Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 2:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a listing of my > packages and also those maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've had issues of > my being mistaken for Daniel Stone in the past, and I don't appreciate it :) > (Neither does he I should imagine :) You poor, poor bastard. I recommend a name change post-haste. I'd like to sincerely apologize to you for any humiliation caused for being confused with me. Cheers, The real DanielS (o/~ I'm the real DanielS ...) -- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://raging.dropbear.id.au KDE Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.kde.org Kopete: Multi-protocol IM client http://kopete.kde.org pgpL5mBQbfWYr.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Hi! This tool is great and very useful. However, there is a little bug with some kind of mangling of the version numbers: on "http://qa.debian.org/developer/index.php?package=loadwatch";, loadwatch appears to have 2 different versions in testing and unstable (1.0_1.1alpha1-1 and 1.0+1.1alpha1-1), while this is in fact the same version. Anyway, this tool is great. Thanks for your work. Nicolas
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-28 17:20]: > > http://qa.debian.org/developer/ > > If you want to have it hosted there, you should really > a) put the files in CVS (module qa), and follow the current standards >for web pages (i.e. have wml files in qa/wml which are build >and then copied to web/) a.1) have your cronjobs in data/cronjobs and the scripts run from it and the data it produces in data// (the extract file for example) > b) give group write permission to the files and chgrp them to qa also make directories g+s please. > c) have a link from the main qa site to them Please also make it clear on each page where each data comes from (Uninstallable for example has no apparent source). Thanks for writing that neat tool. yours, peter -- PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** messages preferred.| : :' : The universal | `. `' Operating System http://www.palfrader.org/ | `-http://www.debian.org/ pgp4Qtd5h3xka.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
* Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-28 17:20]: > http://qa.debian.org/developer/ If you want to have it hosted there, you should really a) put the files in CVS (module qa), and follow the current standards for web pages (i.e. have wml files in qa/wml which are build and then copied to web/) b) give group write permission to the files and chgrp them to qa c) have a link from the main qa site to them Thanks for writing those pages. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Am 28.08.02 um 17:20:44 schrieb Igor Genibel: > I'm sorry I confused the NMU and the uploader field. There was a bug, > fixed for now. Ah, great! I really don't have anything to complain about now.[1] Bye, Mike [1] Where I come from, "I can't complain" is equivalent to "I think it's brilliant". -- |=| Michael Piefel |=| Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin |=| Tel. (+49 30) 2093 3831
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
I see an issue with the link to bugs,non-fixed. The web page adds the url tag "raw=yes". I'm not certain of the function of that url tag. But, with it in, the bugs page shows all of the active bugs instead of excluding bugs that marked fixed or done. Is this a bug in the bugs.d.o/cgi-bin/packagereport.cgi or should the raw=yes url tag not be included in the link? -- Kevin Rosenberg| .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** http://b9.com/debian.html | : :' : The universal GPG signed and encrypted| `. `' Operating System messages accepted. | `-http://www.debian.org/
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:52:49AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does > > "Packages in blue" refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many > > "Packages version in red" either, even when I'm sure it's an NMU. > > It's talking about the color of the package version number. > > Oh and it also thinks that debconf, debhelper, and presumably any debian > native package is a NMU. Whoops. ;) It is now fixed but cannot yet inform that native packages are NMUed or not. I had to parse all the .changes (to compare the Changed-By: field with the Maintainer field) files in order to really know if a package was NMUed or not. > > I don't have any problems. 1600 pixels is enough in my font :-) > > Tiny little laptop screen, I will not let galeon drop below 14 point > fonts. I have reorganised all the columns in to display from the left to the right the most important information. On my laptop 1024 all important informations for most pages fits without scrolling. Regards. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Michael Piefel wrote: > Am 27.08.02 um 13:38:36 schrieb Joey Hess: > > - It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU. > > I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does > "Packages in blue" refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many > "Packages version in red" either, even when I'm sure it's an NMU. It's talking about the color of the package version number. Oh and it also thinks that debconf, debhelper, and presumably any debian native package is a NMU. Whoops. > > - On a 1280 pixel wide display, I can only see half of a line of the > > table at a time. > > I don't have any problems. 1600 pixels is enough in my font :-) Tiny little laptop screen, I will not let galeon drop below 14 point fonts. -- see shy jo
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:31:51PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > Because packages are not required to have an "Uploaders" field. I'm > afraid I don't quite understand your algorithm. For which package will > there ever be a red markup? I'm sorry I confused the NMU and the uploader field. There was a bug, fixed for now. http://qa.debian.org/developer/ Thanks a lot. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:17:13PM +0100, Thom May écrivait: > > I'm sure some will squirm, but I think my.debian.org would work quite > > nicely :-) > > > uh. E > (developer.debian.org, maybe) The new official name is http://qa.debian.org/developer/ Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://strasbourg.linuxfr.org/~raphael/ Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Am 28.08.02 um 16:03:28 schrieb Igor Genibel: > > For instance 10a-1.1 for package kimwitu-doc. Or 3.37-3.1 for file. > I don't know why there is no Uploader field for those packages. Because packages are not required to have an "Uploaders" field. I'm afraid I don't quite understand your algorithm. For which package will there ever be a red markup? Bye, Mike -- |=| Michael Piefel |=| Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin |=| Tel. (+49 30) 2093 3831
