Re: Naming for OSSP projects in Debian (libraries, dirs)

2004-12-17 Thread Piotr Roszatycki
On Wednesday 15 of December 2004 21:05, you wrote:
 I saw that you also ITP a OSSP (www.ossp.org) project for Debian:
 OSSP uuid. I intent to do the same for OSSP sa. I'm using the sa
 library successful for a small application so my intention is
 make it public for others who intent to do the same too.

 I've done already a Debian package and intent to sync the future
 OSSP work with you. The problem I see with OSSP are the too simple
 names e.g. libsa or libuuid. The header files are also installed
 by default in /usr/include. This will lead in problems for uuid
 more then for sa because Debian provide already more then one
 file with the name uuid.h:
 http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?word=uuid.hsearchmod
e=searchfilescase=insensitiveversion=unstablearch=i386

I've uploaded my packages to incoming. You can see them at
http://people.debian.org/~dexter/incoming/

 We run in naming conflicts with other packages sooner or later.
 It would be nice if we can have the same name semantic for this
 two OSSP packages. I would propose:

 Header files go to /usr/include/ossp/*, e.g. /usr/include/ossp/{sa,uuid}.h
 Library start with libossp*, e.g. libossp{sa,uuid}*.

In fact I've already done that. The *.h goes to /usr/include/ossp/ and library 
name is libossp-uuid.so. There is no problem with names as far as I've 
modified /usr/bin/uuid-config.

 The problem is that Debian will become binary incompatible with
 foreign programs base on OSSP libraries :( I hope we find a solution
 that match the requirements of the OSSP project and Debian.

There are no more distributions which release OSSP libraries, AFAIK.

-- 
 .''`.Piotr Roszatycki, Netia SA
: :' :mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  `-




Re: Naming for OSSP projects in Debian (libraries, dirs)

2004-12-17 Thread Raphael Bossek
Hi Peter,

 In fact I've already done that. The *.h goes to /usr/include/ossp/ and
 library 
 name is libossp-uuid.so. There is no problem with names as far as I've 
 modified /usr/bin/uuid-config.
Ok. I did not upload my packages until now. I will change the library and
package name to libossp-sa12 as you did. The include files will also be in
/usr/include/ossp as you have done.

--
Raphael Bossek

-- 
GMX ProMail mit bestem Virenschutz http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail
+++ Empfehlung der Redaktion +++ Internet Professionell 10/04 +++




Naming for OSSP projects in Debian (libraries, dirs)

2004-12-15 Thread Raphael Bossek
URL: http://www.ossp.org

Hi Dexter,

I saw that you also ITP a OSSP (www.ossp.org) project for Debian:
OSSP uuid. I intent to do the same for OSSP sa. I'm using the sa
library successful for a small application so my intention is
make it public for others who intent to do the same too.

I've done already a Debian package and intent to sync the future
OSSP work with you. The problem I see with OSSP are the too simple
names e.g. libsa or libuuid. The header files are also installed
by default in /usr/include. This will lead in problems for uuid
more then for sa because Debian provide already more then one
file with the name uuid.h:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?word=uuid.hsearchmode=searchfilescase=insensitiveversion=unstablearch=i386

We run in naming conflicts with other packages sooner or later.
It would be nice if we can have the same name semantic for this
two OSSP packages. I would propose:

Header files go to /usr/include/ossp/*, e.g. /usr/include/ossp/{sa,uuid}.h
Library start with libossp*, e.g. libossp{sa,uuid}*.

The problem is that Debian will become binary incompatible with
foreign programs base on OSSP libraries :( I hope we find a solution
that match the requirements of the OSSP project and Debian.

--
Raphael Bossek


pgppc0eSBoR6C.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Naming for OSSP projects in Debian (libraries, dirs)

2004-12-15 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 09:05:53PM +0100, Raphael Bossek wrote:
 OSSP work with you. The problem I see with OSSP are the too simple
 names e.g. libsa or libuuid. The header files are also installed
 by default in /usr/include. This will lead in problems for uuid
 more then for sa because Debian provide already more then one
 file with the name uuid.h:
 http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?word=uuid.hsearchmode=searchfilescase=insensitiveversion=unstablearch=i386
 
 We run in naming conflicts with other packages sooner or later.
 It would be nice if we can have the same name semantic for this
 two OSSP packages. I would propose:

In particular, there is already a libuuid in Debian:
libuuid1: /lib/libuuid.so.1

Cheers,
Bill