Re: More DDTP problems
> "daniel" == Daniel Macêdo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> 1. http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/ddtp/, >> svn://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/ >> svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/ daniel> I tried access now but the server is not available :( daniel> [...] I hope it come back soon. >> What you all think about it? daniel> I aggree with this metodology. Let's wait the opinion by daniel> others. Perfect. daniel> Thanks by your iniciative! You're welcome. -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio - "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house."
Re: More DDTP problems
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Daniel [ISO-8859-1] Macêdo Batista wrote: 1. http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/ddtp/, svn://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/ svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/ I tried access now but the server is not available :( [...] ... it seems to be the case since about 1 hour. :-( And even before I did not got any mail about my commits this morning ... Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: More DDTP problems
Em 27/4/2005, "Otavio Salvador" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: >Hello folks, Hi Otavio! > >Like I proposed, I converted all CVS repository to Subversion[1]. > >1. http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/ddtp/, > svn://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/ > svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/ I tried access now but the server is not available :( [...] >We really need to discuss how we will do the checking. One possible >approuch could be use a derivation of how the kernel patches are now >checked. I'll explain my proposal bellow: > > In each file we start to check, we add a footer commented (for > example in C code): > > /* > Checking: otavio; Started in: 2005-04-27 > */ > > After we finished to check the code and have sure it doesn't have > malicious code inside, we change it to: > > /* > Sign-Off: otavio; Finished in: 2005-04-27 > */ > > We should have, at last, two Signs to move the file to trunk. All > this can be done by scripting (only the checking itself by a human) > and looks fine to me. > > What you all think about it? I aggree with this metodology. Let's wait the opinion by others. Thanks by your iniciative! > >-- >O T A V I OS A L V A D O R >- > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 > GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 > Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio >- >"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives > you the whole house." > > >-- >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: More DDTP problems
Hello folks, Like I proposed, I converted all CVS repository to Subversion[1]. 1. http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/ddtp/, svn://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/ svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/ Current layout of the repository is: - branches/ . a/ included on original source. We need to decide what to do with it; . unchecked/ branch with the last code available. This will be where we will do the check and copy the file to trunk/ - tags/ . b/ included on original source. We need to decide what to do with it; - trunk/ currently empty since we don't have any code checked. We really need to discuss how we will do the checking. One possible approuch could be use a derivation of how the kernel patches are now checked. I'll explain my proposal bellow: In each file we start to check, we add a footer commented (for example in C code): /* Checking: otavio; Started in: 2005-04-27 */ After we finished to check the code and have sure it doesn't have malicious code inside, we change it to: /* Sign-Off: otavio; Finished in: 2005-04-27 */ We should have, at last, two Signs to move the file to trunk. All this can be done by scripting (only the checking itself by a human) and looks fine to me. What you all think about it? -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio - "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More DDTP problems
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: I think is best move all there, convert to subversion, and then we oh no. It is CVS now, and we should'nt move it to something different for now. Another one might like arch more, even an otherone might like to use even another version control system. I prefer to use the method Jeroen suggested. BTW, I'm absolutely not religious about source control systems and I would see it like you. But I can assure you that Ottavio did a transition of another project which just left a single thing for me to remember: Just use "svn" instead of "cvs". If he offers to do the work and sees some advantages you can just trust him. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More DDTP problems
Hi Otavio, On Tuesday, 19 Apr 2005, you wrote: > > I think is best move all there, convert to subversion, and then we oh no. It is CVS now, and we should'nt move it to something different for now. Another one might like arch more, even an otherone might like to use even another version control system. I prefer to use the method Jeroen suggested. > start to look file by file. To "Sign" a file, we can commit > another fine and then we write a small script to check against it. I set mail-follow-up to -i18n so lets discuss there further. Greetings Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More DDTP problems