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:26:44PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: Hi, > Am 28.08.02 um 10:15:45 schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > > Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf > > the Uplpoaders field in the control file). > > Alright, but the description "uploaded by developer" is a little > misleading. > > > I guess it detects the NMU with a regexp in the version number. What's > > the version number in question that is badly detected ? > > For instance 10a-1.1 for package kimwitu-doc. Or 3.37-3.1 for file. I don't use a regexp for this stuff but the Uploader: field in the Sources.gz file. For those packages there are no Uploader field so *you* are not considered as a NMUer. The blue color appears only if you are the uploader not the maintainer of NMUed package. For example: http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?package=apt-proxy show us that Chris Halls is the maintainer of apt-proxy (apt-proxy displayed in black) but Manuel Estrada Sainz is the uploader. I don't know why there is no Uploader field for those packages. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Am 28.08.02 um 10:15:45 schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf > the Uplpoaders field in the control file). Alright, but the description "uploaded by developer" is a little misleading. > I guess it detects the NMU with a regexp in the version number. What's > the version number in question that is badly detected ? For instance 10a-1.1 for package kimwitu-doc. Or 3.37-3.1 for file. Bye, Mike -- |=| Michael Piefel |=| Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin |=| Tel. (+49 30) 2093 3831
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: >> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) >> following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). >> Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your >> packages such as: >> - the pts related page about packages (Thanks a lot to Raphaël Hertzog); > Man, these two things really rock :) Need to get them somewhere under > .debian.org... AOL! - it gets better and better. I think I've found a small bug, highlighting NMUs in a different color does not work if there is only version of the package in the whole archive. For example take a look at http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?package=dlocate cu andreas
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
* Hamish Moffatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:20:46AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > For Igor, we could provide him a place somewhere under qa.debian.org if > > he wish I guess. Igor, can you check if satie.debian.org provides > > everything that you need ? > > I'm sure some will squirm, but I think my.debian.org would work quite > nicely :-) > uh. E (developer.debian.org, maybe) -Thom -- Thom May -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wiggy: I just hurt other people. because I am evil!! muhahahahahahahaha! evil, I tell you, evil
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:20:46AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > For Igor, we could provide him a place somewhere under qa.debian.org if > he wish I guess. Igor, can you check if satie.debian.org provides > everything that you need ? I'm sure some will squirm, but I think my.debian.org would work quite nicely :-) Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: Hi, > Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a listing of my > packages and also those maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've had issues of > my being mistaken for Daniel Stone in the past, and I don't appreciate it :) > (Neither does he I should imagine :) Sorry for the mistake... This is now fixed Regards -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). > > Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your > > packages such as: > > - the pts related page about packages (Thanks a lot to Raphaël Hertzog); > > Man, these two things really rock :) Need to get them somewhere under > .debian.org... For the PTS, it's in the process, I'm working with debian-admin to get it installed under the official PTS name : http://packages.qa.debian.org For Igor, we could provide him a place somewhere under qa.debian.org if he wish I guess. Igor, can you check if satie.debian.org provides everything that you need ? Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://strasbourg.linuxfr.org/~raphael/ Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:25:42AM +0200, Michael Piefel écrivait: > I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does > "Packages in blue" refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf the Uplpoaders field in the control file). > "Packages version in red" either, even when I'm sure it's an NMU. I guess it detects the NMU with a regexp in the version number. What's the version number in question that is badly detected ? > > - On a 1280 pixel wide display, I can only see half of a line of the > > table at a time. Same problem here, the table is getting too large. I wish we could use a extended/simple. The extended view would show the less useful columns (uninstallable reports, debcheck links, ...) > But that's your own fault: You maintain too many packages! Repeating the header every 15 packages looks reasonable. :) Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://strasbourg.linuxfr.org/~raphael/ Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:57:14AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > Although, I have one request -- please skip the ampersand in URLs like > > 'build.php?&pkg=foo', they are redundant and they waste bytes :) > > On the same note, please add the missing / in pool URLs, to skip the > redirect and follow the spec, thus also conserving bytes :) The two requests were applied ;) Cheers. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:53:11AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Igor, Hi, > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). > > The site looks great! One request, is it possible to add submit buttons > for each of the various forms on the page? At first glance, it is not at > all obvious to me that the one submit button on the page has nothing to > do with the box where I typed in my email address. :) There are now submit buttons. Regards -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Hello, I found another bug. In the list of available packages the source libsigc++-1.1 is visibile/accessible but libsigc++ does not seem to exist. Michael
