Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
Hi, On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:56:49PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > The release team is pleased to announce that Debian 8.0 "Jessie" is frozen. > Further updates to this release will be restricted to bug fixes only. ... I thought usually this type of announcement comes with next release name. I was going to update web site (later) and debian-reference package (in November) in proper timing. Did I miss some announcement? (Too many init discussion posts ) Regards, Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141108170656.GA22843@goofy.local
Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
It would be useful to know it : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766283 Regards El 08/11/2014 18:07, "Osamu Aoki" escribió: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:56:49PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > The release team is pleased to announce that Debian 8.0 "Jessie" is > frozen. > > Further updates to this release will be restricted to bug fixes only. > ... > > I thought usually this type of announcement comes with next release > name. > > I was going to update web site (later) and debian-reference package (in > November) in proper timing. Did I miss some announcement? > (Too many init discussion posts ) > > Regards, > > Osamu > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141108170656.GA22843@goofy.local > >
Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
Hi, the next release will be named Debian Zurg[*]. [*] soon to be announced, I'm sure. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 06:13:31PM +0100, Javier Barroso wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:56:49PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > The release team is pleased to announce that Debian 8.0 "Jessie" is > > > frozen. > > > I thought usually this type of announcement comes with next release > > name. > > > > I was going to update web site (later) and debian-reference package (in > > November) in proper timing. Did I miss some announcement? > > (Too many init discussion posts ) > > It would be useful to know it : > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766283 To prevent such problems in the future, what about choosing the names for both zurg and zurg+1? This way, the codename for zurg+1 would be known during the whole zurg development cycle. -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory prices. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141108180005.ga15...@angband.pl
Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
On 2014-11-08 18:06, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:56:49PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> The release team is pleased to announce that Debian 8.0 "Jessie" is frozen. >> Further updates to this release will be restricted to bug fixes only. > ... > > I thought usually this type of announcement comes with next release > name. > > I was going to update web site (later) and debian-reference package (in > November) in proper timing. Did I miss some announcement? > (Too many init discussion posts ) > > Regards, > > Osamu > > The release name of Jessie+1 will be announced tomorrow morning (09:15-10:15 UTC) at the Release update at the Cambridge mini-DebConf. ~Niels signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
On 08/11/14 19:00, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 06:13:31PM +0100, Javier Barroso wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:56:49PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: The release team is pleased to announce that Debian 8.0 "Jessie" is frozen. >> >>> I thought usually this type of announcement comes with next release >>> name. >>> >>> I was going to update web site (later) and debian-reference package (in >>> November) in proper timing. Did I miss some announcement? >>> (Too many init discussion posts ) >> >> It would be useful to know it : >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766283 > > To prevent such problems in the future, what about choosing the names for > both zurg and zurg+1? This way, the codename for zurg+1 would be known > during the whole zurg development cycle. In this approach, for consistency, (zurg+1)+1=zurg+2 must also be given, and so forth: so from now to the end of the time, the all codename sequence must be given. Giving (+1) before the freeze of sounds more realistic. Jerome > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/545e64f1.80...@rezozer.net
Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 07:46:09PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > On 08/11/14 19:00, Adam Borowski wrote: > > To prevent such problems in the future, what about choosing the names for > > both zurg and zurg+1? This way, the codename for zurg+1 would be known > > during the whole zurg development cycle. > > In this approach, for consistency, (zurg+1)+1=zurg+2 must also be given, and > so forth: > so from now to the end of the time, the all codename sequence must be given. > Giving (+1) before the freeze of sounds more realistic. There's no no-negligible development nor plans for testing+2, so knowing the name of just testing+1 is enough. What I'm arguing for here, though, is knowing testing+1 no later than the time of testing-1's release. Testing-1's freeze is on the other hand the earliest boundary when this makes sense (if we include experimental as a part of zurg's cycle). I proposed naming zurg+1 right now because we're right on this earliest boundary, and the release team happens to be physically in one place. In the long run, moving the naming ceremony from freeze to release would probably be best. -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory prices. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141108200431.ga7...@angband.pl
Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
Hi, On Samstag, 8. November 2014, Niels Thykier wrote: > The release name of Jessie+1 will be announced tomorrow morning > (09:15-10:15 UTC) at the Release update at the Cambridge mini-DebConf. that's not quite sure yet, it depends whether you'll oversleep or not! ;-) cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
