Re: DFSG: list restrictions, not freedoms

1999-01-26 Thread David Welton
On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 03:44:04PM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:

> Rather than attempt to list all the freedoms that Debian guarantees,
> why not list the *restrictions* on freedom that we do allow, and say
> that any other restrictions violate our guidelines.

I like your idea - I wonde what it would look like when fleshed out a
bit more...  It might be more susceptible to loopholes, though...

-- 
David Welton  http://www.efn.org/~davidw 

Debian GNU/Linux - www.debian.org



RE: DFSG: list restrictions, not freedoms

1999-01-26 Thread Darren Benham
Have you been looking at the current draft floating around? (latest revision is
at: http://master.debian.org/~gecko/dfsg.text).  It does that in part.  It
starts by listing the freedoms and then lists the acceptable restrictions.


On 25-Jan-99 Chris Waters wrote:
> Rather than attempt to list all the freedoms that Debian guarantees, why
> not list the *restrictions* on freedom that we do allow, and say that
> any other restrictions violate our guidelines.
> 

-- 
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <><  *
*  * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1   *
*  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++> P+++$ L++>*
*   KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS--   *
*   Debian Developer   * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b DI+++ D++   *
*  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  * G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+*
*  * --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- ---*
=


pgp2qU81Wfhk9.pgp
Description: PGP signature