Re: Anybody want to adopt cdrecord?

2002-04-05 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h
Erik Andersen wrote on Thu Apr 04, 2002 um 07:42:53PM:

 Sorry about that.  The package needed some immediate attention.
 If I'd had the time, I'd have done it myself... As is  Wish
 it could have been otherwise,

I changed a bit more since tonight, new upload on:
http://auric.debian.org/~blade/

If I do not hear from you today or tomorrow, I will move to incoming.

 cdrtools (4:1.10-2.5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New maintainer
   * forces use of SHM instead of MMAP, ignoring tests at build time which
 depend on the kernel version,
 closes: #127895, #131325, #136754, #138581
   * blackout the build arguments and version info string in mkisofs,
 closes: #87043. Set NOPRIVACY environment to force the default behaviour.
   * cdda2wav's output channel problem is fixed by upstream, closes: #55695
   * symlink mkhybrid and mkisofs, closes: #132479
   * updated upstream's mail address, closes: #115496
   * fixed formatting error in mkisofs.8, closes: #135385
   * respect extension of filenames when creating Joilet info for filenames
 longer than 64 chars, closes: #80202
   * fixed typo in templates, closes: #126870

Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
-- 
Wer Freiheit aufgibt, um Sicherheit zu bekommen, verdient keins der
beiden und bekommt meist auch keins.
 -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Anybody want to adopt cdrecord?

2002-04-05 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 01:56:31PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
[...]
  cdrtools (4:1.10-2.5) unstable; urgency=medium
  .
* New maintainer
[...]

Afaik you should use 4:1.10-3 to distinguish it from the NMUs and
acknowledge the NMUs by closing the bugs they (tagged as) fixed in
your changelog-entry.
  cu andreas (no dd)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Anybody want to adopt cdrecord?

2002-04-05 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h
Andreas Metzler wrote on Fri Apr 05, 2002 um 04:02:28PM:

   cdrtools (4:1.10-2.5) unstable; urgency=medium
   .
 * New maintainer

 Afaik you should use 4:1.10-3 to distinguish it from the NMUs and

Sure, forgot to change it since tonight.

 acknowledge the NMUs by closing the bugs they (tagged as) fixed in
 your changelog-entry.

AFAIK this is done comparing the maintainers data in control file, not
the release number.

Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
-- 
XSnack Alfie du böse du, zwei mal grüsse ich dich gestern und keine antwort
 von dir, oder antwortest du nicht weil ich schon op hatte ?
Alfie Ich antworte in der Regel nicht auf Grüsse, sorry.
[...]
Molle so wie ein #debian* op sein muss *lol*
Alfie XSnack: Wo kämen wir denn da hin, wenn OPs plötzlich höflich werden
würden?
-- #debian.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Anybody want to adopt cdrecord?

2002-04-04 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Apr 03, 2002 at 10:03:24AM -0800, David D.W. Downey wrote:
 Looks like it doesn't matter anymore. I've been removed as the new
 maitnainer by erik due to the 2 week delay.
 
 Once again, I apologize for the delay on the package but it couldn't be
 helped. Hopefully I can assist on some other package.

Sorry about that.  The package needed some immediate attention.
If I'd had the time, I'd have done it myself... As is  Wish
it could have been otherwise,

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Anybody want to adopt cdrecord?

2002-04-03 Thread Adam Byrtek
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 04:32:48AM -0700, Erik Andersen wrote:
 After a bit of discussion on availability of the needed cdwriting
 equipment, etc. I have agreed to let David Downey take over
 maintainence of cdrtools.  Thanks David!  I'm sure everyone will
 be grateful as you fix the bugs I've not had time to address,

What's going on with cdrecord? The maintaner hasn't changed yet, and
there is a big bug in it (important, but i'm thinking about upgrading
it to critical):

#131325: cdrecord: crashes on 2.2.20

It *has* to be fixed before Woody! In fact I'm still using old (1.9-1)
cdrecord because of this bug...

Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 

  _.|._ |_  _.: Adam Byrtek, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (_|||_)| |(_|: gg 1802819, pgp 0xB25952C0
 |


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Anybody want to adopt cdrecord?

2002-04-03 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h
Adam Byrtek wrote on Wed Apr 03, 2002 um 09:12:02AM:

 #131325: cdrecord: crashes on 2.2.20
 
 It *has* to be fixed before Woody! In fact I'm still using old (1.9-1)
 cdrecord because of this bug...

Yes, it has.

Erik: What about that patch for cdrecord, needed to not to depend on the
running kernel? Why cannot we have to versions, cdrecord-2.4.x and
cdrecord-2.4.x?

Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
-- 
Real programmers don't comment their code.  It was hard to write, it
should be hard to understand.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Anybody want to adopt cdrecord?

2002-04-03 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Apr 03, 2002 at 03:52:10PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
 #include hallo.h
 Adam Byrtek wrote on Wed Apr 03, 2002 um 09:12:02AM:
 
  #131325: cdrecord: crashes on 2.2.20
  
  It *has* to be fixed before Woody! In fact I'm still using old (1.9-1)
  cdrecord because of this bug...
 
 Yes, it has.
 
 Erik: What about that patch for cdrecord, needed to not to depend on the
 running kernel? Why cannot we have to versions, cdrecord-2.4.x and
 cdrecord-2.4.x?

I have not had the time to work in it, so on March 21st I put
cdrtools up for adoption.  David Downey agreed to take over, but
it has been 2 weeks since then and he hasn't yet bothered to
upload a new package yet.  Since he hasn't done that yet, I guess
I'm still the nominal maintainer.  As such, if someone else that
_is_ willing to do that job and wants to take over 

As for the 2.4.x vs 2.2.x stuff, it would be easy to make a patch
to test the mmap behavior at runtime and then do the right thing.
I havn't had the time to write such a patch, but that would take
care of the problem once and for all.  Setting compile bahavior
based on the kernel running on the compiling box is just lame,
but thats what cdrecord does

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Anybody want to adopt cdrecord?

2002-04-03 Thread David D.W. Downey
I do plan on doing a maintiner release shortly. I'm in the middle of
moving though. That's what the delay is about. Plese just give me some
time to complete this move. (tough trying to move an entire house)

I apologize for the delay.


--
David D.W. Downey (pgpkeys) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libpam-pgsql Home Site: http://libpam-pgsql.codecastle.com
Newbies: http://linuxnewbie.codecastle.com Admins:
http://admin.codecastle.com
Developers: http://devel.codecastle.com  http://lfs.codecastle.com


-Original Message-
From: Adam Byrtek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:12 PM
To: Erik Andersen; debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Anybody want to adopt cdrecord?


On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 04:32:48AM -0700, Erik Andersen wrote:
 After a bit of discussion on availability of the needed cdwriting 
 equipment, etc. I have agreed to let David Downey take over 
 maintainence of cdrtools.  Thanks David!  I'm sure everyone will be 
 grateful as you fix the bugs I've not had time to address,

What's going on with cdrecord? The maintaner hasn't changed yet, and
there is a big bug in it (important, but i'm thinking about upgrading it
to critical):

#131325: cdrecord: crashes on 2.2.20

It *has* to be fixed before Woody! In fact I'm still using old (1.9-1)
cdrecord because of this bug...

Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 

  _.|._ |_  _.: Adam Byrtek, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (_|||_)| |(_|: gg 1802819, pgp 0xB25952C0
 |


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Anybody want to adopt cdrecord?

2002-04-03 Thread David D.W. Downey
Looks like it doesn't matter anymore. I've been removed as the new
maitnainer by erik due to the 2 week delay.

Once again, I apologize for the delay on the package but it couldn't be
helped. Hopefully I can assist on some other package.


--
David D.W. Downey (pgpkeys) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libpam-pgsql Home Site: http://libpam-pgsql.codecastle.com
Newbies: http://linuxnewbie.codecastle.com Admins:
http://admin.codecastle.com
Developers: http://devel.codecastle.com  http://lfs.codecastle.com




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]