> "martin" == Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: martin> Hi all, martin> On Monday, 04 Apr 2005, you wrote: >> On Apr 4, 2005 4:04 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > I am currently on that (started last weekend). Jeroen sent me >> the CVS > tarball. I hoped to finished it at the weekend but >> it's more than > expected and i did not yet understand all >> code. >> > >> > Perhaps it is also a good idea if some more people could go >> over the > code, as many eyes see more than two eyes do. >> >> We've been talking about this with other people involved and I >> even asked Michael Bramer independently (hadn't seen your >> message). It would be a great thing if DDTP code could be put >> in alioth, so that all of us who want to make it better have >> access to it. >> >> Michael said it was ok with him. Could you start the alioth >> project with the code Jeroen sent you? martin> sorry for beeing a little bit quite last week. I was on martin> vacation and had some personal things to do. martin> I registered a alioth project today, which hopefully will martin> be aprooved soon. I also CCed grisu in this mail, perhaps martin> he can also give us some helping hands with the DDTP. martin> So how do we want to proceed further? I think a good idea martin> might be as soon as we have the alioth project to upload martin> the tar.gz Jeroen send me. Then every file which has been martin> checked for trojanisation (and is negative) could be martin> checked in individualy into the CVS. martin> Or should we have branch the CVS? This way we might be martin> able to restore old CVS log messages. I think is best move all there, convert to subversion, and then we start to look file by file. To "Sign" a file, we can commit another fine and then we write a small script to check against it. -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio - "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More DDTP problems
Hi all, On Tuesday, 19 Apr 2005, I wrote: > I registered a alioth project today, which hopefully will be aprooved > soon. FYI project approoved. https://alioth.debian.org/projects/ddtp/ is our friend. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More DDTP problems
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:51:41PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > So how do we want to proceed further? I think a good idea might be as > soon as we have the alioth project to upload the tar.gz Jeroen send me. > Then every file which has been checked for trojanisation (and is > negative) could be checked in individualy into the CVS. You can just move the ,v files that are checked in place, so you retain the history. You'll have shell access to /cvsroot/ddtp on alioth to perform that task once the project is made and the cvs repository initialized. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More DDTP problems
Hi all, On Monday, 04 Apr 2005, you wrote: > On Apr 4, 2005 4:04 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am currently on that (started last weekend). Jeroen sent me the CVS > > tarball. I hoped to finished it at the weekend but it's more than > > expected and i did not yet understand all code. > > > > Perhaps it is also a good idea if some more people could go over the > > code, as many eyes see more than two eyes do. > > We've been talking about this with other people involved and I even > asked Michael Bramer independently (hadn't seen your message). It > would be a great thing if DDTP code could be put in alioth, so that > all of us who want to make it better have access to it. > > Michael said it was ok with him. Could you start the alioth project > with the code Jeroen sent you? sorry for beeing a little bit quite last week. I was on vacation and had some personal things to do. I registered a alioth project today, which hopefully will be aprooved soon. I also CCed grisu in this mail, perhaps he can also give us some helping hands with the DDTP. So how do we want to proceed further? I think a good idea might be as soon as we have the alioth project to upload the tar.gz Jeroen send me. Then every file which has been checked for trojanisation (and is negative) could be checked in individualy into the CVS. Or should we have branch the CVS? This way we might be able to restore old CVS log messages. Greetings Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More DDTP problems
|| On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:04:52 +0200 || Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: mz> I am currently on that (started last weekend). Jeroen sent me the CVS mz> tarball. I hoped to finished it at the weekend but it's more than mz> expected and i did not yet understand all code. mz> Perhaps it is also a good idea if some more people could go over the mz> code, as many eyes see more than two eyes do. I can help with it. How are you doing it currently? maybe a Alitoh project could be a better place to work together. -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio - "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More DDTP problems
On Apr 4, 2005 4:04 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am currently on that (started last weekend). Jeroen sent me the CVS > tarball. I hoped to finished it at the weekend but it's more than > expected and i did not yet understand all code. > > Perhaps it is also a good idea if some more people could go over the > code, as many eyes see more than two eyes do. We've been talking about this with other people involved and I even asked Michael Bramer independently (hadn't seen your message). It would be a great thing if DDTP code could be put in alioth, so that all of us who want to make it better have access to it. Michael said it was ok with him. Could you start the alioth project with the code Jeroen sent you? -- Besos, Marga -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More DDTP problems
