QA pages and epochs: problem?

2009-12-23 Thread Jens Peter Secher 
Recently, it seems that the QA pages started ignoring the epoch in
changelog versions.  Specifically
http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haxe.html shows an ancient version
20060912-2 as the version in sid, while it shows 1:2.4-3 as the
version in testing.

Have anybody else seen the like?
-- 
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: QA pages and epochs: problem?

2009-12-23 Thread Julien Cristau 
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 17:10:07 +0100, Jens Peter Secher wrote:

> Recently, it seems that the QA pages started ignoring the epoch in
> changelog versions.  Specifically
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haxe.html shows an ancient version
> 20060912-2 as the version in sid, while it shows 1:2.4-3 as the
> version in testing.
> 
Well.  20060912-2 *is* in sid.
  haxe | 20060912-2 |  unstable | source, hurd-i386
So I suspect something's getting confused about multiple versions being
listed in the Sources files (1:2.4-3 is there as well, obviously).

Cheers,
Julien


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: QA pages and epochs: problem?

2009-12-23 Thread James Vega 
Julien is correct.  See #559863 and merged bugs.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: QA pages and epochs: problem?

2009-12-23 Thread Osamu Aoki 
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 05:10:07PM +0100, Jens Peter Secher wrote:
> Recently, it seems that the QA pages started ignoring the epoch in
> changelog versions.  Specifically
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haxe.html shows an ancient version
> 20060912-2 as the version in sid, while it shows 1:2.4-3 as the
> version in testing.
> 
> Have anybody else seen the like?

I see funny page too.

 
http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=default§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=gsynaptics

unstable has oldest version.

old   0.9.7-3 
stable0.9.14-6 
testing   0.9.16-3 
unstable  0.9.7-1 

http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gsynaptics.html

I orphaned this long time ago without anyone taking it.  It looks like
some one uploaded very old version to unstable and got through the
system. ???


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: QA pages and epochs: problem?

2009-12-23 Thread Felix Zielcke 
Am Donnerstag, den 24.12.2009, 01:18 +0900 schrieb Osamu Aoki:
> unstable has oldest version.
> 
> old   0.9.7-3 
> stable0.9.14-6 
> testing   0.9.16-3 
> unstable  0.9.7-1 
> 
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gsynaptics.html
> 
> I orphaned this long time ago without anyone taking it.  It looks like
> some one uploaded very old version to unstable and got through the
> system. ???
> 
hurd-i386 still has 0.9.7-1:
http://qa.debian.org/madison.php?package=gsynaptics
reachable from above PTS page by that little square+arrow icon after
versions
Seems like you missed the mail from d-d-a or the thread on d-d that
ftpmasters allow now multiple versions in unstable, which broke a few
things.

-- 
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer and GNU GRUB developer


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org