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
* Igor Genibel | I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) | following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). | Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your | packages such as: | - the pts related page about packages (Thanks a lot to Raphaël Hertzog); could this link be moved to a column on its own? Also, it seems like neither PTS, nor your system handles udebs gracefully. For udebs, unstable == testing, ATM. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `-
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Am 27.08.02 um 13:38:36 schrieb Joey Hess: > - It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU. I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does "Packages in blue" refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many "Packages version in red" either, even when I'm sure it's an NMU. > - On a 1280 pixel wide display, I can only see half of a line of the > table at a time. I don't have any problems. 1600 pixels is enough in my font :-) > ... on my screen they go off the page when I get 17 packages down > the list. But that's your own fault: You maintain too many packages! Bye, Mike -- |=| Michael Piefel |=| Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin |=| Tel. (+49 30) 2093 3831
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:02:24PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > Am 27.08.02 um 14:24:57 schrieb Igor Genibel: > > - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...); > > Either I don't understand the statistics, or it's not correct. For > instance, on http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?login=nick you > can see there is 1 bug for the file package. But in fact there's dozens. > How come? It is now fixed. Thanks a lot for the report ;) -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Although, I have one request -- please skip the ampersand in URLs like > 'build.php?&pkg=foo', they are redundant and they waste bytes :) On the same note, please add the missing / in pool URLs, to skip the redirect and follow the spec, thus also conserving bytes :) -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). > Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your > packages such as: > - the pts related page about packages (Thanks a lot to Raphaël Hertzog); Man, these two things really rock :) Need to get them somewhere under .debian.org... Although, I have one request -- please skip the ampersand in URLs like 'build.php?&pkg=foo', they are redundant and they waste bytes :) -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Igor Genibel wrote: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). This is very nice. A few comments: - It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU. - On a 1280 pixel wide display, I can only see half of a line of the table at a time. Anything you can do to make it narrower would be useful. It might also be goo to duplicate the source name column half way accross the table or something, to make it easier to tell which package is which when looking at the right hand side of the graph. Similarly, it wouldn't hurt to repeat the column headings a few times since there are so many of them, and on my screen they go off the page when I get 17 packages down the list. -- see shy jo
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Am 27.08.02 um 14:24:57 schrieb Igor Genibel: > - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...); Either I don't understand the statistics, or it's not correct. For instance, on http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?login=nick you can see there is 1 bug for the file package. But in fact there's dozens. How come? Salut, Mike -- |=| Michael Piefel |=| Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin |=| Tel. (+49 30) 2093 3831
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:18:58PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > > Looks like confusion with aewm++, which in turn seems to provoke the bug > > Daniel Burrows mentioned, so there's probably some additional regexp > > metacharacter escaping needed somewhere. > > Yes, very similar problem for kimwitu and kimwitu++. Sorry for the weird > package names, but that's the names from upstream![1] This is now fixed. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: Hi, > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in > stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package. > According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists. It is now fixed. As Colin said, it was a regexp problem. Thanks > Otherwise, looks great. Thanks for your work! Thanks a lot. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Am 27.08.02 um 15:03:31 schrieb Colin Watson: > > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in > > stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package. > > According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists. > Looks like confusion with aewm++, which in turn seems to provoke the bug > Daniel Burrows mentioned, so there's probably some additional regexp > metacharacter escaping needed somewhere. Yes, very similar problem for kimwitu and kimwitu++. Sorry for the weird package names, but that's the names from upstream![1] Bye, Mike [1] However, I also happen to be upstream for kimwitu++. -- |=| Michael Piefel |=| Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin |=| Tel. (+49 30) 2093 3831