On 08/11/14 21:04, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 07:46:09PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> On 08/11/14 19:00, Adam Borowski wrote: >>> To prevent such problems in the future, what about choosing the names for >>> both zurg and zurg+1? This way, the codename for zurg+1 would be known >>> during the whole zurg development cycle. >> >> In this approach, for consistency, (zurg+1)+1=zurg+2 must also be given, and >> so forth: >> so from now to the end of the time, the all codename sequence must be given. >> Giving (+1) before the freeze of sounds more realistic. > > There's no no-negligible development nor plans for testing+2, so knowing > the name of just testing+1 is enough. I am absolutely agree. My point was that the assertion `` choosing the names for both zurg and zurg+1 '' builds an infinite sequence of codenames. This is math. What I'm arguing for here, though, is > knowing testing+1 no later than the time of testing-1's release. > > Testing-1's freeze is on the other hand the earliest boundary when this > makes sense (if we include experimental as a part of zurg's cycle). I > proposed naming zurg+1 right now because we're right on this earliest > boundary, and the release team happens to be physically in one place. > > In the long run, moving the naming ceremony from freeze to release would > probably be best. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/545e8e2b.4080...@rezozer.net
Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 07:00:07PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 06:13:31PM +0100, Javier Barroso wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:56:49PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > > The release team is pleased to announce that Debian 8.0 "Jessie" is > > > > frozen. > > > > > I thought usually this type of announcement comes with next release > > > name. > > > > > > I was going to update web site (later) and debian-reference package (in > > > November) in proper timing. Did I miss some announcement? > > > (Too many init discussion posts ) > > > > It would be useful to know it : > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766283 > > To prevent such problems in the future, what about choosing the names for > both zurg and zurg+1? This way, the codename for zurg+1 would be known > during the whole zurg development cycle. This did occur to us, yes. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141108215304.ga2...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net
Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
Hi, Osamu Aoki: > I thought usually this type of announcement comes with next release > name. > > I was going to update web site (later) and debian-reference package (in > November) in proper timing. Did I miss some announcement? > See the debian-devel archives from mid-Fenruary 2014. According to Neil McGovern, the code name shall be "zurg". >>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/02/msg00905.html While that was in no way official, at the time it kindof struck a chord, so I'd like us to just go with it. After all the init/GR/what-have-you brouhaha, we can do with some levity. :-) -- -- Matthias Urlichs signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
On 2014-11-09 9:23, Matthias Urlichs wrote: See the debian-devel archives from mid-Fenruary 2014. According to Neil McGovern, the code name shall be "zurg". https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/02/msg00905.html While that was in no way official, at the time it kindof struck a chord, so I'd like us to just go with it. I'm afraid you're going to be disappointed; see d-d-a earlier today. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/578f9520761220405657ac58d0b14...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
On 9 November 2014 18:36, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2014-11-09 9:23, Matthias Urlichs wrote: >> >> See the debian-devel archives from mid-Fenruary 2014. According to Neil >> McGovern, the code name shall be "zurg". >> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/02/msg00905.html >> >> >> While that was in no way official, at the time it kindof struck a chord, >> so I'd like us to just go with it. > > > I'm afraid you're going to be disappointed; see d-d-a earlier today. > i am disappoint. =( will second the motion on debian-vote to go for zurg. stretch simply does not have the same ring to it / doesn't sound as cool. (although calling the release stretch, right after squeeze would have been funny) (and buster is an awesome one) -- Regards, Dimitri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/canbhluhih9dnoregqqn3nmeckzqadcsyq4lchgrwi0bu6vx...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
On 10.11.2014 10:55, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > i am disappoint. =( will second the motion on debian-vote to go for zurg. There is a ongoing GR proposal waiting for seconds, see https://lists.debian.org/debian-curiosa/2014/11/msg3.html which I fully support! -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
Hi, Arno Töll: > On 10.11.2014 10:55, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > i am disappoint. =( will second the motion on debian-vote to go for zurg. > > There is a ongoing GR proposal waiting for seconds, see > https://lists.debian.org/debian-curiosa/2014/11/msg3.html which I > fully support! > Don't we all love people playing games with our mailing lists. >> To: debian-vote So it's not been formally posted to -vote AFAICT. On the other hand, we desperately need some levity there, so … Jakub, please do. FWIW: seconded. -- -- Matthias Urlichs signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
Hi, On Montag, 10. November 2014, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Don't we all love people playing games with our mailing lists. no. > >> To: debian-vote > So it's not been formally posted to -vote AFAICT. On the other hand, we > desperately need some levity there, so … Jakub, please do. > FWIW: seconded. can you please keep this to -curiosa where it belongs? cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 10:23:01AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, > > Osamu Aoki: > > I thought usually this type of announcement comes with next release > > name. > > > > I was going to update web site (later) and debian-reference package (in > > November) in proper timing. Did I miss some announcement? > > > See the debian-devel archives from mid-Fenruary 2014. According to Neil > McGovern, the code name shall be "zurg". > > >>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/02/msg00905.html > > While that was in no way official, at the time it kindof struck a chord, > so I'd like us to just go with it. > > After all the init/GR/what-have-you brouhaha, we can do with some levity. :-) > Also, please see the footnote in my mail above. Neil -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)
Hi, Neil McGovern: > Also, please see the footnote in my mail above. > Indeed. Some lies become truths if repeated often enough. This one, apparently, was not. Too bad, really. But no matter. Zurg's time will come. :-P -- -- Matthias Urlichs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141110193013.gb23...@smurf.noris.de
