Re: Intent to package : xmem
I'm pretty sure xmem was in procps or xproc at one point, and got dropped because it wasn't being maintained upstream, or something like that...
Re: Intent to package : xmem
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 02:01:09PM -0600, David Welton wrote: I think it's kind of silly that we no have this more or less 'elementary' X package, so I'm offering to package it. Is it generated from the X sources (in which case, maybe I'll just limit myself to pestering Branden:-), or proc, or is it its own thing? As far as I know, there aren't any X clients in the X sources that I don't ship (with the exception of xdmshell). -- G. Branden Robinson | If you make people think they're Debian GNU/Linux | thinking, they'll love you; [EMAIL PROTECTED] | but if you really make them think, cartoon.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ | they'll hate you. pgpkuEFKyHgk0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Intent to package : xmem
I think it's kind of silly that we no have this more or less 'elementary' X package, so I'm offering to package it. Is it generated from the X sources (in which case, maybe I'll just limit myself to pestering Branden:-), or proc, or is it its own thing? Thanks, -- David Welton http://www.efn.org/~davidw Debian GNU/Linux - www.debian.org
Re: Intent to package : xmem
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 02:01:09PM -0600, David Welton wrote: I think it's kind of silly that we no have this more or less ^ longer Sorry...:-/ -- David Welton http://www.efn.org/~davidw Debian GNU/Linux - www.debian.org