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:10:26PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > It would really be nice if it is possible to know if there are any logs with > build failure in the buildd link, > but it probably needs more work on the buildd page side? Last year (!) I write a patch for the buildd log page and sent it to that page maintainer ([EMAIL PROTECTED] IIRC), the patch wasn't tested because I was unable to test it by myself due to lack of permissions. That patch was supposed to show in red build log finished up with failures. If needed I can try to find it ... Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney pgpwoIoDLJzwF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Igor Genibel wrote: > Hi all, > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). > Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your > packages such as: > - the broken dependencies for each branch (stable, testing, unstable). You could link to debcheck only if the package in question does have an entry there. Fetch http://qa.debian.org/~weasel/debcheck-result/sid/lists/ALL-pkglist (and sarge and woody) daily and look whether the package is listed in it. yours, peter -- PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** messages preferred.| : :' : The universal | `. `' Operating System http://www.palfrader.org/ | `-http://www.debian.org/ pgp8mlM6LYqAC.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:08:44AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > Hm, am I supposed to get hundreds of kilobytes of this? Surely not ! ;) > Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9 > in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349 > > Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9 > in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349 It is now fixed (regexp with ++ in vars...) > Look nice, aside from that. Thanks. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: > Igor Genibel writes: > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in > stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package. > According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists. Looks like confusion with aewm++, which in turn seems to provoke the bug Daniel Burrows mentioned, so there's probably some additional regexp metacharacter escaping needed somewhere. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:11:40PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > OK, things seem to have suddenly got quite a lot more nifty while I > wasn't watching. Thanks! Thanks a lot to. > I notice one slight glitch; following a PTS link to a lib* package takes > you to e.g. http://pts.debian.net/l/libfilter-perl.html when it should > take you to http://pts.debian.net/libf/libfilter-perl.html. Otherwise > it's behaving excellently. This fixed now. -- Igor Genibel http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tuxfamily.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Hi Igor, On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). The site looks great! One request, is it possible to add submit buttons for each of the various forms on the page? At first glance, it is not at all obvious to me that the one submit button on the page has nothing to do with the box where I typed in my email address. :) Cheers, Steve Langasek postmodern programmer pgpfHxT3RKHoO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: > > Igor Genibel writes: > > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in > > Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a listing of my > packages and also those maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've had issues of > my being mistaken for Daniel Stone in the past, and I don't appreciate it :) > (Neither does he I should imagine :) Of course, you're the silver version :) -- Jérôme Marant
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: > Igor Genibel writes: > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a listing of my packages and also those maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've had issues of my being mistaken for Daniel Stone in the past, and I don't appreciate it :) (Neither does he I should imagine :) No idea why this should be happening, but I thought you'd like to know D. -- Daniel Silverstone http://www.digital-scurf.org/ Hostmaster, Webmaster, and Chief Code Wibbler Digital-Scurf Unlimited GPG Public key available from keyring.debian.org KeyId: 20687895 You will be the victim of a bizarre joke. pgpRLGgh3ozp3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Igor Genibel writes: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package. According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists. Otherwise, looks great. Thanks for your work! -- things change. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). OK, things seem to have suddenly got quite a lot more nifty while I wasn't watching. Thanks! I notice one slight glitch; following a PTS link to a lib* package takes you to e.g. http://pts.debian.net/l/libfilter-perl.html when it should take you to http://pts.debian.net/libf/libfilter-perl.html. Otherwise it's behaving excellently. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Hm, am I supposed to get hundreds of kilobytes of this? Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9 in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349 Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9 in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349 ... Look nice, aside from that. Daniel -- / Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---\ | Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you | | tied them the usual way. This happens to us all the | | time with computers, and nobody thinks of complaining.| \ Be like the kid in the movie! Play chess! -- http://www.uschess.org ---/
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:24:57 +0200 Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...); > - the broken dependencies for each branch (stable, testing, unstable). This is simply, great. Good work! It would really be nice if it is possible to know if there are any logs with build failure in the buildd link, but it probably needs more work on the buildd page side? regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview
Hi Igor, On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). > > I waiting for you comments, advices, insults or other things. Many thanks for your effort, you've created a really nice tool. Dennis -- ... [it is] something unearthly ... If there are sentient beings on other planets, then they play Go. - Emanuel Lasker, chess grandmaster
