QA pages and epochs: problem?
Recently, it seems that the QA pages started ignoring the epoch in changelog versions. Specifically http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haxe.html shows an ancient version 20060912-2 as the version in sid, while it shows 1:2.4-3 as the version in testing. Have anybody else seen the like? -- Jens Peter Secher. _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: QA pages and epochs: problem?
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 17:10:07 +0100, Jens Peter Secher wrote: > Recently, it seems that the QA pages started ignoring the epoch in > changelog versions. Specifically > http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haxe.html shows an ancient version > 20060912-2 as the version in sid, while it shows 1:2.4-3 as the > version in testing. > Well. 20060912-2 *is* in sid. haxe | 20060912-2 | unstable | source, hurd-i386 So I suspect something's getting confused about multiple versions being listed in the Sources files (1:2.4-3 is there as well, obviously). Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: QA pages and epochs: problem?
Julien is correct. See #559863 and merged bugs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: QA pages and epochs: problem?
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 05:10:07PM +0100, Jens Peter Secher wrote: > Recently, it seems that the QA pages started ignoring the epoch in > changelog versions. Specifically > http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haxe.html shows an ancient version > 20060912-2 as the version in sid, while it shows 1:2.4-3 as the > version in testing. > > Have anybody else seen the like? I see funny page too. http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=default§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=gsynaptics unstable has oldest version. old 0.9.7-3 stable0.9.14-6 testing 0.9.16-3 unstable 0.9.7-1 http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gsynaptics.html I orphaned this long time ago without anyone taking it. It looks like some one uploaded very old version to unstable and got through the system. ??? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: QA pages and epochs: problem?
Am Donnerstag, den 24.12.2009, 01:18 +0900 schrieb Osamu Aoki: > unstable has oldest version. > > old 0.9.7-3 > stable0.9.14-6 > testing 0.9.16-3 > unstable 0.9.7-1 > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gsynaptics.html > > I orphaned this long time ago without anyone taking it. It looks like > some one uploaded very old version to unstable and got through the > system. ??? > hurd-i386 still has 0.9.7-1: http://qa.debian.org/madison.php?package=gsynaptics reachable from above PTS page by that little square+arrow icon after versions Seems like you missed the mail from d-d-a or the thread on d-d that ftpmasters allow now multiple versions in unstable, which broke a few things. -- Felix Zielcke Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org