Re: Putting distributed-net back up for adoption
Adam Klein wrote: number of bugs filed against it, and it's been exhibiting some weird behavior (apparently caused by the glibc2.1 move). Really? That's odd since it is a statically linked binary. I don't see how libc could affect it. -- see shy jo
Re: Putting distributed-net back up for adoption
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 05:41:01PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: Adam Klein wrote: number of bugs filed against it, and it's been exhibiting some weird behavior (apparently caused by the glibc2.1 move). Really? That's odd since it is a statically linked binary. I don't see how libc could affect it. hmm...that's right...I wonder what caused the problem, then. (the problem is that distributed-net forks an extra process, and kills the original, thus making the pid file unusable) -- a jolly daemon kin
Putting distributed-net back up for adoption
When Joey Hess decided to get rid of all his non-free packages, I snapped up distributed-net, but I was a bit too hasty. It has a rather large number of bugs filed against it, and it's been exhibiting some weird behavior (apparently caused by the glibc2.1 move). And being a binary-only package, it's a bit hard to debug. So, I'm putting it back up for adoption. adam -- no joy killed a yam
