56C0 452B 302E 2A25 8421 53BB A490
Re: ITO several packages
* Sebastien J. Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-14 00:08]: > AFAIK cvs-conf had been odopted. He told me in private mail that he doesn't have the time for it. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ITO several packages
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:20:06PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > * Sebastien J. Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-22 22:08]: > > I would like to orphan some packages that I can't maintain any longer > > due to a lack of time or some which are obsolete today. > > > > cvs-conf > > cwwm > > jpegoptim > > libfork-perl > > metalog > > pip > > These packages still don't have a new maintainer. Sebastien, which > packages are "obsolete today"? I'll get those removes and properly > orphan the rest. AFAIK cvs-conf had been odopted. Other ones are not used by any package. Thus you can saftly remove them. -- Sebastien J. Gross| Debian GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]| http://www.debian.org GPG: 1024g/AF0DDC9A AB35 1FFB 1268 56C0 452B 302E 2A25 8421 53BB A490
Re: ITO several packages
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:20:06PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > cvs-conf > > cwwm > > jpegoptim > > libfork-perl > > metalog > > pip > > These packages still don't have a new maintainer. Sebastien, which > packages are "obsolete today"? I'll get those removes and properly > orphan the rest. If someone want to sponsor me (I'm not DD) I'd like to take metalog.
Re: ITO several packages
* Jeremy T. Bouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-22 17:35]: > I'll take a look at cvs-conf and see if it's something I would > actually use as I've considered doing something with configurations in > CVS recently for both work and home and this sounds like it might be a > solution... If someone else is already using it and wants it I'll let it > be otherwise after I have a chance to look at it I'll get back > privately... What happend to those plans? -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ITO several packages
* Sebastien J. Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-22 22:08]: > I would like to orphan some packages that I can't maintain any longer > due to a lack of time or some which are obsolete today. > > cvs-conf > cwwm > jpegoptim > libfork-perl > metalog > pip These packages still don't have a new maintainer. Sebastien, which packages are "obsolete today"? I'll get those removes and properly orphan the rest. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