Hi Martin, On Monday, 04 Apr 2005, you wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > The questions below were posted at long time in the DDTP-Coors list, but > > weren't replied :((( > > > > IMHO the ddts code needs a revision to correct bugs, I am wrong? This > > revision is possible? I can help. > > It needs a thorough source code review before it can be reactivated > again. I am currently on that (started last weekend). Jeroen sent me the CVS tarball. I hoped to finished it at the weekend but it's more than expected and i did not yet understand all code. Perhaps it is also a good idea if some more people could go over the code, as many eyes see more than two eyes do. Joey, would it be okay for you if i/we think that the code is okay, i/we send you a signed mail including the md5sum of every file? Or is the md5sum of the tarball enough? Greetings Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More DDTP problems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The questions below were posted at long time in the DDTP-Coors list, but > weren't replied :((( > > IMHO the ddts code needs a revision to correct bugs, I am wrong? This > revision is possible? I can help. It needs a thorough source code review before it can be reactivated again. Regards, Joey -- Ten years and still binary compatible. -- XFree86 Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More DDTP problems
The questions below were posted at long time in the DDTP-Coors list, but weren't replied :((( IMHO the ddts code needs a revision to correct bugs, I am wrong? This revision is possible? I can help. # Hi, there are questions made by me at long time but there are no answers :(. Could anybody replies? --- 1 I don't understand what's hapenning with the pt_BR description of the package apache2-mpm-prefork. The status of translation is: packageapache2-mpm-prefork md5sum affbcce10589b4575143937c01409d80 packageapache2-mpm-prefork translator reviewer 0 reviewer 1 reviewer 2 reviewed 000 But if I send an email with the SUBJECT "GET apache2-mpm-prefork pt_BR", the server replies: # package has already been sent to another translator, # in case you want to review it, please send a mail to the server # with subject: REVIEW apache2-mpm-prefork And, if I send an email with the SUBJECT "REVIEW apache2-mpm-prefork pt_BR", the server replies: ERROR: requested package (apache2-mpm-prefork) is not translated review apache2-mpm-prefork pt_BR Know anybody what is the problem and how to resolve? --- 2 there is some way to remove a reviwer from a description? I sent an email to ddts with the command: change data reviewer 0 "" I tried too: change data reviewer 0 '' but didn't work :( --- 3 I don't understand the informations below: list data ef398adbb0c8fcc3f4c7848adcd3768a md5sum ef398adbb0c8fcc3f4c7848adcd3768a package bugs 63358 translator [EMAIL PROTECTED] reviewer 0 Luis Flavio Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reviewer 1 Krishnamurti Lelis Lima Vieira Nunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reviewer 2 Tiago Saboga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reviewed 011 Description: The GNU Bourne Again SHell Bash is an sh-compatible command language interpreter that executes commands read from the standard input or from a file. Bash also incorporates useful features from the Korn and C shells (ksh and csh). . Bash is ultimately intended to be a conformant implementation of the IEEE Posix Shell and Tools specification (IEEE Working Group 1003.2). Description-pt_BR: ... data c53ad38dbe57dadfc23150b4f7af0260 md5sum c53ad38dbe57dadfc23150b4f7af0260 packagebash translator [EMAIL PROTECTED] reviewer 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] reviewer 1 Regis Fernandes Gontijo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reviewer 2 Fabio Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reviewed 001 Description: The GNU Bourne Again SHell Bash is an sh-compatible command language interpreter that executes commands read from the standard input or from a file. Bash also incorporates useful features from the Korn and C shells (ksh and csh). . Bash is ultimately intended to be a conformant implementation of the IEEE POSIX Shell and Tools specification (IEEE Working Group 1003.2). . Included in the bash package is the Programmable Completion Code, by Ian Macdonald. . Statically linked. Description-pt_BR: ... data 52dfe58c1d37394e71d1196084683052 md5sum 52dfe58c1d37394e71d1196084683052 package bugs 63025 63354 translator [EMAIL PROTECTED] reviewer 0 Luis Flavio Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reviewer 1 Krishnamurti Lelis Lima Vieira Nunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reviewer 2 Tiago Saboga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reviewed 001 Description: The GNU stdc++ library NOTE: This is not a final release, but taken from the CVS gcc-2_95-branch (dated 20010522). . This package contains an additional runtime library for C++ programs built with the GNU compiler. Description-pt_BR: ... data 2c261c1ebc9164110dfa1e231f40 md5sum 2c261c1ebc9164110dfa1e231f40 packagelibstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 bugs 63370 translator [EMAIL PROTECTED] reviewer 0 Luis Flavio Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reviewer 1 "Krishnamurti L. L. V. Nunes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reviewer 2 Tiago Saboga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reviewed 001 Description: The GNU stdc++ library NOTE: This is not a final release, but taken from the CVS gcc-2_95-branch (dated 2001-10-02). . This package contains an additional runtime library for C++ programs built with the GNU compiler. Description-pt_BR: ... data 33bee2a0f243491d5637625cbf72fcfe md5sum 33bee2a0f243491d5637625cbf72fcfe package bugs 62885 62892 translator [EMAIL PROTECTED] reviewer 0 Luis Flavio Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reviewer 1 "Krishnamurti L. L. V. Nunes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reviewer 2 Tiago Saboga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reviewed 010 Description: Kernel logging daemon The klogd daemon listens to kernel message sources and is responsible for prioritizing and processing operating system messages. The klogd daemon can run as a client of syslogd or optionally as a standalone program. Klogd can now be used to decod
